Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Causes of civil war dbq
Advantage and disadvantage of slavery
Consequences of dred scott ruling
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Causes of civil war dbq
The Civil War was fought between the United States of America and the Confederate States of America. And it would not likely have happened. If the federal government enabled states to do whatever they wished, and the Northern and the Southern states concluded that they didn't require each other. The North and the South had cemented into two unique societies with various necessities. One of the parts of the Constitution central to state powers, before the Civil War, was the Tenth Amendment, which was ratified in 1791. There were many reasons behind the civil war, yet the principle reasons were clashes amongst North and South states, Controversy over regions, and failure in compromises. The dispute between the Southern and Northern states did …show more content…
not start suddenly with the attack on Fort Sumter, and it long predates the 1860s. (Divine 342) Their war was not a sudden fight, the disagreements were based on many reasons. An unavoidable conflict had been long postponed. From at least the beginning of the 19th century, Southern landowners were becoming increasingly worried that a strong federal government posed a threat to the institution of slavery, and several events testify to the growing tensions between free and slave states. The antislavery North believed in equality and justice for all, while the proslavery South believed in the rights of owners and the states.
These differing beliefs on slavery and constitutional rights are the undeniable cause of the war. “In 1820, Congress passed the Missouri Compromise, which created Missouri as a slave state, and Maine as a free state”. (Divine 344-345) This compromise was done in order to preserve the balance of power between North and South. However, in “1854, the Missouri Compromise was repealed by the Kansas-Nebraska Act”. (Divine 345) This was the later compromise which stipulated that the issue of slavery would be decided by the settlers of each territory, an idea known as popular sovereignty. The Act was passed in spite of the best efforts of Abraham Lincoln, who railed against it in his “Peoria Speech.” After the passage of the bill, violence increased between pro- and anti-slavery settlers in Kansas, in an event that signaled the battles of the Civil War. “According to the 1857 Supreme Court ruling in Dred Scott v. Sanford, Congress did not have the authority to prohibit slavery in the territories”, (Divine 345) That was the reason why Missouri Compromise was rendered unconstitutional. This ruling pleased Southern slaveholders, and angered their Northern …show more content…
opponents. The Northern anti-slavery perspective was made clear in the Wilmot Proviso of 1846, in which David Wilmot, a Pennsylvania Congressman, proposed that “neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall exist in lands conquered in the Mexican-American War”.
(Annual Edition, Pg. 113) These differing beliefs on slavery and constitutional rights are the undeniable cause of the war. Northerners feared that the spread of slavery would discriminate against “Free” farming in the west. Southerners just as adamantly believed that the institution should be allowed to exist wherever it proved feasible. (Annual Edition, Pg. 113) The nation leaders had begun to debate on how to deal with slavery in the lands gained from the War with Mexico in 1848. The requested addition of new states increased feared and it balanced in the Congress between North and South. The discovery of gold in California brought thousands of people into that territory. There would soon be enough people in California for it to apply for statehood. Most Californians wanted California to be a free state, but this would gave more power to north. Southerners wanted to divide California in half, making the northern half a free state and the southern half a slave
state. In 1849, President Zachary Taylor “proposed that California submit a plan for statehood that year, without going through the territorial stage”. (Divine 347-349) This stage could give Southern slaveholders little time to move to California with their slaves. “In March 1850, California applied to be admitted as a free state”. (Divine 349) This helped the northern side more than ever. With California as a free state, slave states would become a minority in the Senate just as they were in the House. Jefferson Davis, a senator from Mississippi, warned, "For the first time, we are about permanently to destroy the balance of power between the sections." (Annual Edition, Pg. 117) This was one of the biggest step toward civil war. California brought power to the North States, while South States were being vulnerable due to the Gold Rush and many resources of the Northern States.
Western expansion and the Louisiana Purchase both led to the formation of the Missouri Compromise because more states started applying for statehood, and this distorted the balance between the slave and free states. Division between the North and South increased as a result of the Missouri Compromise. It created a line that separated the Union and set it to the path of Civil War. At first, the North and South saw the compromise as a successful document that maintained the balance between the number of slave and free states; however, when the Union gained more territory through Mexican War, Congress decided to modify the existing compromise. Finally, the repeal of the compromise made the final push that led to the explosion of animosity between the North and South, which led to the Civil War. Slavery in the new territories remained the main issue that caused the necessity of forming the Missouri Compromise. Jefferson accurately stated that the Missouri Compromise stood only as a temporary solution that eventually led to the full-fledged sectional war between
On April 12, 1861, Abraham Lincoln declared to the South that, the only reason that separate the country is the idea of slavery, if people could solve that problem then there will be no war. Was that the main reason that started the Civil war? or it was just a small goal that hides the real big reason to start the war behind it. Yet, until this day, people are still debating whether slavery is the main reason of the Civil war. However, there are a lot of facts that help to state the fact that slavery was the main reason of the war. These evidences can relate to many things in history, but they all connect to the idea of slavery.
