Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Child protection in a wider concept
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Child protection in a wider concept
Nicholas Menezes
Mrs. Morgan
English 15(13)
9 November 2015
Saving Children in America
“Car accidents are the leading cause of death for children ages 1-12 years old” (Nienstedt 140). The disturbing fact is many of these unfortunate accidents could have been prevented with the use of proper child restraints. Many of motor vehicle deaths involving child are because a child safety seat was not used or not properly installed. In the United States there are some crucial steps that must be taken in order to reduce the number of future death due to caregiver negligence. Child safety seat law should be made of a national level in order to eliminate any gaps in the current state-to-state child safety seats laws. Theses law need to be made to reflect
…show more content…
When a child is first born the infant is placed in a rear-facing car seat. These seats keep the child reclined at a slight angle facing the rear of the vehicle. It is recommenced that a child be keep in the rear-facing car seat until the child reaches the weight and height limit specified but the child safety seat manufacturer, usually around 2 years of age or 22 to 40 pounds. When a child is no longer able to be safely restrained in a rear-facing seat the child then graduates to a front-facing seat. These seats commonly include a five-point harness and allow the child able to sit straight up. Caregivers are encouraged to keep their children in the five-point harness for the maximum amount of time recommended by the manufacturer. Children usually remain in the forward-facing car seat until they are about 4 years of age (“Car seats”). All children who have grown out of a forward facing seat should then be place in a booster seat. These seats are designed for children who are too big for a forward facing car seat but are still to small to fit properly in an adult seat belt. Children must remain in a booster seat until he or she has reached four feet nine inches, usually around 8 to 12 years of age (Ebel …show more content…
Many state have legislations with high safety standards which require what is safest for child passengers, but this is not so for many others. Inconsistencies in legislation translate into difficultly enforcing child safety seat laws and low safety standards misguide caregivers who may use the laws to determine what is safest their child. In addition, many state fines for child restraint violation are not in accordance with the severity of the offence; Steeper penalties for violator would convey the seriousness of the offence and urge parents and caregivers the adhere to the law. One solution that would make motor vehicle travel safer for child occupants would be nationally regulated child safety seat legislation, which would quickly and effectively insure safe standards are consistent
In North Carolina, the “Click It or Ticket” program was put into place in 1993 by former Governor Jim Hunt to increase safety belt and child safety use rates through stepped up enforcement of the state’s safety belt law. According to North Carolina’s safety belt law all drivers and front seat passengers over the age of 16 are required to wear safety belts. Children less than age 16 are covered under the North Carolina Child Restraint Law. This law requires that children must be buckled up no matter where they are seated in the vehicle. Violators of the safety belt law are issued tickets and are subject to a fine of $25 plus $50 court costs. These violations have been defined as “infractions” and are not entered on driving records. In addition to this, effective January 1, 2005, any child less than 8 years old or 80 pounds in weight must ride in a booster seat. Violations of this law will result in a $25 fine plus court costs as well as having 2 points placed against driver’s license. However, drivers cited for this violation of this law for a 5,6, or 7 year old will be able to have the charges dismissed if they present proof to the court that they have acquired an appropriate restraint for that child. Statistics have been gathered on safety belt use since this program began and has shown that seat belt use has increased from 65 percent to 84 percent. It has also shown that fatal and serious injuries in North Carolina have been cut by 14 percent. Resulting in a savings of at least $135 million in health care related costs. Other positive ef...
The leading cause of death for U.S. teenagers is motor vehicle accidents. More than 5,000 of our teens die each year in crashes. For the purpose of this topic, “teenagers” encompasses ages ranging from 15- to 20-year-olds. I am proposing legislation to address this issue.
“The Signs of Safety approach is a relationship-grounded, safety-organized child protection framework designed to help families build real safety for children by allowing those families to demonstrate their strengths as protection over time. This strengths-based and safety-organized approach to child protection work requires partnership and collaboration with the child and family. It expands the investigation of risk to encompass strengths and signs of safety that can be built upon to stabilize and strengthen the child’s and family’s situation. Central to this approach is meaningful family engagement and, in particular, capturing the voice of the child” (http://www.cebc4cw.org/program/signs-of-safety/detailed). Because this approach proposes a framework for child welfare it offers broad applicability to the areas of juvenile justice, foster care and adoption. If one looks at the principles of this approach across all child welfare settings it is evident that they can be used as a map for assessing and planning, building constructive relationships, and improving communication.
