Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Papers about history of sexuality
The History of Sexuality
A history of sex 3
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Papers about history of sexuality
The prevalence of sexology literature and scholarship was and remains to be a topic of discourse when questions to the origins of a ‘homosexual’ identity arise. In today’s society, one usually points to the New York City Stonewall Riots in 1969 as the beginning for the recognition of homosexual love and identity. Indeed, this event remains to be an important marker in queer* history, but there are many scholars in various interdisciplinary fields who would instead argue that emergence of homosexuality as an identity stemmed from medical and psychiatric research carried out by German psychiatrists and doctors.
This field of Sexology, developed from German and French influences, developed a taxonomy and categorization of sexual ‘deviance,’ in which homosexuality was at first seen as pathological and unnatural. This notion of a ‘degenerate’ sexuality and deviances, political, legal and social groups began to understand homosexuality in medicalized terms. Krafft-Ebbing, Ulrichs, Freud. Paedophilia and greeks.
The adjective “nameless” used to describe homoerotic love was never fully articulated until the Oscar Wilde trial. England in the year1895 (Kennedy 5), like Germany, punished sodomy with strict jail time. As in Germany, where it seemed no bourgeois male member of society was safe from speculation of his sexual orientation, famed author, Oscar Wilde was not immune to speculation in England. During his sodomy trial, Wilde, when questioned about the content of a ‘questionable’ poem by Lord Alfred Douglas (Two Loves), Oscar replied with his findings as: “the Love that dare not speak its name” (5). Scholars speculate that this is in fact where John Henry MacKay acquired “nameless”, in order to describe (or not describe) his attracti...
... middle of paper ...
...ere only a very few individuals whom he would be able to love.”
Conclusion
For John Hnery MacKay the term “Nameless” derived form the highly publicized Oscar Wilde obscenity trials was the root for his later description of same-sex and man-boy love by calling it “nameless/namenlose.” MacKay asserted that the love between a man and a boy could not be named, nor pathologized by medical science or sexology. MacKay’s disdain for these terms, led him to describe his homosexual desire as to be without a name because of the stigmas attached to these terms and how there were used in Weimar German society in the political and legal system to criminalize and punish same-sex desire. In order to make this more clear in his literature, MacKay’s Sagitta writings BNL and Puppenjunge serve as examples of MacKay’s own search to explain something that cannot or should not be named.
The word "homosexual" seems to have come into the English language around 1869, introduced by a Hungarian named Benkert but not generally used by the British until the 1880s. Yet, according to Theo Aronson, there were other words used at that time to identify the love between the same gender. "Homogenic love," "similisexualism," and "Uranism" were apparently among the more common references to homosexuality.
homosexual liberation. Some have demonstrated their anger and concerns about prejudice against homosexuals in both riots and artistic forms. Therefore, these people seek to prove to the heterosexual world that homosexual ‘deviancy’ was a myth.
The persecution of homosexuals at Sachsenhaussen was a natural outgrowth of the Nazi idea of the “master race” and was made possible by manipulation of German law. Homosexuals, according to Nazi propaganda, ...
In an effort to legitimize all subcategories of sexuality considered deviant of heterosexual normatively, queer theory acknowledges nontraditional sexual identities by rejecting the rigid notion of stabilized sexuality. It shares the ideals of gender theory, applying to sexuality the idea that gender is a performative adherence to capitalist structures that inform society of what it means to be male, female, gay, and straight. An individual’s conformity to sexual or gendered expectations indicates both perpetration and victimization of the systemic oppression laid down by patriarchal foundations in the interest of maintaining power within a small group of people. Seeking to deconstruct the absolute nature of binary opposition, queer theory highlights and celebrates literary examples of gray areas specifically regarding sexual orientation, and questions those which solidify heterosexuality as the “norm”, and anything outside of it as the “other”.
Jonathan Katz talks about the initial creation of the term “heterosexuality” and how it was used to classify certain groups of people’s way of practicing sex. Along with the negative ideology the term reflected upon society. The author talks about the early definition of the term “heterosexuality”. Katz closely examines the different cultures and what sex meant to them prior to the term and over all labeling of “heterosexual” and what become of them after the fact. Katz illustrates the many faces of the term “heterosexual” starting with the early definition of the word, which was at the
Instead of reclaiming “queer,” one must nullify or completely get rid of it because “the hate, the pain, the violence is locked in that word forever” (Brontsema 49). The opponents of the reclamation of “queer,” or any related word for that matter, according to Brontsema, are “those who have directly suffered” from the unforgettable abuse caused by the use of “queer” in an offensive context by the out-group – heterosexuals (Brontsema 49). The older generation homosexuals who have lived through the 1960s and experienced the obnoxiousness of “queer” feel miserable when someone uses that word around them because the emotional history attached to the word reminds them of their related hate-filled memories that can convince them that they are mentally ill in the eyes of the society.
