Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How do christians practice environmental ethics
How do christians practice environmental ethics
How do christians practice environmental ethics
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How do christians practice environmental ethics
Christians, the world over, have been given the important task of stewardship of God’s creation. The problem is, Christians and non-Christians alike have become so driven to make money that concern for the earth and it’s well-being have fallen by the wayside. As Rich Deem states, “As Christians, we should be doing everything Jesus commanded, including taking care of our families and all the resources He has given to us.” (Deem, 2009) This phenomenon has been going on since the Industrial Revolution. Urbanization is a huge culprit of environmental destruction and those who remain in rural areas to farm the land are often overrun by the industrialization of even farming. This problem continues to be ever-increasing, as society moves more and more to a self-centered viewpoint and acts solely for its own interests. There are many changes that need to be made to combat the problem of the desecration of all that God has entrusted to humankind.
The first thing that needs to be realized is that God created the world and considered its creation “good.” This is often overlooked, even by Christian believers, who sometimes only look at the verse that says we are to “subdue” the earth. (Gen. 1:28, NIV) It needs to be realized that subdue and abuse do not mean the same thing and humankind has come a long way beyond subduing and has crossed the line into abusing the earth. The earth was created to allow humankind to be sustained with plenty of food, good water, and all needs met. Instead, we have stripped entire forests in a matter of hours in order to meet our own interests in the building of homes that are far above and beyond the meeting of our needs. We blast entire mountains to build roads for our chemical fume spewing vehicles so that, w...
... middle of paper ...
...ronment in which we live. Even though these steps can be taken by anybody, Christians should feel that these steps are very important in preserving the creation that has been entrusted to them. There should be a feeling of urgency in every Christian to protect that over which we are given stewardship. No one has stated this better than Berry when he said, “What I have been talking about is the possibility of renewing human respect for this earth and all the good, useful, and beautiful things that come from it.” (Muller & Wiener, 2009. p. 336)
Works Cited
Berry, W. “In distrust of movements” from Citizenship Papers.
Deem, R. (2009) Is Christianity anti-environmental? Retrieved from: http://www.godandscience.org/apologetics/environment.html
Muller, G. and Wiener, H. (2009). To the point: Reading and writing short arguments. New York: Pearson Education, Inc.
Palmer, William. "Rhetorical Analysis." Discovering Arguments: An Introduction to Critical Thinking, Writing, and Style. Boston: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2012. 268-69. Print.
In the journal of Environmentalism as Religion, Paul H. Rubin discuss about how environmental is similar to religion. Rubin want everyone to know that the environment and religion are somehow similar in a way, which they both have belief system, creation stories and original sin.
As students we are taught that in order to have an effective argument, we need a claim, reasoning, and evidence. When comparing, “Two Years Are Better than Four” by Liz Addison, and “Colleges Prepare People for Life” by Freeman Hrabowski it was made obvious that the passage written by Addison had a more effective argument because of the passages claim that was clear to the readers, great reasoning and evidence that backed up her claim.
The author of this book Steven Bouma-Prediger main argument is Christians need to live more earth-careful lives and being called to be caretakers is not optional. The responsibility to care for the earth is a part of our faith. Early in the book the authors takes you back to your first encounter with nature he does to make his topic relevant and personal to the reader. He then opposes his first question, how much do we actually know about where we live? He states that this question shows us how little we know about our trees, plants, flowers, and the patterns of the moon. This is also his first argument in which he said if we do not know our earth we are destine to use and abuse it. Understanding and caring about nature is necessary to live properly on this earth. Chapter 1 (page 21) “we are for what we love, we love only what we know, we truly know only what we experience.
There are many examples of strong argumentative writing in the second half of the book Everyday Arguments. Topics of writing examples include today’s college student, the internet, sports, earning your living, diet, and reading popular culture. Of the writings, two stood out as notable works to be critiqued; Who is a Teacher, and Thoughts on Facebook.
This quotation opens your eyes, I know of no one who wants to destroy the earth either. The majority of man kind doesn’t think too much about what is happening to the earth due to their actions. When most of us drive a car or spray deodorant we don’t think of the consequences. It is the responsibility of those who create problems to help fix them and prevent them from happening again. In society today it i...
Ramage, John D., John C. Bean, and June Johnson. Writing Arguments: A Rhetoric with Readings. 9th ed. Boston: Pearson Education, 2012. Print.