An outline of current legislation, guidelines, policies and procedures within own UK Home Nation (England), affecting the safeguarding of children and young people.
In 1966, the National Highway Safety Bureau (NHSB) was designed by the Highway Act. NHSB’s director, Dr. William Haddon, noticed that he could prevent motor-vehicle injuries by applying public health methods and epidemiology. Various passages demanded the government to set standards for the highway and motor vehicles. The federal government responded by developing new safety features in cars such as safety belts, head rests, and shatter-resistant windshields. Barriers, reflectors, and center line strips were placed on roadways to provide direction and illumination. Traffic safety laws, wearing a safety belt, and public education encouraged drivers to make safer decisions. The use of safety belts has skyrocketed from 11% in 1981 to 68% in 1997 and decreases When the community and government understood the necessity for motor-vehicle safety, various programs such as Prior to the implementation, the rate stood at 18 per 100 million vehicle miles traveled in 1925; however, the rate stood at 1.7 per 100 million vehicle miles traveled in 1997. With all of the new safety features with cars, public education and enforcement of safety laws, “motor-vehicle crashes remain the leading cause of injury-related deaths in the United States.” Over 23.9 million vehicle crashes were reported in 1997; estimated costs were around $200 billion.
The imprudence of drivers causes immoral reputation and increases costs. According to the Department of Health Policy and Management, individuals who do not use seat belts are more probable to have outstanding hospital payments. Adding also that Insurance status increases periodic charges for vehicle titleholders as a method to reimburse the money that irresponsible individuals are pending. By the same reason, every year insured car owners pay extra for coverage because they are required to do consequently. Furthermore, certain government laws impose drivers to use a seat belt while driving. For instance, a number of states have declared specific laws with the purpose of reducing the effects of an accident. As an example, fines for those car drivers who drive lacking a seat belt go from fifty to two hundred dollars, depending on age and unbelted passengers. Similarly, minors unbelted are under the responsibility of the car user so it would be a fine of the similar amount if not used a seat belt. Government has to try to impose the law beholding for the best of
Every person who has gets behind the wheel of a motor vehicle will be involved in some sort of automobile collision at some point in his or her lifetime. Traffic accidents account for over twenty thousand deaths each year and more than ten times as many injuries. There are a number of factors that contribute to these types of collisions, however, new and evolving laws can account for a large portion of successful preventable measures. In order for laws to be changed or added for the purpose of safer roads and highways, lawmakers have to first look at what factors contribute to such unsafe conditions. The top five causes of automobile accidents that cause injury are distracted drivers, driver fatigue, drunk driving, speeding, and aggressive driving. Laws can be proposed to reduce and even eliminate each of these risks.
After the incident, I began doing some research on teenage car accidents at the advice of the officer who had responded to the scene. What I read about and learned was frightening. In 2008 over three thousand teen deaths occurred, either as a passenger or driver in a ...
Even though there are some statistics that may show a lower rate of injury or death if you wear a seat belt when in an automobile accident, I do not feel that the government has the right to make wearing a seat belt mandatory for adults because by making seat belts mandatory it takes away from our right to freedom of choice, and wearing a seat belt does not eliminate the risk of injury or death as people have been injured and/or killed due to wearing a seat belt Current seat belt law originated from federal legislation in the 1960s that made it mandatory for all automobile manufacturers to include seat belts in their vehicles as a standard feature. Originally, the purpose of a seat belt was not to protect the occupants in the case of a crash, but rather to physically keep them in the vehicle, as driving was bumpy business. However, in today’s times, mandatory use of a seat belt falls under various states purview. Each state implements its own laws regarding enforcement of seat belt use.
