The late 19th century saw a new wave of European Imperialism. The colonies of England, France, and Germany are some of the most common examples of late imperialism, but this wave of late imperialism saw the rise of a new major European power: Belgium. King Leopold held a massive tract of land in Central Africa that would come to be know as The Congo Free State. According to the editors of The Encyclopedia Britannica (2015), a small group of investors headed by King Leopold would be drawn to the land after Morton Stanley’s exploration of the land during the 1870’s. Once they had acquired their land they would set up a system that was meant to extract maximum profit from the natural resources of Central Africa. They had a complete disregard …show more content…
of the people who inhabited this land, and used them as disposable tools for growing their fortune. This would result in one of the most brutal regimes to ever exist ruling the Congo region for about 25 years. They would gather immense wealth at the expense of the 10 million Congolese who would die under the rule of the Belgians. Henry Morton Stanley was one of the first Europeans to enter the land that would eventually become The Congo Free State.
In his 1885 journal of his travels in Africa Stanley says: “I speak of eager native traders following us for miles for the smallest piece of cloth. I mention that after travelling many miles to obtain cloth for ivory and redwood powder, the despairing natives asked: 'Well what is it you do want? Tell us, and we will get it for you.'” He says this to explain that he sees a great opportunity for Europeans in Africa. He says that African leaders are eager to make deals with Europeans, exchanging land and African goods for European produced goods. Although Stanley claims that Africans were eager to cooperate with colonists, it must be taken in consideration the mindset of European colonists. The following quote from Marcus R.P. Dorman shows this mindset of Europe perfectly: “The Congo Free State has indeed, without breaking any Treaty, solved the problem which has baffled the combined wisdom of all the ancient great colonial Powers. It exists on its own resources without poisoning the natives with alcohol; it extracts much wealth from the soil without fear of ever exhausting it; it opens up great tracts of land without running heavily into debt, and noblest of all it-daily converts naked cannibal savages into self-respecting responsible people.” (1905) This view of “ naked cannibal savages” was the typical view of Africans during this period and most …show more content…
certainly was held by most if not all the people in control of The Congo Free State. Once this is taken into consideration it is easy to imagine how the contracts that gave Europeans control of Central Africa were at least partly unwilling. Stanley and other Europeans saw a land that they had a strong desire to make their own, and they had a desire to claim these lands for one reason alone, raw goods. Industry was booming in Europe and the resources of Europe were exhausting quickly. So they set their eyes on Africa, but to explore the continent was no small task. In his 1885 journal, Stanley explains how Africa was a daunting place to unprepared Europeans entering the jungle. He says that they considered themselves strong men, but their courage and pride both vanished while in Africa. Central African disease would claim the lives of many Europeans. Once The Congo Basin had been explored, a colonial government replaced the native system of governance. At the Berlin Conference, Belgium’s authority was solidified when the name “Congo Free State” was made official in 1884 when all major European powers recognized King Leopold II’s authority over the region. The land was not given to Belgium though, it was the king's private land that he was free to do with what he pleased, a power which would be abused to the extreme. The Congo Free State was not established as a colony for monetary reasons, or at least this was the case on paper. In 1909, Sir Arthur Conan Doyle described The Congo Free State as such:“ Never before has there been such a mixture of wholesale expropriation and wholesale massacre all done under an odious guise of philanthropy and with the lowest commercial reasons as a reason.” The facade put up by the Belgians was that they were in the Congo to spread "civilization". Marcus R.P. Dorman even says in his 1905 journal that a distinctive feature of the natives that he met was that they nearly all had vaccination marks. Even if this is the case, the good that followed the Belgians was far out weighed by the death and destruction that they wrought on to the land. The end result of bringing "civilization" was the death of about half of the area's population, about 10 million people. ( Hamilton, 2000) Once The Congo Free State was officially founded, a fairly typical colonial government was set up.
