Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
My life as a dog essay
My life as a dog essay
My life as a dog essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: My life as a dog essay
In the book, In Praise of Comedy, by James Feibleman, he mentions, “Where tragedy deals with the substance of power, comedy is more concerned with contradictions revealed in the form of the absence of power. Thus tragedy is largely an affair of feeling, the feeling of the inexorable power of fate, while comedy is largely an intellectual affair, being concerned with the issue of logical contradictions.” (Page 77). The contradictions Feibleman mentions can be identified as major comedic tools both in Aristophanese's play, “The Clouds,” and in the short film, “A Dog's Life,” by Charlie Chaplain. Vicki Janik, Henri Bergson, and Leon Golden identify many of these tools through their published works, all of which can be applied to, “The Clouds,” and, “A Dog's Life.”
One of the major ideas outlined in Viki Janik's essay, “Fools and Jesters in Literature, Art and History,”is that comedic characters, or jesters, can be categorized as either wise fools, innocent fools, tricksters, or any blend of the three. Strepsiades in Aristophanes, “The Clouds,” exhibits characteristics congruent with an innocent fool, as he is often unaware of how ridiculous he behaves, while the character of Socrates is more of a wise fool, conning men out of their belongings by exploiting their weaknesses (Janik). Charlie Chaplain, however can embody all three depending on the situation he finds himself in. One example of Chaplain's tramp like character embodying the innocent fool is when the police officer attempts to arrest him in the yard, yet Chaplain eludes him simply by rolling under the fence every time the police officer runs towards him, seemingly because it is fun to watch the police officer chase after him. Janik continues in her analysis, bringing at...
... middle of paper ...
...t can produce laughter and thought, and Feibleman recognizes this as do many who find comedy to be a legitimate art form.
Works Cited
Chambers, Erve. "Thalia's Revenge: Ethnography and Theory of Comedy." American Anthropologist 91.3 (1989): 589-91. JSTOR. Web. 13 Feb. 2011.
DuBois, Arthur E. "Comedy, an Experience." ELH 7.3 (): 199-210. JSTOR. Web. 13 Feb. 2011.
Feibleman, James. In Praise of Comedy. N.p.: George Allen & Unwin Ltd., 1939. 77. Web. 13 Feb. 2011.
Chaplin, Charlie, perf. A Dog's Life. 1918. First National Pictures Inc. Web. 13 Feb. 2011.
Golden, Leon. "Aristotle on Comedy." The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 42.3 (1918): 283- 90. Web. 13 Feb. 2011.
Janik, Vicki K. "Fools and Jesters in Literature, Art, and History." (): 1-21. Print.
Bergson, Henri. "Laughter: Essay on the Meaning of the Comic." (): 557-64. Print.
According to Aristotle, “Comedy can be any colloquy or performance generally intended to amuse or stimulate laughter”. In modern times, comedy can be found in different forms, such as television, movies, theatres and stand-up comedy.
Steve Almond’s “Funny is the New Deep” talks of the role that comedy has in our current society, and most certainly, it plays a huge role here. Namely, through what Almond [Aristotle?] calls the “comic impulse”, we as a people can speak of topics that would otherwise make many of uncomfortable. Almond deems the comic impulse as the most surefire way to keep heavy situations from becoming too foreboding. The comic impulse itself stems from our ability and unconscious need to defend and thus contend with the feeling of tragedy. As such, instead of rather forcing out humor, he implies that humor is something that is not consciously forced out from an author, but instead is more of a subconscious entity, coming out on its own. Almond emphasizes
1 Charles W. Stein, American Vaudeville as Seen by Its Contemporaries (New York: Knopf, 1984) 3-4.
Pizer, Donald. "The Naturalism of Edith Wharton's The House of Mirth." Twentieth Century Literature 41.2 (1995): 241-8.
Altman, Charles F. “ Lacombe Lucien: Laughter as Collaboration,” The French Review, Vol. 49, No. 4, American Association of Teachers of French, (March1976), pp. 549-558.
Mandel, Oscar. "What's so funny? : The Nature of the Comic." Antioch Review. 30.1 (1970): 73-89. Print.
Griffin, Clive. "The Humour of One Hundred Years of Solitude." In McGuirk and Cardwell, 81-94.
Brown, Earl B., Jr. "Kosinski's Modern Proposal: The Problem of Satire in the Mid-Twentieth Century." Ebscohost. N.p., 1980. Web. Mar.-Apr. 2014.
it: Shakespeare and the four humors." U.S National Library of Medicine. U.S. National Library of Medicine, 19 Sept. 2013. Web. 1 May 2014.
Wilders, John. "The Problem Comedies." In Wells, Stanley, ed. Shakespeare: Select Bibliographical Guides. London: Oxford UP, 1973.
Erasmus demonstrates the value of humor by making fun of insignificant issues and teaching us how to laugh at ourselves. “Jokes of this kind . . . which aren’t lacking in learning and wit” (4) help us put the less significant aspects of life in perspective. They also aim to moderate the level of his criticism making it more constructive than insulting. For it is “the ridiculous rather than the squalid” (7) to which his humor applies. He reserves a more serious voice for more serious wrongdoing. We see this parallel between humor and subject clearly as Erasmus progresses from constructive criticism of insignificant folly to harsh indictment of religious pretension and most of all in his solemn praise of Christian folly.
Comedy differs in the mood it approaches and addresses life. It presents situations which deal with common ground of man’s social experience rather than limits of his behaviour – it is not life in the tragic mode, lived at the difficult and perilous limits of the human condition.
Willeford, William, The Fool and His Scepter: A Study in Clowns and Jesters and Their Audience (Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1969)
Kingston, Evan. "Humor’s Uses In Literature." The Oldest Joke in the World . N.p., 2012. Web. 1 Dec. 2013. .
Humor has been the source of entertainment throughout history. Today humor is practiced in movies, plays, songs, television shows and radio. Humor has brought fame and fortune to those who have mastered its power.