Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Debates about censorship
Controversy in censorship in schools
Debates about censorship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Debates about censorship
Paper, Leather, and Words
Thesis: Some schools have bought books for their library for students to read, however, there have been cases where the school has either tried to hide the book or books, or banned them. As well some schools have been sued for getting the books or taking the books away from the mind of young readers. Schools have been in these situations many times, and have either dealt with the problem or put it away and out of sight. However despite the problems it causes schools should not have the rights to take away books no matter how “inappropriate” it may seem in their eyes, as well, parents shouldn’t have power to take away the right of reading.
It is really sad when
…show more content…
It was a small town an angry parent tried suing the public liberian because she thought the book was too “inappropriate”, and tried pressing lawsuits even though she was a town fraud (Buckley Christopher 64).
Some schools don’t care about book censoring, and some of the parents are the same way or some say it’s a waste of time and a distraction of what really needs to be done in the school
(St. Petersburg FL 2). It has always been a debate in the public Florida high school, but in the eyes of the school board it isn’t necessary to have to keep checking over and over again, as well as they have more important problems to deal with (St. Petersburg FL 2). The students of their age are going into adulthood and should be open to the world of literature (St. Petersburg
Time 2). As well if the school purchases any literature it means the school has approved it and students are allowed to read the book if wanted, and that students and parents should stop trying to protest (St. Petersburg Times 2).
Parents are one of the main causes of the issue; they read the books their children get and start criticizing the books and get onto the school for it. It is tired some for the schools or any
…show more content…
The parent is a mother and says, “I do not like the censoring of books for everyone” (St. Petersburg Times 21A). She has also stated, “If the school board has approved the book then the children should have the right to read it” (St. Petersburg Times 21A).
It is also not just that parent several students have also testified for their reading right. The parent says “Wake up, people. We are talking about fantasy, not reality. Someone has finally published a book over 100 pages that is keeping kids interested in reading again - gee, what a concept - and people want to stop this? One of our great freedoms is being allowed to read what we want. Please don't step on my or my children's freedom.” (St. Petersburg Times 21A).
So far all that has been shown are students, parents or schools, but the main question is “does religion have anything to do with the censoring of books?”. Does religion have anything to do with the censoring of books? Well they do yet they don’t. Down in England a spokesman of a church said “"We love the little devil. We are not in the business of censoring books.
However, schools set their own policies and we never interfere." (Urquhart, Conal, and
...ain groups consider books to be immoral does not mean they need to be pulled from the shelves. Censoring is acceptable for the youth, but there is an age when we all grow up and are able to handle books with explicit content.
The practice of the censorship of books in schools has been prevalent due to the explicit content of them. Parents have been complaining to schools about books that count as required reading because they disapprove with the points made in the book. If a book consists of offensive or sexually explicit material, then parents would challenge the schools about them in order to prevent their children from reading them. Censorship in general has been an intensely debated issue because it is considered an infringement to the First Amendment of the United States Constitution while others argue it is used to conceal inappropriate things (Aliprandini and Sprague). The banning of books in school curriculum has also been debated since parents see certain books as inappropriate while others argue that banning them hinders student learning. Against the censorship of books in schools, Fenice Boyd and Nancy Bailey, authors of Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, believe that banning books creates a barrier between students and intellectual development (Boyd and Bailey, 655). Banning books from schools and removing them from the curriculum prevents students from exploring different ideas and developing creativity and critical thinking skills.
Banning a book on the basis of profanity is merely a superficial reason of those who wish to limit beliefs that do not coincide with their own. By excluding a novel from a high school curriculum in order to shelter students from profanity, is an attempt to do the impossible. Profanity is found everywhere. According to TV Guide, "Profanity is uttered once every six minutes on American primetime television...
Foerstel, Herbert N. Banned in the U.S.A.: a Reference Guide to Book Censorship in Schools and Public Libraries. Westport, CT: Greenwood, 1994. Print.
Trelease, Jim. "Book Banning Violates Children and Young Adult Freedoms." Book Banning. Ed. Ronnie D. Lankford. Detroit: Greenhaven Press, 2007. At Issue. Rpt. from "Censorship and Children's Books." Trelease-on-Reading.com. 2006.Opposing Viewpoints in Context. Web. 31 Mar. 2014.
The American Association of School Administrators (AASA) defines censorship as: “The removal, suppression, or restricted circulation of literary, artistic, or educational materials… of images, ideas, and information…on the grounds that these are morally or otherwise objectionable in light of standards applied by the censor” (Miner 1998). In schools there are three types of censorship, one type is a “parent who doesn’t want their child to read a particular book. Another is a parent, teacher, administrator, or school board member who argues that no one in the class, or school should read the book in dispute. Lastly, there is censorship that involves someone who is part of an organized campaign, whether of a local or national group, and who goes in ready for a fight and wants to make a broader political point” (Miner 1998). Although there are many others ways that a piece of literature could get censored, most censored works are asked to be removed from classrooms and school libraries.
