Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Government and their roles in everyday
Roles of government
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Government and their roles in everyday
“How in a functioning democracy could this figure have climbed over dozens of appealing, able and engaging men to make war and shape peace?” (Matthews 25-26). In this rhetorical question, Chris Matthews forces the reader to understand the realities of politics and government. According to Matthews, to find success in politics one must play a game to earn votes, rather than actually perform the sole duties of government. The reflection, caused by the rhetorical question at hand, allows the audience to understand and visualize the fact that government is a game with no rules, which means outsiders with no experience or qualifications are able to achieve as much success in government as career politicians. In fact, this question gives implies …show more content…
a principle that many government officials, leaders, and members cannot just simply serve their constituents, but must also bolster their careers and identities in politics. “People saw their hard-won benefits and options being siphoned off to fund the health needs of all comers…. [P]eople were eager and quick to refuse [Hillary’s offer]” (Matthews 61). In this excerpt, Chris Matthews relates how the American voters refused, then First Lady, Hillary Clinton’s proposition for a single payer, universal health care system. Matthews gives insight to the anger and frustration the American voters created due to way in which Ms. Clinton explained and revealed her bill to them. Matthews relates that Ms. Clinton did not speak directly to the middle-class voters but rather to the ones who would have most obviously benefited from a universal health care coverage system, the working class. This relates to the reader that the American voter is fickle and makes emotionally based decisions. The fact that voters rejected a system, already proven to work and flourish accross globe, allows the reader to understand how American voters are unique in the way they reject logic because of emotions, such as anger and frustration. The middle class did not understand they would benefit just as much as others as Hillary Clinton failed to directly reach out to them and settle their unfounded fears and concerns, according to Matthews. In fact, this excerpt also gives insight as to why identity politics in the United States is so prevalent, as it is necessary to ensure all groups believe they are receiving total attention from a political party or campaign to achieve political success. “Washington produces just two things; the paper currency we all use and the political currency that politicians use” (Matthews 78).
In this quote, Chris Matthews details the intangible nature of the work that takes place in government as deals and agreements are what allow decisions and policies to be enacted. In fact, Matthew discusses in two later chapters the importance of deals in government as they allow bonds and alliances to be created amongst lawmakers and parties. To be successful in government, according to the Matthew’s premise, one must do more than create and vote for bills. One must make connections, create alliances, form friendships, and organize a posse in order to produce effective, successful results in the government. However, this quote also reveals another characteristic of Washington D.C., which is the fact that politics and government is a game. One does not simply earn the votes and credentials by doing the right thing, one must also take part in the skillful art of creating deals and connections to create a pathway to government positions of …show more content…
influence. “When someone makes an unfair attack, the onus is the victim to set the record straight” (Matthews 125). In this quote, Chris Matthews reveals the unfair realties of political attacks or smear campaigns. Rather than just doing the right thing, and not spreading lies about a political opponent, politicians often resort to fabricating stories and slander to diminish the reputation of their opponents. Chris Matthews relates to the reader that the victim of an erroneous or false accusation is responsible for debunking or clarifying the attack. In fact, Matthews gives insight to the fact that the attacker often is able to create uncertainty among voters for a victim, regardless of that attack or accusation was true. This wholly explains the unfair aspect of politics. In addition, it explains the fact that serving in politics is a game, rather than being a simple or duty or task to perform. “In a democratic society, leaders wield a different sort of authority: they become powerful by appearing powerful” (Matthews 193).
