Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A few keys to success
A few keys to success
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A few keys to success
There are two fathers that has different personality and interest. One is Danny Shader, who is an successful entrepreneur that runs Netscape, Motorola, and Amazon business. While the other father was David Hornik who is an investor and has a lot of interest like collecting books, cerates his own major in computer music, earned a master’s criminology and law dregree, choosing and listening to the entrepreneurs pitches for him to invest on. Shader has this brilliant idea that pitched to Hornik. Shader was proposing an innovative solution about the problems of the Americans in doing online purchases because they don’t have a bank account or credit card. Hornik was interested on it and immediately offered a term sheet to shader. But Hornik realized …show more content…
PayNearMe was growing at more than 30% per month with his major partners 7-eleven and Greyhound in providing these services. When some entrepreneurs call to ask Hornik, Shader tells them, “You may be thinking he’s just a nice guy, but he’s a lot more than that. He’s phenomenal: super-hardworking and very courageous. He can be both challenging and supportive at the same time. And he’s incredibly responsive, which is one of the best characteristics you can have in an investor. He’ll get back to you any hour—day or night—quickly, on anything that matters.” Shader admires Hornik’s dedication and commitment to the entrepreneurs. So Shader recommended him to his known CEO company of Rocket Lawyer to be an investor. Even though it has downsides, working like a giver is like driving it through his success. Because in offering term sheets to the entrepreneurs, if there are at the rate of 50% chance of signing the term sheets it means you’re doing well. But for Hornik he has offered 28 term sheets to the entrepreneurs and 25 of them has …show more content…
Let’s figure out why givers dominate the top of the success ladder. Here are some studies and stories that would enlighten how giving can be more powerful, and less risky than most people believed. There are a lot of different kinds of people that we don’t think that they are givers and we do always taking something to them. As said to the book they are the consultants, lawyers, doctors, engineers, salespeople, writers, entrepreneurs, accountants, teachers, financial advisers, and sports executives. This kind of people are the givers that succeed later. Having the possibility that those who give first are often best positioned for success later. This people are at the bottom of the ladder which are not in a hurry for attaining the success. They just want to give and share their knowledge, talent, and strategies to others that who wants to receive it. But there are some givers who avoid the bottom success of ladder. As far as we think that givers are nice and generous. But they are not as always as that. Givers are being ambitious as takers and matchers. They have different ways on achieving their goals. Givers, Takers, and Matchers has all the desire to achieve success. They have all different perception and ways to attain success. When givers win, people are happy and supporting them because they have given help
... constant today. In earlier times the social purpose of a gift was to either solidify a military alliance or to secure protection from greater powers. Now the social purpose of a gift is to express thanks or, as in ancient times, to solidify a friendship. However, the transfer of wealth upon ones death to loved ones, friends and charities through a legal Will is almost identical to the bestowment of treasure Beowulf exercises upon his death. Andrew Carnegie one of the wealthiest men of the modern era mirrors the Anglo-Saxon gift giving sentiment in his quote, “The kept dollar is a stinking fish…the man who dies rich, dies thus disgraced.” It is interesting that the ideals employed many years ago are still such an important part of modern society. Ideals that transcend the barriers of history are those with the most validity and integration within society.
