Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Event caused civil war
Causes and effects of the US civil war
Causes and effects of the US civil war
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Event caused civil war
Considered one of the most prevalent turning points in American history, the Civil War impacted every person in that era, and continues to do so today. While slavery is well-known to have been the principal cause of the war as a whole, multifarious reasonings were also responsible for the blood stain in history.
The Fugitive Slave Act heightened flourishing tensions between the North and the South, as both held quite differing opinions. The Act stated that any slave who escaped to freedom in the North could be retrieved by slave catchers and taken back to their owners in the South; previously, states had passed acts against assisting slave catchers, so many northerners were extremely outraged. Mobs broke out in attempts to prevent this
…show more content…
Act from being pursued, but without much success. Although this Act was a horrible blot in America, it raised even more awareness for slavery in the North and helped people understand the complexity and torture that slavery is and was. Additionally, slave catchers would find a random, free black man and claim his as his slave, and there was nothing anyone could do about it. Oftentimes, judges would say a black person was a slave merely because they got paid double what they would if they said that person was free, and there was nothing the blacks could do to help themselves as they were not allowed to testify in court, so many ended up in Canada to flee slave catchers. Stephen Douglas desired presidency and believed the Kansas-Nebraska Act would help his chances.
This bill opened the Kansas territory to popular sovereignty, and Douglas hoped that would win the support of the South. The Kansas-Nebraska Act repealed the Missouri Compromise and led to the obliteration of the Whig Party, negated treaties with Indians, and the near destruction of the northern wing of the Democratic Party. In consequence to the Act, “Bleeding Kansas” occurred, which included a battleground of sectional politics, proslavery Missourians who crossed over the border and took over the territorial legislature with their votes, and Northerners founded free-soil communities, which opposed the expansion of slavery. By the summer of 1865, open fighting and warfare ruptured; some even say this was the true beginning of the Civil …show more content…
War. Victim to the Fugitive Slave Act, the Dred Scott Decision is known as one of the worst conclusions in Supreme Court history. The case utterly worsened sectional divisions in the states, as Southerners celebrated the decision and Northerners condemned it. Dred Scott had been a slave in Missouri and eventually moved to Illinois, where he lived for over ten years. In those ten years, Scott gained himself a wife and children, and suddenly his former owner was striving to force him and his family back into slavery. The case took many years to get to the Supreme Court, and eventually it was ruled that Congress could, in fact, not ban slavery in territories, and that Scott’s ten year plus residency in a free territory did not make him a free man. Sadly, Scott was forced back into slavery as were his wife and children, who had never been the victims of it before. The Judge who delivered the verdict, Tauny, spent four hours reading his ruling, and essentially stated that slaves are life long property, and that property may be taken wherever the owner wishes, and whenever the owner wishes to do so. Once again, the Dred Scott Decision infuriated the North, creating more of a divide between the two areas. Quite parallel from most of his time, John Brown aspired the immediate abolition of slavery in the United States. Brown could be considered to have been an intense character, as he intended to organize a raid at Harper’s Ferry, where slaves would be supplied guns to kill their masters. There was a chance of this being somewhat successful for it being the childish plan it is, if only Brown had not forgotten to mention his grand plan to the slaves. Once the raid proved to have been a catastrophe, Brown was hanged, which exacerbated still growing tensions between the North and the South, as the South was shocked when the North reacted in such a melancholy way to his death. While the North mourned Brown’s death, attempted to make him a martyr, and showed support for slave revolts, the South grew more and more outraged at their supposed fellow citizens’ attitudes. This man had just endeavoured to kill slave owners in the South, and the North was upset over his death. This mad Southerners furious and only made situations between the two worse. Lastly, the election of 1860 proved also to be a cause of the Civil War because of its winner.
