Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Literary analysis essay about race
Literary analysis essay about race
Papers on racism in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Booth and Lincoln both search for an identity in their assertions of power. Booth tries emulating his brother’s power by aspiring to “throw the cards” and master the hustle in an attempt to establish his identity, as the “topdog” with power. Maley and Michael LeMahieu discuss the significance of Booth’s self-naming, dubbing himself “3-Card” as he embarks on his endeavor to unseat Lincoln from the position of the “topdog.” However, LeMahieu emphasizes the importance of Lincoln’s struggle to determine “what is,” to separate himself from the legacy of the Abraham Lincoln, the man he is named after and the man he impersonates for an honest living, an identity Link relies on to procure the salary that provides him with control and keeps him in the position of the “topdog.” Maley mentions that “Lincoln always retains power and control” by earning “the salary they share and, more importantly for this relationship, he [still] has the skill to run a successful three-card monte hustle” (187). At the beginning of Topdog/Underdog, on the surface level of the play, Lincoln has completely abandoned the hustle, yielding the control he possessed in tricking others through …show more content…
illusion, only to retain control in the brother’s relationship through yet another illusion. LeMahieu accurately posits that Parks introduces the theme of “the fake, the phony, or the impostor” with Lincoln’s impersonation job, regardless of the fact that Lincoln considers the gig an honest job (35). Even when it seems that Lincoln has denounced the hustle, his control still comes from being an imposter, relying on maintaining the “thuh illusion of thuh whole thing” for the “"folks [coming] in kill phony Honest Abe with the phony pistol" (Parks 49; 33). As LeMahieu states, Lincoln's “anxiety concerning his occupation is a symptom of his uncertainty concerning his identity, whether he is the real deal or whether he is, or has always been, an impostor” (37). Lincoln is so fixated on finding his identity by asserting himself as the “topdog” and being “the real deal,” yet he ultimately resorts to using illusions to ensure his superiority. Lincoln’s control and power as the “topdog” relies on creating an illusion in the same manner that Coates depicts white supremacist relying on the illusions of the notion of hierarchical race and the American Dream to maintain their power. The moment that Lincoln refuses to continue to capitulate to the American Dream, gives up surviving off of an honest job, Lincoln immediately falls back into the mentality that exerting himself as the “topdog” requires employing illusions. After experiencing the intrinsic disappointment present in pursuing the unachievable American Dream, than losing his job and momentarily means of control, Lincoln finds empowered again just in reminiscing about hustling: “Shit, I was good. I was great […] I was the best anyone ever seen. Coast to coast. Everybody said so. And I never lost. Not once. Not one time. Not never. That’s how much them cards was mines. I was the be all end all” (Parks 55). Lincoln had abandoned the hustle thinking “there’s more to Link than that […] more to me than some cheap hustle,” looking to aim for the American Dream only to realize the impossibility of achieving this illusion through an honest job (56). In response to this realization, as Laura Dawkins suggests, Lincoln “assimilates into a hierarchical American society,” which he does in adopting the mentality that self-progress and power relies on employing illusions to hustle others (90). Parks demonstrates Lincoln’s reliance on employing deception to maintain his control and power as the “topdog” by ultimately hustling Booth.