Chris Matthews’ ultimate observation about government reveals that politics is often superficial. Matthews explains that a power figure in government may essentially have the same expertise as a senator’s intern, but it is his or her appearance that determines his or her powers and abilities. This is a powerful message to the audience as it explains that the way they present themselves, whether it be confident or timid, will significantly affect their power and status in society. Those who act as though they are confident, focused, and forceful, will be able to earn that distinction. This is what allows politicians to craft their political identities which they can use to their advantage when drafting bills, finding votes, and creating alliances, according to Matthews. In a sense, the audience is able to understand that the American voter is persuaded by the character of the politician they support, as that is who they believe will be representing them in
government. Hardball, by Chris Matthews, effectively explains why and how politics is a game played by experts. To begin with, Matthews’ purpose for writing this novel is to explain why and how the government of the United States operates the way it does. His knowledge and experience working with the media and government allows him to provide an informed analysis of that events that have taken place in Washington D.C. which in turns assists the audience in understanding the workings of their government. According to Matthews, government participation is essentially a performance, as the way one acts is just as important as what one knows. Matthews relentlessly offers insight to the audience regarding the performance skills they must adopt in order to achieve political success. Specifically, Matthews’ teachings on skillful persuasion techniques and on how to deal with opposition allows the audience to not only understand how politicians have been able to achieve political success, with laws, bills, and power, it also allows them to appreciate the realities of politics, that involve theatrics, tips, and tricks. From this novel, the reader is able to understand why and how government officials must do much more just simply serve and represent their voters. In order to achieve political success, politicians must create connections, persuade members to form an alliance for joint interests, and always cater to the constituents who voted for them. Ultimately, that main takeaway from this novel is that politics is an intricate framework of relationships that must be fully understood in order to amount any results. Chris Matthews’ extensive knowledge of important political figures lends itself to the greatest strength of his novel. The clear, informative insight Matthews provides alongside with his relevant examples that prove his theories true are what support the effectiveness of the novel. Because Matthews explains how an important politician figure employ the techniques discussed throughout the novel, the audience is able to fully able understand and apply the principle in their own lives. For example, when Matthews reveals that Ronald Reagan was able to turn the pressure on Congress to improve his MX weapons strategy, the audience is able to entirely comprehend the political art of eloquence used for persuasion. However, at the same time, the novel fails at detailing the actual processes of government, other than the deal making, politics aspect. If Matthews had explained the successes, as in passing bills, granting funding, and the election process, the readers would have been able to understand the significance and importance of finding success to a better degree. In a sense, Matthews is unable to explain the question as to why politicians want to succeed or what their personals interests would entail, as in their agendas. Throughout the novel, Chris Matthews takes an objective stance on government and politics. When discussing political failures, such as Hillary Clinton’s universal health care plan, he does so by solely analyzing the facts at hand, instead of creating an ad hominin argument. He does the same when analyzing a president’s claim to fame, by primarily referencing the facts that explain why events happened the way they did. For this reason, the novel offers clear, unbiased information that truly assists the audience’s understanding of politics and government. This novel’s insightful information, backed by unbiased evidence, lends itself to being a highly recommend novel for all. Because of the cleverly selected evidence, the audience is able to understand the principles that Matthews discusses and ow to apply them in their own lives. In addition, the novel also presents deeper insight and analysis regarding the American political establishment that has allowed the game of politics to develop. The novel’s high level information, presented in a clear, understandable style, is thoroughly helpful and insight for all audiences.
The excerpt “Congress: The Electoral Connection” written by David Mayhew centers around the fundamental arguments that discusses how members of congress are self-interested for reelection. Mayhew further elaborates on his idea by discussing the electoral activities that congress members devote their time into and resource from, which are advertising, credit-claiming, and position taking. Mayhew’s excerpt further examines the framework in how congress operates which contributes to the explanation of how and why congress partakes in the certain electoral activities.
... appropriately gave to the different sections of the book. Matthews does a great job of explaining the game of politics to even I, who doesn't know much about the game, or even care much for the game. Through the use of understandable examples that have occurred throughout this century, Matthews enables anyone to see the tactics that politicians use in getting ahead in Washington. The language that Matthews uses sometimes is not understandable, but this is only to those like myself who aren't too familiar with political vocabulary. Although the title threw me off a little in the beginning, I was able to get the full sense of what Matthews was talking about. I will no longer look at Washington as a place full of dull, boring old men. Washington is all politics and only those who can play hardball will survive.