Valocchi, S. ""Where Did Gender Go?" Same-Sex Desire and the Persistence of Gender in Gay Male Historiography." GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 18.4 (2012): 453-79. Web.
Halperin, David. "Is There a History of Sexuality?." The Lesbian and Gay Studies Reader. Ed. Henry
This essay will discuss the ways sexuality is gendered and their impacts towards both men and women by exploring the contemporary heterosexual scripts from a sociological perspective on three main aspects; i.e. sex drive, desire and power. It studies how men are deemed to have a higher sexual edge than women, who acts as the relationship gatekeepers. This essay analyses the theory that women predictably pursuits love and relationships while men are more sexually controlled by lusts and cravings. Sexual dominance and passiveness is another traditional script inspected in this essay, focusing on how men are always expected to be the prevailing initiator thus devouring more power in relationships while women stays being the weaker, submissive receivers.
Community members saw these as actions and not a behavior indicative of a certain type of person. Homosexual acts, for example, were treated as actions that were deemed sinful due to their non-reproductive nature. The work would not be complete without a consideration for other types of sex. All too easily Godbeer could have neglected non-traditional, meaning non-male and female, sexual relations. Luckily Godbeer’s work does not suffer from this potentially fatal flaw. Additionally, Godbeer does an excellent job telling the reader to check modern concepts of sex and sexual identity. By thinking of sex and sexuality in terms other than as actions would be to apply modern conceptions backwards, and totally miss the essence of sex and sexuality in early America. The word homosexual does not enter the lexicon until 1886 when it was used in the pioneering work of Richard von Krafft-Ebing, Psychopathia
“The unprecedented growth of the gay community in recent history has transformed our culture and consciousness, creating radically new possibilities for people to ‘come out’ and live more openly as homosexuals”(Herdt 2). Before the 1969 Stonewall riot in New York, homosexuality was a taboo subject. Research concerning homosexuality emphasized the etiology, treatment, and psychological adjustment of homosexuals. Times have changed since 1969. Homosexuals have gained great attention in arts, entertainment, media, and politics. Yesterday’s research on homosexuality has expanded to include trying to understand the different experiences and situations of homosexuals (Ben-Ari 89-90).
Wilton, Tamsin. "Which One's the Man? The Heterosexualisation of Lesbain Sex." Gender, Sex, and Sexuality. New York: Oxford University, 2009. 157-70. Print.
In history around the 1900s in England the victorians from the outside looked repressed however, though their papers and terms historians can see that they thought about sex much more than would be expected. The English categorized and defined people and made their humanity a few words, this boxing and labeling of people is exactly what queer is not. In this where age privacy was assaulted, Oscar Wilde influenced a great number of people in his books and for his flamboyant identity. However, even many years after he and his public figure suffered, we can still use his example and others like Michel Field to draw attention to and learn that throughout the entirety of human history there were people who were different in some way and who stayed marginalized throughout their
Of course, oral sex is sex. I don't understand where this legalistic idea that "sex" means "vaginal penetration" and nothing else came from. I believe that oral sex is a sex act. It is just as intimate, if not more so, than sexual intercourse. It is by no means a safe way to have sex since you can still get sexually transmitted diseases. It will always be viewed as a step below actually having intercourse though. It seems baffling that someone might consider oral sex not to be considered a sexual activity. While it may not be considered the "traditional" method of sexual activity, it still involves sexual organs and still produces fluids from the body. There may not be a risk of pregnancy through oral sex, but there is still the risk of sexually transmitted diseases and that should be brought to light to everyone with the label of "Oral Sex." It is physical sexual contact between
In this paper I plan to showcase the nature of sexual identity, and to do this I will draw from examples in the book As Nature Made Him written by John Colapinto. This book offers two contrasting opinions, one that says it is nature that determines the sexual orientation of a person, and one that says it is how one is raised. As a well-researched book, it offers a great foundation for this paper, and the issues discussed within. To start out, we will begin with John Money’s belief on sexuality, notably that it comes from nurture, and not nature.