Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Organization transformation
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Organization transformation
Change is constant in any industry whether its personnel movement or technology advancement organizations are looking to get a head. Many organizations restructure their business constantly and this may lead to more jobs or loss of job. In today’s society beginning able to keep up with change is necessary. If a company fails and continues with old patterns and does not seek to get ahead the company can fall behind, which may lead to detrimental effects within the organization. As stated by Ready (2013) “It is often necessary to make big changes in organizations. Companies get locked into old patterns, fall behind competitors, or otherwise end up poorly aligned to their markets and objectives.” In taken a closer look and reflection into Barrett’s tenure there where different changes that occurred in Barrett’s three year with Intel.
Barrett’s stint as CEO began to make changes at the beginning of his tenure. Barrett’s started to change the culture of Intel by hiring outside consultant in order to change the mindset by allowing employees to focus on customer relations and drive always from the competitive atmosphere. He also committed to venturing into new technology market that would cut down on production cost for chip making in hopes to increase the sales compare to the other competitors. Barrett’s did not stop there he make to reorganize within the organizations by splitting up departments and making new areas such as the Architecture Group in order to create and enable better decisions and coordination. Although, Barrett’s decisions were still beginning studied you can take that Barrett’s tenure was a successful one. However, Intel did experiences some set back from reorganization such as declining markets and hypercompetion.
...
... middle of paper ...
...ies not only for the organization but to continue to make Intel a better company. His character should determination and hopefully the next CEO will surpass all expectations as a leader.
Works Cited
Bolgar, C. (2013). How Emerging Markets Are Changing The Investment Landscape. Retrieved http://online.wsj.com/ad/article/assetmanagement-landscape
Palmer, I., Dunford, R., & Akin, G. (2009). Managing organizational change: A multiple perspectives approach (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.
Mullins, J.W. & Walker (2014). Marketing Strategies for Mature and Declining Markets. Retrieved http://answers.mheducation.com/business/marketing/marketing-strategy/marketing-strategies-mature-and-declining-markets
Ready, K. (2013). A Hidden Risk of Bug Organizational Change. Retrieved http://www.forbes.com/sites/kevinready/2013/07/24/a-hidden-risk-of-big-organizational-change/
Palmer, I., Dunford, R., & Akin, G. (2009). Managing Organizational Change: A Multiple Perspectives Approach (2nd ed.). New York, N.Y, USA: McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
Spector, B. (2013). Implementing organizational change: theory into practice. (3rd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ
Clearly Polycom’s success does not just stem from quality products and services, but also from the employees who are in the trenches every day; creating new products, increasing productivity, maintaining and increasing customer satisfaction, excellent customer service, etc. Foresight, innovation, and strategic planning are a daily routine to keep the company a successful competitor in the market. It is without a doubt that Polycom needs qualified leadership. High caliber leadership/management is vital to successfully run a global enterprise of this statute. Constant re-organization and product structure changes are necessary to adapt to current and future consumer demands. I interviewed one of the leading managers at Polycom to find out what it takes to keep the machine rolling and what the typical duties of a manager entail.
McShane, S., & Von Glinow, M. A. (2013). Organizational Change. Organizational Behavior (6th ed., p. 436). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill / Irwin.
Palmer, I., Dunford, R., & Akin, G. (2009). Managing organizational change: A multiple perspectives approach (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill
Intel's business grew a bit in the years to come as it got bigger and made improvements on the way that products were made, and produced a wider range/variety of those products. Even though Intel created the first publically available processor (Intel...
Palmer, Ian, Richard Dunford, and Gib Akin. Managing organizational change: a multiple perspectives approach. 2nd ed. Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin, 2009. Print.
