Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Bloom's taxonomy flashcards
Bloom's taxonomy essays
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Bloom's taxonomy flashcards
Bloom’s Taxonomy is a useful strategy that is able to be adapted into any classroom, regardless of the age of the children. It first piqued my interest, during a science lecture where I encountered it for the first time. I had never heard of Bloom’s Taxonomy prior to this, and I found that it made a lot of sense and fascinated me. This prompted me to look into it further and find out more about how to use it in the classroom. After looking into Bloom’s further, I began to realise that it had immense educational value and was seemingly often overlooked by a large majority of schools. During all of my placements a common occurrence when asking a question, was the children either giving an immediate answer, or the children would simply dismiss …show more content…
The main limitation was the unfamiliarity with high-level questions. As laid out above, very often the children would simply dismiss a question without much thought if they didn’t immediately know an answer. I believe that if Bloom’s Taxonomy and high-level questions were a part of the everyday running of the classroom, the children would meet these challenging questions and be able to give a coherent answer. I feel that the children would better understand how to approach questions if Bloom’s Taxonomy is introduced at the beginning of the school year and used in every aspect of the children’s learning. A second limitation was that not all the children engaged in the challenges and it was always the same children who did and didn’t the challenges. This seemed to be a recurring problem every time challenges were set. This would be something that, as a class teacher, I would aim to resolve. The final limitation I identified was the use of pre-planned questions. I believe that it was best to use pre-planned questions to enable the other adults in the class room to be involved confidently. However, using pre-planned questions left no room for adaptability. It would be preferable for all the staff within the classroom to have a good understanding of Bloom’s Taxonomy and how to ask high-level questions. If Bloom’s Taxonomy had been introduced early in the school year, all the …show more content…
It has both confirmed and challenged my thoughts on Bloom’s Taxonomy and high-level questioning. One of my thoughts going into school that was challenged was ability expectations. I realised, when working with different children, that ability levels do not correlate to thinking skills. I went into this study with popular expectations of higher-level children will be able to use higher thinking skills than lower-level children. However, as stated earlier this was not evident anywhere in the study. In fact, often the higher-level children were more reluctant to answer questions, possibly in fear of giving a wrong answer. The lower-level children were just as able, and some even more so. I believe this is a reason why an ability grouped classroom is not necessarily the best thing for children. Children should not be grouped according to ability levels, because ability groups can never be entirely accurate, and children should not be given labels which lead to presumptions. As I found out in this study presumptions are often
Jean Piaget became fascinated with the reasons behind why children cannot correctly answer questions that require logical thinking. Piaget was the first psychologist to conduct an organized study of the intellectual advancement in children. Before Piaget’s study, many believed children were merely less efficient thinkers than adults. Due to his study, however, Piaget proved children think in remarkably different ways than adults. Children are born with a very primitive mental complex that is genetically inherited and learned on which all the following knowledge and learning is based (McLeod, 2015).
Another important contribution is tying Bloom 's Taxonomy of cognitive categories to peer education. According to Lipsky, "Too often students are accustomed to the lowest level of cognition, simple knowledge or recall of details and information (pg. 38). Lipsky went on to discuss the importance of "higher level of cognition" by using directive words to allow students to think independently, and perform at higher levels of cognition.
What is more important to education? The content or the how the content is taught? Many policy makers today believe that the former is far more crucial to the development of our youth. With high-stakes testing and an entire industry of textbooks and test making, the current system places empirical results over all else. Unfortunately, this approach only helps with the lower levels on the depths of knowledge (DOK) and Bloom’s Taxonomy charts. It only helps with basic recall of facts and knowledge. A second area of concern with this type of teaching is that only instills one point of view in the pupils. This is also problematic for diverse classrooms with students from various backgrounds. Would an approach that reinforces critical thinking and higher levels of DOK be more appropriate? A technique that incorporates the diversity of the classroom and life experiences of those students can be explained by Christopher Emdin and Django Paris who are two advocates of Culturally Sustaining Pedagogy or Reality Pedagogy.
