Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Corporate social responsibility viewpoint
Corporate social responsibility m&s
Corporate social responsibility m&s
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Corporate social responsibility viewpoint
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) involves going beyond the interests of the firm and requirements of law to contribute in developing a sustainable environment and a better society (McWilliams and Siegel, 2001). Yet Vogel (2005) claims that regulation is required to ensure that companies comply with a standard of CSR. Unethical practices create negative images of organisations, however through adopting CSR; profitability may be increased through the positive image that society creates (Pava and Kraus, 1997). While Friedman (1970) argues that corporations are responsible for obtaining shareholder’s funds in a profitable and legal way, therefore not engaging in corporate philanthropy. Friedman’s view is egoistic, whereby acting to promote the greatest impact for the company compared to adopting a utilitarian approach which focuses on achieving the greatest good for the majority (Beauchamp and Bowie, 2004). Organisational performance is evaluated on three factors; economic prosperity, social justice and environmental quality (Elkington, 1997), emphasising the significance of companies adopting an ethical stance in the modern business world. This assignment will address the role ethics and CSR play in organisations through applying case studies to examine whether companies adopt CSR for the enhanced reputation and competitive advantage or the social and environmental impact. The role of regulation within CSR will be investigated due to corporate scandals and environmental disasters which raise concerns over the ethical perspective of companies. Companies should embed CSR within the core values of a company. McElhaney (2009) emphasises the importance of committees overseeing the practices, ensuring the implementation and manageme... ... middle of paper ... ...owever, there are companies where CSR is important to them, which is reflected in their ethical stance and their conduct of business. The role of regulation is necessary to use as a base-line for companies to ensure that a standard level of CSR is achieved in order to improve and sustain the environment and improve society. Through regulation, companies would have to adhere to the law therefore minimising the issue of companies only adopting CSR for the reputation and profitability gain. Many companies adopt CSR on the premise of improving society; however there are a few companies who use CSR as an effort to appear ethical and align their strategies with the needs of the stakeholder. However, whilst regulation would be beneficial, some companies would still seek to minimise the money invested in CSR, due to their profit-orientated goals and egoistic ethical stance.
An important factor for the successful development of a CSR framework at the corporate level is to ensure that the framework can be easily merged with the daily routines of the store. In the Siemens case that was studied in class, putting the company back in order had to start from the corporate level and with the individual in charge of corporation – the CEO. Therefore, in order to implement CSR at the store, the initiative has to come from the corporate level, however the store here in Nanaimo can assume a key role by developing and testing new CSR practices.
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is the way a corporation achieves a balance between its economic, social, and environmental responsibilities in its operations so as to address shareholder and other stakeholder expectations. In general, when firms hold this wider encouraging role on the public by being engaged with stakeholders, a variety of profit can be produced for both company and the stakeholders. A key inclination is the combination of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) into the organization strategy, culture, mission and communications. By incorporating corporate citizenship into the company it is no longer an additional “nice thing to do” or something made to obey laws or regulations. Instead, corporate responsibility has become something business leaders and workforce want to engage in, frequently because executives who believe in the long-term see business profit. The four types of social responsibilities a...
Whilst many firms’ Corporate Responsibility efforts prove to be counterproductive, pitting business against society and pressuring companies to think of generic CSR responses, addressing social issues by creating shared value for both society and the firm can ultimately increase profitability and operational sustainability (Kramer, 2006). In the case of Cameco, the corporation’s 5 pillar strategy demonstrates a strategic ethics policy (Moroz et al, 2015), its focus on creating shared-value enhancing the overall effectiveness of business operations in terms of increased worker productivity through improved working and living environments, and increased revenue due to more efficient operations. As measures of stakeholder power, strategic posture, and economic performance are significantly linked to levels of corporate social disclosure (Roberts, 1992), it is evident that adopting wholesome ethical processes in business practices can aid U92 in the achievement of business
Corporate Social Responsibility is the obligation from corporations to utilize their resources to aid and benefit the larger society. The four components of CSR are economic, legal, ethical, and philanthropic. Social Responsibility is a fundamental force in the wealth creation process. If correctly demonstrated, CSR should heighten competitiveness and boost the value of wealth creation to society. A company's CSR Initiatives directly represent who the company is and what it believes it. The m...
Corporate social responsibility (CSR) invaded the corporate world over the last few decades. This concept has become an essential need for competitive advantage unlike its original role as a nicety. The companies have seen the business benefit of the initiative and stakeholders have appreciated the initiative. This has led to the wide application in the firm’s operational agenda.
An organization’s Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) drives them to look out for the different interests of society. Most business corporations undertake responsibility for the impact of their organizational pursuits and various activities on their customers, employees, shareholders, communities and the environment. With the high volume of general competition between different companies and organizations in varied fields, CSR has become a morally imperative commitment, more than one enforced by the law. Most organizations in the modern world willingly try to improve the general well-being of not only their employees, but also their families and the society as a whole.
