Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Sexuality in adolescence
Sexuality in adolescence
Sexuality in adolescence
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Sexuality in adolescence
Books should be banned. The printing press was a writing invention that first appeared in 1440 in the Holy Roman Empire. Book banning prevents children and young adults from inappropriate and value deteriorating material.
Book banning averts children from reading obscene topics such as murder and racism. Graphic descriptions of murder can leave a negative effects on young minds. For example, the novel “Huckleberry Finn” contains mentions of murder. Since this book could be found in public school, it is a prime instance of children being subjected to murder. This could leave young adults to the impression that murder is not a bad as it seems, as it was easily accessible to them.
Some books, used as educational basis, contain X-rated racist
…show more content…
Children who read a book with vulgar language may think that those words are okay to use because they’ve read them in a public area. According to an interview with Mrs. Friedman, many parents fall into the idea that “if he has to be 18 to buy the tape, he has to be 18 to take it out of the library” (Roleff). Various parents would feel more comfortable with an age limit to books. This restricts children under the said age to be subjected to material that deteriorates their innocence. Salacious and rude behaviors within a book can causes influences that ruin family traditions and values. Many parents believe that some books are “pure rot” because of the family-value damaging content that lies within the covers (Lankford). Children are often naively drove to the library, parents unknowing of the content easily found within the shelves. Books like these goes against family preferences, religions, limits, and traditions which is why many are challenged of their …show more content…
Young adults should have access to books that contain homosexuality and other diverse preferences in order to understand others around them and know what to do when subjected to real life matters. After the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) asked Texas to open their records on banned books relating to gay and lesbian content from August 1995 to July 1997, they found that nearly 220 titles by 142 authors were questioned of their appropriateness (Barbour). Teaching children from a young age that people are different can alter their views and opinions for the rest of their lives. Eliminating books that contain factual circumstances does not give them the opportunity to be subjected to different lifestyles. Banning books containing homosexuality is homophobic, or the hatred and fear of gays and lesbians. In 1997, a school in Jefferson County, Kentucky, numerous parents’ requests of removing books published by a gay author were rejected by the school district committee (Barbour). Limiting an authors’ ability to put their books in library and schools is an example of censorship. Parents sometimes feel that the presence of gay and lesbian material is a bad influence on their
...etter than ignorance. Book censorship should not limit the amount of knowledge a child can receive, instead, books should be used to benefit children in their education and future career.
People ban or challenge books because they don't want other to read them because of their content, even thought we see most of it in our everyday life. To stop book banning and to keep books on the shelves; if a book has inappropriate content and someone wants to buy it or get it from the library or store they have to get the parents consent. This will also keep parents informed on what their child is reading.
As the American Library Association notes, books are usually banned "with the best intention…to protect others, frequently children, from difficult ideas and information." (Brunner). If a book has frightening or controversial ideas in them, adults willing often censor that book from children. From 2000 to 2009, of the 5,099 challenges that were reported, 1,639 of these challenges were in school libraries and 30 challenges in academic libraries. (Frequently Challenged Books). At various times in American history, even some of the tamest books have been banned. Harriet the Spy, was banned because it supposedly taught children to "lie, spy, back-talk, and curse." Anne Frank: The Diary of a Young Girl was banned for being too depressing. A Light in the Attic, by Shel Silverstein, was banned because it might encourage kids to break dishes so they won't have to dry them. (Frequently Challenged Books). While some of these excuses are more reasonable than other excuses, the banning of these books prevents the children from empathizing...
From the years 2000 to 2009, 5,099 books were challenged in school libraries, classrooms, and public libraries. Most of the books on this list were banned because of objectionable content such as sexual references, profanity, violence, and the fact that the book was considered “unsuited to age group” (American Library Association). Even prior to the year 2000, censorship and banned books had become an issue for schools in particular all across the country for these very reasons. While the The Color Purple by Alice Walker does contain the objectionable content mentioned prior, it should not be banned because objectionable content found in the book is accessible through the internet and social media, one person’s complaint should not determine another’s choice, and high school students should be mature enough to handle the adult content.
“It’s not just the books under fire now that worry me. It is the books that will never be written, the books that will never be read. And all due to the fear of censorship. As always, young readers will be the real losers” (Blume 1999). Judy Blume can not explain the problem of book censorship any clearer. The children are the real losers because they are the ones that are not able to read the classic works of literature which are the backbone of classroom discussions all across the United States.
