Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Earth science what type of volcanic eruption was in pompeii
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The unorthodox ardent oceanography professor, Clifford Barnes, tracked icebergs during the Second World War before rescuing Curtis Ebbesmeyer’s academic career. His unique holistic approach to science eventually drew Ebbesmeyer to take an apprenticeship under him and would serve beneficial to the field of oceanography. Unfortunately, Barnes would succumb to Alzheimer’s disease, but before that, he would prepare Ebbesmeyer with a broader, more integrated understanding before proceeding to research. Cliff Barnes’ influence becomes apparent through Ebbesmeyer, which drives him to seek unique venues that illustrate the power of oceanography and the resourcefulness of a comprehensive approach to science; In the spirit of Cliff Barnes, the work and …show more content…
As a young man during the war, Barnes aided by identifying icebergs in the North Atlantic Ocean to provide convoys bound to Britain with a safe route. Barnes was a combustion engineer in Ohio prior to his recruitment to the University of Washington’s oceanography department. Of all the professors at the University of Washington, Barnes was the most unconventional as he would take naps during guest lectures and had the most raucous laugh, but was very practical towards oceanography as Ebbesmeyer dubbed him as a water chaser. Through a mutual appreciation and liking for each other, Barnes took Ebbesmeyer under his wing and provided Ebbesmeyer with everything he needed and would become a model scientist for Ebbesmeyer. Resources such as opportunities, equipment, and knowledge were all available to Ebbesmeyer under Barnes. Barnes would wait for Ebbesmeyer to finish his studies on water slabs before retiring. In 1995, Barnes lost the battle against Alzheimer’s disease. Despite the loss of a great oceanographer, Ebbesmeyer inherited Barnes’ work and continues to make progress in the name of …show more content…
Ebbesmeyer began by reviewing pumice from a nearby volcano, Mount St. Helens, before chasing information about Krakatoa, Toba, Vatna, and a 1962 eruption in the South Sandwich Islands. From his investigation Ebbesmeyer learned many things about history; Research found that ashes were the original drifters, an eruption produced one of the greatest drifts on record, and a plausible hypothesis for the origins of life. Ebbesmeyer examined pumice from the 1962 eruption in a plastic tub and noticed scum forming. As a permeable matrix, the pumice could accrue chemicals afloat to create complex organic compounds. The hypothesis of the origins of life could possibly relate to Stromatolites as they were colonies of single-celled organism afloat. Indeed, Ebbesmeyer’s allure to volcanic ash has gifted him more data thanks to his scientific approach which has been quite resourceful. Similarly, through oceanography Ebbesmeyer is able to derive a plausible hypothesis about the origins of life which does not even relate to his career. However, this illustrates the power of oceanography as there is much interdisciplinary knowledge out in the
The novel, ‘Jasper Jones’, is set in a small country town in outback Australia in the 1960’s. The setting was influenced by novels that Silvey, the author had read as a youth. Such as To Kill A Mocking Bird, The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn, and One Flew Over The Cuckoo’s Nest. people from this same hot desert climate and who have a decent knowledge of past events and times can really get into the book, as you can see the different perspectives of each character living in that time and place.
Website for Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution a non-profit organization dedicated to oceanic research and education.
Bragg, Melvyn, On Giants' Shoulders: Great Scientists and Their Discoveries from Archimedes to DNA. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 1998.
In 1977, a recent research by geochemists Eoghan Reeves, Jeff Seewald, and Jill McDermott at Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution (WHOI) is the first to test a fundamental assumption of this ‘metabolism first’ hypothesis. This popular view says simple reaction emerged near ancient seafloor hot springs. These reactions presumably turned a nonliving world to a living one.
United States v. Smiley, et al.. (n.d) retrieved February 17 2014, from NOAA Coastal Services Center Web Site: http://www.csc.noaa.gov/data/Documents/OceanLawSearch/U.S.v.Smiley_CaseSummary_PDF.pdf
Major exploration may harm the environment due to how we exploit resources. According to Philippe Cousteau’s commentary, he states that “the world has fished, mined and trafficked the ocean’s resources to a point where we are actually seeing dramatic changes that are seriously impacting today’s generations” (70). This emphasizes that attempting major exploration has an impact in our environment. Additionally, Elisabeth Rosenthal’s “Stinging Tentacles Offer Hint of Oceans’ Decline” gives us an idea how pollution affects the climate. Dr. Josep-MarÍa Gili
The Origin of Life has long been debated about. In result to that there are many hypotheses that each claim that’s how life started. Some of them claim life came from space, others from clay and even hydrothermal vents. However, they’re only theories which is why many experiments and research going into proving them. Many great minds such as Alexander Oparin, Gunter Wachtershauser, Robert Vrijenhoek and Louis Pasteur are the brains behind the hypotheses which is what makes them even more interesting to test out. The hypotheses that I researched were the Primordial Soup Hypothesis, the Iron-Sulfur World Hypothesis, the Deep Sea Vent Hypothesis, the RNA World Hypothesis, the Community Clay Hypothesis and the Panspermia Hypothesis.
