Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay on civil disobedience
Comment on civil disobedience
Comment on civil disobedience
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: An essay on civil disobedience
Assignment #8
Civil disobedience is a main focus of discussion in chapter six of James Rachels’ The Elements of Moral Philosophy; this can be defined as a usually peaceful, but powerful act of protest against a law or demand from the government. Normally when one would non-violently refuse to obey a certain law, they would see that the law was unjust to them.
Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. is a prime example of this act of disobedience, and said, “The end justifies the means, even though the means are regrettable.” He however did not question the legitimacy of the American government but rather the particular laws that he and others felt were unjust. The civil rights movement was started by Dr. King, in which he found that it would be against
his morals to not stand up for himself and other people of color. If one man found a law immoral, like the fact that black citizens were denied basic human rights, and he was able to gather many followers who shared the same beliefs, then it coincides with the social contract theory’s definition of morality. Rachels explains that for the social contract theory, “Morality consists in the set of rules, governing behavior, that rational people accept, on the condition that others accept them as well.” This definition corresponds to Dr. King and his views of morality and human rights.
Civil disobedience is being disobedient to certain laws in a peaceful, but active manner. So the person who commits civil disobedience must actively rejects to follow certain laws of government and peacefully accept the consequences. For example, Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. is a typical example of modern civil disobedience. He actively rejected to follow
The act of civil disobedience existed for a long time, dating back to the Shadrach, Meshach, Abednego, and early Christians. The height of the civil rights movement was the 1950’s to 1960’s. During this time period, many activists fought for racial equality and rights. Civil disobedience was practiced by these people who fought for racial equality and rights. Martin Luther King Jr. and Atticus Finch in To Kill a Mocking Bird used civil disobedience as an act of fighting back against injustice in order for a better society. These two people, Martin Luther King Jr. and Atticus Finch, of the time of the 20th century practiced civil disobedience in the name of justice.
Civil disobedience is the refusal to follow or demand laws or rules. Taking a stand on issues of justice in society may be important or redundant to many individuals. In my case, taking a stand on issues of justice is important. Individuals take a stand on justice so they can change issues, speak for people who can’t speak for themselves, and fight for what they believe in.
In the Theory of Justice by John Rawls, he defines civil disobedience,” I shall begin by defining civil disobedience as a public, nonviolent, conscientious yet political act contrary to law usually done with the aim of bringing about a change in the law or policies of the government”.
are regarded as unjust” (Schlesinger). In order to eliminate injustice, or at least the most unjust law in the system , people may start disobeying that particular law. Thoreau, Gandhi, and King each were closely related on the concept of civil disobedience, they all thought that the government was in need of fundamental transformation. However, they did support the non-violence movements. I would not say that this was very pretentious--their resort to nonviolence did reflect their morality and religious judgements ,but this is not accurate enough to work one hundred percent. Some people think of civil disobedience as something that must be limited, no one knows to what extent or degree, civil disobedience is always in search of limits.
Comparing the Civil Disobedience of Martin Luther King Jr., Henry David Thoreau, and Mohandas Gandhi. From the onset of man fighting for freedom or his beliefs, the question has always been whether one person can make a difference using words rather than wars. Philosophically, the concept of civil disobedience would appear to be an ineffective weapon against political injustice; history however has proven it to repeatedly be one of the most powerful weapons of the common man. Martin Luther King Jr. looked at the way African Americans were treated in the United States and saw an increase in inequality.
“...It becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another (person)...” Thomas Jefferson wrote in the Declaration of Independence. Civil disobedience is when you exercise the right of the people and protest peacefully against the government. As we read in Jefferson’s writing, as well as Martin Luther King Jr. and Mohandas Gandhi’s. According to our great writers civil disobedience builds a great framework to promote change.
