Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Technology impact on education
Technology impact on education
Future education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Technology impact on education
Bill Gates is considered by many to be the most successful man in America, and since the 1990’s he has been one of, if not the richest person in the world. He was the co-founder of Microsoft and has since become synonymous with computer engineering and software. However he has also become known as a critic of the current American public school system, stating that America is falling behind the rest of the world and the reason is that we are not producing enough knowledge workers, which are vaguely workers that deal with information. Gates’ proposal would change the education system dramatically, creating students who are well equipped to get jobs within the technology sector. Which in theory does sound like an admirable plan considering technology …show more content…
He is generally in favor of the Common Core, a standard that is criticized by most education advocates, and his opponents accuse him of trying to corporatize the American public education system. Though I agree with Gates in many instances I believe that the public school system should be producing freethinking creative individuals and not simply knowledge workers that will be employed by corporate America. If The United States is expected to keep leading the technological revolution our school system must generating student who are able to think critically and problem solve. On October 7th 2015, Bill Gates gave a speech outlining his ideals for a more effective public school system. His foundation has given tremendous amounts of funding to public school reform. Included in his proposals …show more content…
It is not a surprise than that testing and the Common Core are such integral pieces in his plan. He admits though that the Common Core has not yet achieved what it set out to by saying, “There’s one other pivotal step in the movement for strong feedback and improvement systems, and that is the adoption of high, consistent academic standards throughout the country…. Unfortunately, when it comes to the Common Core, the attacks have drowned out the facts—and the fact is, the standards are starting to work for students and teachers. […] If we want to achieve excellence, we have to define excellence. And you can’t define it based on politics or individual preferences. You have to define excellence by anchoring it in something real—like getting a good job, or getting a higher ed degree that means something in the workplace. That’s what these standards do: They ensure that students are gaining the skills and knowledge they need to get a good job or succeed in college. ” I agree that the Common Core was rolled out to soon and the public does not have a firm grasp on its aims. The Common Core addresses some effective learning goals in reading, writing, speaking and language that outline important skills students will need to develop. Still I disagree with Gates that each learner needs to be prepared for higher education. Just
I can support his idea that kindergarten through eight should learn the core knowledge, and high school should be left with most humanities and social science courses. It would lessen how long people need to attend college for their career. What I do not support is his idea of the lower percentile, there could be many intelligent people in that category that could change the world, but they did not show how much they could be valuable in their high school days. Some people could be genius in high school, but not so much in college, or vice versa. What would happen if the person that has what it takes to cure cancer, but no one listens to him because he was not “intelligent” enough to go to college?
The Common Cores are set of guidelines that each teacher must meet during each school year. These guidelines are met during exams and other types of testing. In Stop The Madness: On “No Child Left Behind” by Diane Ravitch she begins her argument against the NCLB-No Child Left Behind- saying that it worthless for it forces the school to focus only making test requirements instead of students actually getting the main reason why students that go to school, it is to receive knowledge. “One of the unintended consequences of NCLB was the shrinkage of time available to teach anything other than reading and math...Test scores became an obsession” ( Paragraph 7 Ravitch). The “test scores” are wrecking and straying away from true purpose of the schools around the country. The obsession made many educators focus on more test taking skills then the actual knowledge of the subject in order to reach the stranders that the administration have given them . Despite the test scores, the United States are not high rank in math according to the U.S Math Performance in Global Perspective by the Harvard University and Stanford University. In the US itself, the percentage of students that are taking advanced classes are 11.4% in Massachusetts. This is the highest percentage in the US that students are taking high scores. Yes, not every student has the ability to do the
Department of Education called Next Generation High Schools: Redesigning the American High School Experience, president Barack Obama elaborates more about his plan to improve the educational system and help children succeed. He personally said that he would, "reward schools that develop new partnerships with colleges and employers, and create classes that focus on science, technology, engineering and math."(College- and Career-Ready Standards and Assessments) He is doing so by creating a project called the Next Generation High Schools. Some new courses that should be developed to challenge students include, "new economy subjects such as computer science; using innovative approaches and strategies to restructure the scope and time spent learning; and employing innovative educational technologies, project-based learning, and competency-based progressions to engage and empower learners."(Next Generation High Schools)
The proposed Reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act identifies key factors for college and career-ready students. The act asks that states adopt rigorous college and career ready standards in English/language arts and mathematics along with assessments aligned to these standards. In June of 2010, the NGA Center for Best Practices (NGA Center) and the Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO) released the Common Core State Standards which 45 out of 50 states have currently adopted. Additionally, states are required to develop a system of accountability that rewards successful schools, requires interventions for the lowest-perfor...
“To ensure all students are ready for success after high school, the Common Core State Standards establish clear, consistent guidelines for what every student should know and be able to do in math and English language arts from kindergarten through 12th grade” (What Parents Should Know, n.d.). Children are entering a world that is requiring more and more than before. Society is changing meaning education must change to keep up with society. “The standards were drafted by experts and teachers from across the country and are designed to ensure students are prepared for today’s entry-level careers, freshman-level college courses, and workforce training programs” (What Parents Should Know, n.d.). The focus is to allow students to think critically and be able to problem solve; skills needed in life. The Common Core State Standards are also providing ways for teachers to track each student’s progress as they grow and learn throughout the year. Common Core has many good qualities, but nothing is perfect. There will always be issues no matter the
Most people do not know exactly what the No Child Left Behind Act was created for. So what was President Bush intending the act to improve exactly? The No Child Left Behind Act was created under a Civil Rights Act for children of different color/races that were academically falling behind average, or traditional, students who were excelling educationally. NCLB was not created only for the benefit for children of different races, but for children with learning disabilities, new English learners, or immigrants, and children who live in poverty throughout the United States. The act was originally accredited for the delegation of ameliorated teachers who could produce more astounding students that could improve their test scores profoundly. In most states, the act has created havoc among schools because...