Double edge sword is what lies at the heart of Roach’s issue with the American political system. While the public’s trust for their elected officials continues to disintegrate because of backroom deals and a poor transparency, it is exactly what the American political system requires its participants to do in order to be effective deal makers and according Roach, “Campaign contributions and smoke-filled rooms, pork is a tool of democratic governance, not violation of it. It can be used for corrupt purposes but also, for vital ones.” Roach argues that the public must take the good with the bad, they do not have to like it or agree with it, but they must see the importance that each side plays. Roach believes that it has been within the past 40 years that publics growing mistrust for the American political system has pushed toward favoring disintermediation, populism, and self-expression over professionals and political insiders.
What motivates members of Congress to act the way they do? Mayhew would argue in Congress: The Electoral Connection that members of Congress are ‘’single-minded re-election seekers’’ and that re-election is their one and only goal. Whilst the assumption that all members of Congress are ‘‘single-minded re-election seekers’’ does go some distance in analysing the motives behind members of Congress, the reading fails to take into account the other key goals of members of Congress. Other goals include good policy and future career positions. It is important to remember that the achievement of both re-election and other goals are not exclusive, members of Congress often are motivated by more than one goal.
Buying media slots for candidates, which used to be a small business just over half a century ago, has grown so that these companies manage “more than $170 billion of their clients’ campaign funds” (Turow 230). This fact about the growth of such an industry should at a minimum raise an eyebrow, as it characterizes the shift and importance this data analysis has become. It also serves as an important point because it fuels the common fear of corruption in politics, as this data essentially offers a window to the responses and how people think to what politicians say. This could lead to the next phase of the “polished politician” where candidates will say statements that statistically receive favorable responses from the population. This strong pathos is a central pillar of the argument Turow is trying to make, effectively playing the emotion of pity from the hypothetical family situation, and building it into a fear of the system and establishment. Such emotions are strong motivators, and this combination encourages the reader to take action, or at the very least inform someone they know about such issues they weren’t even aware were
As seen quite often in the Obama administration, legislation gets stuck and lost in Congress due to the polarization of the parties in recent years. In Obama’s case, he has frequently threatened to go around the House and Senate if they could not reach an agreement or would shoot down his plans. Cato’s Pilon points out, however, that the hurdles of Congress are no mistake. Pilot states that the framer’s of the Constitution knew what they were doing, and this was intended to keep the checks and balances as well as accountability to the public (Lyons,
The game of hardball is all about keeping up a good reputation to your peers and to the public. A successful politician can build up alliances. It is definitely impossible for someone to make their way to the top without any help. Instead of getting help, a person could make a mistake by “limit[ing] their horizons to missions they can accomplish alone” (15). These people ultimately lose the game. Matthews describes one way to forge an alliance in the maxim “It’s better to receive than give”. While confidence is a good thing, too much pride can end in disaster. A way to avoid looking too confident is asking for help. During the General Elections of 1978, Jimmy Carter asked for the help of those who had lost on election night. This is wise because they looked for work and wanted to be needed. Votes and alliances can be made simply because of a feeling of inclusion in the process. A politician asking for help is “offering a chance to join in the political action, to be part of his success”...