Civil disobedience, is often the last step that people take to bring attention to a topic or subject that they feel strongly about. Every day is full of unjust rulings that may not be to everyone’s liking. Many people fight for what they believe in even if the outcome is bleak. You are your own self and you will always have your opinion that may not match all other citizen’s. Civil disobedience has escalated to a majority of non- violent protesting, although there are some cases including violence. It is a form of rebelling against what they feel is unfair or unconstitutional. Showing civil disobedience is an act that you must be willing to accept the legal consequences, which may include incarceration.
Civil disobedience as a whole is often a vague conception; so what is it exactly? Merriam-Webster dictionary defines it as “refusal to obey laws as a way of forcing the government to do or change something.” This is often seen as protesting. Civil disobedience occurs throughout the world; the United States, India, Hong Kong, South Africa (practiced inconsistently), Japan, and many other countries. Each country has its own laws and rights vary, but on a basic level a lot of countries have freedom of speech. One specific example is in the United States Constitution; the First Amendment states, “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.” This basically states that denizens of the United States have the right to protest, as well as freedom of speech and freedom...
The definition of civil disobedience is the refusal to obey certain laws or governmental demands for the purpose of influencing legislation or government policy, characterized by the employment of such nonviolent techniques as boycotting, picketing, therefore nonpayment of taxes. Civil Disobedience is a type of action that involves the public following an important figure trying to forewarn the authorities of the intended action they plan on bringing change to certain laws or government policies. Anyone who participates or encourages others in civil disobedience are willing to accept the legal consequences of their actions. Throughout history, civil disobedience has proved to be an important mechanism for social change furthermore has helped impact societies and governments. The Boston Tea Party, the U.S. Civil Rights Movement, the Suffragette Movement, led by leaders like Martin Luther King Jr. and Rosa Parks are all an example in acts of civil disobedience.
Thoreau’s Civil Disobedience, Douglass’s “What to the Slave is the Fourth of July?”, Harriet Tubman, and Rosa Parks portrayed cases in which civil disobedience is justified. These people go against the law is some way to do what they believe is right. They risk the chance of being punished for, not only themselves, but others too. Without these acts of civil disobedience, others would not feel that it is okay to speak up for their beliefs. Martin Luther King Jr. once said, “One has a moral responsibility to disobey unjust laws” (Tag). Do not be afraid to stand up for what it right and against what is unjustified. It is a big responsibility to go against the law but in the end, it could very much be worth
Civil disobedience, in a general sense, is when a group of people come together to protest inequality or political decisions of a higher authority. Civil disobedience has been seen throughout the world ever since a governmental type system was devised. The reasons why people enact civil disobedience are extensive but John Locke’s explains The Second Treatise of Government, why civil disobedience even exists and what stimulates
Civil disobedience is an active resistance to an unjust law found in a society. This purposeful violation of a law has influenced many changes in societies throughout history and around the world. Some view civil disobedience as having a negative impact on a free society with resistances disturbing the normal order of their lives, but actually the protests are only making the world a better, more equal place for everyone living there. Civil disobedience also establishes the idea that change can take place and be effective with the absence of violence.
Civil disobedience is the act of opposing a law one considers unjust and peacefully disobeying it while accepting the consequences. The courageous souls that have chosen to partake in civil disobedience have shaped our society today. If it wasn’t for them our country would be in a entirely far worse state than it is now. We owe our gratitude to those who sacrificed their safety and freedom to stand up for what was right even when authority said otherwise. From Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. with the Civil Rights Movements to The Natives protesting the pipelines at Standing Rock. We as citizens of a nation made for the people can never stop fighting unjust authority.
Civil Disobedience, the act of opposing a law one considers unjust and peacefully disobeying it while accepting the consequences, is often used to describe the large Civil Rights Movement of the South from 1954-1968 and some of the recent, largely broadcasted, election riots. The phrase ‘civil disobedience’ which has become increasingly more popular these past few months to describe the protests following the results of the presidential election, is not really following the true peaceful civil disobedience that is intended and was portrayed in the historical movement throughout the South. While the past civil rights movement positively affected our free society, these protests, the new ‘civil disobedience’, are negatively affecting our society today.