Jack London Is A Nature Faker

Is Jack London a nature faker? Jack London, a phenomenal writer, wrote The Call of the Wild in 1903. After writing the novel, many people are believed to call London what is a “Nature Faker.” A nature faker is a person back then that misrepresents facts about nature, and especially false information about animals. Jack London was a nature faker in The Call of the Wild because he used a lot of anthropomorphism and gave unrealistic traits about dogs in the book. There is only one answer to this question:Jack London IS a nature faker.

First of all, the protagonist of The Call of the Wild, Buck, is a complete alpha dog. Realistically, nobody can catch up to Bucks skill level. Buck’s muscles became as hard as iron, and he grew callous to all ordinary

pain (28). He could eat anything, no matter how loathing or indigestible (28). His sight and scent became remarkably keen (29). And without a doubt, his hearing was on spot (29). In addition to that, London states Bucks paws are paws of steel, so therefore Buck can crack open frigid frozen ice (29). This is quixotic, and maybe a dog can have one or two of these traits, but having all of them, that will never happen without surgery, making Jack London a nature faker.
Secondly, Jack London is a nature faker because of Buck, yet again.

In The Call of the Wild, Buck has a theoretical relationship with a man like no other relationship. The man, John Thornton, is a real outdoorsy, diligent man that knows how to treat fierceful canines right. John Thornton is Buck’s ideal master, and they never let each other out of their site (117). For example, when Buck hears his ancestors and other keen, primordial, primitive wolves howling for him to join the pack, at first, the dog simply denies it and stays at John Thornton’s camp near the mouth of the White River. Why would Buck not want to join his wolf friends? It is because Buck has the most unrealistic relationship and such love for just a man, meaning he would stay inside of his comfort zone with John Thornton, rather than joining the call of wildness (115). Having the evidence of Buck not joining his wolf friends and staying with a man proves Jack London is a nature faker due to his bogus writings of a

dog.
Although people might still disagree that Jack London is a nature faker, and they might think he is not a nature faker, evidence still proves Jack London is a nature faker.

Even if you think he is not, Jack London is a nature faker, still, due to former President of the United States, Theodore Roosevelt. When a famous political leader came in to hand, it becomes obvious and out of control. It is true that Jack London was just trying to construct a majestic fictional novel, but he still took it too far on the personification and anthropomorphism for 1903. For example, when The Call of the Wild was first released, many people read the book and had mixed thoughts of it. The readers who think it is unrealistic call London the nature faker, while the people who think it was 100% realistic do not call him the nature fakers. After reading, tons of people joined the nature faker’s controversy and said Jack London is a nature faker. Some of those people include public figures and even Theodore Roosevelt. Admittedly, Jack London is a nature faker at

heart.
After reading The Call of the Wild, most people would think of Jack London just trying to write fiction. But after detailed review, people will think more and more of how London really is a true nature faker. Nature fakers have all of the same qualities Jack London does. Fake writings about animals, false relationships between animals and humans, and everything unrealistic about nature. After many people in the world say Jack London is a nature faker, more people agree that he is a nature faker than not. Is Jack London really the nature faker people say he is?