Throughout this course, I have engaged my oldest child in discussions on the topics covered. He is interested at first, believes he knows the correct answer, and then becomes frustrated when there is no simple or correct answer. His reaction is, I believe, entirely age appropriate. Unfortunately, it seems that many people do not move beyond this need for simple answers and dismissal of complexities.
Siegler, R., & Alibali, M. (2005). Children’s Thinking Fourth Edition. Prentice Hall Inc. Upper Saddle River NJ.
Some researchers have been critical about Piaget's "stages" theory, arguing that discontinuous, step-like changes in cognitive development suggested by stages are improbable and that development proceeds in a continuous style (Keating, 1980). Bee (1995) considers that deve...
"Thinkers or Test Takers?." Los Angeles Times. 15 Jul. 2012: A.21. SIRS Issues Researcher. Web. 24 Mar. 2014.
Based on my experiences, children at this stage have not yet mastered their language ability. Their attention spans improve throughout the year as well as their ability to process information. They sometimes have difficulties thinking outside the box because they may only see things from their point of view. Activa...
Piaget theorised that children’s thinking goes through changes at each of four stages (sensory, motor, concrete operations and formal operations) of development until they can think and reason as an adult. The stages represent qualitatively different ways of thinking, are universal, and children go through each stage in the same order. According to Piaget each stage must be completed before they can move into the next one and involving increasing levels of organisation and increasingly logical underlying structures. Piaget stated that the ‘lower stages never disappear; they become inte... ...
Piaget described four major stages leading to the capacity for adult thought. Each stage is a prerequisite for the following stage, but the rate at which different children move through different stages varies with their hered...
I think that the nature of knowledge is relative. Not all children can learn in the same environment. I believe that if a child is put in an environment in which they cannot learn they should be placed in another environment so that they can. Some students learn at a slow pace and others learn at a fast pace. Then there are the students that learn better by lectures and others that learn better by activities. If you mix these children in the same class, than there are usually some lost kids in the class? I know that in my experiences with school, I would have never made it in a normal classroom since I learned so much slower than the other kids did.
The understandings I have gained from this course have completely revamped my way of teaching. I have been using the unit plan and curriculum map I created in this course for the past two years, and my students enjoy it more and more each year. Learning the importance of using big ideas and essential questions in the classroom have made me a better educator and has assisted my students in learning content and skills that they can transfer to all academic areas and into their everyday lives. I now use big idea and essential questions in every ...
The inclusion of engaging activities in this course is not completely clear from the information provided in the syllabus. While details about the texts that will be covered throughout the tentative course outline are shared, there is very little information on the actual learning activities that will be completed by students. In several areas of the syllabus, lists of activity types are given without description. It is stated that students will conduct research, work in groups, keep journals, and take quizzes, but there is no additional information about the expectations or format these assignments will take. The depth of knowledge on these activities is unclear, but may be an area of concern. Rigor is mentioned, but not substantiated with examples or evidence. While this may not be indicative of the actual learning experiences that students complete in class, the actual information on the syllabus guides the reader to the conclusion that students will primarily remain in the lower levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy, for example remembering and understanding, in regards to thinking skills accessed (Ainsworth, 2010, Reeves, 2006). With additional explanation, any confusion or doubt about the focus and purpose of the assignments for this course would be
“There is a need to address the fundamental issue of how the thinking of these children can be made more effective, also a...
Closed ended questions can be used to quiz if students understanding the basic principles behind the learning outcomes. The use of effective open ended questioning should be used during discussions with students to obtain a deeper level of understanding. Marsh (p. 188 – 189, 2010). Petty mentions how questioning should encourage all students to think. He goes on to say that students should be given time to respond to the question asked and praise if correct answers given. (2009, p. 193). But traditional questioning has its limitations as can be hard to include all of the class. Assertive questioning on the other hand is more active and engaging for the students. It is the pair or group work that that make assertive questioning all inclusive. It shares student knowledge on a topic and helps weaker students to learn by doing. (Petty, 2009, p. 282 - 284).