Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The call of the wild summary
Book review call of the wild
Theory of survival of the fittest
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
n the Call of the Wild a major theme was the idea of "survival of the fittest". This theme really describes what the book, Call of the Wild is about because dogs are being sold to be sled dogs, so people can use them as transportation for the gold rush in the Klondike. Buck was one of these dogs and he experienced many things on this journey with meeting new dogs and having new owners, all the while being pushed to be a sled dog even in the harshest of conditions. The dogs were not the only ones that has the idea of "survival of the fittest," it was also the humans and people in this book experiencing it. In this essay you will see the meaning of the idea "survival of the fittest," and the people it affects, along with who succeeded, and who didn't.
"Survival of the fittest" can mean lots of things, but one of the most important meanings is how the dogs and people try to survive using strategies and experience, to be able to survive through the harsh conditions of the wild. The people and dogs that are successful, are the ones that know and sense danger, and the ones that are careful and hardworking at the same time. Buck, for
…show more content…
example, knew about the danger of stepping on that ice, so he refused to go which actually saved his life, and cost all the other dogs their lives including a couple humans, Hal, Charles, and Mercedes. "Survival of the fittest" doesn't always mean the physical part but the mental part, along with the personality of that dog or animal. Spike, had a cocky personality and was always willing to fight because he assumed he would always win, but of course that wasn't always the cause after Buck fought Spike. Buck won, while Spike was no longer the leader, or even part of the dogs because he was dead. So having the right kind of personality is key in surviving especially when with other dogs. Humans are also impacted by this because Hal, Charles, and Mercedes were careless, inexperienced, and dumb when it came to knowing how to lead a dog sled. This is proven by the amount of food given to the dogs, to much and than to less, and also by loading up the sled with lots of thing, making it super hard to carry especially for he dogs who were carrying all of the load. "Survival of the fittest" can mean a great deal for dogs especially because the dogs have to be able to know how to do things in the wild.
Buck, after learning from Pike how to steal food, mimicked him in doing so. This proves that Buck was smart on being able to pick up on how to survive, but it also shows what needs to happen for survival. Buck also knew how to suck water from ice, sense the weather, and things like that which helped him in the long run. Also with being a sled dog, it's important to be knowledgeable about the land, be able to be a good leader, and to be able to fight other dogs and people in order to help yourself. Buck fought to be a lead dog after Spike died. Buck didn't give up until he was the lead dog. He knew that's what he was meant to do .Buck was all of these things which is why he was a very successful sled
dog. "Survival of the fittest" can also mean a great deal for humans as well as dogs. Humans need to have the experience and knowledge of what they are doing. The master of the dogs have to be smart, when handling dogs and also when enough is enough when pushing the dogs. The masters have a lot of responsibility and if they can't handle that then they shouldn't take the role of being a master. The master's also have to be loving along with with being powerful and direct to the dogs. The dogs will also want to rebel if they have a master who doesn't have a love for them and also doesn't care if they are overworked and underfeed. John Thornton was a totally different than Charles, Mercedes, and Hal. While John Thornton was a loving, nice person, along with being experienced, the family of Charles, Mercedes, and Hal were totally the complete opposite. First of all, the family had no experience in leading a dog sled. They over packed, making the sled super heavy and on top of that Mercedes being the whiny women she is, insisted on being on the sled too, making the dogs have to pull a sled with extreme weight for long distances at a time which they were never meant to do. John Thornton on the other hand, saved Buck. Buck and Thornton had a great love for each other. Buck would go great distances to save Thornton like at the bar and the river. Buck would not let his master go out of sight. "Survival of the fittest" meant lots of things including the act of being able to survive and using strategies and experience to their advantage. This idea also did't just mean the act of being able to survive but also the mental way on how to survive. This idea isn't just meant for the sled dogs but also the humans. Buck was able to survive, even though most people he came across didn't. He learned how to survive, which lead him to joining the pack of wolves.
In this article I will be telling some differences between “Call of the Wild” book and movie. Some will be obvious while others may be just a tad bit different. For the most part they were both good. I hope you like my story about them.
First of all, the protagonist of The Call of the Wild, Buck, is a complete alpha dog. Realistically, nobody can catch up to Bucks skill level. Buck’s muscles became as hard as iron, and he grew callous to all ordinary
... middle of paper ... ... He did not turn into an animal, who only thinks of survival, but he shared his food with the people he loved. Therefore, one can conclude that one can see the theme of inhumanity through survival.
On April 1992, a young man from a wealthy family went to have the most amazing experience of a lifetime. He went hiking to the Alaskan Frontier, from the Grand Canyon, and through Chesapeake Beach. His name was Christopher McCandless and he wanted the best for himself. He first burned the cash inside of his wallet, cut up his ID’s, and abandoned his car. He even gave away $24,000 in savings to charity. The story “Into The Wild” describes how Chris McCandless changed his name to Alexander Supertramp. Jon Krakauer’s “Into The Wild” depicts a Transcendental representation due to his appreciation of nature when leaving society, trusting his own instincts, and most importantly, the interconnection of Oversoul.
