Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The connection between critical thinking, creativity, and decision making
What is the relationship between critical thinking and business
The connection between critical thinking, creativity, and decision making
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Hidden Intellectualism by Gerald Graff touches on the struggle of integrating street smarts into the academic world. Book smarts were usually associated with middle and upper class, whereas street smarts were usually associated with working and lower class, and Graff felt that he didn’t belong to either. Graff later explains how there should be a way to build a bridge between a student’s outside interests to the academic world, and he believes that can be done through reading, analyzing and debating on those topics (sports, fashion, cars. etc). Not only would it combat issues like boredom and isolation, but it would also help students develop better literacy and analytical skills, as well as create a sense of community in schools. Graff knows …show more content…
that incorporating outside interests into academics will not guarantee a student’s full interest in the academic environment. He does believe, however, that acknowledging such interests and allowing students to take an academic approach to it, will put street smarts on the same level as book smarts. I think this point is very important because it can often be a struggle that street smart students may face in academic environments, feeling as though their street smarts aren’t useful or as important as the academic topics learned in school. Like Graff expressed in this reading, building the bridge between street smarts and academics could dismantle the divide between the two. Similarly, Blue Collar Brilliance by Mike Rose touches upon the same issue of social class influencing the beliefs on education, especially when it comes to blue-collar jobs.
Blue collar jobs are typically manual labor jobs that do not require “formal education” like white-collar jobs. Rose fascinates over how underrated the blue collar worker’s intelligence is by society. Rose recalls his observations of his mother when she was working at a local diner, and how much intellectual work goes into waitressing. Rose’s mother was able to multitask; remembering tables and orders, knowing how to satisfy a customer’s or fellow worker’s needs, and how to navigate around the diner in an efficient way. Rose further explain how any blue-collar worker can learn how to solve problems through cognitive skills (reading, writing, remembering, paying attention, trial and error, etc). I think Rose’s idea should be heavily stressed to everyone, especially people who work or are interested in working. It’s unfair to blue-collar workers to assume that because they have not received formal education like college/university or vocational schools, that they don’t use or develop intellect in their work areas. The physical work that is performed on the job should not take away from the fact that blue-collar workers use cognitive skills to ultimately solve problems on that job. Rose concludes with the points that society should not think that people who have blue-collar jobs are not intellectual and that it should be acknowledge that there are many variations of intellect across the blue-collar
workplace. In conclusion, both Gerald Graff and Mike Rose communicate that working/lower class individuals do have an intellect that comes in various forms that can influence the shape of the academic and work world. Through personal experiences, as well as observations of other people, both Graff and Rose are able to depict the bigger picture of the connections with social class and how intellectualism is judged from there, as well as providing insights on how to move past those judgments of not being intellectual enough.
We, as a society, feel the need to draw imaginary lines to separate ourselves whether it’s the line between color of our skin, our religion differences, our political beliefs, or the status of our class. As much as I wish there wasn’t a defining line between high class and the educated vs. low class and uneducated, there is. In Mike Rose’s narrative essay “Blue-Collar Brilliance,” he describes his mother’s lack of education and her hard labor work which is the quote on quote the blue collar working class.
