Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analysis of artwork essay
Essays about artwork analysis
Comparing artwork analysis
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analysis of artwork essay
At the San Francisco Museum of Modern Art, the Rauschenberg art piece was definitely one form of art I once did not consider to be art. The artwork is not exactly a painting to me but certainly an illustration of something that is connected to real day to day objects. It was created by the artist Robert Rauschenberg in 1954. It is oil on canvas painting which is eighty by ninety six in size and the materials used are oil, paper, fabric and metal which are all on wood. It looks quite messy, with materials like newspapers, cut out fabrics, the colors’ drips and how they are splashed around. The image doesn’t look attractive but it sure does attract different ideas from the viewers on what the image itself is trying to portray. In Rauschenberg’s art piece, the visual elements include, it’s a painting, the two thin lines within the fabrics and the whole painting right down the middle, small vertical, horizontal and diagonal lines between the fabrics the colors used just as much as the fabrics. The painting I think is abit light from the yellow, white and red colors that blend with fabrics that are the same color. There’s no design in the piece, it’s a chaotic and random composition work since the artist has all the materials blended together including the wooden frame. The elements like the colors pink, blue, orange and yellow plus the random choice and random visuals also have the viewer’s attention, maybe forcing the viewer to look deeper into the art piece. The mixed reaction I have towards the painting is because, first off, I still wouldn’t know what is really behind it or what it’s trying to tell us without looking at it from a distance. When I looked at it from a computer desktop I could see a shoe, a mountai... ... middle of paper ... ...it is a success because it shows its own unique and permanent hidden imagery for all viewers to see. The work is well executed with the materials suitable and when I was looking at it, I visualized and what I actually could see was a clown on the top left, a black dragon down on the right and other random things. After seeing the painting, I was overwhelmed since I had all kinds of ideas coming to me and they kept coming such as saying that the background of the picture was somehow a beach. The art piece by Rauschenberg is of great art and many appreciate the thought and process that might have gone into it even though it is of chaotic design. It is random and all materials are blended so it serves its purpose of leading us to imagine the simple life or perhaps something leading to that. The quality of the artwork is highly original and ranks high in my list.
Gallery 19 of the Museum of Modern Art features Pop Art trailblazers of the early 1960s, ranging from Roy Lichtenstein’s “Girl with Ball” to Andy Warhol’s “Gold Marilyn Monroe.” Alongside these emblematic works of art, there hangs a more simplistic piece: a six foot square canvas with three yellow letters, entitled “OOF.” The work of art, created by Ed Ruscha in 1962, is a painting that leaves little room for subjective interpretation as does the majority of his work. Ruscha represented the culture in the 1960s through his contributions to the transition from Abstract Expressionism to Pop Art, efforts to redefine what it meant for a painting to be fine art, and interpretation of the Space Race.
For one, the viewer can find similarities between Albers’ Homage to the Square, Robert Rauschenberg’s work, and a few of Eva Hesse’s Metronomic Irregularity works. Rauschenberg likes to use bright colors and often times a collage of images to make up his works. Albers’ classes at Black Mountain College focused on color, line, texture, as well as looking at everyday objects, all things that are quite prominent in Rauschenberg’s works. Rauschenberg was greatly influenced by Albers’ class, particularly his “belief in the usefulness and worth of any material.” Rauschenberg began to look at everyday objects in a different light, as Albers had previously suggested, and began to respect the importance of them by making them into pieces of art. Albers’ influence on Eva Hesse was a bit different. In Hesse’s work, there seems to be less about color and more about shape and form, much like Homage to the Square. In her Metronomic Irregularity series, there are many square and rectangular shapes hung up on the wall with a more muted or monochromatic palette. Many of the pieces in this series consist of a complementary, monochromatic color scheme taking on square and rectangular shapes. Much like Albers, many of her pieces within that series focus solely on squares, cubes and rectangles and how their forms interact. Like Rauschenberg, Hesse was also influenced by Albers’ use of different materials in her pieces. She often used polyester and fiberglass to achieve many of her works of art. Hesse was inspired by Albers’ teachings when she was a student of his at Yale University. Albers’ class allowed his students to experiment with different colors as well as different materials to see what they came up with. Albers encouraged his students to work with low materials and sometimes, even without tools. He wanted them to be able to experiments with
The painting caught my attention due to the message I received when I first laid eyes upon it. It illustrates a wise old man teaching an eager to learn young boy. I have been fortunate enough to have my very own replica of this painting in my bedroom and I have spent countless hours
When looking at the painting it gives us a glimpse of the past. It looks almost like a photograph. The fine detail from the building on the right with the statue on top. The citizens walking around.