The election held four candidates: Stephen Douglas, John Breckinridge, John Bell, and Abraham Lincoln. Douglas won the nomination, yet Southerners nominated Breckinridge. Border and Southern state Whigs created the Constitutional Union Party where Bell was entered, and Lincoln represented Republicans as a moderate, someone who supposedly was not on one side or the other. While Breckinridge and Lincoln represented supreme positions on slavery, Douglas and Bell tried to find a sort of middle ground. Lincoln ended up winning the election with a lousy thirty-eight percent of the vote by practically winning over every part of the North; his name was not even on the ballot in nine Southern states, which angered Southerners since a man whom did not even show up on their ballot had won the presidency. As most are aware, Lincoln then took various steps to eventually emancipating slavery in the United States, which officially began the American Civil
War. Without the Civil War ending slavery in the country, America might be in a completely different condition than it is today. Slavery may have been the overlying argument for its beginning, but many other events and actions assisted in the eruption of war between the long feuding soon to be Union and Confederacy.
To put it simply (as I recall and it's been years since I've had to read about this subject)a new territory was opened to settle in. It was decided that the settlers of these states would decide whether or not slavery would be permitted. This gave birth to the new Republican Party which opposed slavery. The Act was designed by Stephen A Douglas a Democratic senator from Illinois (the same who would later defeat a young Abraham Lincoln for the senate in 1858) and repealed the Missouri Compromise of 1820. Thousands of settlers both pro and anti slavery rushed into Kansas particularly and bloody, murderous fights broke out among the groups hence the nickname "Bleeding Kansas". It was actually one territory but this Act divided it into two states.
The Democratic Party was sectionally shattered by the Kansas-Nebraska Act, but it also gave birth to the Republicans. Ultimately, the Kansas-Nebraska Act would lead to a sectional rift in the country that would prove too deep to patch up without war. During the year of 1855, Governor Andrew Reeder called for an election for a legislature for the state o Kansas. He carefully planned out the election to make it fair by appointed two Free Soilers and one proslavery judges and several supervisors.
“For the Slave South to deter its most potentially destructive slave resistance, potential fugitives had to dread coercion outside as well as inside their masters’ estate” and the act provided that coercion. The free blacks, at the very least inspiring images to slaves, encouraged potential runaways through their lifestyles and knowledge. Without these slaves’ attempts to gain freedom, the act would not have been necessary. The northern states would not have made laws allowing citizens not to participate in slave catching, and the southern states would not have been nervous about northern state compliance with the return of their
The Kansas-Nebraska Act was one of the first events that demonstrated Lincoln’s disapproval yet tolerance for slavery. The Kansas-Nebraska Act, proposed by Stephen A. Douglas and signed by Franklin Pierce, divided the region into two territories. The territory north of the 40th parallel was the Kansas Territory and the south of the 40th parallel was the Nebraska Territory, the controv...
During the time period of 1860 and 1877 many major changes occurred. From the beginning of the civil war to the fall of the reconstruction, the United States changed dramatically. Nearly one hundred years after the Declaration of Independence which declared all men equal, many social and constitutional alterations were necessary to protect the rights of all people, no matter their race. These social and constitutional developments that were made during 1860 to 1877 were so drastic it could be called a revolution.
On April 12, 1861, Abraham Lincoln declared to the South that, the only reason that separate the country is the idea of slavery, if people could solve that problem then there will be no war. Was that the main reason that started the Civil war? or it was just a small goal that hides the real big reason to start the war behind it. Yet, until this day, people are still debating whether slavery is the main reason of the Civil war. However, there are a lot of facts that help to state the fact that slavery was the main reason of the war. These evidences can relate to many things in history, but they all connect to the idea of slavery.
In the election of 1860 there were four candidates running; Abraham Lincoln, Stephen A. Douglas, John C. Breckenridge, and John Bell. The Republicans nominated Lincoln, the northern Democrats nominated Douglas, the southern Democrats nominated Breckenridge, and the Constitutional Union Party (Independent/Moderate party) selected John Bell (U-s-history.com). It is believed that because the Democrat Party was split during the election, and therefore had two candidates in which the Democratic voters had to choose between, it divided the Democrat vote and caused Lincoln to win the election. The b...