At The top of society was a small group of Europeans. Rubber agents and other government officers controlled every aspect of life in The State. They even held control over when natives could visit family. (Doyle, 1909) These Europeans had a section of land that they were to supervise and oversee the production of goods. In Belgium, a very selective group of people had control over the region with King Leopold II at the top. He had the final say in all policy of The Congo Free State. Although he held this power, most of the decision making was sub-contracted to government owned companies, such as The Anglo-Belgian Indian Rubber
Company. The Anglo-Belgian Indian Rubber Company, or ABIRC, was the largest of the companies that operated within The Congo Free State. As the name suggests, the primary product of the ABIRC was rubber harvested from wild trees, but they also produced palm oil and ivory. The harvesting of these goods was done by natives who were forced into labor. Strict quotas were imposed and extreme force was used to enforce these quotas. One of the most popular punishments was to have a hand cut off and the number of hands collected was often used to make sure that the natives were properly scared into working. (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2015) Another punishment tactic was to torture entire families or sometimes whole villages for the actions of a few. T. Stanley says that " Villages were set quotas of rubber and the gendarmerie were sent in to collect it - a process that was sped up by looting, arson and rape. If a village failed to reach its quota hostages would be taken and shot." The taking of hostages was common in the classical sense that a few villagers would be taken hostage, but often huge groups were taken hostage and prohibited from movement. Additionally, the private companies in The Congo were legally prohibited from carrying guns, but they got around this in two ways. The first was that they were all given guns, and then declared them private property. (Doyle 1909) Also they hired an army of Africans known as the Force Publique, who perpetrated many of the deeds in the Congo. They were famous for developing a trade in severed hands because soldiers could often not collect the number of hands required. (Encyclopedia Britannica, 2015)
The book mainly chronicles the efforts of King Leopold II of Belgium which is to make the Congo into a colonial empire. During the period that the European powers were carving up Africa, King Leopold II of Belgium seized for himself the vast and mostly unexplored territory surrounding the Congo River.
Leopold paid a large monthly price to a journalist to ensure a stream of sympathetic articles about his activities in the Congo. The French did not feel threatened by Belgium or by Leopold’s claims. Their main fear was that when the king ran out of money, as they were sure he would, in his expensive plan to build a railway, he might sell the whole territory to their rival, Britain. When talking to the British, Leopold hinted that if he didn’t get all the land he wanted, he would leave Africa completely, which meant he would sell the Congo to France. The bluff worked, and Britain gave in. Staff in place and tools in hand, Leopold set out to build the infrastructure necessary to exploit his colony. Leopold’s will treated the Congo as if it were just a piece of uninhabited land to be disposed of by its owner. Leopold established the capital of his new Congo state at the port town of
Throughout the 19th century, European Imperialism had a major effect on Africa. As countries expanded in terms of wealth, resources, and innovation, more territory and workers were needed. The first solution to solve these problems was to begin colonizing in Africa. The driving force for imperialism in Europe and Africa was mainly economical. This economical approach was established through many ways including cultural and nationalistic ideas.
...abor to get what he wanted, ivory and rubber. Leopold was able to colonize and pillage Congo for its resources during the Scramble for Africa through forced labor. The quote that sums up my essay and the book is best described at the end of chapter 15. Massacring huge numbers of natives will eventually frighten the survivors into gathering rubber. This shows the intentions of forced labor by the Force Publique and the reason for the population drop in Congo during Leopold’s rule.
King Leopold’s Ghost is a popular history telling the story how Europeans systematically exploited Africa. Special fork of King Leopold upholds colony of Congo which ran from the late 19th century to early 20th century. The Book actually starts story back during the age of exploration were European explore where would land on west coast Africa and try to engage trade and when they figure out when they could trade guns and other things white slaves undermine the stability of a lot of the states that were set up along the Congo river and also on the west coast of the Africa. What you see is a study political
The story starts with King Leopold II of Belgium. In the scramble for Africa, many nations rushed to establish colonies, and those who did made a great profit from them. The king himself wanted to compete with them, as well as amass a profit. He traveled to several British colonies and learnt how to establish and manage a colony of his own. The king himself then secretly bought the Congo, and supported an expedition led by Henry Morton Stanly.
As Hochschild writes, “His drive for colonies, however, was shaped by a desire not only for money but for power” (39). This quote shows just how much Leopold hated being a king of a monarchy where his powers were limited. He loved having absolute power over the Congo. In the novel, Leopold also says that for him and Henry Morton Stanley, a British journalist and explorer of central Africa, “Africa was a chance to gain upward mobility towards wealth and glory” (63). King Leopold and his allies’ had great power over the Congo, which he soon exploited for its large supply of rubber.
The land Leopold had obtained was about eighty times larger than that of Belgium itself. Plus, Leopold was proclaimed the “sovereign” ruler of the entire Congo Free State, granting him the power to exercise total control, where as, in Belgium, Leopold was forced to rule under a constitutional monarchy.... ... middle of paper ... ... “Africa Imperialism” History of Imperialism.
It is widely debated why exactly King Leopold decided to conquer the Congo, but the general consensus seems to be that it was out of the belief that “the highlands of the Congo may be as rich in gold as the mountains of the western slope of the American Continent” (Stead). In the mid-1870s, the King hired Henry Stanley, who was familiar with many parts of Africa, to help him go about conquering. During the following years Stanley stayed in Africa, talking various tribes into signing over their lands and rights. After this was completed the King officially took over the Congo, renaming it the Congo Free State. This was especially ironic because all natives of the country were either forced to give up their way of life in exchange for virtual slavery in the ivory trade, agriculture, or the rubber traffic, or die trying to escape fate. Leopold was undeterred by the amount of suffering and death in the Congo, brought on by his rule. Belgian soldiers and officials were known for their cruelty in their methods to make, and then keep, Congo natives wo...