First, the size of the painting drew me in before all. It measures at 339.1 by 199.5 cm, surrounded by a large golden frame. The size alone is enough to bring in any person passing by. Once getting close, the really wonder happened. The story told by the painting
People can have many different opinions depending on a topic, but what is truly difficult is getting a complete level of understanding from every opinion, or understanding the point of view of each opinion. Even accepting the points of view can be difficult for some people, who believe that their opinions are right. Luckily, people can learn about the other person’s frame of reference, and at the very least understand the topic or the person a little better. This particular topic is art, which is known for its multiple possible perceptions or its many different messages that it can send a person or group of people. In this way, people can learn more about the thought processes and feelings of others. Unfortunately, with differing opinions,
Visually, both Wassily Kandinsky’s Composition VII and Jackson Pollock’s No. 2 constitute a chaotic arrangement of colors and images with no apparent relation to one another. The randomly scattered paint, large canvas, and over-clamped figures all build a similar visual chaos in both paintings. Despite the mayhem, the two paintings differ in the inner emotions each artist wanted to express and the nature of the “chaos.” While for Kandinsky the chaos represents the smooth and melodic sentiments raised by music, for Pollock the chaos depicts the more spontaneous and impulsive emotions. The authors’ differing goals lead Kandinsky to ponder and refine his painting to capture a more universal theme and Pollock to develop his “drip” painting method
"The Imaginary Orient", an article by Linda Nochlin, brings up that the apparently photorealistic quality of the paintings allows JL Gérôme to display an improbable scene as though it were a genuine portrayal of the east. Nochlin thinks of it as better a portrayal of the West's colonial ideology.
This piece is and is 218.4 centimeters in height and 172.7 centimeters in width. I was not able to find the medium of this artwork but I am assuming it is either acrylic or oil on canvas. The style is also abstract and features what looks like random painted figures and shapes positioned all over the canvas with patches of red, yellow-green, mustard yellow, white and beige as the background. There are a couple random objects painted on this piece that are recognizable, such as a red cup with sugar cubes next to it, but there also many unrecognizable shapes that are more open to interpretation. It is my least favorite because I do not find the overall color scheme of the painting very appealing. Personally I feel as if the colors in this piece do not go well together, especially the shade of green and yellow in the background. Compared to Basquiat’s other pieces that are richer in color, this piece falls
I loved the color scheme he used both the red and white of the two bodies reflected very well off the black background and kept those figures in focus. I feel as though the artist could have actually made the figures more grotesque could’ve added some more blood dripping from where the demon like figure is piercing his way through the human body and could have even painted the figures skeletal like, more details could have made the painting exceptional. Then again the artist could have intentionally made the painting exactly the way it should be and found that in his mind it gave off the right amount of shock to have viewers become entranced in his work. From my point of view it evokes emotion and curiosity, this painting could relate to those who feel they have lost a sense on life, but to not let the chaos swallow you whole, you do have a purpose and go out a discover what you can for yourself or for the world. This painting is true to
Though most works of art have some underlying, deeper meaning attached to them, our first impression of their significance comes through our initial visual interpretation. When we first view a painting or a statue or other piece of art, we notice first the visual details – its size, its medium, its color, and its condition, for example – before we begin to ponder its greater significance. Indeed, these visual clues are just as important as any other interpretation or meaning of a work, for they allow us to understand just what that deeper meaning is. The expression on a statue’s face tells us the emotion and message that the artist is trying to convey. Its color, too, can provide clues: darker or lighter colors can play a role in how we judge a piece of art. The type of lines used in a piece can send different messages. A sculpture, for example, may have been carved with hard, rough lines or it may have been carved with smoother, more flowing lines that portray a kind of gentleness.
...ause the look of curiosity of the girl extends beyond the frame. This gives the painting a sense of curiosity.
This painting by Vincent Van Gogh is on display at the Art Institute of Chicago Museum, in the Impressionism exhibit. There are many things going on in this painting that catch the viewer’s eye. The first is the piece’s vibrant colors, light blues and browns, bright greens, and more. The brush strokes that are very visible and can easily be identified as very thick some might even say bold. The furniture, the objects, and the setting are easy to identify and are proportioned to each other. There is so much to see in this piece to attempt to explain in only a few simple sentences.
The vanishing point was creative because it made me look into the painting more and find the lines. The Wolfflin analysis made me look at a painting like I have never done before. I had to really look at the core of it and point out details I have never thought of before. It was creative to look at all the art and pull apart the details. I think the hermeneutical circle was the most creative. To put pieces together like that was very creative. To take a piece of art and apply it to a painting then add more to it to make a whole was very interesting. How the artist Seurat painting Sunday Afternoon on the Isle of Grande Jatte. Was amazing how he would just sketch a person and then sketch a different person then go home and place everyone as a whole together was very creative how he laid it
...at I get from the painting is that the men are getting a mirror image of them self’s, that makes them see what they are afraid of. In turn when I see the painting it allows me to see my fears. I felt that my fears changed with in two days of being in the program. I loved meeting new people and having new teachers.