As time passes, our population continues to increase and multiply; yet, on the other hand, our planet’s resources continue to decrease and deplete. As our population flourishes, human beings also increase their demands and clamor for the Earth’s natural products, yet are unable to sacrifice their surplus of the said resources. Garret Hardin’s work highlighted the reality that humans fail to remember that the Earth is finite and its resources are limited. Hardin’s article revealed that people are unable to fathom that we indeed have a moral obligation to our community and our natural habitat — that we are not our planet’s conquerors but its protectors. We fail to acknowledge and accept that we only have one Earth and that we must protect and treasure it at all costs. Despite all our attempts at annihilating the planet, the Earth will still be unrelenting — it will still continue to be present and powerful. Human beings must recognize that we need this planet more than it needs us and if we persist on being egocentric and covetous, in the end it is us who will
In the final chapter of the Pope’s encyclical he talks about how “Many things have to change course, but it is we human beings about all who need to change.” The Pope stresses that we need to educate ourselves on the environment and the issues of the world, which would then in turn (hopefully) change people’s attitudes towards the environment and the issues we face and also change their way of life to be more integral and responsible to the earth. The Pope claims that “A great cultural, spiritual and educational challenge stands before us, and it will demand that we set out on the long path of
An environmentalist is a person who worships the environment and cares for nature more than people. Christians and others share the common perception that environmental ethics exist for how human beings should relate to the land, the free market, and the environmental. Humans share a relationship with all creations of the earth. But as humans, they find themselves as having a role in the created order, which is they have a closer relationship with the creator who has charged them with acting responsible within his creation. Even allowing a common complaint of environmental activists is that Stewardship means that the earth was made exclusively because of human beings - that having dominion over nature is the same as having the power and authority of dominion.
“The environment is God's gift to everyone, and in our use of it we have a responsibility towards the poor, towards future generations and towards humanity as a whole,” (C.V. 48). Whether it is one man or an entire nation that suffers from poverty, humans have the moral obligation to help those in need to make ourselves better. “The Church's social doctrine has always maintained that justice must be applied to every phase of economic activity, because this is always concerned with man and his needs,” (C.V. 37).
Christian theology states that God created the earth and gave it as a gift to humans to be shared with all other living creatures. This belief is known as the “Creation-centered approach to the natural environment” (Massaro, p.163). This approach emphasizes the value of nature by recognizing humans as being an equal part of God’s creation under which all “species deserve protection” (Massaro, p.163). With such publicly known cases of pollution like the BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico or Bethlehem Steel’s pollution of Lake Erie decades ago, it is evident that humans have been using the environment in accordance with the Stewardship or even the Dominion model, both of which place humans above all other creations. According to Massaro, Christian theology also explains that showing “disregard for the air that others breathe and the quality of the water they drink is to sin against God” (Massaro, p.162). This type of disregard destroys humankind’s relationship with all other living organisms.
“Unless humanity is suicidal, it should want to preserve, at the minimum, the natural life-support systems and processes required to sustain its own existence” (Daily p.365). I agree with scientist Gretchen Daily that drastic action is needed now to prevent environmental disaster. Immediate action and changes in attitude are not only necessary for survival but are also morally required. In this paper, I will approach the topic of environmental ethics from several related sides. I will discuss why the environment is a morally significant concern, how an environmental ethic can be developed, and what actions such an ethic would require to maintain and protect the environment.
Christians Helping to Perserve the Environment Many Christians believe that God created the World and also made man to be its stewards i.e. To look after something that does not belong to you. Christians who want to be good stewards attempt to protect the World and the rest of creation, by dealing with environmental problems e.g. a major oil of the coast of Spain, or forest fires in Australia. Examples of these stewards are "Green Peace" who try to overt environmental disasters and clear up others. Another example is the "RSPCA", who work to prevent cruelty to animals. As most Christians believe God created the Earth for people to live on and multiply, they give thanks to their creator in many different ways: Well Dressing:
Killing plants without thinking that they are his coat, his food and medicine. Man does not have the slightest appreciation and consideration about the other living beings. Some people made their living by destroying and annihilating our environment. Man bombards the earth and all living things that come cross him with a destructive force. We could make a list of all things that man has destroyed or that had attempt to destroy in his time on earth and each generation has done the same, as if it were the last to come to exist. Such is the destructive urge of man alike trying to destroy his past, the historical past and the assets of mankind. Nowadays they are organization that are fighting to protect the environment and to stop the advance of civilization. The preserve of the environment should be a convergence of cultures, where all united fight to protect the planet. It is a shame but we are far from this to become a real fact. There are some many unconscious people that only consider the human life as the only worthy life to preserve; without thinking that life goes to all living organisms. We are just one among billions of species and life forms. To humans, it took millions of years to become the dominant specie. Man is risking their own survival if the accelerated destruction of the