More handpicked essays just for you.
In the lake of the woods analysis
Meaning of themes of in the lake of the woods
In the lake of the woods tim o'brien essays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In the Lake of the Woods, written by Tim O’Brien is a book which deals with the struggle of John Wade to manage after a recently failed campaign for the United States Senate. After moving to Lake of the Woods, Minnesota, John discovers that his wife Kathy is missing. Through flashbacks of John’s childhood, Vietnam experiences, political career and the history of his relationship with Kathy the reader is introduced to various hypotheses of Kathy’s disappearance. The basis of In the Lake of the Woods is the burden of secrecy and the effects of truth; Mysteries are plentiful, including John’s obsession with magic as a young boy, the hiding of the Mai Lai massacre, the deceit of politics, and the central mystery of Kathy’s disappearance This book dealt with the love and the struggles of the relationship between John and Kathy Wade. John first met Kathy in college and they became intimate despite the numerous secrets they kept. John grew suspicious of Kathy right away and spied on her, and Kathy was aware that John was spying on her. When John was deployed to Vietnam, he was worried that Kathy was seeing other guys. In one of the letters Kathy wrote, “I’ve been going out with a couple of guys. It’s nothing serious. I love you and I think we can be wonderful together” (O’Brien 104). This shows that John had a right to be suspicious of Kathy, as she was cheating on John, and he probably should have left her then. It also shows that Kathy is not really concerned about John, but is more concerned about her own well-being. John and Kathy also dealt with the fallout of a lost election in which John ran for senator. One type of evidence used in Lake of The Woods is evidence. In the Lake of the Woods present conflict occurs in 1... ... middle of paper ... ...s fit. This is why everything in the book must not be viewed as being true. The narrator can admit to being constrained when it comes to knowing everything and the reason for this is that he will always be constrained by his view about things that he does know and his imagination of reality which he cannot possibly no. It is for this reason he cannot be viewed as being completely trustworthy or reliable but through the use of his evidence chapters and external links, we can consider that he is at least somewhat trustworthy and reliable which helps make the hypothesis’s more plausible. One of the prevailing themes between all of these hypotheses is that secrecy was a convenient way for John and Kathy to avoid facing the facts, but the burden of hiding the truth eventually proved to be too much. In conclusion, while the truth is ugly, it does manage to liberate John.
Nature has a powerful way of portraying good vs. bad, which parallels to the same concept intertwined with human nature. In the story “Greasy Lake” by T. Coraghessan Boyle, the author portrays this through the use of a lake by demonstrating its significance and relationship to the characters. At one time, the Greasy Lake was something of beauty and cleanliness, but then came to be the exact opposite. Through his writing, Boyle demonstrates how the setting can be a direct reflection of the characters and the experiences they encounter.
Boyle, T. Coraghessan. "Greasy Lake." X. J. Kennedy, Dana Gioia. Backpack Literature An Introduction to Fiction, Poetry, Drama, and Writing. Ed. Joe Terry. Pearson, 2012. Text. 28 January 2014.
550 - 8 p.m. _________. ___. ___. In the Lake of the Woods. New York: Houghton Mifflin, 1994.
Recently, I saw a movie about female tennis champion – Billie Jean King, and although I have never been into the feminism (neither can I say that I quite understand it), her character woke up some other kind of sensitivity in me. After this – to me significant change – I could not help myself not to notice different approaches of John Steinbeck and Kay Boyle to the similar thematic. They both deal with marital relationships and it was quite interesting to view lives of ordinary married couples through both “male” and “female eyes”. While Steinbeck opens his story describing the Salinas Valley in December metaphorically referring to the Elisa’s character, Boyle jumps directly to Mrs. Ames’s inner world. Although both writers give us pretty clear picture of their characters, Boyle does it with more emotions aiming our feelings immediately, unlike Steinbeck who leaves us more space to think about Elisa Allen.
Grace, Dominick. “Literary contexts in Short Stories: T.C. Boyle’s “Greasy Lake.” 2006:1-1 Literary Reference Center. EBSCOhost. Web.28 June 2007.
Ann and John, two characters from he short story "The Painted Door", do not have a very healthy relationship. John is a simple farmer who thinks the only way he can please his wife, Ann, is by working all day to earn money for her. However Ann would prefer him to spend more time with her. Their relationship is stressed even further when Ann is left at home alone with nothing to think about but their relationship because John has to go to his father’s house. The terrible snowstorm accentuates Ann’s feelings of loneliness and despair. John does not pay enough attention to Ann, and therefore creates a weak relationship.
Her father works out of town and does not seem to be involved in his daughters lives as much. Her older sister, who works at the school, is nothing but plain Jane. Connie’s mother, who did nothing nag at her, to Connie, her mother’s words were nothing but jealousy from the beauty she had once had. The only thing Connie seems to enjoy is going out with her best friend to the mall, at times even sneaking into a drive-in restaurant across the road. Connie has two sides to herself, a version her family sees and a version everyone else sees.
