Mr. McCoy’s testimony revealed that his first issue is regarding the custodial parent (CP), Sabrina Durant Hawthorne. He stated the CP has not had his daughter, Daisha Durant, since she was three years old. He stated he mailed the court order that stated that the child support was to stop to the DHR. He stated he received a garnishment from his bank account and did not understand why. He stated that he called Child Support and was told that he owed the CP $3,000.00; he did not understand why he owed the CP money when the case was closed. He also stated that his aunt, Shirley McKee, has had the child since 2000, the child is 19 years old now and the child support case was closed.
Mr. McCoy stated his second issue is regarding his daughter, Cierra Sanner’s mother, CP, Chinureye Sanner. He stated that they left the State of Alabama in 1997; and he left in 1998. He stated his daughter is 21 years old now; he still pays child support to the State of Alabama, and he is still in arrears. He stated he does not know where the money is going and that he would like to know where the money
…show more content…
DHR’s response: Based on the NCP allegation that the past due support is incorrect. The Child Support Enforcement Division (CSED) has reviewed the facts and finds no error. The lien/levy process is based on outstanding arrears balances and not on payments that are court ordered. The CSED has reviewed the facts concerning the joint account and determined $448.12 will be released back into the joint account. The lien/levy remains in effect. It is not revised or released and please contact the county caseworker in reference to balances and case specific questions you need
Judge Fahey felt that affidavits provided by Dascoli’s mother and ex- girlfriend in support of Dascoli were weak and insubstantial, as well as not credible given the fact the defendant had the opportunity to advise Kelly of first aggressor evidence failed to do so. Additionally, in reference to an affidavit written by a medical expert, Fahey states that his conclusion was “without sufficient factual basis, and is, at best, conjecture and
Zisko asserts that Reilly failed to mention to bar counsel that he is currently married to Elaine Menice, therefore due to the nature of their relationship she did have a right to obtain the requested records from the Sheriff’s Department. The post-divorce matter was in reference to child support, and was resolved shortly after the subpoena was issued. As a result of the matter being resolved Zisko didn’t obtain a court order to further pursue Reilly’s employment records. Zisko’s response will be discussed in more detail further on in this
Facts: Plaintiff Donald Eschbach and Defendant Rite Eschbach were married in 1963 and divorce in 1979 the courts granted Plaintiff Eschbach the divorce on the basis of the couple lived separate and apart pursuant to a separation agreement for one year. The custody of the couple three children was granted to the mother to an oral stipulation of the parties entered in the minute of the court at inquest of the hearing held on January 1979. The stipulation, which also provided visitation rights for the children’s father, was incorporated but not merged in the judgment of the divorce.
I chose to explain Casey Anthony’s behavior using the eight stage theory of identity and psychosocial development by Erik Erikson. If Casey claim against her father and brother is true about them sexually molesting her throughout her childhood, then that would have played a big role in her life and also the fact that she and her mother had a terrible relationship with a lot fighting and abuse toward one another didn’t help her case. If we take a look at Erik’s fourth stage industry vs. inferiority, it states that during this stage school aged children are very social stage of development and if they experience unresolved feelings of inadequacy and inferiority among our peers, we can have serious problems in terms of competence and self-esteem.
Richard Arzu brought action against his father, Frank Arzu, and step-mother, Estanisalo Arzu, alleging misrepresentation and fraud in connection with a medical malpractice action settlement monies which Frank entrusted to his father; and seeking compensatory damages and related relief. The Supreme Court, Bronx County, Silver J. , vacated ex parte order of attachment against defendants’ real and personal property. The son appealed to the Supreme Court, Appellate Division. Justice Sullivan held that the son was entitled to attachment of defendant’s property in light of evidence that they had disposed of or secreted son’s money, with intent to defraud son. The Supreme Court, Appellate Division, reversed the decision of the lower court.
The Police report that there were several calls reporting of the parents were using drugs, and not feeding little Kayleigh, although the police also indicated that the house were safe environment for the child and there was no indication of abusing, the police did not connect child welfare because of no evidence of any kind. The mother and the boyfriend are being charge of felony “assault on a child, causing death to the little baby girl and both admitted of killing the little baby girl, both of the charge are includes special circumstances while the prosecutors await on a piece of information before convicting the mother and the boyfriend. The new also indicated that both of them are being held 25 years to life in prison if they are found convicted.
In Wade F. Horn’s article “Promoting Marriage as a Means of Promoting Fatherhood,” Horn discusses how having a child and being married is better for children because the father is more involved in the child’s life. Kathryn Edin and Maria Kefalas’s “Unmarried with Children,” on the other hand, takes the reader through Jen’s story about getting pregnant at a young age and deciding not to marry the father of her son. While both sources make appeals to emotion, reason, and character, Edin and Kefalas’s article makes more successful appeals and thus is the stronger argument.
