Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Coffee market supply conditions
Market analysis for starbucks
External analysis of coffee industry
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Coffee market supply conditions
Introduction How many times have you ever said to a new or old acquaintance do you want to grab a cup of coffee? Coffee is a drink where we can get to know someone better or just sip while catching up. The latest Hoover’s (2015) market research Keurig Green Mountain is the third largest manufacturer and distributor of coffee and coffee-related products behind both Starbucks and Nestle. To capture greater market share and to rebound from a disappointing 2015, Keurig Green Mountain is considering increasing their operations into Ethiopia. This paper examines the monetary impact of them expanding into Ethiopia, the possible methods of financial options in the capital markets or through a business combination, and demonstrates the fiscal performance …show more content…
Our primary argument is simple, the cost of internal funds and the demand for external financing vary because of possible investment costs and the external financing costs. The effect and relationship of these two factors are paramount in making an educated decision. Keurig Green Mountain would be prudent to consider the debt-to-equity ratio, total long-term liability ratio, and cash flow to determine if they can service an expansion. According to Almeida & Campello (2008) Keurig Green Mountain needs to explore three specific areas to determine the best route: The opportunity costs, constraints of current investments on credit, and the high costs that may exist for external financing. Figures 6 through 8 show the different options for Keurig Green Mountain whether they issue a bond, commercial paper, or via a traditional loan. JAB Holding Company recently purchased Keurig Green Mountain, and this places them in a stronger position to consider a merger or acquisition themselves. J.M. Smucker is slightly larger, and they own distribution rights to Dunkin Donuts, Folgers, and Millstone. A merger could present a promising opportunity to gain market share, but would be a different strategy for expanding operations and would have a different …show more content…
If you look at the key industry margins and compare them to Keurig Green Mountain, they display the financial strength of Keurig Green Mountain. They are well above average and proposing to construct a 500,000 square foot $18.5 million production and distribution plant in Ethiopia is sound. Keurig Green Mountain has the cash flow and resources and free from any legal or ethical restraints. They anticipate breaking ground in the fourth quarter of 2016 and will deploy a leadership team from their Vermont headquarter.
The founders of Keurig Inc. created the company to develop an innovative technique which allows customers to brew one perfect cup of gourmet coffee at a time. In this case, the CEO Nick Lazaris along with the other leaders of Keurig Inc. must determine how to successfully enter the at-home-market for use at customers’ homes, while maintaining a healthy relationship with Green Mountain Coffee Roasters, Inc. (GMCR) and Van Houtte. GMCR and Van Houtte are two of the company’s main roaster partners that own a 70% stake in Keurig, so they want the business to succeed but are a little apprehensive about the company’s marketing and pricing strategies.
Choosing to forfeit market share in several states was an unlikely success, but it didn’t come without opportunity cost. Growth before Expansion: balancing production capacity, brand equity, and development. Production capacity issues will arise and could impact our ability to “mine” current markets. Opening two additional breweries allowed us to adequately serve current markets and enter new ones (15 states total). Still, demand is steadily increasing in and around these markets and should be a priority over new ones.
3-1. What global issues do you see here? What ethical/social responsibility issues do you see here?
The purpose of this case study is to explore the implications for expanding the products offered by Mountain Man Brewing Company (MMBC) from one product, Mountain Man Lager, to adding a Light version of the beer. This paper will evaluate the following:
Senior Management of PepsiCo is evaluating the potential acquisition of two companies – Carts of Colorado and California Pizza Kitchen – in order to expand the company’s restaurant business. If indeed PepsiCo decides to pursue the acquisition of one or both, they must decide how to align each of these business units in its historically decentralized management approach and how to forge relationships between the acquired business units and existing business units. In their evaluation, Senior Management is faced with the question of whether the necessary capital investment in order to purchase one or both of the businesses can be profitable for each of the acquired business units, but must also take into consideration that the additional business units will not hinder the profitability of the existing business units.
