Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The concept of suffering
What the Buddha Taught Summary
Impact of Buddhism on the world
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The concept of suffering
If Buddha Were Alive Today, How Would He Answer The Question: "How Should One
Live"?
What is right? Who is to say what is right? How do we know what we are doing is right? These are all questions that allude to how should one live?
Different people have different opinions on this area. Buddha's theory is one way to answer the question.
Buddha has four noble truths. These four noble truths are suffering, the origin of suffering, the cessation of suffering, and the way of practice leading to the cessation of suffering. If you go through all four of these truths, you will live a "right" life.
Suffering, according to Buddha, is anything that doesn't cause pleasure.
Anytime you do not get what you want, it is suffering. Being born is suffering.
In Buddha's theory, isn't practically everthing we do then suffering? Buddha defines suffering with the five aggregates of grasping. They are the aggreagates of grasping that is form, feeling, perception, mental formaitons, and consciousness. I don't agree with Buddha in any of this. I don't think suffering is caused by any of this. This is all life. I don't think that we are suffering all of this time. My definition of suffering would be anything that causes any pain, not anything that doesn't cause pleasure. There is a huge difference between the two. With Buddha, you are either suffering or in pleasure. I think that there is a middle ground. There are many times when people are not suffering and also not feeling pleasure.
The origin of suffering, according to Buddha, is craving. Craving comes from anything that is agreeable and pleasurable. Sights, sounds, mental pictures, etc. are all agreeable and pleasurable therefore they all cause craving.
Whenever we think of any of this, cravings arise. This is where suffering comes from. This is true to a point. Craving is what causes suffering. Craving comes from pleasurable things. That means that pleasurable things cause suffering.
People want what they don't have. These we think are pleasurable things. We suffer from not getting what we want. When a baby wants a cookie and doesn't get it, he is suffering. It was not getting the cookie that caused the suffering. It was the craving for the cookie that caused his suffering. Buddha was...
... middle of paper ...
...tally off on that one, but that's what I think Right Mindfulness is. Lastly, we have Right Concentration. Right
Concentration occers after man has detached himself from craving and unwholesome mental states, he can concentrate on the first jhana. Once he has inner tranquility, he has reached the second jhana. When he gives up delight and is mindful and clearly aware, he is in the third jhana. He gives up pleasure and suffering. He gives up gladness and sadness. He is now in the fourth jhana. This is Right Concentration. With all these, man puts a stop to suffering.
Back to the question at hand. If Buddha were alive right now, how would he say one should live? I think that if he were alive, he'd take our whole society into consideration when answering the question. I think he'd say that people should be kind to one another and not cause harm. We should live by establised "good" morals. We should be happy with what we have. Maybe not stop every bad thing we say or think about or do, but try to limit ourselves. I think that these are all things that Buddha might say. Most important, I think he'd say "Don't do anything I wouldn't do."
is part of the human suffering due to his cherished relational nature with humans. However,
suffering hurts man spirit is does more good then constant happiness and power. We have to beat
...ith grief, as he would have been under pre-annihilation circumstances, but instead feels a type of liberation.
He starts to believe that what is happening to him is not what the “real” God would do. He starts to question why God is letting these terrible events happen to him, and even starts to question if God is even real. “For the first time, I felt anger rising within me. Why should I sanctify His name? The Almighty, the eternal and terrible Master of the Universe, chose to be silent.
paper. It will be argued that the extent to which those are suffering does, in fact, vary, and that others have continued on with their lives with little to no effect at all.
