Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
123 essays on character analysis
Into the wild character analysis
Into the wild character analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: 123 essays on character analysis
“The best thing about memories, is making them.” In Jonas’s community no had ever made memories .They lived perfect lives in an utopian society, but never had a choice. Everything was chosen for them. Their jobs, names, and whole lives where planned out for them. I would not give up my life of making choices for a life of sameness. People make choices, good and bad, but these choices are what make us who we are and without them we would just be ordinary people living in sameness. In a world without color everything would be black and white. Living a life without color would be dull and boring. “ The life where nothing was ever unexpected. Or inconvenient. Or unusual. The life without color, pain, or past.” To live a life without color would be like drawing a beautiful picture without coloring it in. The world is the picture and without color it would feel as if something was missing. I would give up a life of sameness, of not making choices to be able to see color. I feel as if color is an important way to express emotions. Colors stand for feelings, for example yellow means happy. …show more content…
Love is a deep feeling of affection toward another person.
Living in a world without love would be pointless. There would be no one to care for one another. Without love no one would feel cared for or wanted. “There could be love”, Jonas whispered. In the Giver using the word love was not the right use of language. It was considered not the right use of precision of language. In the Giver no one loved one another. No one could express their emotions. To give up my freedom and my ability to love someone else to live in a perfect world would not be worth it to me. Love is the basis or true relationships. Most everyone has someone they love and care
for. At birth you get a name, most likely chosen by your parents. This name sticks with you for the rest of your life. When a parent chooses a name for a child they choose a name that means something to them, a name with a meaning. In the giver names are assigned. There is no thought given to the name. To conclude, I would never give up the freedom I have today to live in a perfect society. Although, living in a perfect society guarantees no pain and no fear. Living in a world of sameness, where nobody makes choices would be terrible. I would feel trapped. That’s why I would risk the pain and suffering of this world to be able to make choices and feel love, choose names for my future children, and to be able to see in color.
Bang! Bang! Bang! Jonas knocked on the door. A tall shadowed figure came to the door, it was the giver. He let them in and put them on a bed. Jonas started to ask questions to the giver, “Where are we.”
Without memories, nobody can make the right decision, which will lead to a bad choice. Without memories, one cannot shape his or her future. In addition, when Jonas describes the pain he feel when experiencing a sunburn when, “‘It hurts a lot,’ Jonas said, ‘but I’m glad you gave it to me. It was interesting,”(Lowry 86). This quote show that Jonas does not understand
At the end of “The Giver” Jonas finds a small village in elsewhere, however, many people are skeptical that this is true.. On page 166 of “The Giver” the author wrote, “Using his final strength, and a special knowledge that was deep inside him, Jonas found the sled that was waiting for him on top of the hill.” Some people believe that he actually found the sled and others believe that he was hallucinating because he was freezing to death in the cold. I believe that Jonas was hallucinating from the cold because it seems more practical. My justifications for this belief are first, his state of being, second, it can be hypothesized from the quote, “His entire concentration now had to be on moving his feet, warming Gabriel and himself, and going forward” which is found on page 165, and finally this theory could be proven by looking at the descriptions of the memories given to him versus what
In The Giver, a narrative by Lois Lowry, Jonas’s father illustrates his feelings during his Ceremony of Twelve and Jonas tells about his own feelings concerning the forthcoming event. In the text it states, “‘But to be honest, Jonas,’ his father said, ‘for me there was not the element of suspense that there is with your ceremony. Because I was already fairly certain of what my Assignment was to be,’”(Lowry, paragraph 3). This segment of text elucidates the reason of Jonas’s father’s lack of surprise of his Assignment. As stated above, Jonas’s father was already certain of his Assignment, which he continues to explain to be a Nurturer. Jonas’s father explains that as a result of the love he showed all the Newchildren and the time he spent at
He starts to believe that a world of sameness where no one can decide or make choices for themselves is boring. Lois Lowry is warning readers that living in a world of sameness is not something to create as it is boring and dull, but if the world follows conformity and does not value diversity and difference enough, society could become that of Jonas’s. When he turns twelve, his job for the rest of his life is decided as the Receiver. His job is to receive all the memories the previous Receiver has held on to. While this is beneficial for Jonas as he is able to leave the society and his job of the Receiver behind and get freedom, the community is left without someone to take the memories from The Giver.
As Jonas receives these memories, he ponders how their community would be different if they could make more choices. For example, after the Giver transmits Jonas a memory of family, Jonas thinks how crazy it is that they have generations and he says about his community, “‘What if they were allowed to choose their own mate?’”...”’Or what if’”...”’they could choose their own jobs?’” (124). Jonas then thinks if people should make these choices, and things that could go wrong if they did. For instance, while he is thinking about how crazy these choices are, he says, “‘I can’t even imagine it. We really have to protect people from wrong choices’”(124). People in his Community don’t choose their own spouse, the Community leaders assign them a spouse and children if they want. Jonas’s Community is brain-washed into not having opinions or choices. Although they have no divorce and wrong choices, Jonas would rather have choices and a real
What determines a society to be either a utopia or a dystopia? Would it be everyone following the rules? In the book The Giver, by Lois Lowry, a new “Utopian” culture blossoms from the previously failed society. The Giver’s nation starts out with the intention of creating a utopian society; however, the strict limitations turn it into a dystopia where there are receivers, like Jonas, that hold the good and bad memories from the past culture. Jonas will experience great pain and great joy through his job as the Receiver instead of the whole community sharing the burden. The Giver’s world is a dystopia because of the following three reasons: they kill people that disobey the rules, they do not get to pick their own jobs, and, above all, they beat children if they do not use precise language.