One of Buck's Internal Conflict is choosing between a master or a wolf pack(love of John Thornton and the Call of the wild).
The novel, The Call of the Wild, follows a four-year-old mixed Saint Bernard and Scottish shepherd, named Buck. In the beginning of the story, Buck lives in the home of Judge Miller, located at Santa Clara Valley, California. In Santa Clara, Buck lives a luxurious life. At the time of the story, gold is discovered in the North. With this discovery, the value of large dogs like Buck escalated dramatically. The dog’s value was due most to their ability to haul heavy sleds through the abundant snow. Unfortunately, Judge Miller’s servant, Manuel steals Buck to sell him to a band of dog-nappers to pay for his accumulating gambling debts. The ring of thieves that bought Buck is gaining a secure banking by trading the dog to northern executives. Buck, who has had an easy life so far, does not adapt well to the terrain as the other canines do. Buck does not easily tolerate the confinement and mistreatment of his new authority. Buck’s gains the misconception, which then is an aide that any man with a club is a dominator and must be obeyed.
A quick learner, he adapts well to the sled dog life. His heritage also helped him become accustomed to the harsh Klondike climate. Some difficulties such as sore feet and a voracious appetite set him back at the beginning, but he speedily overcomes them. Buck goes through several masters and many thousands of miles. Along the way, he learns “The Law of Club and Fang”: never challenge a human that has a weapon, and once a fighting dog falls to the ground, roaming huskies quickly destroy it.
First, we're going to talk about Buck's strength through the things that he faces and how he adapts to the circumstances. Being that Buck's character doesn't have any speaking parts one get a true sense of how Buck feels through the imagery throughout the story As the story begins we meet Buck, who is a spoiled, carefree and loved pet to Judge Miller in the "sun-kissed" Santa Clara val...
The Call of the Wild, on the surface, is a story about Buck, a four- year old dog that is part Shepherd and part St. Bernard. More importantly, it is a naturalistic tale about the survival of the fittest in nature. Throughout the novel, Buck proves that he is fit and can endure the law of the club, the law of the fang, and the laws of nature.
Chris McCandless and Buck serve as examples of the archetype of the wild through their experiences of leaving where they feel most comfortable and answering the call of the wild. They show that each experience is inimitable because the wild is unique to every individual. For Buck, the wild is a place outside of civilization and his dependence on man, where the external threats of nature exist and he must prove himself as a true animal with instincts for survival. In McCandless' case, the place outside of civilization is actually an escape from his fears because the wild for him is in relationships, where the threat of intimacy exists and he must learn to trust others for happiness. This is because for each of us, the wild is what we fear, a place outside of our comfort zone and, as McCandless' experience shows, not necessarily a physical place. To render to the call of the wild we must leave everything that makes us feel protected, and we must make ourselves completely vulnerable to the wild. McCandless and Buck show that in order to successfully respond to the call of the wild we must relinquish control and drop our guards, until ultimately the fear subsides and we find peace with ourselves as well as with our environments.
The novella The Call of the Wild is a story of Buck overcoming challenges while being thrown into the real world and learning new traits like persistence and resilience. Protagonist Buck is a colossal St Bernards cross Scotch shepherd dog, transforms from a humble house dog and then eventually returns to a primordial state as a best of the wild. Along the way he is faced with an endless array of challenges. London achieves this by portraying Buck’s change in character in a manner that explores and incorporates diverse motifs.
Christopher Johnson McCandless was a hiker who also went by the name Alexander Supertramp and ventured into the Alaskan wilderness in April 1992 with a bit of food and equipment, hoping to live in isolation. Almost four months later, McCandless's body was found, weighing only 30kg. His story shocked many people and got the attention of magazine writer Jon Krakauer. At First he wrote a small article in the magazine Outside that sparked a lot of controversy with the readers. Since Krakauer got a lot of attention from his article, he decided to do more investigation on McCandless’s journey. Krakauer end up writing the book named Into the Wild and explains with plenty of detail McCandless’s life before his journey to the wilderness. Now a days, most teenager or young adult would never give up the life they have, because the way were so attach to electronics and our surroundings, for Chris McCandless is a different story he gave everything he had in life to go out and live a life in seclusion that caused him his death.
like a real wolf, and he even would be strong enough to beat a wolf at
The law of club and fang applies to all creatures. Both man and animal are lured by the attractive forces of their ancestry. It is up to them to decide if they are willing to submit to the call and embrace their primitive nature. The Call of the Wild enlightens readers with a story about a dog who yields to said call and renounces his domesticated ways. Jack London juxtaposes the events in The Call of the Wild with those in his life by creating characters that are indicative of mankind, and incorporating the themes of heredity and the influence of the environment on both man and animal and double meanings of places and characters in the novel.
Thankfully, I had been able to keep myself spoiler free as it relates to “The Deer Hunter.” For a movie with this reputation and fame, I was quite proud of the fact that I hardly knew what it was about, how it ended or even how its famous Russian roulette scene climaxes. I was excited to finally see this movie, in small part because it was the last film I needed to see to have watched every best picture winner from the 1970s. But, to put it bluntly, “The Deer Hunter” disappointed me.