Companies have presented investigations about their motivation towards voluntarily social and environmental as insolvent. This paper argues in agreement with Adam’s view that the goal of CSR reporting is to promote credibility and corporate image of stakeholders operating in a particular industry. Whereas companies must focus their efforts on enhancing their profitability, they should also ensure that the welfare of other stakeholders is protected.
A corporations CSR should be shaped in order to fit the goals of the corporation, although every corporation’s CSR should differ, since most have different goals and different communities behind them. The CSR should be molded into fitting the corporation’s goals in order to make it easier on the corporation in giving back to the community while achieving its goals. For example, a corporation located in a desert wishes to be more efficient, by reducing water usage it is not only creating lower costs, which result in higher revenue, but also helps the community by not taking up so much water. Taking this into consideration, it is critical that the corporation goals and values are established and clear throughout the corporation, they should be developed by the board or directors and CEO, and the highest managerial level should stress their importance to the rest of the corporation. By making the goals and values at the top branch of the corporate hierarchy, it will be simpler for the corporates community to develop in order to nurture those goals and values. Therefore, a corporation can reach the “shared-value,” a value for both its shareholders and community in a simpler manner that can result benefiting the corporation in the end as well. Throughout the article many examples are given of actual corporations that have benefited and changed their CSR in order to fit their goals, therefore, providing solid proof that these methods work. Nevertheless, as acknowledged by the author’s themselves, most of the corporations taken into consideration where one’s that Harvard CSR students were employed
Burke and Logsdon (1996) focus on strategic CSR by outlining five dimensions: centrality, specificity, proactivity, voluntarism and visibility. They define centrality by measuring how close a firm’s CSR fits with its mission. They propose this measurement can supply both feedback and direction for the company’s future. A firm’s specificity measures the ability of the firm to absorb the benefit...
I begin this essay by defining CSR, there are many definitions for this term by various different theorists, and EU says that CSR is "A concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis." On the other hand, Sloman et al. define it as "The concept in which a firm takes into account is the interests and concerns of a community rather than just its shareholder". Davis and Blomstrom (1966), say it "Refers to a person’s obligation to consider the effects of his decisions and actions on the whole social system". These definitions differ from one another in many ways but they agree that CSR involves taking the environment into account and therefore, one must look take social responsibility.
They are held accountable for effectiveness of steps taken, (although a set of activities is specified as to what could constitute as CSR, corporate are given the flexibility tochoose the CSR initiatives it undertakes. Thus, despite the imposition by the new Law, to report CSR spending and reporting of initiatives taken by the firm Corporate Affairs Minister Sachin Pilot confirmed that there will be no pressure from the government on what the companies should do and that it would be up to companies on how to use it for a social cause‘ Hence, self –regulation,’ through CSR gives the impression of moral reflexivity and responsibility on the part of the companies without conceding power to the
Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) is one of the most recognized aspects in the world today since companies’ reputation is judged from its CSR policies, quality of its services and products and competitiveness. Many authors relate CSR with ethical conducts in businesses. Many authors therefore give related definitions for both CSR and ethics. Corporate Social Responsibility can be defined as continued commitment to ethical conduct, to provide and contribute to high living standards of the society by facilitating economic developments and improving the standards of living of the employees together with their families, their society and community at large (MallenBaker.net 2011).
Business organizations regularly run into demands from various stakeholders groups when conducting day-to-day business. These demands are generated from employees, customers, suppliers, community groups, governments, and shareholders. Thus, according to Goodpaster, any person or group of people that can shape or can be shaped by attainment of the objectives by an organization is considered a stakeholder. Most business organizations recognize and understand their responsibilities to these groups and endeavor to honor and fulfill them. These responsibilities are often communicated to the public by a statement of principles or beliefs. For many business organizations, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has become an essential and integral part of their business. Thus, this paper discusses the two CSR views: the classical view and the stakeholder view. Furthermore, I believe that the stakeholder view has brought ethical concerns to the forefront of businesses, and an argument shall be made that businesses would improve both socially and economically if CSR, guided by God’s love, was integrated into their strategic planning.
Now-a-days it is considered that CSR is one of the major concerns of organization’s business ethics. Companies increasingly increase their corporate social responsibility (CSR) and ethical management accepting the positive impact on the bottom line. The vast bulk of Standard & Poor’s 500 companies publish sustainability reports unfolding their program challenges and achievements. These pre-emptive efforts can pr...
As a result of modern corporate scandals and rapid development of international business environments, social responsibility (SR) has become a key aspect of corporate competitive contexts. (Brammer, Williams and Zinkin, 2007). Businesses are under increasing pressure to incorporate SR amongst their profit-driven aims and have become increasingly accountable for their social and environmental actions. Increased interest in CSR developed in the mid 1990s as consumers began to lack their former trust in companies due to both environmental and financial scandals and it became noticeable that society was moving towards values incorporating harmony, quality of life and environmental conservation (Carrasco, 2007) Additionally, major corporate failures over the past two decades have resulted in increased demand for stronger, corporate governance (CG) rules. (Sui, Wright & Evans, 2007). Superior CG rules are needed in order to preserve the integrity of corporations, financial institutions and markets and the health and stability of world economies. (OECD Website)