More handpicked essays just for you.
IB extended essay racial bias in the united states criminal justice system
IB extended essay racial bias in the united states criminal justice system
IB extended essay racial bias in the united states criminal justice system
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Sarah Koenig reveals a bias towards Syed’s innocence. Specifically at the center of this podcast, she uses observes, “that he has giant brown eyes like a dairy cow. That's what prompts my most idiotic lines of inquiry. Could someone who looks like that really strangle his girlfriend? Idiotic, I know.” Claim of fact: Good looking people can not be murderers. Because of this, it adds in as an opinion to Syed's innocence to help the audience what she sees.
Both in the ‘Serial’ podcast by Sarah Koenig and the ‘Making a murderer’ docudrama directed by Laura Ricchardi, use music to cause doubt in the audience’s mind whether to position the person on trial as innocent. Similarly, where Koenig uses music to support ideas and cause doubt in the audience, Ricchardi uses music in accompany with videos and re-enactments so the audience can infer whether Steven is innocent or guilty. Koenig structures the music in her podcast and uses it to appeal to the audience in a way so the audience can infer whether Adnan is innocent or guilty. Koenig uses music to transfer from the interview with Adnan to her narration. This is done because Koenig has found the important information of Adnan’s whereabouts at the time of the murder and positions the audience to view him as innocent.
Tyrone Fleming, an actor in the YouTube crime show "848", was found stabbed to death in his Bronx apartment on University Avenue around 5:30 p.m. Wednesday.
You’re woken up by police officers one morning. They say that they are taking you to be questioned for the murder of Hae Min Lee. That’s what happened to Adnan Syed, a young man sentenced to life in prison for murdering his ex-girlfriend. This would be any old hear-it-and-forget-it case, except that there were multiple problems with the case. The evidence that the State used was flawed. So, because there has not been any evidence presented that can prove him guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, Adnan is not guilty.
Billy Joel once sang, “Only the good die young”. In life, it is true, the young and innocent seem to touch more lives around us than anyone else. In the Casey Anthony trial, Anthony was a suspect in the murder of her daughter Caylee. Caylee’s life shouldn’t be counted in years, it should be counted by how many lives she affected, the love she has gained, and the support the country has given her to find out what really happened. In the play, Twelve Angry Men, a boy killed his father; however, both cases were challenged by the obvious and the abstruse evidence. Large cities towards the east coast, in 1982, Twelve Angry Men, and 2008, Casey Anthony Trial, affiliated with two major trials able to modify the lives of the living and the dead. For that reason, during the Casey Anthony case, jurors were conflicted throughout the trial.
Psychological research shows that eyewitness testimony is not always accurate, therefore it should not be used in the criminal justice system. Discuss.
In America we believe in the saying “you are innocent until proven guilty” but we the people are remarkably swift to point our fingers at someone we believe that committed the crime. This habit is frequently displayed within our criminal justice system when a crime is committed we quickly assume it has something to do with the first person we can link the crime to. We tend to naturally feel sympathy for the victim therefore; if the individual accuses one for a crime the jury has no reason not to believe the victim. Society does not bother to care if the individual did not do the crime because as long as someone was caught and accused of the wrongdoing, then we the people can proceed on with our lives knowing we punished someone for the crime
You are 17 years old, still in school, your girlfriend just broke up with you, and now you are convicted of first-degree murder for the death of your ex-girlfriend. What would you do? Also, what if there wasn’t enough evidence to prove that you did it, but then not enough to prove that you didn’t do? What would you do then? What would you tell people? Would you lie to them if you actually did it? This is a story of a teenager who was in a similar situation. His name is Adnan Syed. He was convicted of killing Hae Min Lee, his ex-girlfriend, in Maryland in 1999. 15 years later Sarah Koenig started a podcast, Serial. In this podcast Sarah explores and digs deep into the two options, is Adnan guilty? Or is Adnan innocent? Adnan Syed should stay
Killer Kovat court, on Sunday a student was charged with terrorist threats and acts. I am defending Emily Kikari Sakamoto 21 whom a Emory University student posted on social media that “I'm shooting up the school,” police and university officials said Monday. She was held on $1500 bond in the Newton County Jail. She could face 1-5 years in prison if she's convicted of the single act of plotting terroristic threats, a felony. In an arrest report, Emory police said Sakamoto used YikYak and posted anonymously “ I'm shooting up the school tomorrow. Stay in your rooms. The ones on quad are who will go first. “ The post was live for a few minutes until Emory students took screenshots of it and provided it to the police and she was arrested later on in the afternoon that day.