And indeed, suffering, lack of safety, is unavoidable, and also necessary for some things. "When I was downstairs before, on my way here, listening to that woman sing, it struck me all of a sudden how much suffering she must have had to go through. It's repulsive to think you have to suffer that much" (65). But we do. Everyone does. In fact, "There's no way not to suffer" (65). We are never safe from it.
is unwilling to stop his punishment and even the gods and goddess' can see this as said best
The question of suffering comes up much when talking about, or practicing any religion. Many ask why people suffer, and what causes suffering? The various religions try to answer these questions in their own way. Pico Iyer’s editorial, “The Value of Suffering” addresses the questions of suffering and how it is handled. This article could be compared to the Bhagavad-Gita which also addresses and explains suffering through different stories of the interactions of humans and different Gods. One can specifically look at “The Second Teaching” in the Bhagavad-Gita, which explains the interaction between a man named Arjuna and the god Krishna. In it Arjuna is suffering because he does not want to fight in a war and with people whom he should be worshiping. Krishna says to fight because the souls of the people will forever live on, and because he needs to fulfill his Dharma. With what is known about the Bhagavad-Gita and how Iyer thinks about the subject, Iyer would agree with how the Bhagavad-Gita address suffering.
... his soul. He believes that he, or anyone in his camp, are not humans anymore. "The student of Talmud, the child I was, had been consumed by the flames. All that was left was a shape that resembled me. My soul had been invaded--and devoured--by a black flame" (Wiesel 66) Faith abandons him, leaving him in a void of pure evil darkness.
forms of suffering. As we grow older, we learn that certain things that we want may involve some pain. For example, goals need some type of action in order to be attained. Schopenhauer says that humans experience pain in everything, such as performing routines, we become enslaved to them. Schopenhauer view of life is constructed in an optimistic way. He believes that human life is not a wonderful thing because it brings pain into our lives. He emphasizes this reality by pointing out that it does not benefit humans to suffer.
The cause of all suffering is people’s selfish desire for the temporary pleasures of this world.
Suffering is an individual's basic affective experience of pain or distress, often as a result of one’s physical, emotional or spiritual circumstance (Stanford Encyclopaedia of Philosophy 2006). Suffering can be classified as physical; for example pain caused by a dislocated knee, emotional; for example one’s grief over the death of a loved one, or spiritual; which is described as the state of being separated from the blissful nature of your divine self (soul). To suffer physically or emotionally is often unavoidable; however it can be argued that spiritual liberation...
Fiedler’ model is considered the first highly visible theory to present the contingency approach. It stated that effective groups depend on a proper match between a leader’s style of interacting with subordinates and the degree to which the situation gives control and influence to the leader (Fiedler, 1967). Fiedler argued that the leadership style could be indentified by taking a Least Preferred Co-worker (LPC) questionnaire he designed. When evaluating a least enjoyed co-worker, a relationship oriented leader scores high in LPC, while a task oriented leader scores low. Fiedler identified three contingency or situational dimensions: leader-member relations, task structure, and position power. A leader will have more control if he has better leader-member relations, high structured job, and stronger position power. The task-oriented leaders perform best in situations of high and low control, while relationship-oriented leaders perform best in moderate control situations. Feedler views an individual’s leadership style as fixed. To assure leader effectiveness, either situation needs to change to fit the leader or the leader needs to be replaced to fit the situation. But in reality, a leader can not use a homogeneous style to treat all their followers in a similar fashion in their work unit (Robbins & Judge, 2011, p. 382).
I believe that having a background in the field of social work is not a curse. In fact I believe that it is a blessing. With any situation there is always different way a person can view the topic. How can a person truly relate to someone if they have never experience the same situation? For example how could I relate to someone who just lost his or her brother from cancer if I never lost anyone before? There is no way I can truly relate, I might be able to understand the situation but I would not be able to relate. Having a background in human services is a benefit. If a person did not have a background in human service they probably wouldn’t have been in this field. Their background could have been what put them in their career. I wish that everyone had a perfect childhood, but that will never happen and the past cannot be altered so its best to look at the positive side about having a background in human services.
For example, a well-structured group with a weak leader-member relationship would benefit from someone who uses a relational and oriented leadership approach. Groups who are already structured and task-oriented would not require additional structure or directives to accomplish a goal, yet they could benefit from the leader who makes them feel a part of a team. Conversely, groups or teams that do not have a structure or a strong leader-member relationship could benefit from the structure and discipline provided by a task oriented leader. Overall, the decision should ultimately be determined by the overall needs of the group or team that needs to be