Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Gender identity is socially constructed
Reflections on understanding gender identity
Discrimination against homosexuals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Gender identity is socially constructed
Howard S. Becker Interview
Interview Ms. Baker: Hello, Welcome back to the show. We are going to have two social thinkers coming on and explain the cause of homosexuality as a deviant behavior. So let’s first welcome Howard S. Becker to the show! Hello Becker takes a seat. It is an honor to have you on this show.
Becker: Yes, thank you it is a pleasure.
Ms. Baker: How does homosexuality become labeled as deviant?
Becker: There are many approaches we have to examine that helps understand homosexuality as deviant.
Ms. Baker: What are those approaches?
Becker: We have to look at the social nature of deviant activity. Deviant behavior first has to be labeled. Homosexuality becomes deviant because it does not fit into what society labels as normal.
…show more content…
Becker: As I stated before “when deviant caught, he is treated in accordance with the people diagnosis of why he is that way” (Cuzzort & King, 2002, p.66). We began to stereotype people by labeling people by their behavior, their looks, the way the talk and dress. When in actually a person may be totally opposite from the way they are perceived. People are or rather before who are homosexual can function and adapt to their environment to be perceived as non-deviant …show more content…
Becker: Labeling theory “asserts that labels influence the perceptions of both the individual and other members of society” (Gold and Richards, 2012, p. 144). Homosexuals began to alter their self images and street and start believing what society says. Through socialization as people come together they begin to act. We teach each other what we have learned in our social institutions. Socialization is reinforcement for society. We have religion, school, family, even the law who feels us that being homosexual is wrong.
When you have power such as law makers, the government and other entities they often feel others. What to do and what not to do. If you break the laws or rules of society you are punished and cast out. We have seen in the past how homosexuals were subjects of hate crimes. This is because labeling homosexuals as defiant because a threat to society going some form or another group must be
In the “Deviant 101” article, Schoeplfin talks about how certain types of behaviors can be seen as deviant. He questions whether an act should be considered deviant if it does not get a response. Schoeplfin uses real and hypothetical examples throughout the article to show how deviance is measured by the reactions it receives. Also, he concludes by looking at whether the feedback from behavior has to be negative to constitute it as deviant or if the feedback can be positive as well.
Social deviancy is the violation of social norms. A deviant is someone who rejects folkways and mores. Any action that violates the values or rules of a social group is deviant behavior. In order to actually be characterized as a deviant, the individual must be detected committing a deviant act and be stigmatized by society. A stigma is a mark of social disgrace, setting the deviant apart from the group. Criminality is healthy for society. Deviance affirms our cultural values and norms. Responding to deviance clarifies moral boundaries and brings people together. There will always be people who break society’s rules and that’s important.
... It causes identity problems, confidence issues, and keeps people from experimenting with their true selves. Sullivan properly allows the reader to look at that point of view, and too understand walking in his shoes as a child. His explanation of self-difference explains why homosexuals contain themselves in order to live a normal lifestyles away from the negative views of our world. “It is not something genetically homosexual; it is something environmentally homosexual. And it begins young.” (Sullivan)
There exists conflicting theories among sociologists in the area of determining why a person is considered to be a deviant, and the reasons behind why he or she has committed a deviant act. From a positivistic perspective, deviance is based on biological or social determinism. Alternatively, from a constructionist perspective, deviance is created and assigned by society. Both perspectives seek to give a theory for why a person may become known as deviant. Although they both view similar acts as deviant, the basic differences between positivists and constructionists theories are clear.
...were mentally ill or psychotic. Frank Kameny, a leader of the gay rights movement, perpetuated the idea that “Homosexuality is not a sickness…but is merely a preference, an orientation, or propensity, on par with, and not different in kind from, heterosexuality.” (Sherry Wolf, Sexuality and Socialism) Some schools even went as far as to create public safe spaces for gay students such as Columbia University’s Student Homophile League. Now, people are well aware of the presence of the LGBTQ community, and members are even trying to educate people who seem ignorant or bigoted. Many people currently dedicate a good portion of their lives to learning and teaching people about the gay rights movement and how it functions today. The community has evolved to include transgender, asexual, pansexual, and non binary people as well as a multitude of other labels and identities.
...a. Homophobic behavior can be driven by an individual’s fear, family, religion, culture, political affiliation, societal setting, and personal beliefs. All three articles made suggestions in order to prevent stereotypes and homophobia, and while many people are being educated and changing their beliefs about homosexuality, many more people may never change their beliefs and ideals. Educating people to change their minds takes generations, since many people are not so easily persuaded to think differently. People have been brainwashed to think certain ways. Even though society is beginning to accept homosexuality and homosexuals, society still has not broken the stereotypes associated. Stereotypes today are still prevalent, need to be addressed, and broken so homosexuals can have the same freedoms as heterosexuals and not live in fear of being discriminated against.
