Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Education for children with disabilities
Education importance for children with disabilities
Education for children with disabilities
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Education for children with disabilities
This case is about how three children will get to and from school as there is a single mom and has a disability of being blind. These children attend Continental Colony Elementary School, otherwise known as Continental Colony. The plaintiffs R.D., R.D, and D.T. attend this school. Their mother is Ms. Todd and she is 37 years old. In 2002, she was diagnosed with retinal detachment, in 2007, she lost sight in her right eye and in 2013 she lost sight in her left eye and is now blind. The case mentioned several times that she is disabled but her children are not disabled. Atlanta Public Schools provides transportation to and from school for children that live more than one mile away from school. Students who live within one mile of the school …show more content…
The Todd children live about a half a mile from the school and most their walking path is within a residential neighborhood to get to school. Ms. Todd’s children would not be receiving transportation to and from the school because they live so close to the school. Ms. Todd managed to get her kids to school from August 3, 2016 through August 8, 2016. The children didn’t attend school from August 9 through October 14 because Ms. Todd felt it was too dangerous for them to walk to school without adult supervision. She doesn’t have anyone to help her walk the kids to school nor funds for transportation to the school. She uses the children as guides for herself so she could help them get to school but would struggle to get herself back home. She spoke with various officials within APS voicing her concerns including the associate superintendent, a social worker and the transportation executive director. The officials conducted an onsite investigation of the walking path her children would take and found it reasonable. The transportation director informed Ms. Todd that they would not be providing a bus because they live in a walk zone and the walking path is safe. He offered to walk her children to school to get them acquainted with other children walking in same
2.Facts: This case was originally presented before the district court of Colorado in 1993 on behalf of the parents of Gregory Urban, a seventeen-year-old teen with severe mental disabilities. Gregory and his parents moved to Evergreen, Colorado in 1991. The parents wanted Gregory to go to Evergreen High School but the school district placed him at Golden High School where he participated in support services for children with severe disabilities. The support services at Golden High School were not available at Evergreen High. After the development of Gregory’s IEP his parents voiced objections to what they believed constituted violations of Gregory’s right to a free and appropriate public education. These violations included placement of Gregory outside his neighborhood school and failure to stipulate transition services in his IEP. After initially participating in the IDEA administrative process the parents filed a case with the district court claiming the school district violated Gregory’s rights under IDEA and ADA. The court ruled in favor of the school district by rejecting
General education high school teacher, Michael Withers, failed to comply with his student’s Individual Education Plan (IEP). D.D. Doe’s IEP required tests to be read orally. Despite knowledge of this IEP and being instructed to follow the IEP by the superintendent, school principal, special education director, and special education teacher, Withers still refused to make the accommodations for D.D.’s handicapping condition. As a result, D.D. failed the history class. His parents filed charges against Withers, arguing that D.D was not afforded the right to a Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) promised to all students by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). They also filed a claim for injuctive relief against the Taylor County Board of Education to enforce the laws that protect handicapped students.
The proposed expulsions and suspensions from their disability behaviors deprived them of their right to a free and appropriate public education in accordance to the EHA. The Judge ordered the school district from making other disciplinary acts other than a two-to-five-day suspension against any disabled child for disability-related behaviors and ensured that the “stay-put” provision would be in place and no student would be removed. This went to the Ninth-Circuit appeal where the previous decision was affirmed and modified to allow up to a ten-day suspension.
Scenario 1: A father informs you, the center director, that his daughter who has chronic asthma, needs to stay indoors every time he suspects the child is becoming ill. At first, you try to accommodate him, but with growing enrollment this becomes impossible. The staffing problem has been explained to the parent, but he feels that the school should be able to provide service to children like his who have chronic health problems.
Nappi court case went to trial in the district court. The court found that ruled in favor of the plaintiff, which was Kathy Stuart. The judge explained that expulsion would reject Stuart from a free and appropriate education guaranteed to special education students in the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA). The expulsion of handicapped children not only jeopardizes their right to an free and appropriate education, but it is also inconsistent with the procedures established by the Handicapped Act for changing the placement of disruptive children. Leagle (1985). STUART v. NAPPI (610 F.Supp. 90). Retrieved from http://www.leagle.com/decision/1985700610FSupp90_1677/STUART%20BY%20AND%20THROUGH%20STUART%20v.%20NAPPI. The court said that expelling students with disabilities will limit their availability to an education in the least restrictive environment. However, the court did rule that school officials could substitute an expulsion with suspension when dealing with a student who met the criteria to be covered by the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA). In fact, the court ruled that a school district could suspend a student from school for a maximum of only ten days. The court also determined that a school district could also hold a meeting to change the placement of the student if a more restrictive environment was needed. First, school authorities can take swift disciplinary measures, such as suspension, against disruptive handicapped children. Secondly, a (special education committee) can request a change in the placement of handicapped children who have demonstrated that their present placement is inappropriate by disrupting the education of other children. The Handicapped Act thereby affords schools with both short-term and long-term methods of dealing with handicapped children who are behavioral problems. Casetext (1978). STUART V. NAPPI, (D.CONN. 1978). Retrieved from
In the Evan v. Board of Education of Rhinebeck Central school district, the mother of the child Frank Evans, Catherine Evans filed a case for the reimbursement of the child’s education at the Kildonan School. The Kildonan School, which specializes in special education for children with learning disabilities like dyslexia. The basis for her case is that the school did not provide her son with the appropriate education, as is required for children with learning disabilities under the provisions of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) (Wrightslaw - Caselaw - Evans v. Rhinebeck (S.D. NY 1996), n.d.).
