Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of pesticides essay
Harmful effects of pesticides essays
Impacts of pesticides on agriculture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of pesticides essay
The food we enjoy every day comes at a cost, and could stop being produced in an instant. Caesar Chavez knew of this problem and devoted his life to fixing it. Farmers across the United States suffer from unequal treatment. Chavez has worked to improve the financial, medical, and labor standards for all farmers regardless of race, or social standing. Health challenges are among one of the greatest threats facing farmworkers in the United States. Employers have no urge to help workers in the fields, even though there are plenty of resources available to assist them. According to Chavez, “Today, thousands of farmworkers live under savage conditions—beneath trees and amid garbage and human excrement—near tomato fields in San Diego County, …show more content…
tomato fields which use the most modern farm technology.” (Chavez, Address to the Commonwealth Club of California) Chavez’s point is that the conditions in which a farmworker must live in are unreasonable and one can easily damage their health living this way.
This not only shows what the growers are doing to their workers, but what they are doing to that land as well. Pesticides and other harmful chemicals are used on the crops which damages the environment and can harm farmworkers. Caesar Chaves points out the growers blame the workers for the problems occurring, but the growers are the true cause of the problems. Chaves himself comments, “The growers only have themselves to blame as they begin to reap the harvest from decades of environmental damage they have brought upon the land--the pesticides, the herbicides, the soil fumigants, the fertilizers, the salt deposits from thoughtless irrigation--the ravages from years of unrestrained poisoning of our soil and water.” (Chavez, Address to the Commonwealth) The environmental damage the growers are causing are not only affecting the land around them. If the land becomes too bad to produce upon there will be no agricultural use for it, …show more content…
and will leave behind many sick workers from the chemicals and minimal health care received. This proves the corruption of the growers, how one-sided their cause is, and the amount of health benefits and care the workers in the field get from their job. This also illustrates that there are more problems than just health issues regarding farmworkers in the fields. Financial problems still exist today even though Chavez has fought to fix related issues.
Programs such as the H-2A program allows agricultural employers to hire temporary workers inside the United States to complete seasonal work. Within the last decade, earning a stable living has been an increasing challenge for farmworkers. Most farmworkers receive lesser wages than common jobs found in cities, such as a fast food worker. Mentioned in the article Farmworkers in the United States, “The majority of farmworkers earn annual wages below the federal poverty level. According to the Natural Agricultural Workers Survey, the only national cross-section survey of farmworkers, 61 percent live in poverty. The median income for farmworkers is less than $11,000 annually.” (MHP Salud, Farmworkers in the United States) As stated in the article, most farmworkers live in poverty and barely earn enough money to support themselves or their families. This shows there are still problems to be fixed regarding workers in the agricultural industry. This also brings out the point there is still a large amount of corruption among the employers of the farmworkers. Caesar Chavez worked hard to provide public benefits towards farmworkers, such as healthcare or food stamps, although many have a hard time acquiring these benefits. Income received from working with food is a shockingly low rate when considering the behalf of farmworkers. As referred to earlier, the article Farmworkers in the
United States conveys, “In fact, while 71 percent of every food income dollar goes to corporate food processors and 23 percent goes to growers, only 6 percent goes to farmworkers.” (MHP Salud, Farmworkers in the U.S.) The income of workers across farms in the Unites States has been unequally distributed for the amount of work that is completed. While the growers earn large amounts of money, the farmworkers are suffering from unequal treatment. This proves there are still problems occurring today dealing with farmworkers, even though Caesar Chavez persevered to create an equal working environment for all farmworkers and their employers. The working conditions endured by farmworkers are unethical and bitter. Chavez focused all of his efforts towards fixing these problems, and did make a difference. Although there are still issues occurring today, life as a farmworker would be worse without Chavez’s help. This does not mean the farmworkers are a lost cause, but it does mean there needs to be a change soon before the workers become tired of this unequal treatment and decide to stop putting up with the current conditions provided. The food we enjoy every day is created from individuals who deserve more, but at one point these workers may stop laboring to make a stand for what is right and to take matters into their own hands.
Before reading or watching the film, I knew little about Cesar Chavez. I only knew that he fought for the rights of farm workers, but had no idea of how he achieved it. I was surprised to learn about some of his innovations that later lead to his success. Especially since some were already used by other strong leaders previously from him. The two innovations that stood out to me the most were the use of nonviolence and boycotting. Both innovations helped Cesar Chavez in achieving fair rights for other farm workers. These innovations are still used and seen today since they have been effective in accomplishing change.