Coates states that the illusion of the American Dream creates white supremacy by requiring that blacks are “the essential bottom of the country” (106). This element of the American Dream demonstrates that this tool of control ultimately ensures power for those at the top of a hierarchy by oppressing others, keeping them within the confines of the lower positions. Lincoln’s use of illusion in Topdog/Underdog rests on the same fundamental basis; in order to maintain his position as the “topdog” Lincoln “asserts his topdog status by playing on his brother's desire to unseat him” by both conning Booth and consequently keeping him in the position of the underdog (LeMahieu
35). Topdog/Underdog is essentially a play-length hustle Lincoln carries out on his mark, Booth. According to Maley, in a 3-card monte hustle, the “dealer controls the game’s result with one or both of its trademark sleight-of-hand moves;” therefore the hustle relies on the dealer’s skill creating an illusion through the sleight of hand (189). However, the hustle is more elaborate; as Maley states, that in 3-card monte, the “mark is most vulnerable when most confident” (190). Any expert dealers will throw a few rounds to “boost his mark’s confidence progressively higher” until the mark eventually raises the stakes” (191). The entirety of Topdog/Underdog follows Lincoln’s own hustle on Booth; Lincoln is driven by his greed for power and need to remain the “topdog” into manipulating Booth out of his five-hundred dollar inheritance. Lincoln consistently seizes every opportune moment to bolster Booth’s ego and confidence till Booth stakes his inheritance. Whenever Lincoln appears to be a nurturing older brother trying to help out Booth and assist him in working towards gaining some sense of control over his life, Lincoln is ultimately manipulating the “underdog” and setting up this elaborate con. Lincoln is a master manipulator; he boosts Booth’s confidence by pretending to teach him the tricks of his trade while simultaneously seeming to relinquish some control by appearing vulnerable from job insecurity and the loss of his wife, Cookie. Lincoln expresses deep worry about losing his job, the means by which he holds control in the relationship in economic gain, and seemingly turns to Booth for assistance: BOOTH: You was lucky with the cards. LINCOLN: Lucky? Aint nothing lucky about cards. Cards aint luck. Cards is work. Cards is skill. Aint never nothing lucky about cards. (Rest) I don’t wanna lose my job. BOOTH: Then you gotta jazz up yr act. Elaborate yr moves, you knw. You was always too stiff with it. You cant just sit there! Maybe, when they shot you, you know, lea up flail r arms than fall down and wiggle around and shit so they gotta shoot you more than once. LINCOLN: Help me practice… (Parks 29-30) Lincoln appears to slide out of the position as the “topdog” in control, turning to his younger brother for advice and support; typically, in their relationship, it is the “underdog” Booth who relies on Lincoln for guidance.
...rough popular sovereignty and majority rule. With Andrew Jackson he had come from a humble beginning and could understand the minority and gain their support just as much as the majority on an economical level and what he could do for both classes. Even through out time this gaining a support from a common majority and or minority to voice that group’s opinion has lived on through out Americas time in such cases woman’s rights, Fredrick Douglass and his the fight against slavery, Martin Luther King and the fight against racism, and now our celebrities are speaking and idolized for and by the people in which they use to be such as Jay-Z and Kendrick Lamar. Those seeking power connect the best way possible with those who give them just that and those seeking a voice give those with more and common understanding a chance to speak for them in hopes to be heard.
Though Henry David Thoreau lived more than one hundred years before the time of Martin Luther King Jr., his philosophy lingered in the minds of many individuals. Thoreau was opposed to injustice in general and refused to support or to follow the unjust laws. His idealism and anarchism influenced the thinking of King. Douglass' narrative shows how his thinking would have been similar to that of Thoreau's.
In Henry Thoreau’s essay, Resistance to Civil Government, the harmless actions he takes to rebel against the government are considered acts of civil disobedience. He talks about how the government acts wrongful such as, slavery and the Mexican-American war. This writing persuades Nathaniel Heatwole, a twenty-year-old college student studying at Guildford College in Greensboro, North Carolina, to take matters into his own hands, by smuggling illegal items on multiple Southwest airplanes. The reason in that being, is to show the people that our nation is unsafe and dangerous. In doing this, he takes his rebellion one step too far, by not only jeopardizing his life, but as well as many other innocent lives.
America was influenced in the antebellum period by many aspects, and authors with their writings were no exception. Henry David Thoreau a famous American writer sparked the ideas of reform and standing up for ones belief through his writings such as Walden, Civil Disobedience, and speeches such as Slavery in Massachusetts. Thoreau started life through education, but still did not conform to who society thought he should be, but rather rose with his idol Ralph Waldo Emerson into transcendentalism and pushed the limits of government. Thoreau was an influential gentleman who stood for what he believed in time and time again and pushed Americans to do the same through his writings and actions.