He also explains that the public succumbs to the stereotypes that support the government: news, law enforcement, and politicians. Lippmann then points out that the “visible government” is the aftermath of the assumptions made by the public about democracy. Lippmann argues, “the substance of the argument is that democracy in its original form never seriously faced the problem which arises because the pictures inside people’s heads do not automatically correspond with the world outside” (Lippmann 19). This argument makes sense because the interpretation of symbols and fictions, as well as propaganda and stereotypes, differentiates person to person. As democracy has developed, the pictures inside people’s minds have pushed it from its original form. Concurrently, the people in power have the same distorted picture in their head. He continues this evaluation by saying, “for in each of these innumerable centers of authority there are parties, and these parties are themselves hierarchies with their roots in classes, sections, cliques and clans; and within these are the individual politicians, each the personal center of a web of connection and memory and fear and hope” (Lippmann 13). This places the public at risk because their leaders are acting with a pre-disposition to certain stereotypes and the effect trickles down to plague the
In chapter 3 he encourages the exchange of favors. He mainly focuses on others doing favors for you. Matthews incorporates Jimmy Carter’s plan on hiring people who worked in failed companies. The mentality behind this is by offering work in their time of need will create this sense of gratitude towards the former president. Politics is all about understanding what people want and getting in tune with the minds of others. Chapter 3 circles that concept and giving advantages on how to make yourself almost indispensable in the eyes of some people; having a more personal connection with people so they would not have a reason to vote against you. Even chapter 4 and 5 show this type of mentality; viewing politics as a mind game and playing tricks to succeed. For example, chapter 4 discusses loyalty and keeping the mentality of “What have you done for me lately?”. By doing little favors for someone after certain periods of time so they can remember it easier. Even chapter 5 discusses the relationship a politician should have with their enemy. This novel shows the lifestyle a politician must lead to be acceptable as a
The public falls into three main traps about politicians. The first main trap that the public falls into is “The Leader-and-Follower Trap.” The public wants politicians to be leaders, but when they do not lead the way citizens want, they are disliked. Expecting politicians to lead the way they believe the country should go and also follow what citizens want is unfair to them, (Medvic p. 9). Another trap that the public falls into is the “The Principled-and-Pragmatic Trap.” The public wants politicians to stand up for their beliefs, but to also negotiate to solve issues...
South University Online. (2013). POL2076: American Government: Week 4: People and Politics—Interest Groups. Retrieved from http://myeclassonline.com
In the excerpt from Politicians Don’t Pander, Lawrence Jacobs and Robert Shapiro argue that politicians do not cater to what the public wants, but rather ignore the preferences of the American people to mold a version of public opinion that is harmonious with the politicians’ own views. The two recognize different patterns in contemporary American politics. First, politicians disregard public opinion in order to avoid compromising their policy goals and use the strategy of crafted talk to change public opinion to avoid facing the consequences of not voters’ preferences. Jacobs and Shapiro continue to argue that politicians respond to public opinion by either assembling information on public opinion to design government policy or by using research
An example would be a politician who managed to get a major bridge built in their district let the bridge be named after themselves. It would be also a congressmen’s desire to be seen as the cause of benefitting constituents mutually helpful. For candidates who are trying to win an election, the “image” or impression they give has been very important in politics. And through credit claiming, the image of the candidate would definitely give an impact to the people to vote for them. First impressions are extremely important as it is the factor of success or rejection. It shows the personality and how it can come across to voters. Politicians are aware of how the public views them and take years to build trust, make connections, and establish a vision for a community. However, one negative comment or distrustful action can destroy the foundation. There has to be an image of confidence, in order for citizens to trust politicians. As body language plays a significant role in public communications, it delivers a level of comfort leading the public and the standings of their ideas. Politicians must also keep calm in high- pressure situations, such as debates. Strong images must be kept whenever the public’s attention is on them, as every word and movement matters. Since public politicians are constantly in the public eye, image has been important as to how they appear
In deciphering what constitutes the brilliance of democracy then, we find that it is not citizens’ ability to make informed decisions or an unflawed and subtly manipulated election process, but the unapparent way in which democracy persuades citizens – informed or not - and leaders – corrupt or not – toward working to build better, more prosperous societies.
Politics is the means for attaining valued things. Although, valued things are different in every society, the means of securing those things has never changed. The competition for power, authority and influence will always be the backbone of politics. Applying power, authority and influence to the valued things that support the public good, will produce the quality of life a society desires. In the present day, citizens in the United States demand certain valued things such as welfare, education, safe streets and healthcare. Through politics, citizens can apply their power in many different ways to get the things they want. Power is the ability to get someone to do something they may or may not want to do. Through the use of or the application of coercion, persuasion, manipulation and negotiation, power is used to influence the system.