Books are banned for many reasons but more times than not it is because of the sensitive information found within the novel that agitates the reader. As long as people have been able to develop their own opinions, others have sought to prevent them from sharing. At some point in time, every idea has ultimately become objectionable to someone. The most frequently challenged and most visible targets of such objection are the very books found in classrooms and public libraries. These controversial novels teach lessons that sometimes can be very sensitive to some but there is much more to challenged books than a controversial topic. What lies within these pages is a wealth of knowledge, such as new perspectives for readers, twisting plots, and expressions that are found nowhere else. For example, To Kill A Mockingbird, contains references to rape, racial content, and profanity that have caused many to challenge the novel in the first place. The book was banned from countless
...ading the novel. The teacher should always listen to input from the parents of their students, and should make the parents feel comfortable discussing with them the problems they see with their child reading a certain book. There should always be parental consent when reading a book so that the parent will be able to discuss with their child their views and issues on a certain book. Discussion should always be welcome within the classroom for student growth and to confront any issues that may arise. When following these guidelines, teachers can prepare their students for the future real-world problems that they will be confronted with.
Every year in the United States we have books being banned and challenged by many people who do not like the contents of books. When researching for this argument essay I found an article written by Rebecca Hagelin. Rebecca Hagelin is the author of Home Invasion: Protecting Your Family in a Culture That’s Gone Stark Raving Mad and the vice president of communications and marketing at the Heritage Foundation (Lankford).
... Donelson, K. (1997). The 'Secondary'. "Filth" and "Pure Filth" in our schools--Censorship of classroom books in the last ten years. English Journal, 86 (2), 21-23.
Censorship in School Libraries The most debatable and controversial form of censorship today is the banning of books in school libraries. Banning books that educate students is wrong and selfish. Censorship of books in school libraries is neither uncommon nor an issue of the past. Books with artistic and cultural worth are still challenged constantly by those who want to control what others read. The roots of bigotry and illiteracy that fuel efforts to censor books and free expression are unacceptable and unconditional.
As it is inevitable that children will grow up to be exposed to the world's evils, which are shown in novels like Fahrenheit 451, teaching the context and meaning of those evils in a learning environment allows for more of a educated understanding and a fuller grasp on the issues within. By reading controversial novels in schools, students in middle and high school will benefit tremendously by being exposed to them in a learning environment. Although teachers and parents have control as to what the students are exposed to at a young age, Fahrenheit 451 should not be banned from middle and high schools as it depicts the effects of censorship on a dystopian society through use of controversial material which doubles as
Retrieved December 2, 2002 from Lexis-Nexis/Academic database. This article addresses some of the reasons that censors attempt to remove books from the curriculum: Many censors feel that works are not age appropriate for students. Staff, Wire Reports. (2002 October 3). Book banning spans the globe.
I strongly believe that the banning of this book is a huge loss for the future generation of these young readers. Mississippi placing 49th among the 50 states for quality of education can be put into consideration that the banning of the book is questionable. Why do schools with higher academic achievements not ban this book? Parents perceive censoring as protection, but by doing so we are posing a threat to freedom of choice. Supporting the idea of parents making decisions on behalf of their children, forcefully shaping the child’s way of thinking, ending up marginalizing the lives of young readers.
The lessons taught to children by the puritanical books, though, were far from the rudimentary ideas that I had of teaching children morality through gentle children’s books. An insight that I gained from reading West’s article Teaching Banned Children’s Books was that Children’s literature as a genre is much more powerful than what I gave it credit for. In fact, the idea of children’s literature lacking power as a genre because the wording is simple is far from true. Children’s literature elicits many strong emotions and draws critics because of the types of ideas that the genre exposes young minds to. West introduces that censorship is used in children’s literature to prevent children from being exposed to ideas that are too controversial, challenge authority, contained sexuality, described violent acts, and address social problems (West,1).
Some people may argue, if kids didn’t read about these things, they wouldn’t know about them, but in all reality, that’s absurd. Some kids hear foul language and use it before they can even read. Children see things, hear things and do things, that we consider “bad” in these books, before they have even touched a chapter book. We should not be able