Bureaucratic Discretion

1598 Words4 Pages

President Woodrow Wilson penned “The Study of Administration” in an 1887. The paper is considered to be the origin of the Public Administration field of study. Via this weighty article, President Wilson took Public Administration out from under the field of general political science as he argued that Public Administration should be treated as its own academic field; while also making the critical point that public administrators should be beholden to elected officials and thus ultimately beholden to the general population. This is a critical point in President Wilson’s argument because bureaucrats are responsible for implementing laws passed by Congress and accomplish this feat through their positions in the executive branch. These bureaucrats …show more content…

Legislators and their staffs rarely have the time, or more importantly the expertise, required to make minute policy decisions governing modern society. Still, the actual quality of government decision-making used to solve problems is better when Congress allows substantial bureaucratic discretion. Granting substantial discretion allows for more substantive expertise from career bureaucrats and permits implementation of the law to be linked more closely with legislative policy intentions rather than asking Congress to actually write rules and regulations. This is all true provided that the bureaucratic discretion is exercised in a thoughtful and a constructive manner. And herein lies the problem, as not all administrators can possibly be thoughtful and constructive. Sadly, even a minuscule percentage of bureaucrats can spoil all the good the abundance of bureaucrats do within the administration. Therefore, Congress must build flexibility into laws; as it is all but impossible for the legislature to anticipate the range of issues that may arise in the actual implementation of a program and they cannot possibly account for those very few unscrupulous bureaucrats. Therefore, building in flexibility is crucial for successful implementation by the bureaucratic experts within the Administrative …show more content…

Bureaucratic agencies were formed with the intent that Congress and their staffs would have an opportunity to monitor and oversee agency and department activity. However, as agencies grew and staffs did not, oversight became harder and harder to accomplish in an efficient and structured manner. These are the structural issues. Lobbying issues arise when interest groups infiltrate agencies or are able to corrupt bureaucrats through lobbying or one-sided education on select policy topics. When individual bureaucrats interact with select individuals and listen to select individuals not of a similar mind as Congress’s objective intent then political drift will occur. Interest groups lobbying bureaucrats have influence, thus instead of policy serving the general good, policy may serve one interest above another interest. The third cause of political drift is Presidential appointments as the president is allowed to name the heads of agencies and the highest level positions within agencies and administrative departments. Though the Senate provides an up or down vote on many of these political appointments, the president chooses whom to offer up to the Senate for consideration. Political appointments have changed drastically over the years and for the

Open Document