Green Mountain Coffee Roasters initially got started in 1981 as a small café in Waitsfield Vermont and united with Keurig later in 2006. The company produces specialty coffee as well as coffee makers with the help of Keurig whom produces single-cup coffee and tea makers; it is now among their product list. The company roasts 100% Arabica type of coffee transforming it into more than a hundred different coffee products available for selection. Green Mountain Coffee Roasters and Keurig coffee no longer retains ownership of the original café. However, the company still has its headquarters situated in Waitsfield Vermont on a vase land of about 90,000 square feet. (8,400 square meters). The company also prides on having other regional centers which are located in various cities including: Upstate New York, Washington, Maine, Massachusetts and Connecticut. According to the case study, “Exhibit 6 shows the net sales and growth in reference to the year 2008, 2009 and 2010” (C36 in the book, [Dess et al, 2012]). From that data, we can see how the company has developed. The rest of the 2010 annual report also helps in examining the performance of the company which can be seen in Exhibits 3, 4 and 5.
The larger serving size of Great Cups of Coffee is perhaps the most apparent gage that will improve appeal for the company’s customers. Receiving extra of a proportionately quality product for a comparable price obviously works as an enticement for customers to prefer Great Cups more than the opposition. While customers identify with a better quality and superior taste with fresher coffee, Great Cups supports its effective model of serving coffee that has been roasted no more 72 hours ago and that is blended and ground right at the store. Great Cups also provides as an unintended marketing method community bulletin boards and assists with book club gatherings as well as
them back, If MMC produces more coffee, then their profit will increase even more since they
The importance of economic indicators to the strategic planning process in any organization is the ability to benchmark economic conditions that contribute to improve profitability, business growth and market size. Leadership sets up the mission “to establish Starbucks as the most recognized and respected brand in the world.” In doing so, they have created a set of industry-leading, comprehensive coffee-buying guidelines addressing coffee quality, financial transparency, social and environmental responsibility. Starbucks strategy is also expanding market in globally to provide high quality coffee in convenient and visibility locations. They are continuing to innovate and extend the business with imaginative new ready-to-drink beverages and expanded packaged coffee offerings (Starbucks Corporation, 2007).
Starbucks achieved the first principle by purchasing “coffee from small farmers in 29 different countries … [and buying] coffee at a higher than market price and guarantees future purchases” (Alter). With this, Starbucks has greatly impacted these small-scale farmer’s lives by insuring they have good long-term stability and financial security, farmers who aren’t otherwise noticed in the conventional market options. And “globally, Starbucks contributed over $3.5 million in Fairtrade premiums for coffee-growing communities” (Alter).
Adolph Coors found the Coors Brewing Company in 1873. Statistics revealed that the sales of the company increased by 13 percent, amounting to $1 billion in revenue, which is the highest amount the company had ever acquired in its entire operations(Coors Brewing Company, 2010). Since then, Coors Brewery had went through various changes in management, marketing, production, and distribution.
Koehn, N.F., Besharov, M.A., & Miller, K. (2008). Starbucks Coffee Company in the 21st Century. [Case study]. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Publishing.
Preliminary Starbucks – one of the fastest growing companies in the US and in the world - has built its position on the market by connecting with its customers, and creating a “third place” beside home and work, where people can relax and enjoy themselves. It was the motto of Starbucks’ owner Howard Schultz and, mostly thanks to his philosophy, the company has become the biggest coffee drink retailer in the world. However, within the new customer satisfaction report, there are shown some concerns, that the company has lost the connection with customers and it must be taken some steps to help Starbucks to go back on the right path regarding customer satisfaction. I will briefly summarize and examine issues facing Starbucks. Starting from there, I will pick the most important issue and study it from different positions.
This paper will provide an argument for diversification to be presented to board of directors for Starbucks. A strategy for diversification indicating the products and industries for diversification and how synergies may be gained will be provided. The identification and the discussion of the foreign market Starbucks should enter will be presented, along with the strategy it should use to enter the market. Challenges Starbucks may face in the foreign market will be discussed, as well how it might respond strategically to minimize the impact of these challenges.
Starbucks has identified high value opportunity in China, India, Brazil and Japan. The large expansion opportunity of twelve billion in China alone is enough to drive Starbucks to expand globally. The organization has planned to double its footprint to 3000 stores in China by 2019 ("Starbucks Details Five-Year Plan to Accelerate Profitable Growth", 2014). Starbucks realizes that eventually there will be a diminishing return on their existing market within the US due to market maturity and there are only two ways to expand through diversification in their offerings and entering new markets. Given the international opportunity for growth and expansive tea market in Asia, the company will enjoy the benefits of the growth opportunity. Management’s decision to continue to grow globally is a driving force that has yielded