Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Bloom's taxonomy flashcards
Bloom's taxonomy essays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Bloom's taxonomy flashcards
Bloom’s original taxonomy was a framework created for educators to limit time preparing lessons by offering assistance in curriculum objectives and the creation of the assessment activities. The original framework also serves as a measurement guide to evaluate items in lesson creation. Bloom’s original taxonomy was the main tool used to create activities for individualized needs of students (Scott, 2014) and an easier tool to understand and offer activities simple to complex for educators for differentiation (Noble, 2004). Common educational language, determination of coursework, and evaluation of curriculum were the goals of the original Bloom’s taxonomy (Krathwohl, 2002).
Bloom’s original taxonomy focused primarily on differentiating common goals with the use of varied activities that would meet the individuals’ needs. The revision of Bloom’s taxonomy by Krathwohl (2002) focused on the cognitive processes as learners are made aware of their learning through metacognition.
…show more content…
Educators are able to use modification specified in the framework to create appropriate rigor needed for gifted learners. Educators can also differentiate the activities for gifted learners using flexibility, changes to complexity, and pace as stated in the framework. According to Programming Standard 1.1.1, gifted learners need time to reflect on their interests and strengths with support. The Cognitive Knowledge Taxonomy allows gifted learners time to explore their metacognitive knowledge and think about their thinking. Development of activities that encourages the use of variety of sources is a focal point of the NC AIG standards. Through the use of the Cognitive Knowledge Taxonomy, opportunities are allowed to modify the process of teaching and learning in the environment to meet the needs of diverse
The concepts behind Bloom and Perry’s Taxonomies provide interesting and different ways to view graduate school education, and really education in the most general sense. On one side, you have Bloom’s Taxonomy which is very lineal and presents the idea that education is a building block effect of sorts which is illustrated as a pyramid. The higher you go the smaller the pyramid becomes until you reach the top, evaluation stage of learning. Perry’s Taxonomy on the other hand presents frameworks of sorts that explain how students retain knowledge and learn. Neither Bloom or Perry’s Taxonomy is better than the other, rather they work together to provide contrasting views on learning.
Gifted and talented programs are intrinsically valuable to many children’s education as they provide a system in which all students involved are engaged, challenged, and intellectually stimulated. In "How People Learn", Donovan, Bransford, and Pellegrino (1999) stress the importance of each student being given reasonable and appropriate goals based on his or her level of understanding and competency (p. 20). Gifted and talented programs help institutionalize the attempt to meet all student’s needs by providing uniquely appropriate challenges which aim to keep every student engaged, thus receiving the best chance at success. Although there are many valuable and important aspects of gifted education, there are also significant issues rooted in the base of America’s gifted and talented programs, one of which I will address throughout this paper. In my opinion, the most notable problem which troubles gifted and talented programs is the system by which students are selected to join their school’s gifted and talented program.
Whitney, C. S. & Hirsch, G. (2011). Helping Gifted Children Soar. A Practical Guide for
Yssel, N., Adams, C., Clarke, L. S., & Jones, R. (2014). Applying an RTI Model for Students With Learning Disabilities Who Are Gifted. Teaching Exceptional Children, 46(3), 42-52.
The Gifted program exists to provide more academic opportunities for those who qualify as “gifted.” “’Gifted means performing or demonstrating the potential for performing at significantly higher levels of accomplishment in one or more academic fields due to intellectual ability, when compared to others of similar age, experience, and environment’” (Quoted in “Gifted”). In order to make it into the program the student must show higher intellectual ability than the average student at his or her age, but what determines that factor? The student must take a multidimensional test and score in the 98th percentile. However, the most weighted part of the test remains an average IQ test. Intelligence test scores should not be the primary qualification for admittance into the gifted program. They should not remain the primary qualification because it allows the minorities and the economically disadvantaged to be underrepresented, it proves insufficient when compared to other means of testing, and it fails to accurately reflect a student’s intelligence.