Thomas Jefferson was a man who believed that all American citizens need to be educated so that they may exercise their rights. He saw public education as essential to a democracy. One proposal he made for public education would guarantee that all children could attend public schools for three years. However, much like other early school reforms, this proposal received much rejection and was never brought into being. Despite this rejection, Jefferson still believed that America needed public education. Eventually, he opened the University of Virginia. Even though his bills and proposals to benefit public education never saw the light of day, he still made many contributions to public education by providing the foundation on how a democracy should handle educating its
Detroit, once known as a bustling city of fast cars and bling, is now known for its poor education system. Detroit, minus its Red Wings, has failed at every turn economically and educationally. With its population cut in half and poverty rates soaring, there is no telling what can stop this disaster of a city. The only hope, it seems, is to better educate the region that Detroit inhabits. Detroit Public Schools has been one of the worst performing school districts in recent years. In 2013, the city of Detroit filed chapter 9 bankruptcy, the largest account of bankruptcy to-date. Good teachers avoid Detroit Public Schools because of the poverty, job quality, and low pay, leaving children with the unqualified teachers they have today in this poverty-plagued city that they call home.
In the study of The Way Schools Work we learned to question the ideals of meritocracy and the American dream. However, Conflict Theories challenge the system of meritocracy, in which people are sorted and selected on the basis of talent and ability. On the contrary, “Conflict Theories, on the other hand, imply a system of inheritance in which people’s life chances are largely determined by their starting point within an existing structure of inequality” (McNamee and Miller Jr. 2014, 11). According to these theorists mentioned in The Way Schools Work (Boudin 1974; Bowles and Gintis 1976; Carnoy 1972; Carnoy and Levin 1985; Persell 1977), they speak about how schools reproduce status in several ways. First, they use formal language, and hold
Parents have the right to be included in placement decisions, IEP developments, and evaluations. Schools should collaborate and communicate consistently with family members due to the fact they know their child better than anyone else and can be a powerful resource, as well as an advocate, for their development and education (American Foundation for the Blind, 2015). Furthermore, information regarding a student’s disability is highly confidential. IDEA clarifies that such information may be shared with only individuals who are working directly with the student (Friend, 2014).
On June 26, 2009, the Supreme Court of British Columbia held that the Chilliwack School District was responsible for the injuries sustained by Devon Hussack, a 7TH grade student playing field hockey in his Physical Education class. The court found that the physical education teacher didn’t meet the standard of care as the student didn’t have any experience in the sport and was not taught at all how to play this particular sport.
Petitioner, Kaitlyn M. (“Kaitlyn”) is a twelve-year-old student in the 6th grade. Kaitlyn resides with her maternal grandmother, Lydia Delacroix within the jurisdictional boundaries of Beaumont Independent School District (“BISD”). District records indicate that Kaitlyn has lived with her grandmother since infancy. Ms. Delacroix advised the District that Kaitlyn has a medical diagnosis of ADHD, asthma, and allergies. Ms. Delacroix has indicated that Kaitlyn’s was diagnosed with ADHD in first grade while attending elementary school in Vidor. Ms. Delacroix notified the BISD that Kaitlyn’s physician prescribed approximately five different medications for ADHD which were discontinued by Ms. Delacroix because she did not see positive results. Kaitlyn
The Gaskin Settlement Agreement is an agreement between a group of families and advocacy organizations who filed a class action lawsuit against the Pennsylvania Department of Education (PDE) on behalf of a group of children with disabilities in 1994. This agreement does not change a student’s placement, program, or IEP in any manner. Only the IEP team has the authority to make modifications that will impact a student’s IEP. The main goal of this settlement is to make sure that IEP teams will determine if the goals in a student’s IEP may be implemented in a general education setting with supplementary aids and services prior to considering an environment that is more restrictive in nature. The elements of this case were designed to help increase the capacity of school districts to provide related services, SDI that is appropriate, supplementary aids and services, and supports to students who have disabilities that are placed in general education classrooms. The PDE lists many important elements of the Settlement Agreement to be aware of...
The defendant Rachel Holland was at the time a nine-year old girl with an intellectual disability with an I.Q. of 44 and an academic functioning level of a four-year old child. Rachel was described as being well behaved and popular with her second grade classmates. She enjoyed school and was motivated to learn. The plaintiff Sacramento Unified School District proposed to educate Rachel half time in a special education class, and half-time placement in a regular classroom. Rachel’s core classes such as Reading and Math services would be rendered in a special education class and classes such as PE, Music, Lunch, and Recess would be rendered in a general education classroom. Rachel’s Individual Education Plan (IEP) stressed language and communication goals such as speaking in four or five word sentences, initiating and terminating conversations, verbally stating name, developing twenty-four word sight vocabulary, counting to twenty-five, and printing first and last
Texas is best known for its individualistic subculture, but that individualism has led to a downfall in the educational system affecting all students in Texas. There are many reasons as to why this problem is still being currently seen, and one of the biggest reasons is inadequate funding. Although, inadequate funding is one of the biggest problems, gaps in the educational system will not be solved simply by providing more funding, instead a new system must be created. This new system should be one that speaks to more students, provides quality education by having better teachers and most importantly, students should have a closer one on one with teachers instead of being overcrowded in classrooms.