Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Introduction to a case study examples
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
For those of us old enough to remember, the Challenger and Discovery shuttle disasters will be forever embedded in our memories. These tragic events were a part of my childhood that unfailingly dictate my thinking and feelings toward the space program, space exploration, and failed organizational initiatives. These events serve as a reminder of the profound results failed management techniques and change processes can have on an organization and the public around them. The Challenger and Discovery disasters may directly affect me more than others because they serve as examples of what happens when closed-minded thinking, refusal to change, and poor communication are part of the norms and foundation of an organization. I find these issues easy to detect within an organization and difficult to change.
The commissions tasked with the responsibility to determine the reason for the disasters. Each of the events was caused by somewhat obvious equipment failures and management initiatives. Research and development can fix operational errors. Honest appraisal, desire, motivation, and careful planning are needed to correct communication problems, management techniques, and employee thinking and feeling. Change initiatives can be a difficult process for everyone involved. Change is even more difficult to sustain. Organizational change can be summarized as a modification of strategy, structure, and processes as a result of internal or external factors. The success of the change initiative is heavily reliant on a common vision, company goals, and employee readiness and willingness to do things differently. Readiness for change is defined as the extent employees hold positive views about the need for organizational change, as well ...
... middle of paper ...
...eb site: http://www.forbes.com/sites/stevedenning/2011/07/23/how-do-you-change-an-organizational-culture/
Dr. Wagner-Marsh, F. (2013). Organizational Culture . Retrieved from Encyclopedia of Business, 2nd edition: http://www.referenceforbusiness.com/management/Ob-Or/Organizational-Culture.html
Executive Summary, The Presidential Commission on the Space Shuttle Challenger Accident . (1986, July 14). NASA Headquarters. Retrieved from National Aeronautics and Space Administration : http://www.hq.nasa.gov/office/pao/History/actions.html
Kleeper, S. (1997). Industry life cycles. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(1), 145-182. Retrieved from Klepper, S. (1997). Industry life cycles. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(1), 145-182.
Zimmerman, R. (2005, March 31). Space Watch: A Cultural Change At NASA? Retrieved from Space Daily: http://www.spacedaily.com/news/nasa-05d.html
Two tragic incidents, the Challenger Space Shuttle crash of 1986, and the Three Mile Island near meltdown of 1979, have greatly devastated our nation. Both these disasters involved failures of communication among ordinary professional people, working in largely bureaucratic companies. Two memos called the “Smoking Gun Memos,” authored by R. M. Boisjoly, of Morton Thiokol, and D. F. Hallman, of Babcook and Wilcox, will always be associated these two incidents. Unfortunately, neither of these memos were successful in preventing the accidents of the Challenger and the Three Mile Island near meltdown.
On a cold winter’s morning on the 28th day of January in the year 1986, America was profoundly shaken and sent to its knees as the space shuttle Challenger gruesomely exploded just seconds after launching. The seven members of its crew, including one civilian teacher, were all lost. This was a game changer, we had never lost a single astronaut in flight. The United States by this time had unfortunately grown accustomed to successful space missions, and this reality check was all too sudden, too brutal for a complacent and oblivious nation (“Space”). The outbreak of sympathy that poured from its citizens had not been seen since President John F. Kennedy’s assassination. The disturbing scenes were shown repeatedly on news networks which undeniably made it troublesome to keep it from haunting the nation’s cognizance (“Space”). The current president had more than situation to address, he had the problematic undertaking of gracefully picking America back up by its boot straps.
middle of paper ... ...2014. The 'Standard' of the 'Standard'. The "NASA History" Congressional Digest 90.7 (2011): 196-224. Academic Search Premier -. Web.
Through this national address Reagan hopes to reach out to the public and encourage them to keep their faith firm in the American space progra...
It took NASA a couple years to resume its flight to orbit. The catastrophe of the space shuttle challenger shook them up and have rethink their procedures and methods of operation. NASA, improve or I should say worked on developing its shuttle management structure, its shuttle safety panel, critical review and hazard policy, communication, safety organization and many more.
Enduring Understanding: Space Exploration has changed the outlook on space & human existence throughout time as technology has improved.
The Challenger disaster of 1986 was a shock felt around the country. During liftoff, the shuttle exploded, creating a fireball in the sky. The seven astronauts on board were killed and the shuttle was obliterated. Immediately after the catastrophe, blame was spread to various people who were in charge of creating the shuttle and the parts of the shuttle itself. The Presidential Commission was decisive in blaming the disaster on a faulty O-ring, used to connect the pieces of the craft. On the other hand, Harry Collins and Trevor Pinch, in The Golem at Large, believe that blame cannot be isolated to any person or reason of failure. The authors prove that there are too many factors to decide concretely as to why the Challenger exploded. Collins and Pinch do believe that it was the organizational culture of NASA and Morton Thiokol that allowed the disaster. While NASA and Thiokol were deciding whether to launch, there was not a concrete reason to postpone the mission.
My main objective was to make a risk analysis of the Space Shuttle Challenger Disaster occurred in 1986. My chosen focus area was the risk analysis process of the space shuttle and I was able to understand the risk potential.
Many of NASA’s programs have had to be cancelled due to vast corruption. 9 billion dollars was thrown away due to corrupt management and spending on the Constellation program (NFAA). The corruption within the United States Congress dire...
In 1986, the Challenger crew met at NASA's Kennedy Space Center for countdown training. The crew of this shuttle included two civilians and five astronaut members: “Teacher-in-Space” payload specialist Christa McAuliffe; payload specialist Gregory Jarvis; and astronauts Judith A. Resnik, mission specialist; Dick Scobee, mission commander; Ronald E. McNair, mi...
Goman, C. K. (2000, December). The biggest mistakes in managing change. Retrieved May 13, 2011, from http://www.winstonbrill.com/bril001/html/article_index/articles/501-550/article506_body.html
Andrews, Bill. “50 years of Americans in space.” Astronomy. 01 Feb. 2012: 20. eLibrary. Web. 20 Feb. 2014.
This essay gives a basic idea of what organizational culture is, and emphasis on the controversial issues of managing organizational cultures. As there are various definitions for organizational culture, and none of them are universally agreed. Therefore, for an easier understanding by readers, the definition of organizational culture given in this essay focusing on levels of culture, and will be discussed t together with Schein's(1983) framework. Before talking about managing organizational cultures, the types will be introduced first. Because, there are some descriptions about managing different types of organizational cultures, in the following content.
Organisational culture is one of the most valuable assets of an organization. Many studies states that the culture is one of the key elements that benefits the performance and affects the success of the company (Kerr & Slocum 2005). This can be measured by income of the company, and market share. Also, an appropriate culture within the society can bring advantages to the company which helps to perform with the de...
The presidential commission examining the Challenger mishap put a decent part of the fault on defective administration rehearses at the space organization. Key data was not being identified with top administration, for example, the developing worry about the O-rings. It additionally blamed NASA for withholding data from the general