Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Emotions and perception of art
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Emotions and perception of art
I would look at both the paintings of cave walls and nonfigurative works by Gerhard Richter in the sense they both evoke an emotion from the viewer of the art. Whether it’s an emotion of nostalgia from cave paintings or emotions of satisfaction from looking at how Richter manipulates colors to make an overall nice looking display. I believe that is one of the most powerful things that can come from paintings is the ability to see a work of art and have a certain emotion come out of you whether the artist was trying to do that or not.
In the documentary about Gerhard Richter, Richter spends a lot of time manipulating the paint on the canvas until it looks good to him. Even when he already was finished with a piece of art he decided to scrap it and start over after he saw it on the wall and wasn’t
…show more content…
14). This agrees with the point that paintings are to evoke emotions even if it’s to get viewers in the “mood” to do work or be ready to pay homage to their religious figures. This can be backed up from the documentary Cave of Forgotten Dreams, the cave they looked at in southern France could have been a place of great importance to the people who made the cave paintings over 32,000 years ago. The stunning artworks in the cave may have been painted to evoke emotions to get people ready to pay homage to their religious figures. Even in current day, the paintings stun the people that have been able to see the cave. One archaeologist who first saw the cave was so stunned he needed time away from the cave before going back in to fully appreciate what he saw. Not all paintings have to give viewers those intense reactions but the fact that the cave artwork do only strengthens my view that the caves are in fact “paintings” because they evoke
paintings when they want you to see what they are trying to express. Like if
Throughout the US, millions of POC students exposed to the traditional, rather outdated version of US History. Never do the textbooks explicitly mention and/ or explain the terrorizing, constant stripping down of others’ cultures and appropriating it into the dominant group of predominantly white, Anglo-Saxon and protestant. For many Mexican American students, they can’t relate to anything in the text, nor do they share an interest in the coursework provided. The way US history sets up doesn't teach and somehow excludes Indigenous backgrounds or for the most part was never taught in the classroom but, rather briefly mentioned in one or two paragraphs. Immigrants from diverse groups built this country yet their culture is consistently shown
Seeing the art in person truly made me see the beauty and captivity a painting can hold. Each gallery was filled with different American works. My favorite kind of paintings are the ones I can look at and immediately write a story in my head about what is happening, even if it not what the artist intended. As I was going through the galleries one painting in particular stuck in my mind. I was fortunate enough to experience a special exhibition called, “Audubon to Warhol.” It was composed of different works acquired from private and public collections. I was lured to the emotions that was captured by the main figure in one of the works. I was drawn not only to the beauty of the painting, but the story it shared. The painting I chose was Peeling Onions, by Lilly Martin Spencer.
The mixed reaction I have towards the painting is because, first off, I still wouldn’t know what is really behind it or what it’s trying to tell us without looking at it from a distance. When I looked at it from a computer desktop I could see a shoe, a mountai...
Though most works of art have some underlying, deeper meaning attached to them, our first impression of their significance comes through our initial visual interpretation. When we first view a painting or a statue or other piece of art, we notice first the visual details – its size, its medium, its color, and its condition, for example – before we begin to ponder its greater significance. Indeed, these visual clues are just as important as any other interpretation or meaning of a work, for they allow us to understand just what that deeper meaning is. The expression on a statue’s face tells us the emotion and message that the artist is trying to convey. Its color, too, can provide clues: darker or lighter colors can play a role in how we judge a piece of art. The type of lines used in a piece can send different messages. A sculpture, for example, may have been carved with hard, rough lines or it may have been carved with smoother, more flowing lines that portray a kind of gentleness.
Mark Rothko is recognized as one of the greatest artists of the twentieth century and during his lifetime was touted as a leading figure in postwar American painting. He is one of the outstanding figures of Abstract Expressionism and one of the creators of Color Field Painting. As a result of his contribution of great talent and the ability to deliver exceptional works on canvas one of his final projects, the Rothko Chapel offered to him by Houston philanthropists John and Dominique de Menil, would ultimately anchor his name in the art world and in history. Without any one of the three, the man, the work on canvas, or the dream, the Rothko Chapel would never have been able to exist for the conceptualization of the artist, the creations on canvas and the architectural dynamics are what make the Rothko Chapel a product of brilliance.
There are many different types of artworks that express the artist feelings but the ones that capture my eyes the most are the works that are muted and more hidden then in your face. The artworks that scream out the artist feeling do not need as much studying in my mind then the ones that invite you to a quite space to breathe and look. Gaela Erwin works are that, her works are about the hidden feelings that people hide from others.
Throughout history, humans have created art as a record of their lives and their belief systems. By studying the content, methods, and styles in works such as the Hall of Bulls in Lascaux cave, the wall paintings at the tomb of Nefertari, and the Stele of Naram-Sin, the way people generally viewed themselves and their leaders is evident. In the Hall of Bulls, the primary subject matter is animals. People in this era relied on animals for their survival. They used materials that were plentiful and easy to obtain to create images of the animals in their environment on the walls deep in the cave. While there is no way to be certain of the purpose of these paintings, the appearance of images painted atop other images would imply that overall composition was not the concern of the artists. This is in
...rspectives. For example, Monet’s Water Lilies allows you to see how light can greatly change the way a scene may look; the soft, undetailed way he paints captures details (Theo Van Doesburg). In many ways, this shows the emotions of an artist better than if all the details were revealed, as the focus of the artwork isn’t just what is painted but what it actually intended to represent. Contrary to what some people believe, I feel that even small paintings may trigger an emotion. For example, I considered the paintings of Theo van Does burg, founder of the De Still movement (Theo Van Doesburg). The simple shapes used to show how simple life can be at times, and if you look very closely you can see that life is made up of small challenges that need to be overcome. Having only black and white shows that everyone is the same and that people must learn to live together.
