Why Is Major Exploration Worth The Risk?

679 Words2 Pages

Taking leaps off the edges of cliffs doesn’t sound like a good idea; the chances of making to the other side is too low. It’s not worth the risk to do something scary, who knows what’s on the other side? The discussion relates to the argument whether major exploration is worth the risk. The risks for major exploration are too dangerous to face. “Why Exploring the Ocean is Mankind’s Next Giant Leap” by Philippe Cousteau, “Stinging Tentacles Offer Hint of Oceans’ Decline” by Elisabeth Rosenthal, “Remarks at the Dedication of the Aerospace Medical Health Center” by John F. Kennedy, “Living in the Dark” by Cheryl Bardoe, and “Is Space Exploration Worth the Cost?” by Joan Vernikos support the idea that major exploration is not worth the risk. …show more content…

According to Philippe Cousteau’s commentary, he states that “the world has fished, mined and trafficked the ocean’s resources to a point where we are actually seeing dramatic changes that are seriously impacting today’s generations” (70). This emphasizes that attempting major exploration has an impact in our environment. Additionally, Elisabeth Rosenthal’s “Stinging Tentacles Offer Hint of Oceans’ Decline” gives us an idea how pollution affects the climate. Dr. Josep-MarÍa Gili indicates that “these jellyfish near shore are a message the sea is sending us saying, ‘Look how badly you are treating me,” (18). Due to human-caused tension, such as global warming and overfishing, jellyfish invasions has caused nuisance and difficulties for tourists and fishermen. If we were to attempt major exploration, it would cause much more pollution than it was …show more content…

It is true that Joan Vernikos’s Essay says, “Space exploration is not a drain on the economy, it generates infinitely more wealth that it spends” (58). However, this is not a valid argument, because the space shuttle program has ended. Cousteau states that “the space shuttle program that had promised to revolutionize space travel by making it (relatively) affordable and accessible came to an end after 30 years” (18). This proves that if space exploration actually generates wealth, why did it end? As a result, opponents are mistaken due to

Open Document