Book banning is a prime target for censorship. Censorship in print media, notably book banning, occurs across homes, schools, stores, and other facilities daily. Censorship in the schools is the most widespread and exposed place for book banning. Do administrators and school boards have the right to ban books? Are we taking away the rights of children to read? In case of Island Trees Schools District V. Pico in New York, the Supreme Court gave the school board broad discretion to frame curriculum and teach civic and moral values. This case resulted in the school board removing ten books from the school library for being "anti-american, anti-christian, anti-semitic, and just plain filthy." Another case involving book banning was Hazelwood School District V. Kuhlmeier. In this case the Supreme Court again gave school officials the broad discretion to control curriculum. This time the court left open the question if this affects the school libraries. In Olathe, Kansas, the district's superintendent made the decision to remove all copies of Nancy Gardner's Annie On My Mind because of it imposing views for gay actions. This standpoint resulted in a public book burning by a homophobic community group. At Hempfield High School in Western Penn...
When a book is banned, reasoning should be backed up with many facts and teachers should be able to agree or disagree. Teachers are the ones who have graduated from colleges and have earned this right. Though the opinions of parents matter, their opinion does not necessarily take into account all that the book has to give. Parents may not see the potential of the book as a whole. They may just see the racist language or cruel behavior in a book. What their opinions are mostly based on is the information that will keep everyone the most comfortable instead of the importance behind the basics for students to learn (Hills). Some books may include opposing ideas like this, but that does not mean that they do not have something to teach us. Many teachers take it on themselves to determine what is appropriate. They take on a certain level of self-imposed censorship to make sure that they are teaching appropriate material. Along with this, books being bought with school funds have to go through a process of approval (Zimmerman). This should eliminate any problem areas that parents may have. Besides just having the school board approving the books, many teachers have the same basic outline of what a book should include and be like. They ag...
Every year in the United States we have books being banned and challenged by many people who do not like the contents of books. When researching for this argument essay I found an article written by Rebecca Hagelin. Rebecca Hagelin is the author of Home Invasion: Protecting Your Family in a Culture That’s Gone Stark Raving Mad and the vice president of communications and marketing at the Heritage Foundation (Lankford).
The most debatable and controversial form of censorship today is the banning of books in school libraries. Banning books that educate students is wrong and selfish. Censorship of books in school libraries is neither uncommon nor an issue of the past. Books with artistic and cultural worth are still challenged constantly by those who want to control what others read. The roots of bigotry and illiteracy that fuel efforts to censor books and free expression are unacceptable and unconditional. Censoring school books in libraries can often lead to censorship of our basic freedoms guaranteed in the First Amendment. In some cases, a minority ends up dictating the majority in censorship cases. To be told what is permissible reading material and what is not is a direct violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution.
Brinkley describes a few actions that can lead to the censoring of a book in a school or school system: An expression of concern is simply a question about the material with overtones of disapproval; an oral complaint is an oral challenge to the contents of a work; a written complaint is a formal written challenge to the school about the contents of a work; and a public attack is a public statement challenging the contents of a work that is made outside of the school, usually to the media to gain support for further action (1999). Brinkley also points out an important difference between selection and censorship: Selection is the act of carefully choosing works for an English course that will be age-appropriate, meaningful, and fulfill objectives, while censorship is the act of excluding works that some con...
However, Los Osos High School and several other high schools have not banned these books because they are important pieces of literature and their offensive content originates from the time period they were writing about. However, that freedom doesn’t seem to extend to all books. On August 5, 2016, Jennifer Teresi, a Los Osos High School English teacher for freshmen and sophomores, attempted to get several books authorized in order to broaden the amount of modern literature at our school. However, the school administration quickly rejected these books without a clear explanation, leading to many questions and speculation as to the reasons why the books were rejected.
“Some parents oppose having their children exposed to fiction that doesn’t have a happy ending, teach a moral lesson, or provide noble role models. If these and other individual preferences were legitimate criteria for censoring materials, school curricula would narrow to only the least controversial—and probably least relevant—material. It would hardly address students' real concerns, satisfy their curiosity or prepare them for life.” (Censorship in Schools). Banning books or censoring material eliminates the true components that create each literary work. Not all books have happy endings or provide godly figures, but that is the beauty of storytelling. Without the vast set of elements that make up a novel, it would be harder to address real situations or help prepare individuals for life ahead. When society bans books it denies the appreciation of great literary works that hold powerful meaning which helps shape the lives of
Many parents believe that some books are “pure rot” because of the family-value damaging content that lies within the covers (Lankford). Children are often naively drove to the library, parents unknowing of the content easily found within the shelves. Books like these goes against family preferences, religions, limits, and traditions which is why many are challenged of their
Other parents disagree and attempt to ban books from class lists. One article says, “Because we no longer live in a world where it would be unthinkable for an authority figure to give a child a book in which depictions of sex, violence, drug use, and profanity and the like are major elements…” (Article 2). Society has changed and most parents want their children to face reality.