As the story begins, the narrator's compliance with her role as a submissive woman is easily seen. She states, "John laughs at me, but one expects that in marriage" (Gilman 577). These words clearly illustrate the male's position of power in a marriage t...
John and Clarisse both show honesty in their words at all times, no matter what, which according to Data Koncepts, is, ”the single most important quality or trait our polling sample looked for in a hero,”(1). Honesty always causes for the better in the situations that John and Clarisse tell the truth in, and this is a very important quality that makes a hero a hero. For example, when Heidi’s father is consistently calling John’s house, and his wife says that they should catch him calling and put him in jail for several more weeks, he says that,”[they] should simulate real life as much as possible, and there will be a time… when Alicia has to figure out whether or not she is going to be able to put the kids’ best interests ahead of her own,”(Crutcher, 138), since this is the right thing to do. John knows that being honest of his opinion that seeing if Alicia is willing to protect her children from he...
George says, “Annie, you didn’t know what was done to that man. You don’t know what happened” (46). Truth about Joe’s faulty part is an inevitable truth that could take Ann away from Chris. Another truth that causes Chris to nearly lose Ann is Kate accidentally saying the truth about Joe’s health. It causes George to go mad and attempt to take Ann again. Also, Sue tells Ann about the Keller’s dark truth and this makes Ann hesitate about Chris for a moment. The truth that should resolve life’s conflict is creating more conflict, like how Chris nearly lose Ann and how he lose his relationship with his family later on.
An issue which is mentioned throughout the story is the concept of “Ignorance is bliss”, which is an old cliche meaning what we don’t know can’t hurt us. While massaging his naked female neighbor’s body, the narrator is asked if he’s going to tell his mother. No, he answers. “So you even know that certain things are better left unsaid! You really are a devil” (Mahfouz, 13). The neighbor makes the obvious point that sometimes there are things that don’t have to be repeated, for the benefit of all the parties involved. Some might argue that the Truth will always come out, and by hiding it someone will end up being affected by it much more later on. But that is only if the information does get repeated. Knowledge doesn’t always have to be repeated, as was shown by our narrator and his neighbor. If the narrator had told his mother, would any of the parties benefit from this knowledge?
Literal and figurative borders can restrict and control many aspects within the lives of people all over the world. All people should be able to make the decision of where they wish to settle, start a family, and eventually die as a happy and fulfilled human being. The idea of travelling or living in a different country other than where you were conceived and brought up is a dream many people aspire to in era, but all wander-lusting souls should have the opportunity to make that dream a reality and find happiness and a new home in an unfamiliar city or country. The issues with this can vary widely; sometimes there can be issues with obtaining legal immigration papers while moving across countries or maybe financially they are not ready to
Reading In the Lake Of The Woods, my thoughts on how Kathy magically disappeared has shifted back and forth. I believe she was murdered by her husband John, a Vietnam veteran. Some evidence to prove this would earlier in the book, the police had questioned Kathy’s sister and an old colleague about Kathy’s and John’s characteristics. In the evidence, Kathy’s sister had talked oddly about John but would always stop mid-way and state she shouldn’t talk about it. Kathy’s old colleague would describe their daily routine after work and how they would go for a swim, but never stated much about John. In addition, the police questioned John’s mom, in which she provided further explanation of who John truly
Writing in her journal is the only thing that keeps her sane; yet John takes that away from her: “I must put this away-he hates to have me write” (Gilman 41). The narrator yearns to confess to John how she really feels, but she prefers to keep her feelings bottled up: “I think sometimes that if I were to write a little it would relieve the pressure of ideas and rest me” (Gilman 42). Instead, she is passive and hides her emotions. “I cry at nothing and cry most of the time. Of course I don’t when John is here, or anybody else,” only “when I am alone” (Gilman 44). She tells us that “John doesn’t know how much I really suffer” (Gilman 41). Even when the narrator tries to communicate with him, he immediately dismisses her: “I tried to have a real earnest reasonable talk with him,” but “John wouldn’t hear of it” (Gilman 40). Instead of speaking her mind and standing up for herself, she withdraws and does “not say another word”(Gilman 47).
Now that we have a little background on the author, we can take a closer look at the actual work and its characters. The two main characters of the story a narrator and her husband, John, and the story takes place in the 19th century. Life for the two is like most other marriages in this time frame, only the narrator is not like most other wives. She has this inner desire to be free from the societal roles that confine her and to focus on her writing, while John in content with his life and thinks that his wife overreacts to everything. Traditionally, in this era, the man was responsible for taking care of the woman both financially and emotionally, while the woman was solely responsible for remaining at home. This w...