He claims to relate his mother’s quick and effective decisions, customer interactions, memorisation and problem solving, and his uncle, Joe’s, learning, planning and management skills to that of a white-collar worker. “Preposterous”, some might argue. “You cannot possibly compare waiters and conductors with boffins.” However, the dichotomy between the blue-collars and white-collars are subtle. Regardless of Rose’s claim that blue-collar workers are more efficient and carry a broader skill set, there exists no comparison between the two categories. Granted, the social biases about one’s occupation are irrational; however, blue-collars cannot substitute white-collar workers merely because of their “diverse intelligence”. Given Rose’s experiences, he has colluded blue-collar intelligence with white-collar intelligence. Id Est, he believes that social discrimination against blue-collar workers is fallacious from his observations; thus, their skills are the analogous to white-collar workers. In sum, blue-collar workers are intelligent and important in their respective and applicable fields, and white-collars in theirs’; drawing comparisons between them are like comparing apples and
In the article, “Blue-Collar Brilliance” by Mike Rose, he begins with an anecdote of his mother working her blue-collar job at a diner as a waitress. Rose vividly describes her common day that is packed with a constant array of tedious tasks she has to accomplish to make her living. The authors goal appears to be making the reader appreciate the hard work of blue-collar workers because society places a stereotype on them as being less intelligent than someone with more schooling or even a white-collar job: “Our cultural iconography promotes the muscled arm, sleeve rolled tight against biceps, but no brightness behind the eye, no inmate that links hand and brain” (282). I agree with Rose’s conclusion that if we continue to place a stigma on
Blue Collar workers today are looked down upon by most of society. People think that if you have a blue collar job you aren’t smart and not successful. But in my opinion, blue collar workers are the backbone of our society, and deserve the same amount of respect as white collar workers. “Blue Collar Brilliance by Mike Rose” explains how blue collar workers are very smart and use a lot of brainpower to get their jobs done. Both his Uncle and mother were blue collar workers and that’s where he got his inspiration to stand up for blue collar workers around the world. He gives us examples of how his own family members were blue collar workers and how they were smart and how they excelled at their jobs. He uses his own experiences to show us that blue collar workers are in fact smart, able to adapt to many different situations, and deserve respect.
Graff takes a logical approach to defending his opinion on the age old battle of “street smarts versus book smarts” in the article “Hidden Intellectualism”. Through several historical and personal examples, he strongly delivers an argument that schools have been discounting students who may not think academically. In reality the students who can relate articles from sources like Vouge and Sports Illustrated to life may be the ones who will truly be successful. Throughout his writing, he uses many devices to sway the audience’s opinions in the direction of his. Through Graff’s rhetorical writing strategies, he opens reader’s eyes to the fact that any subject can be intellectual when observed “through academic eyes”.
“Intelligence is closely associated with formal education- the type of schooling a person has, how much and how long- and most people seem to move comfortably from the notion to a belief that work requiring less schooling requires less intelligence” (Rose 276). My Dad has worked blue collar jobs his entire life. Security guard, lawn service, woodworker, carpenter, plus anything else that involves his hands. He didn’t have any schooling past his high school diploma. But he’s always told me, “Yeah, I wish I went to college, but I’m sure as hell glad I was taught and forced to learn the skills I have now. Like doing things on my own and working with my hands, my work ethic, and my ability to absorb as many things as I could to get the job done.” Blue collar jobs can never be outsourced. There will always be a need for plumbers, electricians, machine operators, carpenters and many, many more
Mike Rose’s article “Blue-Collar Brilliance” talks about people judging other people’s intelligence based on their jobs. Mike Rose explains in his article that people with blue collar jobs are just as intelligent as people with white collar jobs because they both use critical thinking and multi task while they are working. The standard of their jobs might be different because of their different ways of learning. People who are considered professionals or white collared individuals learn by studying or reading reports where blue collared individuals learn by performing a task. They learn faster ways to perform the task after they have done it multiple times. I believe that Rose’s thinking is very effective as it tells us that we should not judge
In “ Blue Collar Brilliance” Mike Rose argues that intelligences can’t be measured by the education we received in school but how we learn them in our everyday lives. He talks about his life growing up and watching his mother waitressing at a restaurant. He described her orders perfectly by who got what, how long each dish takes to make, and how she could read her customers. He also talks about his uncles working at the General Motors factory and showed the amount of intelligence that was need to work at the factory. Rose goes on talking about the different types of blue-collar and how he came up with the idea that a person has skills that takes a lot of mind power to achieve.