He uses colourful, poetic language in his interviews and with his descriptions. His interviews are conversational and in natural settings. Interviewees who don’t speak English are dubbed over instead of subtitled. He talks with scientists who are studying the paintings; we see them cautiously working to study the paintings without disturbing prints and scratches. We get a look at them working in the caves and at computers. Motion graphics and maps are used. Everything in the cave must be carefully preserved. Herzog visits art museums and talks with art historians about the earliest art, those found in the cave and similar pieces found elsewhere. He talks with a perfumer who discusses constructing the past by studying odours. Sweeping panoramics of the surrounding areas outside the caves play under Herzog’s storytelling, as he recounts the discovery of the caves and asks hypothetical questions. A historian speculates about the lifestyle of early humans, demonstrating tools they might have used. Another wears clothes that he believes may have been worn. For the caves, the shots slowly linger on each painting. The lengthy montage with surreal vocals, moments of silence, and soft instrumentals help create a feeling of wonder and serenity. Due to the extreme age of these paintings, Herzog brings this story to a close by asking one of the historians to speak to the beginning of
When I saw Vermeer's Girl with a Pearl Earring about five years ago at the National Gallery in Washington, D.C., I felt something about the painting that I had never felt before when looking at artwork. I felt as if this girl, this young woman in the painting was real, hiding in the museum behind this canvas. She was in the flesh. Her skin was still dewy from three hundred-something years ago, the light across her face still glowing. She was in the round, her eyes followed mine, she was real. She was about to speak, she was in a moment of thought, she was in reflection. This girl was not crimson red or titanium white, she was flesh. Vermeer caught her, a butterfly in his hand. She was not just recorded on canvas, she was created on canvas. She was caught in a moment of stillness. Vermeer creates moments in his paintings. When viewing them, we step into a private, intimate setting, a story. Always, everything is quiet and calm. I realize now it is no wonder I had such a strong reaction to Vermeer the first time I saw him: he is a stillness seeker.
This is a critique of" Roger And Me", a documentary by Michael Moore. This is a film about a city that at one time had a great economy. The working class people lived the American dream. The majority of people in this town worked at the large GM factory. The factory is what gave these people security in their middle working class home life. Life in the city of Flint was good until Roger Smith the CEO of GM decided to close the factory. This destroyed the city. Violent crime became the highest in the nation, businesses went bankrupt, people were evicted from their rented homes. There were no jobs and no opportunity. Life was so bad that Money magazine named Flint the worst place to live in the entire nation. When news of the factory closing first broke, Michael Moore a native of flint decided to search for Roger Smith and bring him to Flint.
Art has had its roots, one may argue, when civilization was born. With each respective civilization and time periods from the past, humans have formed a diverse and unique society, a group of people with their own individual characteristics, cultures, as well as philosophies within which all kinds of differing ideas, thoughts and opinions are always brought upon for challenge and evaluation. These distinct aspects of a culture and/or time period may be recorded by people in varying forms of expression we all know as art. Directly from where culture had originated, events and/or emotions from that time period have been reflected or directly recorded in the arrangement of pictures i.e. paintings from the past which inform us about the people’s experiences and events in the past historical periods. Ultimately, History is the record of the development and how we have evolved as humans together in a society. History can be expressed and reflected in different kinds of music, sculptures, as well as paintings. There are several different periods of Art, each has contributed and reflected to how a society was. Art has been usually used by historians as one of the vehicles of history to illustrate and illuminate it as they are able to recognize that some types of art may be able to help them identify and explain the nature of societies and periods in history. Art and society have counteracted with each different type bringing forth new arts and new societies for many generations to come. Ideas have caused responses by citizens and therefore bring forth several different types of influences on a period’s background, heredity, and environments. These influences are then translated into new a idea, which then triggers the circle to repeat it...
Cubism takes the opposite route for the same effect. Solid lines are drawn, but the painting itself is usually more abstract (as with Picasso). At times it can be difficult to discern what some paintings are supposed to represent. Bright, vivid colors infuse the pieces with more passion. The contrast between those not well defined objects and the punch of emotion gives cubism its personality and vitality.
Art has been around for centuries, and yet there are still questions that remain about the true meaning of the object. Who truly gets that last say so about what the artist was trying to depict out of the picture, is it the audience or the artist himself? While conducting research online there has been numerous controversial pictures and paintings that came up for various reasons, merely the main three topics were about sex, religion, and politics. Of course, there has been discrepancies on religious pictures, as there are several religions, simply put the one painting with multiple variations to my surprise, the Mona Lisa by Leonardo Da Vinci. While in grade school, there are numerous schools that focus on this picture as a simple art project, therefore, reading the different opinion of people and the history behind it, is a world that no person could be prepared to walk through.