Commencement Speech: David Foster Wallace

1008 Words3 Pages

Commencement speeches are often a sending off to the graduates by a highly regarded person, and is suppose to have a purpose. The purpose of the speech is to: motivate, inspire, encourage, provoke, a call to action, and to give hope to the graduates as well as congratulate them on their achievements. Often the speaker is someone who is famous or have been successful in their life. In regards to how the speech is given, it usually starts out with the speaker congratulating the class. They will typically try to relate to the audience by making fun of themselves to lower them to the graduates level. A conventional speech follows these conventions, but not all stay within the bounds, mostly due to wanting to be remembered or heard. David Foster …show more content…

He immediately brings himself down to their level. "If anybody feels like perspiring [cough], I 'd advise you go ahead, because I 'm sure going to"(Wallace 1). Like Rowling who in her speech at Harvard in 2008 who had mentioned she was so fearful and had nausea that she lost weight, he poked fun at himself by showing that he was nervous. Unlike a conventional speech however, Wallace seems to bring himself down even further by imploring a didactic story about fish. In his first story he talks about two younger fish who are swimming along and come across an older fish. The older fish says "Morning boys, how 's the water?" however, when the younger fish keep swimming along, one turns to the other and says "What the hell is water?"(Wallace 1). Wallace tells the audience to not see him "wise, old fish". This is unorthodox in comparison because at a commencement, usually they would require a person who is seen as wise to give the graduates words of wisdom. Chiefly, It is important to note that while he is masking the obvious, he is trying to be relatable to the audience. It is at this point in his speech when the conventions start to take a turn, as he tries to guide the graduates to what he is getting …show more content…

This is seen as nonconventional and a tad mocking to the traditional commencement speeches in the sense that most speeches don 't refer to the clichés of a commencement speeches as Wallace does. Wallace mentions that the most prevalent cliché for the genre is to give more meaning to their degree than just a money maker. What is notable is that Wallace tries to not insult them over the fact that someone needed to teach them how to think, but rather of what to think about. He wants the graduates to understand that they have a choice in what to think about. This is reinforced with yet another didactic story about two men in a Alaskan Bar. The two men are arguing over the existence of god, and the Atheist mentions that he has played with the god thing, when he got stuck in a blizzard. He prayed to god for help and some Eskimos came across him and showed him the way back to camp. The atheist is so sure that it had nothing to deal with god. This story shows that by choosing to stay closed minded, the Atheist isn 't really open to the possible reasons for it. He isn 't choosing what to think about because it is so natural to him in what he believes and sees. This seeps into Wallace next main point. We all have a default setting as pointed out by Wallace. This is unusual from a traditional speech because in regards

Open Document