Just three days after taking office in January of 2001 as the forty third president of the United States, George W. Bush announced his plan of No Child Left Behind. Signed January 8, 2002, it was the reauthorization of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act, the central federal law in pre-collegiate education. (Rebora) No Child Left Behind cleared Congress in a landslide with overwhelming majorities. (Seligman) It was said to be the most ambitious school reform effort in at least a generation. (Symonds) No Child Left Behind, is a landmark in education reform, designed to improve student achievement and change the culture of America's schools. Bush describes his plan as 'the cornerstone of my administration' (Rebora).
The United States is a country that thrives through technological advancement. The wealth and success of this nation is dependent on providing every child, regardless of race, ethnicity, or gender, with the opportunity to obtain technological skills that are essential for a successful future. Unfortunately, educational funding for technology has failed to take precedent. In realizing that, the question then becomes, how is a country expected to thrive from the use and advancement of technology, when failing to properly train future leaders? Funding must be provided for schools to purchase technological equipment, such as computers, in order to ensure that each child has an equal chance to thrive in a country that is defined by its advancement in technology.
These learning goals outline what a student should know and be able to do at the end of each grade Anya Kamenetz author of "Tough Week for the Common Core" writes that “[t]he Common Core [is] not, strictly speaking, national standards. They were developed independently of the federal government, and states are not under a mandate to adopt them,” but then goes on to say that the “standards received a big boost in the form of funding incentives from the Obama administration” (1). These “big boost[s]” are what concerns many like Bobby Jindal. “A few years ago, Jindal was one of the Common Core 's biggest proponents. But he has since had a change of heart” (3). Bobby Jindal, along with many other opposers, question what would happen if state who had implemented common core in their schools suddenly dropped the plan? Anya Kamenetz furthers her article by stating that the three states who have already done this “now face spending tens of millions of dollars to create new standards, adopt new materials to go with them and retrain teachers” (1). Some might say that this decrease in funding is expected because the federal government had agreed to fund a specific program and although schools don 't have to use that program, those who don 't have to find the funding for their programs themselves. But how is this
When most people hear about Bill Gates the first thing that comes to mind is the obscene amount of money he has made through out his career. Owning many different foundations, the most common foundation known to most college students is the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation that provide many different scholarships. However, this foundation also does various things to give back to communities and aiding suffering countries. Within this foundation there are also various branches such as the United States Program, The Global Development Program and the Global health program that have grown over time making the Gates a commonly used household name.
(2014) exclaimed that why do 62 percent of parents think the Common Core is not perfect for their kids, despite it has fascinated some entrepreneurs such as Bill Gates and the secretary of education. In a case in point, parents should get more involved in the education of their children if they do not approve of measures being used. She agrees to the idea of a federal government using incentives to adopt their specific education program, but then again she only sees that parents complaining and not taking action. In another context, “parents have no choice about whether their kids will learn Common Core, no matter what school they put them in, if they want them to go to college, because the SAT and ACT are being redesigned to fit the new national program for education”. (Pullmann, J. 2014, September 24, p. 1). In fact, Porter (1989) states that the Common Core standards became as opposing to teachers and teaching occupation, and the tactics are not good strong enough for enabling teachers to be dependent. The teacher is often understood to be the planned without rules. Moreover, some voices against the criticism of the common core, they believe that it is meaningless because districts are still permitted to select which material goes out with stem the basis stated by the Common Core
Throughout his life he has proven time and time again he is a catalyst for change. Most people are only considered catalyst for changes if they excel in working for change in one aspect of the world. Bill Gates has successfully changed two huge aspects of the world. His passions have affected billions of people and he keeps going. Bill himself said this “If I had set some sort of finish line, don’t you think I would have crossed it by now?”(Bill … Quotes). Bill Gates has been, is, and will continue to be someone who works tirelessly to make the world a better place.
A leader is someone that you can look up to, someone who has a conglomerate of attributes that motivate people to follow them. There are many reasons why you can find someone amusing, intriguing or interesting but the conglomerate of actions performed by them is what makes them stand over others. A global leader is someone who has transcends the geographical limits with their contributions not only to their field but to humanity as well. In this essay I will briefly discussed the attributes of the global leader I selected, his visions and his contributions to mankind.
Gates has also given over half of his life earnings to charity and other public minded organisations. This has helped him achieve not only the status of one of the world's greatest entrepreneurs, but also a man who ultimately cares about the future of society, which is reflected in new product developments and technologies, all of which are designed to make our lives simpler.
His solution to the perceived crisis of American education is to "Abolish compulsory-attendance laws and allow only those who are committed to getting an education to attend". This sounds like a republican, agenda to me, because they only care about less government and everyone should be able to “pull themselves up by their own boot straps”. Sipher is obviously a wealthy white man with white privilege and has no compassion for people who learn differently, people with emotional problems, poverty, or have family problems. I disagree with his solution to ending “mandatory-attendance laws” and would rather see the institution of education to create more services and more support to those student with attendance and trouble while at school. School is necessary for everyone.