Ferriss, Susan, Ricardo Sandoval, and Diana Hembree. The Fight in the Fields: Cesar Chavez and the Farmworkers Movement. New York: Harcourt Brace, 1997. Print.
Since 1962, Chavez created and maintained a union for farm workers called the United Farm Workers of America. He went through many hard times and had to make very hard decisions but nothing stopped him from giving up on his dreams to help other people. In Document A, Dick Meister talks about how he saw the UFW through his point of view, a highly skeptical reporter from San Francisco. He says ...
Chávez’s leadership was based on an unshakable commitment to nonviolence, personal sacrifice and a strict work ethic. He emphasized the necessity of adhering to nonviolence, even when faced with violence from employers and growers, because he knew if the strikers used violence to further their goals, the growers and police would not hesitate to respond with even greater vehemence. Despite his commitment to nonviolence, many of the movement’s ‘enemies’, so to speak, made efforts to paint the mo...
Crops today are thriving, and farmers can owe it all to the pesticides they use. If no pesticides were used, then insects would destroy crops, feeding off of their leaves and produce until hardly anything is left. According to corncommentary.com, Without the use of pesticides and fungicides, most fruit and vegetable crops would suffer a 50-90 percent loss due to uncontrolled insects and disease organisms. Despite what most people believe, even organic growers use pesticides on their crops that have been approved for such organic growers. Even they know that the wrath of insects and other disease organisms would destroy their plants and their profit they would have made from those plants. Also, without things such as weed killers, people would have to till the soil around their crops by hand. On large scale farms, this would take a huge amount of people to complete a task like this. The weeds would have to be pulled up, by their roots to ensure they wouldn’t grow back rapidly. On top of that, the crop would have to be routinely checked for weeds, as they grow fast and of many. The amount of money it would take to pay all the workers, and how often they would need to be paid for their work, is not owned by any farmer. Pesticides, herbicides and fungicides are what help keep our crops protected and healthy. Without them, we would be in deep
The phenomena of Migrant Workers would not be possible if the migrants were able to get jobs elsewhere, but as many come from Third-World Countries with little economic possibilities, this is not possible. What has resulted is an inexhaustible supply of cheap labor to the United States. This willingness on the part of the workers to work for wages otherwise unacceptable in the United States is problematic. Employers in this position are not under any pressure to reveal truthful, or even any information about wage rates, and many workers do not ask how much they will be paid. As a result, workers often do not know how much they will paid until they are thousands of miles away from their homes, and frequently not until they are paid at the end of a week. This is the story for the Mexican blueberry pickers in Maine, and the growing number of apple pickers who are Jamaican.
There is much to commend about the inclusion of United Farm Workers (UFW) co-founder and Filipino Larry Itliong in the Hollywood biopic “Cesar Chavez” directed by Diego Luna. However sadly, his depiction is problematic. The film fails to present an accurate history of this historically important farm workers’ movement. “Cesar Chavez” does not stress the historic multi-ethnic partnership between Mexicans and Filipinos in the UFW and the effort that was born as a product the Filipinos’ 1965 Grape Strike. Rather, the film is told from a predominantly Chicano/a perspective that only lightly accents the contribution of Filipino-American farm workers.
...struggling to earn any income at all and sometimes do not even get the opportunity to eat. Another issue that Raj Patel did not touch on is the lack of care consumers have for the farmers. It seems that consumers care about farmers about as much as the corporations do, which, in my opinion, is not a lot. When consumers only care about low prices and large corporations only care about making a profit, the farmers are left out to dry. Many consumers believe “food should be available at a bargain price, a belief that relies on labor exploitation and environmental exhaustion at multiple points along the commodity chain.” (Wright, 95) Corporations as well as consumers generally tend to be selfish and I think Raj Patel is afraid to mention this. If only these people cared a little bit more about each other I believe the hourglass of the food system will begin to even out.