Europe, in the late 1800’s, was starting a land grab on the African continent. Around 1878, most of Africa was unexplored, but by 1914, most of Africa, with the lucky exception of Liberia and Ethiopia, was carved up between European powers. There were countless motivations that spurred the European powers to carve Africa, like economic, political, and socio–cultural, and there were countless attitudes towards this expansion into Africa, some of approval and some of condemnation. Europe in this period was a world of competing countries. Britain had a global empire to lead, France had competition with Britain for wealth and so did other nations like Germany and Russia.
As a political figure, King Leopold of Belgium had minimal power, yet he acknowledged the political and financial advantages of colonization, and acquired the Congo as a private colony whereas Britain snatched up colonies globally, including the “crown jewel” of all colonies, India. Belgium and Britain demonstrated a stark contradiction of two opposing methods of colonization. These two countries methods’ of domination ultimately decide the fates of each party, conqueror and conquered, in the precarious gamble that is imperialism.... ... middle of paper ...
While Leopold II, the King of Belgium, desperately wanted an overseas colony, The Belgian people did not share his enthusiasm; which created the feelings of neglect and apathy Belgium had towards Congo. The Congo Free State, established “in the margins of the Berlin Conference” in 1885, allowed Leopold to “gain international recognition of his possession” which he had begun to take control of since the 1870s. However, while Leopold was securing control of the Congo, the Belgian people were not interested in controlling colonies, as they believed that colonies “would merely soak up resources that would be better used for social purposes at home.” Thus, the Belgian people decided to solve the problem of having an unwanted colony by separating the Belgian government from...
Although there are many other important factors, the main cause of the rise of imperialism was most certainly economic. The Age of Empire, by Eric J. Hobsbawn, provides an interpretation of New Imperialism. Hobsbawn calls imperialism “a natural by-product of the international economy” (Sherman pg 177). He is basically saying that imperialism is dependent on the rivalries of competing industries, which continually drive the international economy. Hobsbawn also dictates the need for external markets. The Industrial Revolution created many products that needed markets, thus creating a need of colonies. Hobsbawn believed that the overproduction of the Industrial Revolution and the Great Depression could be solved. He also realized that many businessmen knew that they could make a large profit off of China’s large population. For example, if every one of the three hundred million Chinese purchased one box of tin-tacks the businessmen knew that there would be a huge profit, consequently increasing the desire for colonization of weaker countries.
In the early 1880’s, the powers of Europe started to take control of regions in Africa and set up colonies there. In the beginning, colonization caused the Africans little harm, but before long, the Europeans started to take complete control of wherever they went. The Europeans used their advanced knowledge and technology to easily maneuver through the vast African landscape and used advanced weapons to take control of the African people and their land. The countries that claimed the most land and had the most significant effect on Africa were France, England, Belgium, and Germany. There were many reasons for the European countries to be competing against each other to gain colonies in Africa. One of the main reasons was that the Europeans believed that the more territory a country was able to control, the more powerful it could become and the more powerful it would be seen as by other countries. Other reasons for the desire to control African land included the many natural resources that could only be found in Africa, such as diamonds, gold, and as time progressed, rubber. It also provided new markets in surrounding places so that manufactured goods could be sold for a larger profit. The Europeans had many motives for imperialism in Africa. Yet the true motives were often shielded as they tried tom present themselves as humanitarians when in reality they were making Africa a terrible place to live with brutality and harsh treatment of the African natives. The ways of the Europeans had many physical and emotional costs for the people of Africa. The imperialism process also took a toll on the people of Europe. The European imperialistic colonization in Africa was motivated by the desire to control the abundant natural resources an...
...ermore established imperial rule in the Congo. The Force Publique was Leopold’s governing army. They were to oversee the work of the now colonized people of the Congo. Another of Leopold’s objectives was to gain wealth from his acquired colony. With the Force Publique, he would force the Congolese to gather ivory from the land. Those who refused had their elders, women and children held hostage until they complied. Leopold’s International African Association was to be a humanitarian project that would help to end slavery, however, by forcing the people to work for him, he was enslaving those he supposedly sought to help. When the popularity of the bicycle rose in the late 19th, manufactures were in need of rubber for their tires. Leopold saw this as an opportunity to gain more wealth and quickly had the Force Publique force the people into harvesting rubber.