Eleanor Roosevelt once said, “Remember always that you not only have the right to be an individual, you have an obligation to be one.” In this quote, Eleanor is expressing that you should always take advantage of the universal human right to be an individual. From time immemorial, many of those who have led meaningful and enjoyable lives have shared one particular trait in common: individualism. Chris McCandless and Thoreau were no different, they both embodied individualism and as a result they have unknowingly inspired generations.
When you look at today’s government, it is viewed that everyone will be treated equally and decisions will be made in the best interest of the people. But when thinking about the government of the past, one must ask if these same views were expressed by the people of that time? Did everyone fill that they were apart of a just system? According to Frederick Douglass and Henry David Thoreau the answer to that question is no. The government was unjust because so many followed the wrong doings of the law rather than doing what was right, subjected African Americans to harsher punishments
Although his actions were admirable and act as evidence to integrity, the writings of Henry David Thoreau and Emerson reveal a haughty and pretentious individual. Thoreau's courage was noble. He was quick to immerse himself in his beliefs
Frazier begins a more detailed explanation of his theories by discussing the place of the black bourgeoisie in the political and power structures of America. He contends that the black middle class has no real power in America at this time. He attributes the appearance of power to the fact that the members of the black bourgeoisie hold strategic positions in the segregated community. However, he maintains that all of these “power” positions still feed into the white power structure.
How people see one another vary in numerous ways, whether it be from actions or what is gathered through spoken conversations. When an intellectual meets someone for the first time, they tend to judge by appearance before they judge by how the person express their thoughts or ideas. In Thoreau’s excerpt, he emphasizes the importance of his philosophy, especially by making sure the reader is aware of his own feelings about it. He puts literary devices such as metaphors, personification, and imagery to construct his explanation for his philosophy as well as provide several attitudes to let the reader identify how he feels towards people and the value of their ideas.
When it comes to civil rights, there are two pieces of literature commonly discussed. One of these pieces is Henry David Thoreau’s persuasive lecture On the Duty of Civil Disobedience. In this work, Thoreau discusses how one must combat the government with disobedience of unjust laws and positive friction to create change. The second piece is the commonly known article Letter From a Birmingham Jail by Martin Luther King Jr. This letter covers the ways in which peaceful protest and standing up against injustice can lead to positive results. Both pieces conveyed a similar message of standing up for what is right. The strongest rhetorical methods which Thoreau uses are allusions, logos, ethos and rhetorical questions. However, King’s use of
Why do so few Americans not see all of the problems in society? Do they simply not care or are they not able to see them? With Thoreau's statement, "To be awake is to be alive", he implies that Americans have their eyes closed to these issues. They do not choose to overlook these issues but they simply pass them by because their eyes are shut. Some people are not able to grasp the concept in Thoreau's statement and find it to be foreign or subversive because it threatens the way the see the world.
... were changing, but being African American could prevent a person from reaching their goals and achieving success and in doing so, completely forget the importance of family and tradition. Through this play, Hansberry affirms that America’s values are constantly changing and evolving. The American Dream is constantly morphed, and people will take different actions according to their beliefs, but factors such as racism can prevent a person from becoming successful and achieving their dreams.
During the Gilded Age white were understood to be at the top and all other ethnicities were below them as well in the 1941, however during the 1950-1980 things were starting to change but not dramatically. White men in all three periods were allowed to speak their minds and say whatever they wanted because in their minds they understood that they were at the top.4 For example, white men joined forces and created the unions to go against the overbearing power of corporations.5 These corporations c...
Henry David Thoreau implies that simplicity and nature are valuable to a person’s happiness in “Why I Went to the Woods”. An overall theme used in his work was the connection to one’s spiritual self. Thoreau believed that by being secluded in nature and away from society would allow one to connect with their inner self. Wordsworth and Thoreau imply the same idea that the simple pleasures in life are easily overlooked or ignored. Seeing the true beauty of nature allows oneself to rejuvenate their mentality and desires. When one allows, they can become closer to their spiritual selves. One of William Wordsworth’s popular pieces, “Tintern Abbey”, discusses the beauty and tranquility of nature. Wordsworth believed that when people