First, we must examine the definitions of deviance and norms. Henry defines deviance as a person who goes against the standards, expectations, and norms of their society (lecture). Further, deviancy is thought of as a personal
Deviance is a title that insinuates the violation of social norms in society. This can be described as adjacent to criminal and improper behaviour imposed by the people who break the social norms of a society. Thus, becoming subjective to a label of 'deviant'. Deviants often have punishment bestowed upon them by authoritive figures such as the enforcers of law. There are many universal types of deviance throughout societys over the world such as alcoholism, addiction, mental illness and homosexuality. All of these may be a result of biological and social constructionist theories of deviance, this essay will define the opposing differences and the relation of the two in this essay. Both hold contributing factors to the construction of deviance in society, but are both highly conflicting theories.
Homosexuality is a sensitive topic and often avoided in conversation. For centuries the human race has oppressed and persecuted others strictly because they are gay, lesbian, bisexual etc. Although it is disturbing to most of us, these actions still occur in our society today, as many believe that homosexuality is abnormal and disgraceful. One supporter of this belief is Michael Levin, who strongly believes that homosexuality is highly abnormal and thus, undesirable. Although his beliefs and theories supporting this claim are subjective, there is evidence that can support his stance on this topic; we will analyze this claim in further detail and how it relates to his other views mentioned in this essay.
Two boys walk down the corridor of a friendly, residential, public high school. As they approach, the crowd slowly parts as its bystanders just stare at the boys. The boys walk with a certain aire about them, as their trench coats swing from side to side and their gloomy faces meet the eyes of the rest of the students. They are pointed at and called names such as fag or freak-- for they are members of the infamous trench coat mafia. These two boys can also be described as the murderers in the Columbine High School shootings. Somewhere across the country in another friendly, residential, public high school, a good looking boy of the same age walks down a similar hallway, and has a similar effect on the crowd. Instead of being laughed at or called a fag, this captain of the football team, Corey Johnson, gets a few " good job at the game yesterday" or hellos from people that have only heard of him and wished to actually know him personally, for he is notorious for being "cool". Rather than being called a fag as walks down the hallway no one even suspects or even contemplates the fact that he is a homosexual. These individuals are alike in various aspects; age, sex, surroundings, and others, but yet have managed to be labeled and categorized so differently and so harshly. So what are the social conditions that have allowed such opposing figures to take shape in our culture? What is it that forces youth to be successful at being normal or unsuccessful and weird? The answer is the confining and forceful methods that our society has used to produce its norms. These two particular cases are just representations of many types of kids who are forced into two very dist...
Becker uses the definition of the word deviance, the question that is typically asked as an outsider is why do they do it? That being said what leads these individuals to do “forbidden things” as Becker said. Nobody questions the concept of the word deviant, in other words they overlook it. Becker questions the word deviance and wonders who is deciding the process of the word deviance and who decides it and how they decide it. The first argument of the view of deviance is a statistical definition of the word deviance, that anything that is statistical. The second definition is the pathological deviance a metaphor for an illness, a disease, it is hard to know what a healthy behavior is or what is a sick behavior as Becker try to prove, he says
My arguments will be ignoring a major element in factoring the morality of homosexuality, the law. Yes, many people know that stealing and murder are both wrong, but this is based on socialization and learning passed down from previous generations. The aim isn’t to ignore the rules, but examples from history relating to homosexuality will not aid in proving ground for its ethics. A rational, autonomous decision making process must be used in order to decipher right from wrong, which can lead to solid, concrete answers.
An issue that has, in recent years, begun to increase in arguments, is the acceptability of homosexuality in society. Until recently, homosexuality was considered strictly taboo. If an individual was homosexual, it was considered a secret to be kept from all family, friends, and society. However, it seems that society has begun to accept this lifestyle by allowing same sex couples. The idea of coming out of the closet has moved to the head of homosexual individuals when it used to be the exception.
This field of Sexology, developed from German and French influences, developed a taxonomy and categorization of sexual ‘deviance,’ in which homosexuality was at first seen as pathological and unnatural. This notion of a ‘degenerate’ sexuality and deviances, political, legal and social groups began to understand homosexuality in medicalized terms. Krafft-Ebbing, Ulrichs, Freud. Paedophilia and greeks.
In order to understand these theories that I will address, one must look at the issue of deviance. In order to grasp the concepts of these theories, it is necessary to look at deviance on deeper level. Deviance, after all, is the basis of what these theories are based upon. Normal behavior is defined as conforming to a standard, usual, typical, or expected (Soanes, 2001). Deviant behavior is a divergence from normal standards, usually social or sexual. Therefore, by definition, deviance is not normal.