Canada A similar pattern of the cultural dimension and a close regionally distance between the two nations do not describe a similarity of both the U.S and Canada cultures in doing business. While many American business people make the mistake of considering Canada and the States have basically the same business culture, some take the difference in American and Canadian business communication and negotiations seriously and achieve more successes.
Verbal communication styles Americans should not meet any problem talking or taking a business conversation with Canadian business people because both countries are low-context nations in which the meaning of the speech is more likely explicit, direct, focused, and precise.
Communication methods
…show more content…
Interestingly, the author stated that an American meeting tends to allow arguments, while the Canadian people attempt to make harmony and consensus, even though confrontations are accepted and fixed peacefully.
Language and perceptual barriers Unlike the United States, Canada has two official languages: English and French. Nonetheless, a finding of Katz (2006) asserted that Canadian English is more English than American English, and the Canadian French differs from the original French. Most of the differences are found in writing forms, so American business people should be careful reading contracts and business papers before placing their signatures. An extra valuable finding from the author was the volume of voices where Canadian less likely to raise their voices to make a point and tend to be patient listeners and politely interrupters.
Negotiation
…show more content…
What else? There will be more an American business might think of but the point here is doing business in Canada is not as same as doing the same thing in the U.S. A clear plan and a workable strategy are still necessary even though Canada shares several similar traditions with the United States. Quality approaches The quality imperative method is such a good approach to the Canadian market as it utilizes to increase quality and reduce mistakes in servicing and production. The question here is now why quality imperative and why in Canada. In literature, scholarly writers Galperin and Lituchy (1999) argued that even the individualistic culture in Canada has less total quality management’s beliefs than the collectivities cultures, such as Mexico, the quality imperative impacts are still heavy enough for a business consideration. Born-global companies are needed in
But today more then even Canadian culture is affected by the American influence. Media, American artists, economic dependence, American propaganda and political pressure from the United States is making Canada too Americanized. All of these factors reflect on the social life of ordinary Canadians threatening the heritage and the traditions that define Canada as independent country. Canada and the United States are the largest trade partners in the world. It is the result of the geographical position of two countries and the free trade between two countries.
Our group chose Canada because we feel that there are many similarities between our culture in the United States and the culture in Canada. Comparing the economies of these two nations shows that they are nearly identical. If combined, Canada’s and the United States’ economies would be the world’s largest economy; therefore, it would be advantageous to incorporate in both nations.
The Canada-U.S. trade relationship is not static. Political and business strategies and practices change on both sides of the border, and events occur such as "mad cow disease" that are beyond almost everyone's control.
In the 1990s, 95% of feature films, about 70% of retail sales of sound recordings, 60% of television programs come from abroad, overwhelmingly from the United States. 80% of magazines, 70% of books come from abroad, of which overwhelmingly from the United States especially in the educational publication, only 25 %of educational book publishers in Canada were Canadian. At the supermarkets, the shops such as McDonald’s, Wal-Mart chain stores went into Canada on a ...
...nguage, and religion all make up Canada’s human face, but also front how the cultural accommodation will continue with the risk of losing Canada’s main traditions. Faultlines again come into perspective within demographic issues, especially with newcomers/old-timers, aboriginal population expansions, and French/English language. The core/periphery model is also represented. The end of the chapter places a focus on Canada’s economic face as well, dealing with stresses inside the global economy as well as its strong dependency on the U.S markets (Bone, 169) especially with the stimulating global recession. Canada’s economic structure leans on the relative share of activity in the primary (natural resource extraction), secondary (raw material assembly), tertiary (sale/exchange of goods and services), and quaternary (decision-making) sectors of the economy (Bone, 166).
