Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Microsoft and Nokia merger case study
Microsoft and Nokia merger case study
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Microsoft and Nokia merger case study
Strategy of Microsoft and Nokia
Microsoft and Nokia have mentioned the acquisition in the 2013 annual report. Both companies have outlined a clear strategy that will connect the two businesses together.
The leadership team of Microsoft has highlighted three aspects for enhancement in 2014. Firstly, Microsoft has designed a new organizational structure in June 2013. The changes are small but were considered very effective. The leadership team changed the way of how each team was organized. For example, the engineering team that specializes in engineering solution and software construction (Jones, 2014), and also the sales team is responsible to promote the products. All the teams are working together as a coherent fashion in order to help
…show more content…
(2012). International Business - An Asian Perspective. 9th ed. Singapore: McGraw Hill.
The chart explains the lifetime of a product or business from its early idea through its various sales stages as well as its inevitable death (David, 2005). Nokia was clearly on the decline curve of the cycle. The evidence is that Nokia was struggling and losing market share in the smart phone business before the acquisition.
While the product life cycle for Microsoft is a little bit different, Microsoft has completed its stage of maturity since it completed the IPO in 1983. Yet Microsoft is still remaining strong on many products and services. In the meanwhile, Microsoft also experienced failures in some products and services such like Windows Vista. However, there is no sharp decline for the company. Therefore, Microsoft should be placed on the slight decline curve of the product life cycle, and it has been making efforts in growing stronger as a company that provides both great software and hardware to the global
…show more content…
Nokia has a long history of success in the mobile phone industry. Nokia also has extensive research and development segment and many manufacturing facilities that run around the world. On the other hand, Microsoft is a technology giant entered the market early, and the company still enjoys a large portion of the market of their operating systems and software applications.
Microsoft acquired the mobile phone division and the extensive supply chain and logistics network from Nokia through the acquisition. The purpose is to gain more advantage in the mobile phone industry as a successful technology company.
The acquisition of Nokia has brought the magnificent manufacturing capability in the smart phone business for Microsoft. Microsoft could leverage on the productivity and logistics of Nokia to differentiate itself in the smart phone business. The acquisition would help both companies to resist competitions, since the competition is getting more and fiercer as innovation happens every day in the technology industry. However, Microsoft needs to come up with new ideas to preserve the dominant status in the many sectors. In the meanwhile, Nokia needs to focus on the rest of its business that had not been sold to
Two organizations that show the importance of aligning a company’s business strategy with their IT strategy are Cirque du Soleil and Major League Baseball. Both of these organizations rely on digital technology to make it easier to provide to their customers better entertainment through collaboration.
Microsoft has devoted huge amounts of effort to marketing in developing their products and services, as well as to the integration of their software products with one another in an attempt to create a seamless and consistent computing environment for the user.
Microsoft is currently the largest company in the computer industry. With a market capitalization of $291 billion, Microsoft has built an empire by dominating software sales for personal computers. Stock growth over the past 25 years has increased by more than 30,000%. However, Microsoft’s growth has substantially decreased since the market collapse of 2001(Niemond 25 April 2007).
I believe that Microsoft has the best intensions for society, because they are constantly developing the software market into a more competitive and challenging industry. Microsoft’s success as a company is partly due to its commitment to making the best product possible and strategic business practices. The first reason Microsoft is not a monopoly is because of the standardized quality of its OS. Second is the intelligent business practices Microsoft has engaged in through many of its business partners. The legal issues of the alleged antitrust accusations from the department of justice are just totally overrated.
Sigurdson, J. (2004), ‘The Sony-Ericsson Endeavour: Part 1’, Institute of Innovation Research of Hitotsubashi Unniversity, Working Paper, (Tokyo: Japan).
Microsoft was founded in 1975 by Bill Gates and provides products, services, and devices in 190 countries around the world. They sell a wide variety of goods and services including laptop and desktop computers, video games and systems, applications for both phones and computers, and cell phones among other things. Their strategy is designed to allow them to accomplish three key goals: “reinvent productivity and business processes”, “build the intelligent cloud platform”, and “create more personal computing” (Microsoft Form 10-K). The main competitor for Microsoft today is Apple, who competes with Microsoft with its own line of laptops, cloud services, and phones. All of these devices use Apple operating systems and software which are direct
Microsoft, from its inception, has been known for its software, especially its Windows platform. It has changed the way we operate computers and through its software, has made the computer user-friendly and very efficient. Microsoft, however, does not want to only specialize in the software department. They have thus expanded their excellence in other departments such as gaming, music and hardware.