“Tell me about your hair.” “Tell me about your chin.” “Your jaw?” “What would be your most prominent feature?” These were the questions each woman was asked to describe themselves to the Forensic Artist while he was drawing them. “It kind of protrudes a little bit. Especially when I smile.” “My mother told me I had a big jaw.” “Kinda have fat, rounded face.” “The older I’ve gotten the more freckles I’ve gotten.” “I would say I have a pretty big forehead.” These were the replies of women illustrating their face features. Toward to the end of the video, the women come back to the studio and see two sets of sketches: one sketch is the women’s descriptions of how they see themselves and the second sketch is a stranger’s description of the person they were told to meet. The women were
After being given the murder of Nisha Patel-Nasri to study, the initial starting point was to gather as much information as possible about the case, a YouTube documentary (real crime UK 2010) on the case and investigation leading to the arrest and sentence of Fadi nasri and the other men involved gave us a good starting point for the investigation. The discovery of this documentary and the depth it went into created a feeling of intrigue and a form of excitement toward the case and the want to find out more. To do this we split our investigation up between the group into the key area, the suspects, the victim, the investigation, the trial and outcomes and any key changes in the law due to the case, everyone in the group was enthusiastic about the case and eager to get started. The area which I was studying was the trial and outcome for the suspects/offenders, this was an area I was keen to look into, as a law student I felt I could use my pre-existing knowledge of the law and the legal system to help analysis the case outcomes, and look into the judge’s decisions, appeal cases and convictions. As a fairly recent case, 2006, and not being hugely influential in current law it was difficult to find many books or journals on the case, a problem which many of the group found studying their respective areas, this therefore meant we had to be more creative in the references we used. As I was researching the outcomes I went to the legal website of west law to see if the case was reported on their unfortunately the main case involving Fadi, Jason, Roger and Tony was not reported by the website, but reported was the appeal of Roger Leslie (R v Leslie) the following year. This allowed me to uncover some of the what the judge and Roger, one o...
Who really define what criminal act is, is it society, government or the individual himself? Our society today identify crime in many angles. For example, a crime can be breaking the laws, killing innocent people, and being a distraction to others. However, when it comes to criminal acts some people do not just blame the person himself they blame the whole society that has similar aspects like racial or religion identification. Which is not always the case, because everyone have different believes on what can be an act of criminal. Even people with same skin color religion or origins they all grow to develop their own believe on moral and immoral acts. The book Infidel by Ayaan Hirsi Ali explore this concept of who to should be blame for a criminal act. Ali was born in a strict religious family. Growing up she was thought to respect
The landmark ruling in the case of an Afghan bomb maker is set to make it harder for him to bring a successful legal claim against the Ministry of Defence.
Judith Wright's poem `The Killer' explores the relationship between Humans and Nature, and provides an insight into the primitive instincts which characterize both the speaker and the subject. These aspects of the poem find expression in the irony of the title and are also underlined by the various technical devices employed by the poet.
Yates mental issues seen from the light of the theories describe how she was dealing with severe mental issues. She had symptoms before she committed her heinous crime and had problems that could be seen beforehand. It really paints a dark issue on how she was considered normal from the beginning and only after her first kid was she treated for her actions. The book also states,” Both a hospitalization at the end of March and her medication, however, were terminated by her psychiatrist, Dr. Mohammed Saeed, because, he claimed, she did not seem psychotic” (93). In hindsight, it does appear as a mistake for the doctor, but she acted in what she believed was right. Psychopathy is a complicated issue that can affect more people than we know.
Newland Archer seems to be reaping the benefits of upper class New York society. He was born into and shaped by the elegant customs of his surrounding society, and was set up for a life of wealth, popularity, and success. But in her novel, The Age of Innocence, Edith Wharton’s protagonist’s, Newland Archer, world is shook when he meets and ultimately falls in love with the exotic and beautiful Countess Ellen Olenska. Once Countess Olenska enters his life, she opens Newland up to a whole new world of possibilities, which ultimately isolate Newland psychologically from conventional 1870’s New York society. Outwardly, Newland can never let go of his status and admit his deepest feelings, because he is incapable of allowing himself to be ostracized