The election of 1860 brought a dramatic change to politics. The country had already been divided by the Northern states and Southern states. There were disagreements over whether the territories should be expanded and about each state entering the Union. In addition, slavery was also a major issue. Not only was Lincoln not even on the ballot in nine Southern states, he only won 2 of 996 counties in the entire south. Not only did Lincoln not having any southern support, but also he was apart of the Union and against slavery; his views could have seriously lost him the race. Along with this, other things could have cost him the victory at the end of the election such as more Southerners voting and if the Democratic Party outweighed the Republican Party. Lincoln's candidates used different newspaper publishing to convince voters not to vote for him. Many of them dealt with him and his feelings of anti-slavery.
The Civil War was an important war over the freedom of slaves in the U.S.. The Civil War is well known for being caused by the issue of slavery, but it is really a combination of different events and actions that caused tensions to rise throughout the country. The economic and political issues in the U.S., along with certain actions caused the Civil war, which is one of the United States’s worst wars. All in all, the Civil War was one of the most devastating wars for our country as a whole, and the process of rebuilding would take years and is no easy job.
The Fugitive Slave Act was part of the Compromise of 1850. This act required that authorities in the North had to assist southern slave catchers to retrieve and return slaves to their owners. Southerners favored this act because they saw no slavery in the territories to the west, by the passing of the Fugitive Slave Act it would help preserve slavery in the south. This act allowed southern slave owners to get their slaves back when they escaped to the North that is why this act was important and critical to southern survival. The view of this act by the North was the opposite, especially from those who were black, they feared this act. The blacks in the North were terrified that this act would make it so they could be ushered back to the south even if they were innocent. This led to the creation of resistance groups in the North.
In the 1860 presidential election, Republicans, led by Abraham Lincoln, opposed the expansion of slavery into United States' territories. Lincoln won, but before his inauguration on March 4, 1861, seven slave states with cotton-based economies formed the Confederacy. The first six to secede had the highest proportions of slaves in their populations, a total of 48.8% for the six. Outgoing Democratic President James Buchanan and the incoming Republicans rejected secession as illegal. Lincoln's inaugural address declared his administration would not initiate civil war. Eight remaining slave states continued to reject calls for secession. Confederate forces seized numerous federal forts within territory claimed by the Confederacy. A peace conference failed to find a compromise, and both sides prepared for war. The Confederates assumed that European countries were so dependent on "King Cotton" that they would intervene; none did and none recognized the new Conf...
The Kansas-Nebraska Act of 1854, which advocated popular sovereignty, gave Lincoln his much needed opportunity to gain support in politics.
In 1850, a document called the Fugitive Slave Act was passed. Primarily, this document dealt with the reclaiming of runaway slaves. This law allowed southerners to call upon the federal government to capture runaway slaves who had fled the South and may be living in the North. The Fugitive Slave Act and the laws that went with it only caused controversy in the North. This split the North and South. In reaction to this, some northern states passed laws forbidding state officials to enforce the Fugitive Slave Law, which only angered the southern states. Northerners had become aware of the hypocrisy of slavery and became resolved to end slavery. Many abolitionists started to take action to help slaves escape. This major controversy over the runaway slaves sparked the beginning of the Civil War.
Although the American Civil War mainly occurred because of slavery, the fact is that slavery had a lot to do with economic and social issues.
These differing beliefs on slavery and constitutional rights are the undeniable cause of the war. “In 1820, Congress passed the Missouri Compromise, which created Missouri as a slave state, and Maine as a free state”. (Divine 344-345) This compromise was done in order to preserve the balance of power between North and South. However, in “1854, the Missouri Compromise was repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act”. (Divine 345) This was the later compromise which stipulated that the issue of slavery would be decided by the settlers of each territory, an idea known as popular sovereignty. The Act was passed in spite of the best efforts of Abraham Lincoln, who railed against it in his “Peoria Speech.” After the passage of the bill, violence increased between pro- and anti-slavery settlers in Kansas, in an event that signaled the battles of the Civil War. “According to the 1857 Supreme Court ruling in Dred Scott v. Sanford, Congress did not have the authority to prohibit slavery in the territories”, (Divine 345) That was the reason why Missouri Compromise was rendered unconstitutional. This ruling pleased Southern slaveholders, and angered their Northern