My attention was also drawn to several questions in this podcast, which made me eager to find the answers to these questions. For example, one interesting question I heard was “when you do see generosity how do you know it’s really generous” (Levy, 2010). This question stood out to me because it is one particular question I don’t think about often and made me wonder whether people help someone out because they see it as a duty. However, I believe the best answer to this question is the portrayal of the concept of norm of reciprocity, which indicates “the expectation that helping others will increase the likelihood that they will help us in the future” (Akert, Aronson, & Wilson, 2013, p.303). This is true because “generosity” happens when both persons are nice to each other and if an individual helps another person then it’s easy to assume that the person who was
Through the eyes of the prosperous, a lack of wealth indicates a fault in character, while their own success is the product of self-control. Paul Buchheit, who analyzed seven different psychological studies in his article titled “Ways the Poor Are More Ethical Than the Rich,” found that “ample evidence exists to show a correlation between wealth and unethical behavior, ...wealth and a lack of empathy for others, and…wealth and unproductiveness” (Buchheit). The relationship between wealth and poor character implies that when people become rich, they start caring more about maintaining their money supply and less about the well-being of others. As wealth increases, generosity, integrity, modesty, and other positive characteristics diminish. Paul Buchheit also noted that “low-income Americans spend a much higher percentage of their income on genuine charitable giving, [with] about two-thirds of ‘charitable’ donations from the rich go[ing] to their foundations and alma maters” (Buchheit). This proves that the wealthy are generally self-absorbed because a large proportion of them, despite having an abundance of money, refrain from devoting it to those in need. When donations are made, it’s only for their own personal benefit. Because the wealthy are programmed to be self-centered, they fail to serve others with their money and instead serve
´´ If one advances confident in the direction of his dreams, and endeavors to live the life he imagined, he will meet with a success unexpected in common hours. ’’ These words were spoken by Henry David Thoreau.Success is within the mind of the individual. A large portion of one´s life is spent working to become successful. People are told throughout childhood to work hard so they can grow up and achieve all of their dreams. But success takes many different forms. Different people have different interpretations of what success means to them. It does not matter how related they are to each other in certain áreas they always have a different point of view of what success really is. For some success is measured by social status and wealth
Midas almost died because of his crazy wish. Therefore, there will always be problems with shortcuts to success, so it has to be worked for. In addition, working for success relates back to modern day, because it is not as easy to achieve success as we think. G.K. Chesterton the author of the “Fallacy of Success” explains how “Books of Success” are full of lies that do not teach you how to be successful but instead teach you how to be snobbish. Furthermore, Chesterton goes on describe “In our society, temperance will not help a poor man to enrich himself, but it may help him to respect himself. Good work will not make him a rich man, but good work may make him a good workman.” To sum it up, nowadays, demeanor cannot give a poor man money or education, but can give him value in society. Just because he works hard it doesn’t mean that he will become rich ,but he will be a great workman. (Paragraph 11,
In society, only certain individuals were successful because success and wealth were pre-destined. On the macro level, society had an established hierarchy based on wealth and income. The wealthier a person; the higher up the hierarchy they were. This social aspect encouraged people to establish a strong work ethic on the micro level because wealth and success were a blessing. Therefore, people worked hard in order to attain
Often, success is rooted in factors beyond an individual’s knowledge or control. These exterior forces may vary greatly in all aspects except one: the successful individual has no power over them. Society likes to paint famed success as the result of years of arduous work in which an individual seizes every opportunity and eventually sees all of his struggles pay off as his goals are achieved. Sure, success would have been a distant dream if not for the seizure of opportunities and all that hard work, “but in fact [people who stand before kings] are invariably the beneficiaries of hidden advantages and extraordinary opportunities and cultural legacies that allow them to learn and work hard and make sense of the world in ways others cannot” (Gladwell 19). Take, for example, the story of a successful career man who made his living for 39 years thanks to a conversation behind closed doors of which he was not aware until he inquired about it years later. Greg Counts spent all but the first few years of his career in transportation and logistics because of a job he took in the first few years of his life after college. The
In today’s world, success is a word that is defined differently in everyone’s dictionary. Some people perceive success to depend on how much money an individual makes, person’s status in the society, and how well they can flaunt; but I think, success depends on the inner drives that satisfy own desire, the value of an experience than a product, and one’s ability to be self-gratified. In this era, success is defined based on how much money a person makes. Society thinks that if a person makes lots of money, he or she must be a successful person. Also, individuals who are given high status in the society appear to live a very successful life; the world considers them as role models. Similarly, those who flaunt their wealth create the impression
