Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Summary of chief seattle speech
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Summary of chief seattle speech
In his oration to Governor Stevens, Chief Seattle tries to persuade the whites into treating his people with more respect, even though his people are seen as inferior. Through his use of metaphors, religious ethos, and multiple allegories, Chief Seattle is able to show Governor Stevens that the Natives, although minimal in size and numbers, are not powerless. It’s evident that Chief Seattle intended to acquire some respect from Governor Stevens in his opening words. He referred to Stevens as the “Good White Chief” and the whites as his “Paleface brothers” to emphasize the absence of hostility between groups and to recognize their superiority. Not only that, but also through the use of metaphors such as “their hearts are black,” when describing his own tribe, Chief Seattle develops the idea that his tribe should be held responsible for previous conflicts. By implying an apologetic, respectful and responsible tone, Chief Seattle gains a favorable opinion from Stevens in his opening. About midway through his speech, however, Chief Seattle has a shift in view on their relationship. It goes from a relationship based on maintaining peace to the idea that a decent relationship between groups is rather unattainable. By promoting the idea that they are “two distinct races with separate origins and separate destinies,” Chief Seattle targets the …show more content…
conflicting ideals of their religious ethos to develop this tone of segregation. He refers to their God as one that “loves your people and hates mine”, proving that, in no fault of their own, a bond between the two groups is physically impossible to obtain. It wasn’t until the conclusion of his speech that one sees Chief Seattle's true purpose. By analyzing his words for their true meaning, one can quite evidently uncover a threatening tone toward Governor Stevens. One line in particular provides an easy to see representation of his view: “Your time of decay may be distant, but it will surely come, for even the white man whose God walked and talked with him as a friend with a friend, cannot exempt from the common destiny.” In the mind of Chief Seattle the Natives quite simply have nothing to lose, and they are willing to fight until their ultimate end for what they believe in. He knows that they are outnumbered and in that “these shores will swarm with the invisible dead of my tribe,” but what he also knows, and what he is beating into the skull of Governor Stevens is that “the dead are not powerless.” By attaining respect, emphasizing differences, and portraying an intimidating threat, Chief Seattle highlights his resentment on the unfair treatment towards his people.
Despite his calm portrayal of the situation at hand, Chief Seattle has warned Governor Stevens of the power that his people possess in a distinct manner. His oration was so deeply filled with metaphors, religious ethos, and multiple allegories that his purpose was blatant to both readers of today and Governor Stevens, and Chief Seattle knows that Governor Stephens may take their land and their lives, but he will never take their pride or their will to
fight.
It is a beautiful day in the area modernly known as southern Mississippi. The birds are chirping, the plants are growing, and the sun is shining. The day starts off like any other in this Native American community. The women began to tend the fields and the men are preparing for the next hunt. Suddenly, many strange figures appear at the entrance of the village. These figures appear to be men but these men are far different from any Native Americans they have seen. In the beginning, these men appear to be friendly and even exchange gifts with the local groups. Not for long these relationships began to change these white men began to disrespect the local chiefs and began to dominate the lands. Interaction of this kind was common along the Native Americans and the European settlers, however, it is not exact with every Native American group.
Not many know about Dragging Canoe and the battle he fought during the American Revolutionary War. The Native American’s role in the Revolutionary War was very important, but not well known. As a result, the Revolutionary War can come across as one-sided. Dragging Canoe fought for the Native American’s existence in the colonies. First, he was strongly opposed to Henderson’s Purchase or also called the Transylvania Purchase. Secondly, Dragging Canoe’s raid at “Battle of the Bluffs” became an issue for the colonists. And lastly, there was negotiating done between the British and Colonists would somehow effect Dragging Canoe, his warriors, and the future for the Native Americans.