One example that can be used to show where an individual passed of something untrue as true can be associated to Gerald Barnbaum also known as Gerald Barnes. Gerald Barnes is a former pharmacist and convicted felon who posed as a medical doctor between 1976-2000. Barnes held the post of chief physician at a well-known health clinic and seemed to many the very symbol of Hippocratic virtues. Though Barnes never attended any medical school and his only formal training is a bachelor’s in pharmacology which doesn’t make him a
"Oceans." Opposing Viewpoints Online Collection. Detroit: Gale, 2014. Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 8 May 2014.
Oceans are such so vast that people underestimate the impact their actions —seeming so insignificant— have on them. Humans have by and large taken the oceans for granted; not considering how important a healthy ocean is to our survival. A popular mind-set is that the oceans are a bottomless supply of fish, natural resources, and an infinite waste dump. There are myriad reasons why the oceans should be saved and the most obvious one is marine life. With 71% of the Earth being covered by water, it is obvious that sea creatures are predominant form of life, making up 80% of the species of life on Earth. However, as important as marine life is, that is not the only reason why saving the oceans is crucial. The ocean floor provides natural resources such as, oil, natural gas, petroleum, minerals, medications, and ingredients for foods and products. The economic benefits of the oceans are huge and significant, as well. Fishing and fish products have provided employment to 38 million people and have generated about $124 billion in economic benefits. However, oceans are on the verge of crisis, marine life, natural resources, transportation, the economy, and important ingredients are at risk due to overfishing, pollution, and acidification. Thus, in this essay I will argue that, oceans are not impervious to human activity and threatening the health of the ocean threatens the health of humanity, since oceans key to our survival.
Scientists appear to have become aware of the issue of rising sea levels in the mid to late 1980s. An article published in Science News in 1987 predicted that “global warming… will cause… the world's oceans to expand, raising the average sea level by 4 to 8 centimeters in the next 40 years” (Monastersky). Though 4 to 8 centimeters sounds like a miniscule amount in relation to the vastness of the world’s oceans, this early article disturbed many readers. Many for this reason: early stud...
Bowermaster, Jon. Oceans: The Threats to Our Seas and What You Can Do to Turn the Tide: A Participant Media Guide. New York: PublicAffairs, 2010. Print.
Four NOMAD buoys across the North Atlantic registered a 13-degree drop in SST. And soon a series of extreme weather happened in front of my eyes: hurricanes, snow storms, and even cyclones that rapidly pulled cool air from the upper troposphere which made people freeze instantly. Those were the scenes I saw from The Day after Tomorrow, the film that inspired my curiosity in atmospheric sciences in my seventh grade. Although shocked by the catastrophe caused by global warming in the film, I couldn't help take an eager interest in how freshwater from melted polar ice caps brought a shift in the North Atlantic Current, and how the shifted current brought a change in the earth’s climate. Later, as I gathered more information about the climate, I became fascinated by the physical and dynamical mechanisms explaining atmospheric phenomenon. And after three years of undergraduate study of atmospheric sciences, beyond the starting point of fascination, I have taken concrete steps forward with my hard work, independence, and creativity.
Francis Crick, co-discoverer of DNA, has said that “the origin of life appears to be almost a miracle, so many are the conditions which would have to be satisfied to get it going” (Horgan 27).2 Noted evolutionary astronomer Frederick Hoyle has described the chances of life having evolved from nonlife to be about as likely as the chances that “a tornado sweeping through a junkyard might assemble a Boeing 747 from the materials therein” (Johnson 106). Why do respected scientists doubt what textbooks teach as fact? It would appear that these scientists know something that current theories describing the origin of life fail to explain. While current theories describe scenarios in which genetic material such as RNA becomes entrapped in a protective cell membrane as a likely recipe for the formation of life, they generally do not focus on the difficulties of forming and concentrating all of these components in the first place.3 To clarify, current theories suffer from what I call the “cookbook mentality.