Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essays about book censorship
Essays about book censorship
Essays about book censorship
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Role of Book Banning in a Developing Society
Is book banning necessary or unnecessary in a society? This has been the center of debate throughout literary history. The practice of banning books is a form of censorship, from political, legal, religious, moral, or commercial motives. While some believe that book banning benefits a society by keeping harmful material away from individuals, book banning isn’t necessary in a society because it restricts freedom of speech and conversation, and denies the appreciation of great literary work.
Banning books restricts freedom of speech and conversation. “Censors ban books to prevent the dissemination of thoughts and ideas they have deemed dangerous, and a book may be banned due to moral, religious,
…show more content…
or political motivations.”(Gale). The act of banning books is used to prevent specific thoughts and ideas that could be dangerous, although this action can only restrict differences in thought and stunt individual speech. It minimizes conversation within a society and denies the presence of opinion. Elements crucial for development in the world. Americans can not restrict or censor what they feel is inappropriate in books, on the contrary people should accept difference of thought and appreciate new conversation that is enabled by freedom of speech. Banning books denies the appreciation of great literary work.
“Some parents oppose having their children exposed to fiction that doesn’t have a happy ending, teach a moral lesson, or provide noble role models. If these and other individual preferences were legitimate criteria for censoring materials, school curricula would narrow to only the least controversial—and probably least relevant—material. It would hardly address students' real concerns, satisfy their curiosity or prepare them for life.” (Censorship in Schools). Banning books or censoring material eliminates the true components that create each literary work. Not all books have happy endings or provide godly figures, but that is the beauty of storytelling. Without the vast set of elements that make up a novel, it would be harder to address real situations or help prepare individuals for life ahead. When society bans books it denies the appreciation of great literary works that hold powerful meaning which helps shape the lives of …show more content…
many. Some may believe that book banning benefits a society by keeping harmful material away from individuals.
Although this may be true, School Libraries Should Not Restrict Access to Any Books article thinks otherwise. “What's obscene is that kids who are maltreated often grow up angry and depressed and anxious and desperate. They experience crippling difficulties in school, in social relations and in all matters of self-esteem. They use the language I use in the story and worse because it is all they have to try to match what is inside to the outside world.” (Crutcher). The article explains that humans make sense of our emotions through knowledge and information gathered from books. Without these literary resources kids can lack self-esteem and can become sad. Overall, some may believe that book banning benefits a society by keeping harmful material away from individuals, it can almost harm a society due to the lack of relatable information given to a growing society.
In conclusion, book banning isn’t necessary in a society because it restricts freedom of speech and conversation, and denies the appreciation of great literary work. Restricting freedom of speech and conversation can only decrease a society's growth. Also without appreciation for great literary work, there will be no resources for individuals to find a personal connection and understanding with. Overall, is book banning necessary or unnecessary in a
society? Work Cited "Book Banning." Opposing Viewpoints Online Collection, Gale, 2017. Opposing Viewpoints in Context, link.galegroup.com/apps/doc/PC3010999101/OVIC?u=pioneer&xid=af1d5f55. Accessed 6 Oct. 2017. “Censorship and the First Amendment in Schools: A Resource Guide.” Censorship in Schools: Learning, Speaking, and Thinking Freely: The First Amendment in Schools, Accessed 6 Oct. 2017 Crutcher, Chris. "School Libraries Should Not Restrict Access to Any Books." Censorship, edited by Julia Bauder, Greenhaven Press, 2007. Current Controversies. Opposing Viewpoints in Context, Originally published as "To the Students of the Limestone School Disctrict,", Mar. 2005.
...etter than ignorance. Book censorship should not limit the amount of knowledge a child can receive, instead, books should be used to benefit children in their education and future career.
When authors write books, the books are meant to be read not banned. Authors write books to be read, so when schools and other facilities are banning books it’s taking away the author’s right. In the letter, I am Very Real written by author Kurt Vonnegut, he states “If you were to bother to read my books, to behave as educated persons would, you would learn that they are not sexy, and do not argue in favor of wildness of any kind. They beg that people be kinder and more responsible than they often are.” This excerpt from the text states that the author doesn’t write books to teach cruel things. Vonnegut writes books in a kind manner with the idea that people become more
People ban or challenge books because they don't want other to read them because of their content, even thought we see most of it in our everyday life. To stop book banning and to keep books on the shelves; if a book has inappropriate content and someone wants to buy it or get it from the library or store they have to get the parents consent. This will also keep parents informed on what their child is reading.