The critical thinking component is not to be overlooked in the classroom, and this is where both Bloom’s Taxonomy and the DOK can be useful tools for preparing the lesson and assessing student milestones. Bloom’s Taxonomy is, undoubtedly, the most widely used of the two, but it does leave something to be desired relative to attaining the goal of completion to mastery. The downside of Bloom’s Taxonomy is the longivity of navigating through the levels, if taken literally (Wirth & Perkins,
As a kid, I was enrolled in my school system’s Talented and Gifted (TAG) program, which “provides highly motivated, academically gifted students with an opportunity to realize and develop their exceptional intellectual and creative abilities.” I loved TAG. As a proclaimed “talented and gifted” student, it was refreshing to learn in an engaging environment where creative thinking, deep conversations, and real world connections were encouraged. For six years of my early school life, up until I started high school, I was in this type of classroom with some half of the same group of sixty kids. We enjoyed learning and were encouraged to expand our knowledge and critical thinking.
It is important to understand the many different methods of educating gifted and talented students. Most people, whether as teachers, students, or parents, will at some point be faced with the many options of educating the gifted and talented. In the United States today, 3-5 percent of students are considered gifted. Defining whether or not a student is gifted can be quite difficult, but many would agree that gifted students “are able to learn material rapidly and understand concepts deeply” (Lynch, 1999). Within this paper I will discuss the process of identifying gifted and talented students and the different methods of educating them including tracking, grade advancement, and cooperative learning. Of these three methods I believe the most effective method used to teach gifted and talented students is tracking.
Programs provide new and unique perspectives on topics students may have studied during the school year. The Center offers programs, workshops, research, and services to parents and the community reflecting creativity and academic rigor. Creative materials, activities, and strategies evidencing critical and productive thinking are inherent in the Center’s design to enable students to think more formatively and perceptively. Hands-on activities and discovery of inventive modes of participation encourage the development of originality and imagination. Several one day workshops and week long programs are offered through The Center for Gifted both during the school year and in the summer.
what kinds of evaluation tools can be used to determine if the learning exercise was effective (curry & Milsom, 2014)? Bloom’s taxonomy theory is to assist school counselors to develop and organize an academic curriculum that assists the student to gradually increase the child’s maturity in regard to career preparedness (Curry & Milsom, 2014). The condensed version of Bloom’s taxonomy theory uses six different objectives that are being used today they are: creating, applying, evaluating, remembering, analyzing and understanding. The techniques/interventions that could be most useful and effective in regard to theory and development are choosing, creating and designing lesson plans that are culturally sensitive and responsive i.e. supports the child language, home life, and culture that assists the child to be able to be successful in school. Create curriculum that addresses and aimed at how a child learns i.e. auditory, kinesthetic, and or visual (Curry & Milsom, 2014).
However, using pre-planned questions left no room for adaptability. It would be preferable for all the staff within the classroom to have a good understanding of Bloom’s Taxonomy and how to ask high-level questions. If Bloom’s Taxonomy had been introduced early in the school year, all the
PBR LITERATURE REVIEW Introduction - Identifying Intellectually Gifted When asking yourself what an intellectually gifted student is, the first thing you may focus upon is their ability to achieve high results. Public Schools of North Carolina encompasses it as the following, ‘the potential to perform at substantially high levels of accomplishment when compared with others of their age, experiences or environment’ (Public of North Carolina, 2012). This can also be further extended from Avery County Schools, who state that ‘Academically or intellectually gifted students exhibit high performance capability in intellectually areas, specific academic fields, or in both’ (Avery County Schools, 2008). So, intellectually gifted means to perform
References CLARK, Barbara.1992, Growing Up Gifted 4th ed., Macmillan Publishing Company, New York. SNOWMAN, J., BIEHLER, R. 2000, Psychology Applied To Teaching, Houghton Mifflin Company, Boston. RAND WHITMORE, J. 1980, Giftedness, Conflict and Underachievement, Allyn & Bacon Inc., Boston. ZIV, A. 1977, Counselling The Intellectually Gifted Child, Guidance Centre, University of Toronto, Canada.
Metacognition influences the manner in which students’ problem solve and utilize operations to guide their learning (Swanson, 1990). Camahalan (2006) states metacognition provides learners with ways of estimating the effects of their efforts, and to predict the likelihood of being able to remember the material later (p. 78). John Flavell became a pioneer in the field of metacognition and working with the way students organized their tasks. Flavell (1979) stated that it is the ability of metacognition to direct cognition process and to have comprehensive knowledge of this process; to accomplish the task of comprehending the text successfully, the reader must utilize metacognitive knowledge and must invoke conscious and deliberate strategies to learn (p.
Parke, B. (n.d.). Challenging gifted students in the regular classroom. Retrieved March 1, 2004, from http://www.kidsource.com/kidsource/content/Challenging_gifted _kids.html