The seat belt or safety belt is a safety harness designed to secure the occupant of a vehicle against harmful movement that may result from a collision or a sudden stop. As part of an overall automobile passive safety system, seat belts are intended to reduce injuries by stopping the wearer from hitting the hard interior of the vehicle, or other passengers, when in the correct position for the airbag to deploy it prevents the driver and passengers from being thrown from the vehicle. Seat belts absorb the energy of the impact by being designed to stretch during any sudden deceleration, so that there is less speed differential between the passenger's body and their vehicle interior, and also to spread the loading of impact on the passenger’s
Using seat belt when driving can help us to prevent death when an accident occurs.
When a person dies in an accident or become disable because of an accident, it is not only a single life will be effected by a preventive accident, it is about the emotional connection to those life of so many life who will be suffering because of the devastating accident. According to the U.S. Center for Disease Control and Prevention, “In 2013, 2,163 teens in the United States ages 16–19 were killed and 243,243 were treated in emergency departments for injuries suffered in motor vehicle crashes.1 That means that six teens ages 16–19 died every day from motor vehicle injuries”(CDC). Today alarming numbers of teens are dying not because of drugs, not even from drinking and driving, but because of the accident which could have prevented. Today smartphone is gaining popularity on all ages, particularly among the teenagers, and these smartphone also fueled teens who were already engaging on phone while driving. Report published from American Psychological Association that, parents are having a direct role on distracting their kids while they were driving. Forty three percent of teens said that they talk to their parent while driving and another twenty six percent of teen text. ( in need intext citation )If we have so many data and research that are saying loud about the fatality number on distraction teens while driving, why parents are forcing their kids to die. According to the National Highway Traffic Administrations year 2011 report, teenager from age fifteen to nineteen years make ten percent of all drivers who involve in a fetal crash who were distracted while operation moto vehicle; most of them were using a cell phone (NHTSA 2015), we have to acknowledge the risk of our decision and that five seconds of time spending off of road to read a massage will cost a life and
Car accidents are the leading cause of death for people under the age of 35. Wearing a seat belt can prevent death in about half of these accidents. Did you know that every 15 seconds someone is injured in an automobile accident if they are not buckled up, or that every 13 minutes someone is killed in a crash. Failure to wear a seat belt contributes to more fatalities than any other single traffic safety related behavior. According to the National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration seatbelts saved nearly 12,000 lives in the United States in the year 2000. The NHTSA estimates that more than 9,000 U.S. car accident fatalities in 2000 would have been avoided if the victims had been wearing seatbelts. Sixty three percent of the people killed in accidents were not wearing seat belts. The NHTSA a...
There is a strong reason why Texas is stressing so much on the child safety system. The injury and choking hazards have been increasing almost every day due to improper usage of child safety system. It is highly quintessential to use the right restraint for your kids’ age, weight and height. When you meet with an accident, the force from the car crush might increase the risk of hurting your kid and if the common seat belts are used it might be too small for the child or may not fit appropriately at all.
Cuts, bruises and even broken bones will heal, but damage to your brain can last a lifetime. You can prevent possible injuries from unforeseen disasters such as smacking the street, sidewalk, curb, a car, tree or anything else around you by using safety precautions. In some cases, we are required to use safety measures, while in others we are merely advised. For instance, while driving an automobile, the law requires for all occupants in the vehicle to wear safety belts. The reason for this law is because without using such cautiousness, fatal accidents would be more frequent. In the same respects, safety should be required for bicycle and motorcycle riders. Various injuries from an accident can be prevented with the correct use of a helmet. The United States does not have any federal laws requiring bicycle helmets to be worn (“Bicycle Helmet Laws”). States and localities began adopting laws in 1987, but there is no formal central registry for helmets (“Bicycle Helmet Laws”). A total of twenty states have adopted laws, including the District of Columbia as a "state", and at least 135 local laws (“Bicycle Helmet Laws”). Seventeen states have no state or local helmet laws at all (“Bicycle Helmet Laws”). According to The Bicycle Helmet Safety Institute, the state laws that require cyclists to wear helmets only end at the ages between fifteen and eighteen years old. As a result, children are required to wear a helmet, but it is not mandatory for adults to use these preventive measures, it is merely advised. Since accidents are inevitable, it is impossible to predict the outcome of a tragedy. Therefore, the law should include statutes that require all cyclists, regardless o...