Charles Sanders Pierce's The Fixation Of Belief

"The Fixation of Belief" Charles Sanders Pierce discusses logic, knowledge, reason, and how we come about to believe what is true and what is not. He also describes four methods of fixing beliefs, which is the main focus of his article. Pierce first describes to his readers what believing and doubting are. He suggests that believing is a feeling of satisfaction and serenity, while doubt is one of unrest and dissatisfaction. that a state of doubt is simply one in which we struggle to pass from into a state of belief. He calls this struggle inquiry. And he states that the sole object of inquiry is the settlement of opinion. As humans we tend to have one problem though; as soon as we reach a firm belief, we tend to adhere to it wether it's false or not, mostly because of our then satisfied state. Here he goes into the first method of fixing beliefs: tenacity. This is a method in which people believe that if they cling to their views and never stray from their system of beliefs, they will forever be satisfied thus acquiring a great peace of mind. This method however, has a great flaw: social interaction tends to disprove false beliefs no matter how strongly the person believes them. People are influenced

by others. And doubt, no matter how small begins to seep in and the person will take note of others' beliefs and will become more and more susceptible to the truth (or what others believe to be the truth). The only way to avoid this is to live a totally isolated life.
P. 2The next method discussed is that of authority. This method resembles tenacity is its fundamental approach, but is somewhat more effective. In this method an authority figure (government, church/religion) more or less dictates a set of beliefs which its people and/or citizens are to follow with the threat of punishment for nonconformists. To the rational man's eyes, this system is always accompanied by cruelties, which in turn can become atrocities when consistently carried out. This method does have somewhat of a positive side though. It is evident that in every case the system of beliefs and values changes over time, but this takes place so slowly, it would be impossible to recognize in one's lifetime.
The third method of fixing beliefs is a priori which means agreeable to reason. Peirce says that "it does not mean that which agrees with experience, but that which we find ourselves inclined to believe" is an apt expression of this method. As in the first two methods, truth is'nt the primary concern, just the feeling of peaceful satisfaction.
The final method is that of science.

Peirce calls it a method to satisfy our doubts and the only one to make a distinction between a right and a wrong way. The only test on the first three methods is what the individual or state or whoever thinks, but using the scientific method, all people can come to the same conclusions, therefore those conclusions must be true. And experience of the method hasn't cause people to doubt it, but to believe it because it settles opinions beyond reasonable doubt. Therefore truth and true knowledge can come into existence for all humans who chose to believe in the scientific method. But we all use this method for a variety of every day observations, so in truth we all use this method, but not everyone believes that they believe in

it.