Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Business law and ethics case study
Case study assignment in business ethics
Business law and ethics case study
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Business law and ethics case study
On Tuesday, September 26, 2017 at approximately 2:15PM I was exiting the security office for dismissal at HAAS. When I entered the vestibule area I noticed a parent in the main office, who appeared agitated. I entered the office area and I asked if I could assist her, she told me she was meeting with a teacher. I asked her if she had an appointment and who was the teacher, she proceeded to tell me it was with Mr. Greg MAZUREK, and referred to him as a "pedophile." I instructed her to refrain from using that terminology, and she continued by stating, HUDOCK and MEARS, both HAAS Teachers were also pedophiles. Mrs. Marie ERNST, HAAS Assistant Principal, heard the parents' allegations, and we directed the parent and daughter into Mrs. ERNST's office and closed the door to continue the allegations in a confidential manner. I asked the parent her name, she identified herself as Mrs. Tracey LEONARD and her daughter Sydney LEONARD, grade 11. Mrs. LEONARD stated she was here because of a "0" that Sydney received for not completing an assignment. Mrs. ERNST told Mrs. LEONARD she would talk to Mr. MAZUREK regarding the grade and would rectify the concern regarding Sydney's grade. …show more content…
I spoke with Mrs.
Leonard regarding the allegations of the 3 male teachers and she stated her concerns were due to male teachers addressing Sydney about dress code. LEONARD said she feels her daughter is being singled out and again referred to MAZUREK, MEARS and HUDOCK of being pedophile's. I told Leonard the term pedophile was an extremely inappropriate comment and could be considered defamation of character. I informed Mrs. LEONARD, a follow up meeting would be scheduled and stated she would be available after 9:15am the next day. Mrs. ERSNT informed Mr. Rocco PETRONE, HAHS Principal of the incident. Mr. PETRONE notified Chief of Police Edward HARRY, Director of Security and School Police Services both informed Mrs. ERNST they would be attending the
meeting. A conference was held at 9:30AM on Wednesday, September 27,2017, in attendance were Mrs. LEONARD, Mr. PETRONE, Chief HARRY, Mrs. ERNST and myself. Mrs. LEONARD apologized for the allegations made regarding the male teachers, she referred to as pedophiles. Mr. PETRONE informed Mrs. LEONARD the statements made by her were serious, and was accusing the male teachers of committing a crime. Mr. PETRONE stated, she should refrain from these comments in the future. Mrs. LEONARD spoke about her concerns of her daughter receiving a "0" Mr. PETRONE said the academic grading would be addressed by Mrs. ERNST and her daughters teacher. Mr. PETRONE told her that her daughter must follow school policies, including dress code and all teachers will continue to monitor all students to assure compliance. Mrs. LEONARD agreed in the future to schedule school related conferences and would not show up without a legitimate purpose of being on school property. This case is closed.
At Hazel East High School, the school has a sponsored newspaper called “The Spectrum” that is written and edited by the students. On May of 1983, the high school principal, Robert E. Reynolds, received the edited version of the May 13th edition. Upon inspecting the paper he found two articles that he found “inappropriate.” The two articles contained stories about divorce and teen pregnancy. The article on divorce featured a student who blamed her father’s actions for her parents’ divorce. The following article featured students at Hazelwood East and their experiences as teen parents in high school. Reynolds immediately asked for the two articles to be withheld from that weeks edition. Reynolds had concluded fairness required the father in the divorce article to be informed of the article and given the chance to make any comments. He also stated that changing the names of the girls in the teen pregnancy article may not be sufficient enough to keep them unidentified. Also, the topic is not suitable for younger students. As a result he forbid the two articles from being published. On October 13, 1987 Cathy Kuhlmeier (a student at Hazelwood East High) claimed that Hazelwood East High School was violating her First Amendment rights, and her case was
(Frugis v. Bracigliano, 2003). The judges in this case needed to determine of Elmwood Park Board of Education was at all responsible for this act due to lack of supervision of Bracigliano (Frugis v. Bracigliano, 2003). The facts of the case explain that Bracigliano obstructed views into his office as soon as he became the principal in 1982, which was against a New Jersey law that required every room used by school staff to have a view into it (Frugis v. Bracigliano, 2003). During his tenure as principal a state inspector ordered that the covering be removed, which it was, but only temporarily (Frugis v. Bracigliano, 2003). The School Board was aware that the covering was ordered to be removed by the state inspector, but they never verified that it had in fact been removed (Frugis v. Bracigliano, 2003). Staff members were also aware that students frequently visited Bracigliano’s office, the door was locked, and pictures were taken when the students were in there (Frugis v. Bracigliano, 2003). Several staff members also witnessed Bracigliano doing inappropriate things to students, but they were unaware of the procedure to report these acts and, therefore, the acts went unreported to Bracigliano’s superiors (Frugis v.