When considering the birth of America, most people look to Christopher Columbus and the Pilgrims who landed at Plymouth Rock. In An Infinity of Nations, Michael Witgen looks to shed light on the role Native Americans played in the formation of early America. Witgen analyzes the social relationships between the European settlers and the indigenous tribes of the Anishinaabeg and the Haudenosaunee in order to tell the story of the westward expansion of early American civilization. Witgen depicts agreement and conflict between the colonizing groups while also explaining the formation of power within them – but his analysis is incomplete. The incorporation of Joan Scott’s and Michael Foucault’s definitions of gender and power relationships into
In Thomas King’s novel, The Inconvenient Indian, the story of North America’s history is discussed from his original viewpoint and perspective. In his first chapter, “Forgetting Columbus,” he voices his opinion about how he feel towards the way white people have told America’s history and portraying it as an adventurous tale of triumph, strength and freedom. King hunts down the evidence needed to reveal more facts on the controversial relationship between the whites and natives and how it has affected the culture of Americans. Mainly untangling the confusion between the idea of Native Americans being savages and whites constantly reigning in glory. He exposes the truth about how Native Americans were treated and how their actual stories were
Native American’s place in United States history is not as simple as the story of innocent peace loving people forced off their lands by racist white Americans in a never-ending quest to quench their thirst for more land. Accordingly, attempts to simplify the indigenous experience to nothing more than victims of white aggression during the colonial period, and beyond, does an injustice to Native American history. As a result, historians hoping to shed light on the true history of native people during this period have brought new perceptive to the role Indians played in their own history. Consequently, the theme of power and whom controlled it over the course of Native American/European contact is being presented in new ways. Examining the evolving
of Native American Culture as a Means of Reform,” American Indian Quarterly 26, no. 1
The goal of this paper is to provide an examination of the book “The History of the Ojibway People” by William W. Warren as well as express some of what I learned about the book, the author and the Ojibway people. William W. Warren, born of a white father and Ojibway mother, used his fluent familiarity with the Ojibway language and his tremendous popularity with both whites and Indians to document the traditions and oral statements of the Ojibway people at a time when the future of their existence was in jeopardy.
Native Americans have always been interpreted as “savage beast”. We are told the stories of the Europeans coming to America and their encounter with the Native by teachers, movies, and history books. When looking at the art of people “interpreting” the Native American the idea is still quite similar. Horatio Greenough work, Rescue, shows the common idea seen by most.
The story chronicles situations that illustrate the common stereotypes about Natives. Through Jackson’s humble personality, the reader can grasp his true feelings towards White people, which is based off of the oppression of Native Americans. I need to win it back myself” (14). Jackson also mentions to the cop, “I’m on a mission here. I want to be a hero” (24).
Native American identities, through sovereignty, have been beneficial to the people while also inflicting enduring adverse effects through treaties. This segment shows how Native American sovereignty has undergone change, destruction by the hands of white outsiders, and eventually recreation. In Indian Pride: Treaties and Sovereignty, John Echohawlk defines Native American sovereignty as: “making their own decisions, claiming their own land, and conducting government to government relationships with other governments.” Today, Native American tribes are granted sovereignty and their treaties with the United States are fairly upheld. This was not the case during the civil war. This sentiment is portrayed in Fools Crow, when Fools Crow states: “He has promised us that we would be treated fairly and we would be rewarded for the lands we have given up. He has promised us rations. But so far the Pikunis see nothing” (158). I believe this example also relates to Smith’s claim that “a range of social interventions that have been remarkably ineffective in dealing with communities” (231). While social interventions have been ineffective in the past, I was thrilled to discover that currently, there are three levels of government “federal, state, and tribal” (Indian Pride:
We should take careful notice of how Turner describes the role of native tribes in American history. The reason for this is that it proves to be very insightful into the kind of historical narrative that Turner presents to describe the ‘real reasons’ for why American’s expanded into the Western frontiers.
In Martin Luther King, Jr.’s speech, “I have a Dream,” he inspires the crowd to take a stand with the following words, “Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter.” Clay felt like he had been quite for far too long, listening to Lula the Hyena harass him with her belittling words. Lula tells lies, is deceitful, and manipulative; these characteristics represent the oppressive white community. I will describe to you how Clay’s reactions, Dutchman, were solely based on Lula preying upon his weaknesses, like the troubles that the black race felt while battling Civil Rights.
The movement westward during the late 1800’s created new tensions among already strained relations with current Native American inhabitants. Their lands, which were guaranteed to them via treaty with the United States, were now beginning to be intruded upon by the massive influx of people migrating from the east. This intrusion was not taken too kindly, as Native American lands had already been significantly reduced due to previous westward conquest. Growing resentment for the federal government’s Reservation movement could be felt among the native population. One Kiowa chief’s thoughts on this matter summarize the general feeling of the native populace. “All the land south of the Arkansas belongs to the Kiowas and Comanches, and I don’t want to give away any of it” (Edwards, 203). His words, “I don’t want to give away any of it”, seemed to a mantra among the Native Americans, and this thought would resound among them as the mounting tensions reached breaking point.
Joseph, Chief. “An Indian’s Perspective.” For the Record. 5th ed. Vol. 2. New York & London:
For example, in the local school, stereotypes such as the image of the ‘wild man’ are consolidated by claiming that there was cannibalism among the indigenous people of the northwest coast (Soper-Jones 2009, 20; Robinson 2010, 68f.). Moreover, native people are still considered to be second-class citizens, which is pointed out by Lisamarie’s aunt Trudy, when she has been harassed by some white guys in a car: “[Y]ou’re a mouthy Indian, and everyone thinks we’re born sluts. Those guys would have said you were asking for it and got off scot-free”