In today's society to understand success is to understand a particular individual. No two people's visions of what success means match. This greatly opposes “Death of a Salesman,” where success is seen as simply being wealthy and popular. In “Death of a Salesman” success seems to be a straightforward yes or no. If someone is wealthy and popular they are successful otherwise they are not. However, in the real world success is more individual based. One person’s success might be another person's nightmare. Some people want more intimate friends rather than a bunch of less personal friends or vise versa. Some people want to make a lot of money while others just want to make a difference. Furthermore, not everyone wants a lot of money. In today's society especially, wealth comes with a tremendous amount of additional stresses and pressures. These stresses include the fear of friends only interested in your wealth, or preventing your money from controlling you. These troubles are overlooked in the play. Instead, “Death of a salesman” portrays these two categories as entirely positive and the only necessary parts of being successful. Furthermore, success in today's society does not even necessarily include wealth as a criteria. For example according to the Huffington Post’s list of successful people includes Vincent Van Gogh who was a poor man throughout his entire life. Furthermore, Michelle Wall received the covenant honor, Mother of the year. According to the American Mother association she succeeded in raising her children and was a wonderful role model. Time and time again in our society today it does not require wealth and popularity to be
It has always been taught that sharing is caring, but people in power seem to have difficulties maintaining this moral code, which demonstrates the phenomenon referred as the power paradox. The power paradox is an observation in which people gain power and the capacity for influence through social practices that advance the interest of others, but as soon as the gain power their practices disappear, and they become narcissistic. Generosity is a vital factor in rising in power and receiving respect from others. According to Datcher Keltner, Co-Director of the Greater Good Science Center, states, “Competitive altruism refers to how people rise in power through acts of generosity. Relevant studies find that as people share more, they actually rise in the esteem of others and enjoy elevated power.” In other words, it is shown in studies how generosity affects power and the way you can influence other solely based on the fact of sharing. There are many things that people with the authority can give to others to allow the rise in the esteem, such as resources. An example of this can be found at the location of those who live in small hunter-gatherer societies. The power and status goes to the one who shares the most, which can include from food to labor or care and protection. Also, another thing that can contribute to possessing generosity is to give power away. Later on in Datcher Keltner’s article, Why
...esult, the more directly one sees their personal efforts impact someone else, the more happiness one can gain from the experience of giving. Sometimes generosity requires pushing past a feeling of reluctance because people all instinctively want to keep good things for themselves, but once one is over this feeling, they will feel satisfaction in knowing that they have made a difference in someone else’s life. However, if one lives without generosity but is not selfish, they can still have pleasure from other virtues.
When I was given this assignment, I didn't know who to chose. For pretty much all of my life, my personality and interests have fallen into place of me doing things and making decision on my own, so I decided to look further. As I grew older, I noticed how much my dad cared for our family and how he constantly tries his best, and I appreciated that. It feels like I’m only starting to get to know my dad recently, and that’s gone pretty well so far.
When people think about their lives and what they have accomplished to become powerful, wealthy, and happy, they tend to weigh the success that they have had to get them to where they are in life. Many people base their success on what they have done or accomplished either in work, school, or family life. What is success, according to Webster’s New World Dictionary the definition is, “1. a favorable result 2. the gaining of wealth, fame, etc. 3. a successful person a thing” (Neufeldt & Sparks, 1995, p.589). Based on the number-two definition, people are successful when they have wealth, fame, and other physical things to show their accomplishments. People obtain success either alone or with help of other people in both a business environment and educational environment. In both cases, success must be accomplished alone for many things, but in other important tasks, working in a team is best. Being able to be successful on a team, either in work or school, will help a person create skills that he or she did not have and work on skills that he or she already had.
wanting to give more than what they have. moral character of the rich and the poor and
Perhaps the most significant realization in the journey of personal growth is that there is not one single way of achieving success. Almost everyone grows up being taught that money is everything and are pushed to work hard and become wealthy. In this world, success is the equivalent to being rich and everyone assumes money is the only thing that will make life enjoyable. Essentially, everyone should realize that each person has different goals and ambition, which means that not everyone believes money leads to his or her objective and happiness in life. The assumption that success is the outcome of wealth is what humanity is exposed to and told to believe. Although success is oftentimes associated with wealth, success is the staircase to