Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Legally upholding a restraint of trade
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Legally upholding a restraint of trade
Restraint of Trade
The purpose of restraint of trade is merely to limitate any future activities of commercial trade, social activity and etc in particular region of a state, or any activities that has substantial impact on local commercial trade or activities. A restraint of trade can be assumed as legal or illegal depends on its effect and attention.
In Malaysia context, under Section 28 of the Malaysian Contracts Act states that “every agreement by which anyone is restrained from exercising a lawful profession, trade or business of any kind, is to the extent void”. It was based on English common law and personal law which is based on Syariah law to be applied on Muslims. In English Law, this kind of agreement in contract would be in group of illegal and void under public policy, while in Malaysia this restraint of trade is more restrictive. (Shearn Delamore and Cecil Abraham, April 2007). Cecil Abraham resigned from Shearn Delamore and come up with a proposal to merge with Zul Rafique and Partners, this was violating the covenant with Shearn Delamore which restricts him to practice within Kualan Lumpur for 2 years. ( Under Contract Law Series ,361 Ministry of Domestic Trade, Cooperatives & Comsumerism) There are three exceptions to the general rule are provided in Section 28, namely:
Exception i: One who sells the goodwill of a business may agree with the buyer to refrain carrying on a similar industry or business, within a specified locationl limits, so long as the buyer, or any person deriving title to the goodwill from him, carries on a like business therein: Provided that such limits appear to the court reasonable, regard being had to the nature of the business.
Exception ii : Partners may, upon or in anticipation of a d...
... middle of paper ...
...pany to misused their power on their interests.
Restraint of Legal Proceedings
Any practices by any employee is governed by rules of procedure under Section 28 which is not void for a contract. An employee is prohibit to use his/her company confidential information by trading secrets of the company to outsider. It also forbid an unlawful consipiracy intention to injure or cause a damage the goodwill of the company. (Faccenda Chicken v Fowler 1987). The employer’s lawyer will threatens to file with the court when the employee is violated the agrrement. The employee is advised for factors which are weighing against a defence in court, and depending on nerve, cost constraints and the benefits at stake, the employee submits or some compromise is hammered out. The factor of weigh against proceeding does not broken in any cases, unless the new employer ready to involve.
This is a complex case, involving multiple parties and several variables that need to be examined thoroughly. The parties mentioned include Knarles operator of the facility maintenance company, his son Barkley, their employee, a licensed plumber, and Mr. Chetum. Although in the end Chetum is suing the facilities maintenance firm for a breach of contract, all factors must be examined to determine proper fault.
Under which theory or theories of product liability can Kolchek sue to recover for Litisha’s injuries? Could Kolchek sue Porter or Great Lakes?
Office of Industries, U.S. International Trade Commission.(2009).Export controls: an overview of their use, economic effects, and treatment in the global trading system. Retrieved from United States International Trade Commission http://www.usitc.gov/publications/332/working_papers/ID-23.pdf
Max was negligent in failing to warn of Joe of the hazardous door, which caused Joe’s injury.
1. Because the additional terms become part of the contract,In the battle of the forms, all additional terms become part of the contract unless they are promptly objected to, are material changes or are banned by the offer. Katie sent Phil a text asking him to pick up and deliver her new boots. Phil agreed but only if Katie agreed to go out on a date with him and Katie refused. These additional terms (the date) did not become part of the agreement because Katie refused Phil’s advancement.
Because the field of Business Law is so great, this paper will examine a single aspect of Business Law, that of antitrust action. Specifically, as it is applied to Microsoft, antitrust litigation is raising eyebrows in both the legal and business worlds.
... I am of the view that the doctrine of unconscionability is not appropriate to form an underlying basis for voidable contract on the ground of undue influence. This is because both of the doctrines embrace different elements and principles and therefore the doctrine of unconscionability is not appropriate to be submerged in the doctrine of undue influence within section 16(3)(a). Both doctrines have evolved quite separately to meet the justice of different factual situations. It is suggested that Malaysia should import a wider ground of doctrine of unconscionability which is independent from the doctrine of undue influence into the Malaysian Contract Law in order to overcome contractual fairness. Quoted by Gopal Sri Ram J in the case of Saad Marwi, Malaysia should adopt the English doctrine of unconscionability and apply it in a broad and liberal way as in Canada.
The scope of the activity addressed by the restriction is also reasonable. Although the term “substantially similar” is a bit ambiguous since it does not specify what products and services would be counted as similar in substance to Nova Graphic Design, Nova could argue that this provision is clear and reasonable in this specific case because Roxanne is starting her own graphic design business, which will be providing the exact same type of service as Nova did. Although the other restrictions are clear and coherent, Roxanne could argue that the territorial scope of the restrictive covenant is
As a consequence of the separate legal entity and limited liability doctrines within the UK’s unitary based system, company law had to develop responses to the ‘agency costs’ that arose. The central response is directors’ duties; these are owed by the directors to the company and operate as a counterbalance to the vast scope of powers given to the board. The benefit of the unitary board system is reflected in the efficiency gains it brings, however the disadvantage is clear, the directors may act to further their own interests to the detriment of the company. It is evident within executive remuneration that directors are placed in a stark conflict of interest position in that they may disproportionately reward themselves. The counterbalance to this concern is S175 Companies Act 2006 (CA 2006) this acts to prevent certain conflicts arising and punishes directors who find themselves in this position. Furthermore, there are specific provisions within the CA 2006 that empower third parties such as shareholders to influence directors’ remuneration.
,dishonesty ,substance abuse and absenteeism. Would all play a part in the ethical violation of
In other words, judicial restraint is the idea that one should not interpret laws differently than what has been expressed in the Constitution. Judicial restraint is used in many different circumstances. What this means is that Justices were concerned with becoming involved in issues that were not their concern: Therefore, judicial restraint was justified. Justices who follow judicial restraint are also much more likely to uphold previous decisions made by the Supreme Court.
According to the confidentiality requirements, in section 2, the followings shall be considered during the tender design: a) Hold the Confidential Information in strict confidence and not disclose, or cause or permit, or take any action which would require the disclosure of the Confidential Information, except as permitted under this deed poll or with the prior written consent of the Beneficiaries; b) Not disclose, or cause or permit, or take any action which would require the disclosure to any person of, any opinion in respect of the Confidential Information or a Document created in accordance with clause 3(c), except as permitted under this deed poll; My employment to a competitor company could potentially cause an unintentional breach of information. This could happen by involving in the tender design of the same project. To further my investigations, I approached a partnership agreement lawyer, as was suggested in the training. I explained the situation in detail and described the expected performance in the potential employment.
The basic law of a contract is an agreement between two parties or more, to deliver a service or a product. And reach a consensus about the terms and conditions that is enforced by law and a contract can be only valid if it is lawful other than that there can’t be a contract. For a contract to exist the parties must have serious intentions, agreement, contractual capacity meaning a party must be able to carry a responsibility, lawful, possibility of performance and formalities. Any duress, false statements, undue influence or unconscionable dealings could make a contract unlawful and voidable.
While free trade is supposed to mean that governments do not interfere with trade by applying policies to affect trade, all governments do intervene in trade to give their country an increased financial advantage. The effects of the government policies are further discussed as well as how those policies affect free trade.
Substantive and Procedural Law – Substantive laws are the social rights and duties of people, and procedural law are guidelines through which government bodies or courts deal with breaches in substantive law. E.g. substantive law would state that hitting someone with a car and driving off is a crime, while procedural law would define how the courts could try and sentence in the case.