The culture of Canada refers to the shared values, attitudes, standards, and beliefs that are a representative of Canada and Canadians. Throughout Canada's history, its culture has been influenced by American culture because of a shared language, proximity, television and migration between the two countries. Over time, Canadian-American relations have helped develop Canada’s identity during the years 1945-1982; thus introducing changing social norms, media and entertainment. In support of this, due to the United States being approximately 9.25 times larger in population and having the dominant cultural and economic influence, it played a vital role in establishing Canada’s identity. With Canada being its neighbour, naturally, the United States would influence their way of life upon Canada.
people, either English or French or any other group, have defined the Canadian values that we
There are many differences with Canada’s neighbour, the United States of America; some in which can be dated back to our ties with our English heritage. Canada is known as a constitutional monarchy; meaning that although they are independent from
Canada is a vast country with a strong multiculturalism policy, many distinct regions, and heavy foreign influence. The size of Canada has shaped much of Canadian’s way of life. Communications could not have developed easily or naturally in Canada without relying on technological innovations to bond the country in a communicative society. Canada has been divided into provinces and territories which have extremely different terrains, climates, economies and cultures. These differences create conflicting interests and misunderstandings.
The Canadian government’s move toward globalization is creating a level playing field for the Canadian economy and the culture by closing the gap of trade barriers and opening up the market, thereby making Canada a more industrialized and multicultural society. Globalization, the term is defined as the interactions among people of different nations through international trade and communication integration. This approach is unlocking the nationalistic perspectives to broader outlook, thus encouraging multiculturalism as well as linking ties among the nations.
Firstly, we can analyze that Canadians are individualism while Chinese are collectivism. Canada negotiators are more concerned with their sales over establish relationship with Chinese negotiators. They care ab...
The cultural difference between Canada is huge. Both the countries are multicultural but Canada is more western in culture whereas Singapore are mostly dominated by Chinese, Malay, and Indian culture. According to the Greet Hofstede Model,
Their values are similar in terms of government, diversity and human rights. In both countries, the governments are run democratically. The people of the country vote for their leader rather than the leader be appointed by themselves like a dictator. Both countries are civil with each other because both the people and the governments believe in democracy over communism or fascism. Therefore, we get along in a way that we have parallel views about how our countries are to be run in peace and equality. Also, Canada and the United States bond over the diverse populations we have and the cultural influences we have endorsed over the years. In Canada, more than 200 languages were reported in the 2011 Census of Population as a home language or mother tongue . Likewise, there are about 14 million households in the United States which English is not spoken as a first language . With this variety of languages and cultures, Canada and the USA share the same inclusive values and therefore develop a healthy relationship. Additionally, these two countries both believe that all human beings deserves rights and freedoms with no exclusions or exceptions. Of course there are some people within these countries who think the opposite of equality, however as a whole, both countries try to enforce human rights and freedoms. For
Each mediums of communication have its pros and cons while each person has her own communicating habits too. To me, purpose of the interaction is the most important considering factor. For example, are we informing, requesting or apologizing? I would choose the most effective medium of communication depending on different situations, For example, if I are going to inform somebody about the details of an events (time, date, venue), I use messages as the details can be clearly listed without any human errors like mishearing or misunderstanding. We can also check the information again through conversation record if we forget it, so it prevents other from forgetting where and when they should go; but if someone is asking me for advices on a problem she met in daily life, I would prefer phone calls so that I can feel her emotion more accurately not only through words but also through tones. Choosing the right communication method is very significant as it helps us to deliver message clearly in an appropriate tone and communicate in the best way to attain our
Communication is an interdependent process of sending, receiving, and understanding messages. The definition implies that the components of the communication process cannot be examined separately. Rather, the relationship exists between the sender and the receiver, as well as the environment of the communication event, must be viewed as a whole. According to this perspective, if any of the components and circumstances change (that is, the number of individuals involved in the interaction, seating arrangements, or the time of the day) the communication event is altered. Communication is an ongoing process; we never stop sending and receiving messages. As we will discover, communication is a dynamic process, a process that changes from one communication setting to the next. Although it is difficult to predict, the ways of interpreting communication, certain components are always present in the communication process.