In The Giver, by Lois Lowry, the reader is left with an uncertain ending about what happens to the main character of the story, Jonas, and his little friend, Gabriel. The plot of a story usually ends with a resolution, where the conflict of the story is resolved; however, this is clearly not the case with The Giver. It is not possible to be completely certain on the ending of this book by reading this story alone; however, it is possible to gather the evidence and assume what likely occurred in the ending of The Giver. One cannot be sure on what happened at the ending of The Giver; however, I believe that Jonas and Gabriel did not survive. I also believe that there could have been a more effective ending to the story; I highly disagree with Lois Lowry’s choice of leaving it up to the reader to decide what happens in the ending of the story, for it leaves too many unanswered questions. Overall, I did not enjoy the ending of The Giver due to its ambiguity.
In his society, everything is all about Sameness because nobody can have individuality. “If everything’s the same, then there aren’t any choices! I want to wake up and decide things! (Lowry 123)” Jonas said with frustration. This quote reveals that in Jonas’ society, there isn’t any individuality and they celebrate Sameness. On the other hand, modern day society celebrates individuality. For example, modern day celebrates individual birthdays, depending on what day of the year you were born. As you can see, Sameness plays a huge role in their community however, in addition to Jonas’ society having no love and experiencing Sameness, his society also does not have the freedom to
In addition everyone’s life has a story filled with good and bad memories and that is what makes it so distinguished from Jonas
Jonas misses the way it was before he had memories where there was no pain or feeling, because everything was innocent. But he understands that although there was innocence nobody feels true happiness.Jonas thinks: “But he knew he couldn’t go back to that world of no feelings that he had lived in so long” (Lowry 131). Jonas wishes he could go back when everything was innocent and when he had no burden of pain, but although there was innocence the bad memories were stripped away to avoid the feeling of pain but also leaves everyone emotionless. But he knows it can never be the same again because of all the knowledge he gained from memories. He learns that memoires need to be valued, even the painful ones. Jonas feels that his community can change and things could be different. He thinks they should live in a world with memories. Jonas says: “Things could be different. I don’t know how, but there must be some way for things to be different. There could be colours [...] and everybody would have memories [...] There could be love” (Lowry 128). Jonas wishes that they could all have memories because everyone would be able to experience love. Love is one of the most important things in human life. He knows that there are bad memories, but without them, he wouldn’t be able to enjoy the good ones. Eventually, with his feelings
...s us to celebrate our differences. We also realise that we live with the same kind of memories that Jonas struggles to carry, every day of our lives. Although the fact that the memories are new to him makes it harder for Jonas to bear the pain, it also makes it easier for him to appreciate the beauty of the little things. We, on the other hand, being familiar with the sensations, do not cherish them as much as we should. None of us savors the warmth of sunshine or the beauty of snow the way Jonas does. Perhaps we need the darkness of the night to appreciate the brightness of the moon.
Jonas’ community chooses Sameness rather than valuing individual expression. Although the possibility of individual choice sometimes involves risk, it also exposes Jonas to a wide range of joyful experiences from which his community has been shut away. Sameness may not be the best thing in the community because Jonas expresses how much he feels like Sameness is not right and wants there to be more individuality. Giver leads him to understand both the advantages and the disadvantages of personal choice, and in the end, he considers the risks worth the benefits. “Memories are forever.”
In the novel, Johan’s mother tells him that “the word "love" is so generalized as to be meaningless, and they suggest questions such as "Do you enjoy me?" or "Do you take pride in my accomplishments?" This tells me that the community does not use the word because they can’t express or feel love because this is not an emotion that they have ever experienced before.Unlike Jonas how has experienced love through the memories The Giver has given
A world without color is an interesting scenario to consider. We would be left with a white sky, a black sea, and grey buildings. If you considered to imagine this, most people would imagine a black-gray-white world but aren’t they colors too? The absence of color is an impossible concept to imagine for those who have lived with color, and never really considered it to be such an important topic. Color is always a concept that we take for granted, and frequently fail to notice its wonderment. Now, let’s all take a moment to ask ourselves these questions. What would the world be like without the vibrant colors of a rainbow? Would the horizon exist? Would we appreciate the beauty of the sunrise or sunset? There are many things we would not be able to experience fully if there were no colors. Interestingly enough, many people still debate whether color really does exist or is it just an illusion in our minds that help us distinguish things from each other.………