Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The pinochet era in chile
The pinochet era in chile
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The pinochet era in chile
NO. Directed by Pablo Larrain. 2012. Chile: Sony Pictures Classic, 2012. DVD. The film’s setting is in 1988 during Chile’s Berlin Wall moment. The genre of the film is drama and historical fiction. The film was directed by Pablo Larrain in 2012. The major actors in the film were Gael Garcia Bernal, Alfredo Castro, and Luis Gnecco. There was only one actress in the film and that was Antonia Zegers. NO was a very dramatic and inspirational movie that showed the hardships of people’s lives in Chile. It was very intense throughout the whole movie with the military’s rough involvement with the President Augusto Pinochet. The film was put together very well and stayed with the main topics of the movie the entire time. It had great editing, actors, screenplay, and dialogue. There were no mistakes anywhere throughout the film. The film also had a great sense of what the world in 1988 in Chile looked like and how a person dresses, they were spot on with the costumes. The film was very interesting and it really opened my eyes to how harsh the presidents and the military behind them were. The film …show more content…
starts out with Rene Saavedra as a creative ad maker for a soda company. He was in the store trying to sell his soda product called Free. Then walks in Jose Thomas Urrutia interrupting his sell to tell him that he needs to design the campaign for the resistance movement’s fifteen minutes of fame. They wanted Rene to be the designer because he had a way of seducing people with his good looks and very quiet voice. The resistance wanted him to make a very breathtaking campaign for NO. In class we haven’t really talked much about Chile and their government. As I was going through my notes, though I could compare the government of Chile to the government of Iran. As I could see in the movie there was a mismanagement of government, poor planning, and corruption and in Chile just like there was in Iran during the 1970’s. There were multiple disregards of human rights, imprisonments, exiles, and people disappearing out of the blue. It was up to the people to decide who they wanted to rule their country, but most of the time the people were afraid of the already ruling president and their military. President Pinochet had a secret police force called DINA. They were going around terrorizing the people of Chile so they wouldn’t vote for the resistance. The main themes of this film would have to be military, government and Augusto Pinochet.
These three themes were the ones that caught my eye the most. Military was the biggest because of how much influence they had over the people and also how they could just push around and threaten people without even getting in trouble for it. The government was another big player because they had rule over everyone and could make all the decisions that would affect the people of Chile. Then we have President Pinochet, who decided to bring attention up his international legitimacy by holding an election to decide whether he should continue as president of Chile. That right there just came across as big headed and cocky. Pinochet just gave me a bad vibe right when he did that in the film because I knew he thought he had this vote right in the bag because the people of Chile were
terrified. NO is a very inspiring and emotional film that explains the lives of the people of Chile and their President. NO captivates the election based on the President who decided to bring attention up his legitimacy by holding an election to decide whether he should continue as president of Chile, after there has been an aggressive dictatorship. There for fifteen years. Then Rene Saavedra comes into play as this soda salesman just trying to rekindle his love with his wife that comes to his house every night just to tuck his son into bed. The great campaign maker and seducer of the people to try to get Augusto Pinochet out of office along with his military. Which there happens to be a great outcome at the end of the film. The campaign NO was created to speak to the hearts of the people of Chile and motivate them to go and vote. As you read in the above paragraphs that the people of Chile were terrified by Pinochet’s secret police the DINA. DINA stands for, National Intelligence Directorate. As an answer to the people fears Rene said, “Everyone wants to be happy”, “Happiness will be the campaign”, “Happiness is coming to you vote NO!” That message also got celebrities to come out and join in delivering the message: “Chile: Happiness is coming.” The activist won the campaign because of their extreme work in the happiness campaign. They didn’t attack President Augusto Pinochet, they just promised the people of Chile a happier and brighter future. 97% of registered voters went to the polls to vote and the NO campaign had about 56% of the vote. For a moment YES was ahead in votes, but the final results were that NO won! It was really extreme but very moving because the military surrounding the Pinochet Headquarters withdrew from Pinochet’s and forcing him to concede. A new Chile is being born!
The film tells two distinct stories. The first story is a light hearted ethnic comedy about the growing friendship between an Italian American (Bruno, a man with little positive to say about illegal immigrants finds himself working with one in this film) and a Mexican immigrant (Ignacio) both struggling with their co-dependency for each other and the stronger need for a paycheck. The second story tells us about just how uncertain the life of a migrant worker can be.
Alfredo Corchado — is the author of the book named " Midnight in Mexico:A Reporter's Journey through a Country's Descent into Darkness”. We are, probably, all interested in finding out the facts, news, and gossips about Mexico. This country was always associated with something mysterious. For me personally, the title of the book seemed to be very gripping, I was interested in revealing the secrets of life in Mexico, thus I decided to read this book. I was really curious, what can Alfredo Corchado tell me about the life in this country, the country, where the constant massacre is the picture, people used to see. In his book, the author tells the reader about the real situations, which took place in Mexico, reveals the secrets of the people’s lives and tells the story from the “inside”. He describes the way he lives his life, and does his work. The " Midnight in Mexico: A Reporter's Journey through a Country's Descent into Darkness” is a memoir. Author tries to transform his own experience into the story line. Corchado shows the reader the darkest episodes of Mexican society, while relying on his own experience.
The relationship between the working class and Allende is definitely a difficult to understand because it's hard to understand how a political party is supported by the same group who contributes to their downfall. The working class was not the only reason Allende lost power, but was a heavy contributor. The working class seemed to only use Allende as a reason to enforce reform, and Allende used the working class as a group of supporters. The two groups could only agree on the fact that Chile needed serious social change, and Allende was the best shot they had.