In this paper, team B will discuss the internal and external factors of the Microsoft Corporation. We will explain how these factors affect the four functions of management, planning, organizing, leading, and controlling. Also, we will explain how globalization, technology, innovation, diversity and ethics will be delegated to manage the different factors. Microsoft Corporation was established in 1975 in Albuquerque, New Mexico producing software for developing, manufacturing, licensing, and support for range of software products and service for different type of computing devices. Microsoft grew from six employees to the largest personal computer software company in the world. By 1978, Microsoft earned $500,000 in the first quarter, and by the end of the year they earned revenue of $1,000,000. In the early 1980s Microsoft, in collaboration with IBM they released MS-DOS as their first 16-bit operating system. However after the late 1980s, Microsoft started to build its reputation by creating the Microsoft windows operating system and Microsoft office product, which includes internet explorer, excel, PowerPoint, and word programs. Then in the late 1990s, Microsoft teamed with Sega to incorporated their windows software package into the game developer’s Dreamcast hardware. Also they developed their own gaming system called the Xbox and that eventually was replaced by the xbox360. Microsoft has come a long way and is no longer just a worldwide leader in computer programming but also a major part of the technology world. Microsoft windows have been the flagship and accounts for most of its revenue for Microsoft: but the company has also branched ...
In today’s current economic state, the likelihood of a company entering into a global market is inevitable. Multinational corporations (MNCs) such as Vodafone are required to standardise their Research & Development activities throughout the world in order to penetrate the market. This is achieved by obtaining new technological opportunities, such as the most up-to-date phones, thus maintaining a competitive driver in the market.
Microsoft’s mission of placing a “PC running Microsoft software on every desk and in every home” drove their overall strategy early on. Depending on the business segment within Microsoft, one would see in place very different business models as the strategy for each line of business could vary. In the operating system (OS) segment, Microsoft initially brought in an existing product and modified this (MS-DOS) to work with the Intel microprocessor, which were the “brains” of the IBM PC. Microsoft partnered with IBM to provide the operating system for the IBM PC. In addition to developing Windows, Microsoft during this period was working to write applications for the Apple OS.
This essay will utilise the following structure. It will commence by providing the reader with a brief history about Microsoft and then go onto explaining what corporate strategy is. Following this will be Microsoft’s diversification strategy in parallel with the reasons why they choose to diversify. Within this section the author plans to explore Microsoft’s related diversification approach, their corporate rationale, alongside why skill transferring is essential to them sustaining a competitive advantage and also how they achieved and utilized economies of scope (EOS). In the section regarding reasons why Microsoft chooses to diversify will be notions of proactive and defensive reasons, along with the idea of increasing market power and spreading risk. Then finally, a conclusion will follow summing up Microsoft’s overall ability to sustain a competitive advantage.
Microsoft is the leading and the largest Software Company in the world. Found by William Gates and Paul Allen in 1975 Microsoft has grown and become a multibillion company in only ten years. It all started with a great vision – “a computer on every desk and every home” - that seemed almost impossible at the time. Now Microsoft has over 44,000 employees in 60 countries, net income of $3.45 billion and revenue of 11.36 billion. Company dramatic growth and success was driven by development and marketing of operational systems and personal productivity applications software.
By the end of 2003, Nokia was the clear market leader in the mobile phone industry in terms of sales and profitability. It was ahead of giant companies like Motorola, Ericsson, Siemens, Samsung, and other worthy competitors. Since the early 1990s, Nokia's Strategic Intent was to build distinctive competency in product innovation, rapid response, and global brand management. Its strategic intent required rapid growth in the core businesses of mobile phones and telecommunications networks. This goal was achieved by Nokia's development of new products and expansion into new markets. In order to become the global leader as it is today, the company had overcome numerous challenges and obstacles over the last decade.
Microsoft saw this and began to develop their own company similarly , entering the tablet market in 2013. However, the problem that Microsoft have is that Apple have established a premium brand image which has attracted high loyalty from their customers, what this means is the any new product that is released is immediately demanded from their customers. Proven by the huge demand for’ Apple Watches’ after their announcement. The demand was so high that orders were stalled back to August even though it was launched in January. This lack of brand loyalty meant that when Microsoft launched their tablets consumers were much more judgemental in deciding whether to buy a ‘Surface tablet’ or not. This meant faults were scrutinised more carefully. For example the app store on Microsoft 's tablet launched on a smaller scale in comparison to what Apple were offering and this hurt sales as people had a much smaller choice, so for Microsoft to increase sales and thus profits in this market a longer development process to allow for more applications to be developed may have been beneficial. However, what Microsoft realised is that although they didn 't have the brand that Apple had built but they were going to combat this with USPs (unique selling points) for example the Lumia 1020 launched with a 41 megapixel camera to appeal to niche markets of consumers who cared more for the camera on a phone than the applications, this allowed sales to be higher for the phone in certain markets. This may be one way in which Microsoft may be able to increase profits by increasing sales of their phones by accepting that they don 't have the brand image that Apple have and instead playing to their strengths such as the higher quality
Today, Nokia is the world leader in mobile communications. The company generates sales of more than $27 billion in a total of 130 countries and employs more than 60,000 people. Its simple mission: to "connect people."