Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Budget analysis process
Budget analysis process
Important of income statement and balance sheet
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Budget analysis process
1. INTRODUCTION
In this assignment, we will be conducting a business analysis on two major corporations in the same industry. Nestle and Dutch Lady. The analysis will be based on the companies’ performance for both the years 2011 and 2012 and the data will be extracted from the companies’ financial reports.
2. PROFITABILITY
2.1 Return on ordinary shareholder’s fund (ROSF)
According to the chart above, there is an increase on Nestlé’s ROSF of 6.63%. Such that, in 2011 the ROSF was 65.36% while in 2012 was 71.99%. Analytically, in 2011 for every RM 1 of ordinary shares contributed, it was able to generate RM 65.36 on the net profit. While in 2012, for every RM 1 of the ordinary share, it was able to generate RM 71.99 on the net profit. However, according to the balance sheet, in 2012 the ordinary share capital (RM 751.2 million) was more than that of 2011 (RM 652.7 million). Actually, this is a great improvement experienced by Nestlé berhad of RM 98.5 million on the share capital have strong asset productivity, structure of finance and most importantly the business is growing, rapidly, (Sander & Haley, 2008).
However, on the other hand; Dutch Lady has also experience an increase in it ROSF. The ROSF increased by 4.58% from the year 2011 to 2012. Moreover, from the annual report on the financial summary (p. 4), it shows that Dutch Lady experience a decline in its shareholders’ funds from the 2011 (RM 259.2 million) to the 2012 (RM 216.1 million). Thus, the growth of ROSF was less affected by the decline in the shareholders’ funds.
2.2 Return on capital employed (ROCE)
ROCE refers to the net operating profit of a company to its capital employed, (Peavler, 2009).The chart above shows the return on capital e...
... middle of paper ...
...e liquidity ratio, most of Dutch Lady’s ratios decline in value (figure) from the financial year 2011 to 2012. From our point of view, the company was experiencing some liquidity problems. As recommend, b the company should decrease its borrowing and consider meeting its maturing obligations as soon as possible. Besides that, the company should increase its ability of generating cash from trading operation, as it is among the fast moving consumer good (FMCG) in Malaysia.
In conclusion, Nestle has been successively a good performance for the past two financial years. And from our recommendations, they will help the company perform even much better for the current financial year, and even other years to come. On the other hand, Dutch Lady should look closer to the conclusion that we draw, because they may help the company to perform effectively in terms of liquidity
Berghaus’ Case Study 1) Berghaus is very successful business having an annual growth rate of 25%. This indicates that there is an increasing demand for their products. They also have an export ratio of 50% meaning that their distribution rates are very good. Last year alone their per-tax profits were £750,000 and a large amount of this money can, most probably, will be reinvested into the company for further development.
I will talk about functional areas of M&S and KFH. through Comparison and contrast of how they contribute and operate their functions, as will as the structures, also my task is, to evaluate the benefit and disadvantages of their functions, finally, try to explain my opinion about how well the two companies run there business.
Return on sales is decreasing and is below the industry average, but the goods news is that sales and profits have been increasing each year. However, costs of goods are increasing and more inventory is left over each year causing the return on sales to decrease. For 1995, it was 1.7% which is less than the average of 2.44% but is a lot higher than the bottom 25% of companies as seen in exhibit 3, which actually have negative sales return of 0.7%. Return on equity is increasing each year and at a higher rate than industry average. In 1995, it was 20.7%, greater than the average of 18.25% and close to the highest companies in exhibit 3, of 22.1% showing that the return in investment in the company is increasing, which is good for the owner.
...o renegotiate credit agreements with banks. However, the liquidity was a result of structural changes and would not bring significant effect to the company because it is unusual and infrequent (the extraordinary credits of $15 million fall in this category also). The financial report must be consistent year-by-year. A company should do the same or similar activities, especially operating activities, to generate “money” every year and recognize “money” as its profit. However, this is not the case for Harnischfeger. We are doubtful that the company will perform well in the future. The company recorded modest profit this year because it reduced operating cost not because it increased operating revenue. Since Harnischfeger did not generate its profit by operating activity, it would be too risky to predict if its stock price will reach $6.00 per share in the 1986-87.
This analysis will identify the current value of the company at a stand-alone value and explain why Nestle Food would want to buy this company and the synergies involved for their reasoning. We will also discuss who will benefit if Reynolds Metals were to sell to Nestle or were to create an IPO. Finally we will provide a recommendation for Reynolds Metals that will be most beneficial to the company financial needs.
Current Ratio – For the last three years was growing from 3.56 in 2001 to 3.81 in 2002 to 4.22 in 2003. The reason of grow is increased in Assets. Even though Liability was growing, Asset grow was more significant.
(2013). Strategy- nestle roadmap to good food good life.Nestle Good Food, Good Life, Retrieved from http://www.nestle.com/aboutus/strategy
Each competitor 's current ratio, quick ratio, and cash ratio are able to be found in this exhibit for the year ended in 2015. McDonald’s currently has a cash ratio of 0.76, a quick ratio of 1.20, and a 1.52. Starbucks has a cash ratio of 0.44, a quick ratio of 0.64, and a current ratio of 1.19. Finally, the Dunkin Brand Group Inc. has a cash ratio of 0.59, a quick ratio of 0.74, and a current ratio of 1.25. When looking at these ratios one is able to find that compared to its competitors, Starbucks is less liquid than McDonald 's and Dunkin Brand Group
The transnational corporation Nestle Company founded in 1886 based in Vevey, Switzerland, sells its products in 189 countries and has manufacturing plants in 89 countries around the world, boasting an unmatched geographic presence. The company started off as an alternative to breastmilk and initially looked into other countries for an increase in global opportunities. It founded its first out of country offices in London in 1868, and due to the small size and inability of Switzerland to compensate growth manufacturing plants were built in both Britain and the United states in the late nineteenth century. A large portion of Nestlé’s globalization came in the 1900s which was when it first moved into the chocolate business after
The Quick Ratio shows that the company’s cash and cash equivalents are the highest t...
The current ratio and quick ratios for the year 2003 are at 2.5 and 1.3, which are both higher than the industry average. The company has enough to cover short term bills and expenses. Both the current and quick ratios are showing an upward trend compared to 2001 and 2002. The current assets decreased by $ 20,264 to $ 1,531,181 and the current liabilities also decreased considerably by $255,402 to $616,000, a 29.3% decline, thus making the current ratio jump to a 2.5. The biggest decline was seen is accounts payable which decreased by $170,500 to $230,000, a decline of 42.6 %.
The companies I have selected for this assignment is Malaysia Steel Works (KL) Bhd (5098) and Kossan Rubber Industries Bhd. (7153), both of the company is from industrial products sector and its share is traded in main market.
Furthermore, Cocoaland Holdings Berhad has the total revenue of RM50,000,000 in 2015 and RM10,000,000 in 2016. It can be seen that decrease RM40,000,000 compare to this both years. Additionally, this company’s debt consists of 34,685,858 in 2015 and 38,057,668 in 2016. Moreover, it consists of total equity and debt-to-equity ratio inside their capital that is 202,680,654 and 0.17 in 2015 and 2015239,503,310 and 0.16 in 2016. It can conclude that total equity increased and the debt-to-equity ratio was decreased compare to 2015 to
http://www.nestle.com. 2013. Nestlé nine-month sales: 4.4% organic growth, full-year outlook confirmed. [online] Available at: http://www.nestle.com/media/pressreleases/AllPressReleases/nine-month-sales-2013 [Accessed: 04 Feb 2014].