Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay congo crisis und un forces
Congo crisis and united nations essay
Essay congo crisis und un forces
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay congo crisis und un forces
The Cold War is commonly viewed as a conflict involving the US and Soviet Union. However, the Unites States and Soviet Union were not the only two countries fighting this war. Among other countries, Congo was a very important proxy conflict during the Cold War between 1960 and 1965. The Congo is a vital place in the world to study, understand and pay attention to. “The Congo crisis was a proxy conflict in the Cold War due to the support of the Soviet Union and United States in opposing parties.” The soviets split the Congolese government the involvement of the Soviets split the Congolese government led by Lumumba which resulted in the mounting pressure from Western countries to remove him from power. The Congo crisis of 1960–1961 was one of …show more content…
Congolese President Joseph Kasavubu and Prime Minister Lumumba asked and received a peacekeeping force from the United Nations (UN). “The U.S. played a major role in converting the newly independent Congo into a cold war battleground.” The conflict also became the site of a dangerous Cold War “proxy” contest between western powers led by the United States and the Soviet Union-led Communist bloc. Under pressure from western nations and in exchange for UN support, President Kasavubu purged his government of radical elements including Prime Minister Lumumba. The ultra-nationalist Lumumba, though supported by the Congolese, was viewed by Western business leaders as an obstacle to their continued investments in Congolese diamond mines. Fearing Lumumba was secretly a Communist, the United States was particularly adamant about his removal from power. Prime Minister Patrice Lumumba of Congo was authorized to be murdered by the Eisenhower administration. Mobutu was then installed in power in place of Lumumba by Washington and was kept there for more than 30 years. He no better than Lumumba was responsible for destroying the economic conditions of Congo and was extremely corrupt and suppressed human rights in Zaire. However, “the U.S. prolonged Mobutu’s rule by providing more than $300 million in weapons and $100 …show more content…
feared that the charismatic Lumumba and his supporters would allow the break-up of Congo and Soviet domination of central Africa. Under pressure from western nation and in need of the United Nation’s support Kasayubu tried to eradicate Lumumba. However, Lumumba, an ultra-nationalist and supported by the Congolese, responded by firing Kasayubu as both leaders claimed control over the country, and Army Chief of Staff Joseph Mobutu in turn orchestrated a military coup d’état which ousted the two leaders. Mobutu's government was supported by western governments. However, Mobutu, like most, was a terrible leader but did provide some benefits to the Congolese. From 1965 to 1975 he was able to build the economy based on the copper boom. On the other hand, he quickly destroyed it by appropriating all local businesses and turning them over to chersonese. Moreover, he did built the first hydroelectric dams in the region as well as established hospitals and a state television system. He also change the name of the state from Congo to Zaire. What at first seemed was a positive coup quickly became obvious to the people that it was not going to be peaceful or and open government that would ultimately factor into the Congo
Wallerstein, Immanuel, and Dennis D. Cordell. "Patrice Lumumba (Congolese Politician)." Encyclopedia Britannica Online. Encyclopedia Britannica, n.d. Web. 20 Oct. 2013. .
It is widely debated why exactly King Leopold decided to conquer the Congo, but the general consensus seems to be that it was out of the belief that “the highlands of the Congo may be as rich in gold as the mountains of the western slope of the American Continent” (Stead). In the mid-1870s, the King hired Henry Stanley, who was familiar with many parts of Africa, to help him go about conquering. During the following years Stanley stayed in Africa, talking various tribes into signing over their lands and rights. After this was completed the King officially took over the Congo, renaming it the Congo Free State. This was especially ironic because all natives of the country were either forced to give up their way of life in exchange for virtual slavery in the ivory trade, agriculture, or the rubber traffic, or die trying to escape fate. Leopold was undeterred by the amount of suffering and death in the Congo, brought on by his rule. Belgian soldiers and officials were known for their cruelty in their methods to make, and then keep, Congo natives wo...
Odd Arne Westad, Director of the Cold War Studies Centre at the London School of Economics and Political Science, explains how the Cold War “shaped the world we live in today — its politics, economics, and military affairs“ (Westad, The Global Cold War, 1). Furthermore, Westad continues, “ the globalization of the Cold War during the last century created foundations” for most of the historic conflicts we see today. The Cold War, asserts Westad, centers on how the Third World policies of the two twentieth-century superpowers — the United States and the Soviet Union — escalates to antipathy and conflict that in the end helped oust one world power while challenging the other. This supplies a universal understanding on the Cold War (Westad, The Global Cold War, 1). After World War II, the United States and the Soviet Union opposed each other over the expansion of their power.
It had intentions of breaking post-colonial hegemonic forces that portrayed Lumumba as a nationalist dictator.
Mobutu was a corrupt ruler who embezzled billions of dollars and ruled over Africa in an almost dictatorship way. Hochschild chose to include the quote from philosopher Ibn Khaldun. This quote said that “Those who are conquered always want to imitate the conqueror in his main characteristics.” This showed the way that Leopold ruled had an impact on later African rulers who chose to imitate his ruling authority. Because of Leopold’s rule, many civil wars broke out among tribes after the Congo gained its independence.