School is a frightening place. It is broken down into multiple social ranks, and many children find themselves at the bottom. With children trying to work their way to the top of the food chain, the actual learning portion is either set aside or forgotten altogether. In Grant Penrod’s essay, Anti-Intellectualism: Why We Hate the Smart Kids, he explains how modern children are growing to dislike intellectual children. The varying social ranks teach children to ignore low grades and try to be popular in school. Anti-Intellectualism is a trend which is becoming increasingly popular throughout the world. People who only strive to be popular tend to tease intellectuals, but this is not half of the story. If the only goal children have in school
In the essay “Hidden Intellectualism” Gerald Graff expressed his views on education. He feels that teachers or professors only see traditional subjects or text as intellectually valuable even though, although as a professor himself, he disagrees with it. He feels that the spectrum should be broadened to be able to interact with the kids more and get them more interested in the reading that are taught in schools. He is speaking to teachers in an effort to get them to change from the mindset of teaching traditionally and get reading that students to relate to. He is also speaking to students to get them to feel better about not being able to relate certain readings, and to also see that not being able to relate to the readings is not a bad thing. Although Pop Culture reading is not considered as intellectual reading it should be.
In “Hidden Intellectualism,” Gerald Graff pens an impressive argument wrought from personal experience, wisdom and heart. In his essay, Graff argues that street smarts have intellectual potential. A simple gem of wisdom, yet one that remains hidden beneath a sea of academic tradition. However, Graff navigates the reader through this ponderous sea with near perfection.
In the article “ Blue-Collar Brilliance” the author Mike Rose, was obviously arguing that just because some jobs requires less schooling than others, it doesn’t mean that their jobs use less brain, intelligent and less thought process in their profession. To argue his theory Rose told us about his mother, about how when he was younger, he observe his mother as a waitress at a coffee shop and family restaurant. Rose told us how his mother loves her being a waitress and how her job required her to use her memory and knowledge. As rose stated “my mother kind of work demand of both body and brain” (245) His mother also learned how long each dish is suppose to take before its ready to be serve, and his mother also learned human skills. For example, if there was a problem at work she would knew how to solve them, while she’s still doing her job as an employer. To furthermore his explain his theory; Rose tells reader about
Why street smart students are considered anti intellectual in academic area? In the article “Hidden Intellectualism” by Gerald Graff, he accounts the idea that street smart students are way more smarted than book smarts. He explains that street smart student will be able to solve an issue much faster than book smart because of his/her previous experience. According to author, the problems with considering street smarts as anti intellectual are they are actually much smarter that book smart students, they don’t equal opportunity , and schools along with colleges never challenge their mind get them to succeed in academic work.
Co-author of “They Say/I Say” handbook, Gerald Graff, analyzes in his essay “Hidden Intellectualism” that “street smarts” can be used for more efficient learning and can be a valuable tool to train students to “get hooked on reading and writing” (Graff 204). Graff’s purpose is to portray to his audience that knowing more about cars, TV, fashion, and etc. than “academic work” is not the detriment to the learning process that colleges and schools can see it to be (198). This knowledge can be an important teaching assistant and can facilitate the grasping of new concepts and help to prepare students to expand their interests and write with better quality in the future. Graff clarifies his reasoning by indicating, “Give me the student anytime who writes a sharply argued, sociologically acute analysis of an issue in Source over the student who writes a life-less explication of Hamlet or Socrates’ Apology” (205). Graff adopts a jovial tone to lure in his readers and describe how this overlooked intelligence can spark a passion in students to become interested in formal and academic topics. He uses ethos, pathos, and logos to establish his credibility, appeal emotionally to his readers, and appeal to logic by makes claims, providing evidence, and backing his statements up with reasoning.
Rose explains an important revelation, blue-collar workers have worked hard to gain the intelligence it takes to efficiently do their jobs. A significant problem pointed out by Rose is that society has shaped people to believe that intelligence is solely based on the level of schooling someone receives. Also, it details where they fall on the intelligence scale as expressed in their occupation. Rose discovered that many times blue-collar workers have to think on the spot on how to solve problems, and most times they are able to do so effectively. Not only this, but the workers are able to adapt to their work environments and efficiently get the job done. Many of the workers were able to quickly come up with plans to solve a typical work problem by coming together with co-workers and pulling on a combined intelligence. Communication is key in many blue-collar jobs, Rose noticed this because without it training and advice would not be around to better others work technique. Not only this, but it also benefits those with jobs involving vague descriptions from customers, and being able to understand what is needed. As Rose mentioned, intelligence can be determined in more ways than people know and because of it people overlook jobs that are assumed to be