Jack Welch is one of America’s best known and most highly respected corporate CEO’s of all time. Vadim Kotelnikov’s website Leadership and New Management Secrets discusses how Jack Welch’s vision to restructure General Electric to a “unique learning culture and boundaryless [sic] organization” has help make GE one of the fastest capital growing companies. In the 1980's he was said to be “the biggest S.O.B.,” but today his management techniques are now credited with empowering the employee (“Jack Welch Gurus”). Management guru Jack Welch, former CEO of General Electric, has been instrumental ...
From 1980 to 1996, Apple’s competitive range in the PC industry was rocky. Although Apples products were unique and well built, they were overpriced compared to competing products from IBM and others. As competitor prices dropped, Apple prices stayed the same and the company saw a decline in sales as customers opted to purchase from its competitors. John Sculley, former CEO of Apple, took many steps to improve the company’s competitive advantage. One of those steps was to compete with price by producing a low-cost computers that appealed to a mass-market. The second step was to form an alliance with rivals IBM and Novel in order to create new operating systems and applications...
These products, built upon incredible foresight and attention to detail, carried tremendous customer loyalty and high margins. Apple management must bridge the perceived innovation gap with some sort of product breakthrough. Otherwise, it is reasonable for the company to accept lower Street expectations built upon the premise that while the company remains an exceptional production, distribution and branded business, the days of unparalleled enterprising innovation and leadership may be ebbing. The best things to do, by Cook, would be to have a VP that replace the innovation brought by Jobs and be in charge only on innovation.
Change is a fundamental element of individuals, groups and all sorts of organizations. As it is the case for individuals, groups and societies, where change is a continuous process, composed of an indefinite amount of smaller sub-changes that vary in effect and length, and is affected by all sorts of aspects and events, many of which cyclic are anticipated ones. It is also the case for organizations, where change occurs repeatedly during the life cycle of organizations. Yet change in organizations is not as anticipated nor as predictable, with unexpected internal and external variables and political forces that can further complicate the management of change (Andriopoulos, C. and P. Dawson, 2009), which is by itself, the focus of many scholars in their pursuit to shed light on and facilitate the change process (Kotter 1996; Levin 1947; et al).
According to the casing study, Intel’s “Rebates” and Other Ways It “Helped” Customers Intel paid customer huge pay. As the dominating company, they purposely paid other companies not to use ADM products. They paid Dell 6 billion dollars over a 5 year period (Velasquez, 2014). In addition, they knew ADM would not be able to compete with them: they took advantage of their size and used their rebate program to try and ADM from advancing in the x86 processor industry. In addition, Intel’s monolply-like behavior is displayed in the terms of quality. They did not care about customers wanting the reliable x86 processors, they wanted to monopolize the market with their product, and would pay a huge amount of money to achieve their
In September 2011, Hewlett Packard’s CEO, Leo Apotheker was fired and replaced within a year of being hired. The quick involuntary separation from the company came as a shock to many people. Apotheker was an experienced business executive with much knowledge. Hewlett Packard’s Chairman, Ray Lane stated, “the problem with Apotheker wasn't lack of vision as much as a lack of execution and communication” (Goldman, 2011). Lack of communication was one thing that caused Apotheker to lose out what could have eventually turned into a successful career with Hewlett Packard.
... will continue to be. It is not cheap and often requires trade-offs. It requires a commitment of resources, time, and money. For these and other reasons, change is difficult to initiate and impose. Even after establishing need, developing a plan, and attempting to embed it into the company culture, it can fail. But it is far more likely when those who will implement the change also participate in the development of the change. Internal support is essential to reducing resistance and ensuring success of the plan. Moving forward without this support will only amplify the investment and the difficulty. The change management process mostly focuses on performance and outcome; however, the most important aspect is the attitudes and behaviors of the employees. They can be major obstacles to innovation and change. Constant communication is imperative to successful change.
Keeping up with technology is difficult, tiresome, and firms find it very costly to keep at pace with it. Technology rapidly and constantly keeps on changing. Being at par technologically requires extensive research and strategic analysis of acquiring new innovation. Enforcing new technology requires staff retraining and in some cases making employees redundant.