This case involves a sophomore at a high school named Christine Franklin, who alleged that she was sexually harassed and abused by a teacher and sports coach by the name of Andrew Hill. These allegations were occurring from 1986-1988, a total of two years. These allegations included Hill having explicit conversations with Franklin, forcing her to kiss him, and forceful intercourse on school grounds. Franklin claimed that she let teachers and administrators know about the harassment and that other students were going through the same harassment. The result of telling the teachers and administrators was that nothing was done about the situation and even encouraged Franklin not
High school student “John Doe” responded to peer teasing by choking the student and then kicking out a school window. Middle school student “Jack Smith” made sexual lewd comments to female classmates. Both had a history of hostile and aggressive behaviors that are manifestations of their disabilities. On the fifth day of the school suspension, the district notified both boys’ parents that they were proposing expulsion and they extended suspension until the expulsion proceedings were finished. Doe filed suit against the school district and the superintendent on grounds that the disciplinary actions violated the “stay-put” provision of the then Education of the Handicapped Act (EHA) (later IDEA). Having learned of Doe’s case, Smith also protested the school’s actions and intervened in Doe’s
Groves, S. L., & Groves, D. L. (1981). Professional Discretion and Personal Liability of Teachers in Relation to Grades and Records. Education, 101(4), 335-340.
In this case perhaps McCoy would wish to be a limited partner and be removed from the day to day operations. An option he could choose could be to be a Limited Liability Corporation, may come with additional costs, work and headaches, but even so as we with any business it has its advantages, which includes the flexibility of who manages the business, can be easier to raise capital and add or transfer ownership interests. Owners are no longer liable for business debts, but the
The area high school had undergone a large amount of change in the last seven years and has continued to revamp their current curriculum to meet the recent changes in the education laws. The previous administration had been in office for several years and had a track record of being well organized and supportive of their staff. Seven years ago, the majority of the administration retired/left along with a bulk of the tenure faculty, causing a number of inexperienced individuals to take over key positions. Therefore, the faculty left to replace the head of the science department lacked the inexperience and may not have been the best person for the position.
1. Because the additional terms become part of the contract,In the battle of the forms, all additional terms become part of the contract unless they are promptly objected to, are material changes or are banned by the offer. Katie sent Phil a text asking him to pick up and deliver her new boots. Phil agreed but only if Katie agreed to go out on a date with him and Katie refused. These additional terms (the date) did not become part of the agreement because Katie refused Phil’s advancement.
John Henry is a 15 year old 9th grade student who suffers from ADHD and anxiety disorder. John frequently makes inappropriate verbalizations during teacher’s instructional time. This behavior causes distractions for himself and his peers. The teacher would ask John to stop talking out of turn, but the student only stopped for a short amount of time. The teacher would then pull John out of the classroom to speak one-on-one on some adjustments he can make with his behavior to make his learning more successful. After pulling John out of the classroom, he would be complaint for 2-3 days, but not for a week long period. Afterwards, the parent/guardian were contacted, but the target behavior was still not altered in any way.
During second period in Chemistry class Butterfingers was demonstrating to his students how to use sulfuric acid for the lab they were doing that day. Although we teaches students to follow safety protocol a student claims, “…doesn’t use proper safety protocol,” says Tim Glad. Butterfingers said that these allegations are false ,but there isn’t much proof they are. Security was alerted of the spill around 9 a.m. Butterfingers sent Glad to get the security guard while he cleaned the spill himself. The principal was alert and a school wide evacuation took place. “I was scared he would lose his job…”
In this scenario, a bet of $1000 between two people on the outcome of a football game occurs. A short statement regarding the bet is written and signed on a napkin; witnessed by 10 other people. After winning the bet, the other loosing person refuses to pay the $1000 to the winner. The questions to answer here is whether the winner will be able to legally collect the money from the looser? Why or why not?
On Monday, February 10, 2014 I was observed during sixth period by Mrs. Morgan. She came into the class a few minutes after the bell had rang. Previous to her entering the class, a student had cursed and got into a verbal argument with another student and I had called Coach Pugh down to the room, because of the student behavior. Coach Pugh said for me to write the cursing up for detention, I told him I would send the write ups down later. There was obvious tension in the air between students.
It is highly important for teachers to keep student information confidential. Teachers should be a voice for students in order to give them the resources they need to thrive. It is the teacher’s responsibility to create a safe working environment for the students. If the students do not feel safe in their learning environment they are not going to thrive. The dispositions assessment form that I have attached demonstrates my knowledge of professional behavior and dispositions and provides evidence of my progression in becoming an
After the meeting, I walked slowly back to my history class, trying to understand exactly what had led to the administration investigating my language arts teacher. The injustice of it all astounded me; the day before, he was playing around with my class, jokingly giving out extra homework assignments. Now, without warning, he was inexplicably removed from our lives on a vague accusation of misconduct. I worked sporadically for the rest of
It was scheduled on a non-staff meeting day and a selected group of individuals beside the regular teaching staff was mandated to attend. This meeting was different from all the meetings I have ever attended at the school. After all required staffs were present in the meeting room, the principal asked that the doors be shut, and that the teachers sat in a circular position around tables where they could all see each other. The meeting was about the behavior of teachers and other administrative staff. Prior to the meeting, it was obvious that there were tension among staff members in the school. One major problem discussed in the meeting was that the principal was wrongfully reprimanding individuals without thoroughly investigating information presented to her by some members of staff. The principal did not take this problem presented in the meeting lightly. Hence, she apologized about it and since then, she has been making every attempt to remedy the situation by visiting classrooms more regularly, and sitting in and participating in different group meetings. Tschannen-Moran (2004) advised that trustworthy school leaders must learn to create conditions in which trust can flourish within their school as well as between their school