King Leopold II developed his dream for colonization at an early age. Before he even took the throne he was on the lookout for unconquered land that could later be in his possession. The king wanted to become rich as a result of his new land through the process of trading. Once King Leopold II set his sights on the Congo, he would not give up until the land was his. He connived, manipulated and conned his way into the land. He did not care who got hurt; he just wanted his dream to be fulfilled.
At The top of society was a small group of Europeans. Rubber agents and other government officers controlled every aspect of life in The State. They even held control over when natives could visit family. (Doyle, 1909) These Europeans had a section of land that they were to supervise and oversee the production of goods. In Belgium, a very selective group of people had control over the region with King Leopold II at the top. He had the final say in all policy of The Congo Free State. Although he held this power, most of the decision making was sub-contracted to government owned companies, such as The Anglo-Belgian Indian Rubber
The Congo Crisis was a war of cultures between the US and the USSR. Despite the Soviet Union having some support within the Congo, the US was able to prevail and instill capitalism by taking more direct action in the Crisis and by ensuring the new leader of Mobutu was friendly to American interests. The Congo Crisis negatively affected decolonization by serving as an example of the failings of an independent state ran by Africans, despite a majority of problems coming from foreign influence. As a battle of the Cold War, the Congo acted as foreshadowing to the US success over the USSR and as proof to the West that capitalism was the best and foreign ideas were inferior, negatively affecting their opinions of other states for years to come.
Since the late 1800’s, almost all of Africa had been under European colonial rule, but this changed drastically in 1960. Sixteen African nations gained their independence that year, including the former Belgian Congo, which became the Democratic Republic of the Congo on June 30. One of the key personalities that made this possible was Patrice Lumumba, who experienced widespread support in gaining independence and became the first Prime Minister of the DROC. However, he lost much of this support once he was in office, and lasted fewer than 200 days. Lumumba’s ability to communicate was a key reason for his success and failure.
... attention allowed economic exploitation in the Congo and its people devastated by human rights abuses, and even today the lack of international attention has caused many conflicts in and around the Congo. The economic exploitation of the Congo during colonial times robbed the country of wealth which could have been used to develop the land, and the lack of wealth has contributed to Congo’s poor standing in the world today. Lastly, the human rights abuses in the Congo Free State contributed to economic and political troubles during the colonial period and has continued into the present day, as human rights abuses are still prevalent in that region of Africa. Due to the lack of international attention, economic exploitation, and human rights abuses, the Congo Free State was harmful to the Congo region of Africa and its legacy continues to harm that region of Africa.
Emizet, Kisangani N. F. . (2000). Explaining the Rise and Fall of Military Regimes: Civil-Military Relations in the Congo. Armed Forces & Society. 26 (2), p203-227.
Updated Feb. 11, 2005. GlobalSecurity.org, Accessed 06 March 2005 &nbs 3 “Mubutu Sese Seko,” Encyclopedia. Updated in 2005. Infoplease, Accessed 06 March 2005. 4 “Congo Civil War,” GlobalSecurity.
The cold war rivalry between the United States and the Soviet Union provided a script. This script was encouraged by the secessionist forced in Katanga. The Belgian Government stated that the Belgian authorities would continue to take "the necessary security measures" in the case of grave danger. The colonialist had no intention of abiding by the Council's decision, but the Council still wanted to continue their armed intervention against the Congo. Military intervention was being accompanied by efforts to dismember the young State.2 "Under these circumstances and before the dangers we would bring down upon us by prolonging our submission to the arbitrary will and Communistic intentions of the central government, the Katangan government has decided to proclaim the independence of Katanga." 2
Over a period from 1960-1965, the first Republic of the Congo experienced a period of serious crisis. There was a terrible war for power that displayed senseless violence and the desperation to rule. There were many internal conflicts among the people. The country eventually gained independence from Belgium. For many countries this would be a time for celebration. Unfortunately for the people of the Congo this became a time to forget. Almost immediately after independence and the general elections, the country went into civil war. Major developed cities like Katanga and Kasai wanted to be independent from the Lumumba government. Different factions started to fight the government and Katanga and Kasai tried to secede from the rest of the country out of fear of the mutinous army that was out of control looting and killing.
At the beginning of 1960, during a round table in Brussels attended by Congolese separatists and delegates of the Belgian Parliament and Government, Congo's independence was set for June 30 of the same year. With Joseph Kasavubu as President of the Republic, while Patrice Lumumba holds the posts of Prime Minister and Minister of Defense, Lumumba's friend Joseph Mobutu is appointed Chief of Staff with the rank of Colonel. This period was named the first republic (1960-1965). The prime ministers followed one another until Mobutu led a second military coup on November 24, 1965, this time overthrowing President Kasavubu. The 2nd Republic (1965-1997)