In the spring 1861, years of building tensions between the northern states and southern states resulted in the American Civil War. In 1680 an anti-slavery Republican, Abraham Lincoln was elected president causing seven southern states to secede from the union. These seven states included--Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Louisiana, Mississippi, South Carolina and Texas--. These seven states formed the Confederate States of America. The American Civil War lasted from April 12, 1861 to May 9, 1865 and claimed more than roughly 620,000 lives. So what caused the Civil War? The three main causes of the Civil War were differences between the north and the south in economies, disagreements in abolishing slavery, and whether the State or Federal
There are various explanations as to who and what really caused the Civil War. It is even fair to say that sometimes morals stand in the way when deciding who really started the war. Therefore, the facts must be analyzed clearly and in depth. It is true that the north played a major role in the Civil War, however, the south would not release their strict traditional beliefs of slavery. As time progressed, slavery debates pressured the South more and more to stand by their strict beliefs. Fugitive acts, Uncle Tom’s Cabin and Secession all showed how the south used brutal methods to preserve slavery. Therefore, since the popular sovereignty doctrine, the pro-slavery souths’ strict use of slavery and decisions to secede from the nation, angered the north, leading to a civil war.
As the country began to grow and expand we continued to see disagreements between the North and South; the Missouri Territory applied for statehood the South wanted them admitted as a slave state and the North as a free state. Henry Clay eventually came up with the Missouri Compromise, making Missouri a slave state and making Maine it’s own state entering the union as a free state. After this compromise any state admitted to the union south of the 36° 30’ latitude would be a slave state and a state north of it would be free. The country was very much sectionalized during this time. Thomas Jefferson felt this was a threat to the Union. In 1821, he wrote, ”All, I fear, do not see the speck on our horizon which is to burst on us as a tornado, sooner or later. The line of division lately marked out between the different portions of our confederacy is such...
The South was fighting against a government that they thought was treating them unfairly. They believed the Federal Government was overtaxing them, with tariffs and property taxes making their lifestyles even more expensive than they already had been. The North was fighting the Civil War for two reasons, first to keep the Nation unified, and second to abolish slavery. Abraham Lincoln, the commander and chief of the Union or Northern forces, along with many other Northerners, believed that slavery was not only completely wrong, but it was a great humiliation to America. Once we can see that with these differences a conflict would surely occur, but not many had predicted that a full-blown war would breakout.
In 1820 Missouri wanted to join the Union as a slave state. As this would ruin the balance between Slave states and Free states in the Senate, Henry Clay proposed the Missouri compromise. This arranged it that while Missouri was admitted as a Slave state, Maine was also admitted as a free state. It also created an imaginary line along the 36o latitude, where slavery was allowed below it but prevented above it. However they limited themselves by only applying the Compromise to lands gained in the Louisiana purchase. This led to conflict after the Mexican war in which America gained new territories in the West. This doomed the Missouri Compromise, which was probably the most promising of the three. Had the Compromise been applied to all American lands then perhaps it could have succeeded. Instead the Missouri Compromise failed and only led to further conflict between north and south in the future.
The people of the North and South each believed fiercely in their cause, one for a free people the other for life servitude. Neither group, based on the documents presented were willing to budge regarding their beliefs. They North wanted to abolish slavery completely and the South could not understand why they had to give up their way of life because the concept was so ingrained in them as a people. The two completely different ideals could not co-exist peacefully and therefore the eventual climax of this issue, the war, was an inevitable
The act effectively nullified the Missouri compromise of 1820, and gave the two new territories an opportunity to choose, through popular vote, whether they would permit or outlaw slavery. Southern slave holders viewed the act as a chance to spread slavery into the new territories and Northern free-staters saw a means to end it. Pro and anti-slavery advocates poured into the new territory of Kansas to help sway the vote in their favor. The stage was set for democracy to act, the people could choose, and they chose violence. Not a year after the act was signed Kansas turned bloody and the infamous “Bleeding Kansas” began. The issue of
In the years leading up to the Civil War, there was great conflict throughout the United States. The North and South had come to a crossroads at which there was no turning back. The Secession Crisis is what ultimately led to the Civil War. The North and the South disagreed on slavery and what states would be free states. The South despised Lincoln's election and rose up in revolt by forming the Confederate States of America.
The Civil War was a battle between the northern states and the southern states. The southern states wanted to secede
The Republicans nominated Civil War General Ulysses S. Grant, he was a great soldier but no political experience.
When victory in the Mexican War resulted in the US expanding its territory all the way to the Pacific Ocean, the question was now whether or not to permit slavery in the new territories. The debate over slavery increased , creating a bigger gap between the states who wanted slaves and the states that did not have slavery . the new Republican Party swept the 1859 elections in the North and the party’s candidate Abraham Lincoln, and accepted the problem of the expansion of slavery, Which caused north carolina and other states to secede causing the whole problem, leading to the civil war.
The United States of America has always disputed over the amount power the federal government had in regards to what the federal government could control through laws. Federalist and Anti-Federalist argued for years because they could not agree if the United States should or should not have a powerful central government (Kennedy). Even after those parties transformed into different parties, the continuous debate over the amount of power the federal government should have continued. The Civil War was fought over slavery and Southern States seceded from the nation to display dominance over the federal government and eradicate laws made by the federal government the South did not support, such as those regarding slavery (Causes of the Civil War).
Considered one of the most prevalent turning points in American history, the Civil War impacted every person in that era, and continues to do so today. While slavery is well-known to have been the principal cause of the war as a whole, multifarious reasonings were also responsible for the blood stain in history.