This is a movie in another movie that has a story from the past that is repeated nowadays: the same conflicts between exploited and exploiters, enslavement, injustice, protection of the public against those who put a price, and also the story of how the union of many sometimes gets what seemed
The main characters in the film include Sebastian and Costa, who happen to be lifelong friends. Sebastian is a compulsive visionary who strives to direct controversial a film about one of history’s most influential figures, Christopher Columbus. He is determined to escalate the “myth” that western civilization's arrival in the Americas was a force for good. Instead, his story is about what Columbus set in motion; the hunt for gold, captivity of, and penal violence to those Indians who fought back. His story is counteracted by the radical priests Bartolome de las Casas and Antonio de Montesinos, the first people to ra...
Mosquita y Mari is a story that focuses on the relationship between two Chicana teen girls in East Los Angeles. Growing up in immigrant households Yolanda and Mari are expected to prioritize their families’ well-being. As the storyline progresses, unexpected feelings and desires for each other begin to surface.
The movie, “The Perfect Dictatorship” (“La Dictadura Perfecta”), directed and produced by Luis Estrada and released in 2014, is a political, satirical comedy story of two reporters attempting to repair the image of a corrupt governor after he signs a deal with the boss of their television company, Television Mexicana. That’s one way we could describe the plot of the movie. Another would be that the movie depicts the inherent corruption of the Mexican government and the lengths to which they will go to retain (or regain) their reputation. Equally, we could see the movie as a demonstration of the corruption of the Mexican media and the ways in which the media influences and effects politics. In fact, the
As the first major U.S. success for a Spanish language film, Como Agua Para Chocolate (Alfonso Arau, 1992) has had a major impact on Hispanic culture and the future of Hispanic cinema. This film has many implicit and explicit layers that challenge typical cultural ideals, not only in Hispanic culture, but in various cultures across the world. Based on his wife, Laura Esquivel’s novel, Arau used this film, known commonly as Like Water for Chocolate, to bring to the surface the liberation of females through the empowerment of food. Although food and cooking are often associated with the oppression and generalization of Hispanic women, Like Water for Chocolate captivates an empowering view of women using intimate and heightened cinematography of the food.
The film “Camila” was produced in 1984 and directed by Maria Luisa Bemberg (1922-1955). Based on the true story of Camila O’Gorman, an Argentine woman who falls in love with a priest in 1840’s Buenos Aires, this story dealt with the terrifying reign of Juan Manuel de Rosas. Camila is from an influential family and is betrothed to a Rosas loyalist. She is passionate and daring, just like her grandmother, and reads books that have been censored by the ruthless Rosas. When she falls in love with Father Ladislao, the two flee Buenos Aires and assume new identities as school teachers in a small village. During a party, a priest from Ladislao’s old church recognizes Ladislao and turns them both in. They are both executed by firing squad even though Camila is pregnant.
Pinochet ordered a removal of all that was left in Chile. Over the next few years more than 3,000 supporters of the Allende regime were killed. Pinochet was also responsible for thousands of Spanish citizens being tortured. Pinochet’s period of power is described as a nightmare of killing and repression.
One of the issues that was raised is the idea of the relationship between femininty, technology and sexuality. The relationship between all of these qualities converse in one character, Maria. The real Maria has many roles thoughout the movie, including one who cares for the workers children, a preacher of peace for the workers, and one who loves Freder. The machi...
Sicario is a 2015 film starring Emily Blunt, Josh Brolin and Benicio Del Toro. The movie is directed by Denis Villeneuve and is a realistic take on the war against drugs on the border of US and Mexico. In many aspects this is a perfect movie: editing, acting, movement, photography and sound. Though the story is nothing to write home about, the subject matter remains serious enough to write to Obama about. As crucial as it is to win the war on drugs the movie does a great job at showing the dark underbelly of the US secret operations. Not everything is done by the books and the events that do make it onto the news may be a glossy fabrication of propaganda. The story does not have major plot twists or jaw dropping story elements and that is what makes it grounded. The plot understands what it is and makes room for the real hooks of the movie.
The story was compelling since it showed the perspective from both sides being told from the soccer players, the fans, coaches, sports writers, and anyone who could add any historical perspective. Despite the film being about soccer, the meaning is much deeper in a sense that it actually sends a message to the audience about the history between the two cultures from the Monroe Doctrine to the Mexican-American War and finally to where Mexico is now with the United States. Furthermore, not only can this film relate to Mexico, but it can also relate to other countries in Latin America because throughout the years, North and South America have always been intertwined in all aspects of political, economic, and social
Every person lives in their own personal world; their own sense of reality. However, sometime these realities are not as they seem. As everyone is caught up in their monotonous lives, they become accustom to their own view of the world, not always realizing the world of their fellow man. Being sheltered from the reality of the world can only be challenge as one begins to question their privilege and look at the worlds who others face. Luis Puenzo’s The Official Story follows Alicia, an upper class women with a husband and an adopted daughter, as she is exposed to the corruption of her country Argentina. While other films may focus on the governmental aspect of the dictatorships, Puenzo shares a relatable retelling of how a military dictatorships
...ple of Chile had mixed opinions of General Pinochet with primary source Karen expressing her views of the dictatorship and what it did for the country. Nevertheless, there are some crucial elements which cannot be pushed aside, for example, the murders, the mass arrests and tortures as well as the exile. These things cannot simply be left out of the question. Although the media always puts a dark side to any story, the legacy of Augusto Pinochet might not have been too far from the truth, with many sources suggesting that he was a traditional dictator. And he was not a president that saved Chile from communism; he established a dictatorship that could not be challenged, murdered, tortured and imprisoned without trial, for the singular reason of having different political views, which is why General Augusto José Ramón Pinochet Ugarte is not a benevolent dictator.