"Book Banning." Current Issues: Macmillian Social Science Library. Detroit: Gale, 2010. Gale Opposing Viewpoints In Context. Web. 31 Jan. 2011.
Number one, as I said: quality of information. Number two: leisure to digest. And number three: the right to carry out actions based on what we learned from the interaction of the first two”(84-85). Books are where people get their information from, banning books basically means the censorship of information.
Countries worldwide actively call for the banning of books that are found to be politically inconvenient, religiously awkward, or embarrassing in one form or another. But for writers like Russia's Vasily Grossman, a book's ban means far more than just a dip in sales. In 1961, he pleaded with the Soviet censors, "I am physically free, but the book to which I have dedicated my life is in jail." (Merkelson). A book represents an idea, thus limiting access to a book is banning the representation of an idea. The banning of books in American schools should not be allowed, because banning books will prevent students from learning the reason for the controversy and alternate viewpoints they can come to on their own.
“It’s not just the books under fire now that worry me. It is the books that will never be written, the books that will never be read. And all due to the fear of censorship. As always, young readers will be the real losers” (Blume 1999). Judy Blume can not explain the problem of book censorship any clearer. The children are the real losers because they are the ones that are not able to read the classic works of literature which are the backbone of classroom discussions all across the United States.
Banning books from public schools and public libraries is wrong. It’s irrational to have a parent or school board member’s opinion determine what a school district should be reading. Books including and not limited to, The Scarlet Letter, The Great Gatsby, To Kill a Mockingbird, The Lord of the Flies, and Animal Farm all have one thing in common. They have all at one time or another been subject to banishment. These literary classics have been around for a long time and proved to be vital to the education of many, especially children and adolescents. These novels teach values and educate children about world affairs that can not come from an everyday experience. These controversial novels encompass the materials that ultimately boost our educational wealth. Banning books infringe
People should be allowed to read whatever they want to read, even if it is a touchy subject to someone else. Although some people mainly believe in the banning of books due to explicit content, it actually causes a negative effect on people and children. Not only does it take away the people’s first amendment rights, but it also shelters children from real life situations that might affect their future. Banning books is unconstitutional and shelters children.
In conclusion, book banning is necessary because children may be taught bad habits, lose the magical innocence of childhood, and not be mature enough to decide what materials to read. The banning of books, while unfortunate, is needed to help keep children safe and
Book banning in the United States and anywhere else in the world I feel should be abolished. Books are published and written for a reason. The reason is to expand the mind to new things. Sure some books are better than others but there is no reason to challenge or ban books.
The most debatable and controversial form of censorship today is the banning of books in school libraries. Banning books that educate students is wrong and selfish. Censorship of books in school libraries is neither uncommon nor an issue of the past. Books with artistic and cultural worth are still challenged constantly by those who want to control what others read. The roots of bigotry and illiteracy that fuel efforts to censor books and free expression are unacceptable and unconditional. Censoring school books in libraries can often lead to censorship of our basic freedoms guaranteed in the First Amendment. In some cases, a minority ends up dictating the majority in censorship cases. To be told what is permissible reading material and what is not is a direct violation of the First Amendment of the Constitution.
Staff, Wire Reports. (2002 October 3). Book banning spans the globe. The Houston Chronicle, pp.C14. Retrieved December 2, 2002 from Lexis-Nexis/Academic database.
The lessons taught to children by the puritanical books, though, were far from the rudimentary ideas that I had of teaching children morality through gentle children’s books. An insight that I gained from reading West’s article Teaching Banned Children’s Books was that Children’s literature as a genre is much more powerful than what I gave it credit for. In fact, the idea of children’s literature lacking power as a genre because the wording is simple is far from true. Children’s literature elicits many strong emotions and draws critics because of the types of ideas that the genre exposes young minds to. West introduces that censorship is used in children’s literature to prevent children from being exposed to ideas that are too controversial, challenge authority, contained sexuality, described violent acts, and address social problems (West,1).
The banning of books has now become a common policy in the US. Books are becoming banned for numerous reasons that some people might view as dumb or irrelevant. Many authors think that censorship is unfair and “Writers want to talk about creation, and censorship is anti-creation, negative energy, or uncreation…”(Rushdie 2017). When books become banned they are considered a violation to the first amendment by restricting what it is considered the authors freedom of speech. Censorship is also known for intruding art.