Sarah is 26 years of age. She has four children of her own. Her children are Shelby Brown dob 2/9/07 born in Springfield, Il, Robert Brown dob 5/23/09 born in Springfield, IL, Charlie Lake dob 11/14/10 born in Springfield, IL, and Jenna badger dob 1/14/12 born in Springfield, il. Sarah's preferred language is English. Sarah has prior DCFS involvement with her own children. Sarah stated that in 2014 her ex husband, Timothy Masters, spanked her son Robert and left and red hand print on him. School reported the hand print. DCFS came to her home. By the time Sarah was notified her ex husband had destroyed her home while leaving before DCFS Came to investigate. Sarah was charged with the neglect of her home due to the conditions Timothy left the
In late October of 2015, Mrs. Holmes filed for divorce against Anthony Holmes. The couple has been living together for seventeen years and married for fourteen. Two years prior to the marriage of the couple, Mr. Holmes began a now successful computer business which generates about $2.2 million in annual income. Two weeks ago, a prior administrative assistant sued Mr. Holmes for child support, claiming he is the father of her nine month old son. Mr. Holmes has denied the claims and says that she has been married for five years. Mr. Holmes has two minor children of his own with Mrs. Holmes. The situation of the case is that Mrs. Holmes is asking the court for custody of the children, spousal and child support and ½ of all of the property they
Madison County DHR’s testimony revealed that this case opened in February 2008; the custodial parent (CP), Tekisha Triplett, requested paternity and the establishment of an order for child support. At the time, the non-custodial parent (NCP), Nelson Pierce, resided in the State of Missouri. In December 2009, on the behalf of Alabama the State of Missouri issued a child support order.
On 3/16/17, Hennepin Child Protection accepted a report alleged physical abuse, domestic violence of Destiny Jennings by half-brother, Montez Jennings. Per reporter Destiny and Ms. Jennings came home and Montez began threatening Ms. Jennings states he was going to “knock that smile off your face” and "you're really gonna get it if you call the police. Per reporter Montez was throwing food at Ms. Jennings and approached her then Destiny stepped in and Montez pushed Destiny away. Per reporter Ms. Jennings had to go outside to call police as Montez threatened to knock the phone away if she tried calling police. Per reporter Ms. Jennings went to the garage because she was afraid for her safety.
Child custody is a difficult and sensitive matter. During the disputes people go through multiple interviews, background checks, and other privacy invading matters. Child custody evaluations are need when parents are divorcing. This is all done in order to obtain custody of one or more children. The children do not have to be the parents biological children in order to be able to fight for custody of the child. In the evaluations multiple factors are taken into consideration. Through the entire process the most important aspect about the outcome of the evaluations, is that the child’s best interest is always the main factor. Child custody evaluations attempt to investigate and find the best situation for the child between the parties fighting over custody.
After half an hour of searching, finally I have the opportunity to observe a court in person for the first time. At the 302nd Family Court in downtown Dallas on the 3rd of Dec, 2013, the case I was observing was a child custody case between Anna Smith and David Smith. The case number as show on the board outside the court is DS-12-08126. Furthermore, the Judge of 302nd Family Court is Tena Callahan.
In chapter 10 the book talks about Juvenile courts. Juvenile court is a court of law that has jurisdiction over minors. The purpose for juvenile courts is to offer juveniles justice and treatment. In most states, juvenile court purpose clauses fall into one or more of five categories (Synder and Sickmund 2006, 98). The five categories are balance and restorative justice clauses, standard juvenile court act clause, legislative guide clause, clauses that emphasize punishment and traditional child welfare. In all states the courts puts children under three classification. The first one is those who are neglected or abused. The second is status offenders. The third is those who broke the law. There has been several issues on deciding if a child can tried in an adult court. What’s the appropriate age? The nature of the crime depends on if the child will be tried in adult court or not.
Due to the increased recognized differences between adults and juveniles in terms of needs and developmental capabilities, offender’s treatment differ depending on whether they are treated in an adult or juvenile court. In the adult court jurisdiction, public safety and retribution are the most salient tenets while in the juvenile courts the best the intentions are intended towards the best interest of the child focusing on rehabilitation. The best goals and objectives of the juvenile court sanctions aim at ensuring that the youth in trial at the juvenile court desists from delinquent behavior and thus easy to be reintegrated in the society once more. This fact is mainly achieved through offering the youth individualized case management programs