After the devastation left from the Civil War, many field owners looked for new ways to replace their former slaves with field hands for farming and production use. From this need for new field hands came sharecroppers, a “response to the destitution and disorganized” agricultural results of the Civil War (Wilson 29). Sharecropping is the working of a piece of land by a tenant in exchange for a portion of the crops that they bring in for their landowners. These farmhands provided their labor, while the landowners provided living accommodations for the worker and his family, along with tools, seeds, fertilizers, and a portion of the crops that they had harvested that season. A sharecropper had “no entitlement to the land that he cultivated,” and was forced “to work under any conditions” that his landowner enforced (Wilson 798). Many landowners viewed sharecropping as a way to elude the now barred possession of slaves while still maintaining field hands for labor in an inexpensive and ample manner. The landowners watched over the sharecroppers and their every move diligently, with harsh supervision, and pressed the sharecroppers to their limits, both mentally and physically. Not only were the sharecroppers just given an average of one-fourth of their harvest, they had “one of the most inadequate incomes in the United States, rarely surpassing more than a few hundred dollars” annually (Wilson 30). Under such trying conditions, it is not hard to see why the sharecroppers struggled to maintain a healthy and happy life, if that could even be achieved. Due to substandard conditions concerning sharecropper’s clothing, insufficient food supplies, and hazardous health issues, sharecroppers competed on the daily basis to stay alive on what little their landowners had to offer them.
Although agriculture is one of the most hazardous jobs in the United States, there is a huge gap in healthcare for those that work in the industry. Due to the large migrant and seasonal worker population, especially those from Mexico, it is a hard population to reach when it comes to healthcare needs. Fear, language barriers and cultural norms are all barriers that need to be addressed for this special population. “(Holmes 2011) Agriculture is one of the most hazardous occupations in the United States. In 2000, there were 780 deaths and 130,000 disabling injuries in agriculture. The only industry that had more deaths was construction, with 1,220.”(Hansen and Donohoe 2003) “Migrant workers face numerous barriers to medical care, including lack of transportation, insurance, and sick leave, the threat or fear of wage or job loss, language barriers between MSFWs and health care providers, and limited clinic hours.”(Hansen and Donohoe 2003) Traumatic injuries, food insecurity, infectious disease, chemical and pesticide related illness, dermatitis, dental, heat stress, respiratory conditions, musculoskeletal disorders, and reproductive health are just some of the issues that migrant farm workers face. (Hansen and Donohoe 2003; Wang, Myers et al. 2011; Weigel and Armijos 2011)
The articles “The Fruits of Ill-Health: Pesticides and Workers’ Bodies in Post-World War II California” by Linda Nash and “La Pica Tierra/The Soil Bites: Hazardous Environments and the Degeneration of Bracero Health” by Mary Mendoza relate by examining the relationships between workers and pesticide use following the second World War. Nash argues that the bodies of farmworkers and the environment are intricately linked, while Mendoza’s article focuses specifically on the discrimination of Mexican agricultural workers in the Braceros program.
Around the world, incessant debate swells over the matter of industrial farming. Today, arguments over organic versus industrial farming are analogous to a salmon swimming downstream in a murky nitrogen runoff stream – it’s stalled, hazardous, and rather convoluted. From meticulous inspection of the facts, one realizes that both sides’ arguments can often overlap and contradict each other, often with disputable claims backing up certain viewpoints. In this regard, David Biello, associate editor of Scientific American, argues that in developing countries, industrial farming is preferable to organic farming in developing countries because it is more suitable and safe. However, Biello fails to address industrial farming’s most dangerous and deadly aspect – pesticides. The effects of pesticides are so dire that it is nearly impossible to suggest that industrial farming is more innocuous and suitable for third world countries.
Jordan, Miriam. “Got Workers? Dairy Farms Run Low on Labor” Wall Street Journal 30 5 2009:
Hugo Chavez was a powerful and positive force in addressing social issues, however, his singular focus on social issues at the expense of other matters of the country left the Venezuelan economy in tatters. In 1998, 50.4% of the Venezuelan population was living below the poverty line, where as in 2006 the numbers dropped to 36.3% (Chavez leaves). Although he aggressively confronted the issue of poverty in Venezuela, many other problems were worsened. Some Chavez critics say he used the state oil company like a piggy bank for projects: funding homes, and healthcare while neglecting oil infrastructure and production. Without growth in the oil ind...
The farm which had once been the source of inspiration with a democratic society was now a farm of death, destruction and communism. This is the impact of social injustice on what was once a just community in a revolutionary society.