Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
The migration of native Americans
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: The migration of native Americans
Introduction
People arrived in North America around 14,000 BP (BP = Before Present). Evidence for the arrival of Homo sapiens is found throughout the Bering Strait (then Beringia), Siberia, and Alaska. Homo sapiens arrived through Beringia, most likely through the boat, despite the lack of evidence. Homo sapiens are said to have originally rooted in Africa; from Africa, Homo sapiens migrated north into Europe and Asia over the course of 10,000 years and then over to North America followed by South America. Along the time that Homo sapiens were moving into Eurasia, there was also proof of Homo sapiens moving into Australia (Choi, 2014) showing that they had a good idea of marine travel, something that will be important when considering the
…show more content…
movement of people once they enter America. Along with the Bering Strait hypothesis, there is another potential hypothesis called the Solutrean Hypothesis. In this hypothesis, it is shown that people travelled across Europe (from France, Spain and Portugal) and across the ice bridge that once existed where the Atlantic ocean is today (Straus, 2000). This hypothesis has less support because of a lack of genetic support, however, that does not mean that it is completely incorrect (Johnson, 2002). Where Did People Come to North America From? There are many varying opinions about when people reached north America for the first time. Genetic evidence in Eurasia shows that groups of people had left for Beringia around 30,000 BP and genetic evidence also shows that people had commenced the migration to North America around 16,600 BP (Hall R et al., 2004). Archaeologists suggest that people could have entered North America earlier than 16,600 BP but there is no way to tell without evidence. Proof of migration throughout North America is most prevalent after 15,000 BP (Goebel, T et al., 2008). In 14,600 BP, artifacts were found along the western coast in places such as the Paisley Cave in Oregon (Goebel, T et al., 2008: Fig.1). Genetic proof of life in Paisley’s Cave is denoted by mtDNA found from the A2 and B2 Haplogroups (University of Oregon, 2008). The haplogroups that show the migration through North America are labeled A, B, C and D as well as X (Goebel, T et al., 2008). It is noted that Haplogroups C and D’s DNA are more closely associated with more Asian oriented countries such as Mongolia and Altai-Sayan ranges. The haplogroups A, B and C are found throughout Siberia, Mongolia and other surrounding countries (Starikovskaya, E. B et al., 2015). Evidence that people on the west coast came to North America from the Bering Strait is solidified with the discovery of these found genetics. It is agreed upon by archaeologists that Homo sapiens had settled in north America by 11,500 BP because there is skeletal proof of Homo sapiens by that point in time (Kelly, 2003). Homo sapiens were said to have spread from Alaska into British Columbia and Alberta because this is where the mouth of the Ice Free Corridor would be (Pitbaldo, 2011). The IFC (ice-free corridor) is the area of North America where land was accessible and ice had recessed to a manageable point. The IFC carried over to the west coast which allowed the native people to make their way south. Proof that people did, in fact, move south across the coast lies in the diets of the discovered people. Across the west coast, there were discoveries of marine life usage for food as well as transportation for southern migration. Found in Cross Creek, California was a series of bones from fish in the area. Though this does not dictate a lot on its own, it is accompanied by remains of people from 12,800 BP to 9,300 BP. The accompanying remains include the Prince of Wales Island Man (Dixon, 2001) who’s genetic group, Haplogroup D (Pitbaldo, 2011) showed traces of an aquatic diet, the Kennewick Man (Goebel, T et al., 2008: Fig. 1), whose diet showed a 70% salmon-dependent diet (Pitbaldo, 2011), and the Buhl Woman, whose diet contained “anadromous fish” (Pitbaldo, 2011). Arlington Springs man was found on an island near Santa Barbara, California (Goebel, T et al., 2008: Fig. 1) around 13,000 BP. An interesting fact about the Arlington Springs man is that the proof was found on an island that would only be accessible by boat (Goebel, T et al., 2008). The fact that Arlington Springs can only be accessed via waterway corroborates the idea that people had understood the uses of water and were using it to their advantage (Dixon, 2001). The Arlington Springs man also proves that people had, in fact, moved down to southern America relatively quickly after entering through Beringia. Along with the hypothesis that people came to America through Beringia, there is also proof that people could, in fact, have come to America from Europe, more specifically Spain, France and Portugal (Straus, 2000). Although there is not much genetic proof of this migration, there is a viable option for the time of discovery. At the time of the last glacial maximum, Europe and North America were connected by an ice bridge which would lead to the eastern coast of America and Canada (Straus, 2000). Proof of people on the eastern coast exists most abundantly in relatively coastal US states, places such as Cactus Hill, VA, a place where European instruments were found. Tools such as hammers and flakes were found in the North Eastern Americas tracing back to 20,000 BP (Johnson, 2002). These tools could not have been brought by the migrators from Beringia because they pertain to the fashion of the Spaniards and they are also stratigraphically much older than those of the migrants from Beringia. This brings up the idea that perhaps the Europeans were the first migrants or one of the first migrants to the USA. Because of the lack of evidence, many people do not support this theory including myself, however, it is interesting that these materials were found on the eastern coast. Proof There is an abundance of genetic proof when it comes to people coming to the Americas. Genetics have been divided into Haplogroups for ease of classification and to show where people came to America from. Haplogroups A to D and X have been classified as those of Native Americans. Haplogroups flow throughout the alphabet and each letter has a specific area that it pertains to. Haplogroup E, for example, stems from East and West Africa as well as Southern areas of Asia. There is genetic verification of people moving to Alaska and then down into South America within 2000 years and part of this phenomenon is the fact that coastal waters flow south making it easier for people to make their way down. Genetic proof of the descent down does not appear chronologically but does appear nonetheless. The Arlington Springs and Cross Creek examples show that people made their way down to the edge of Mexico by 13000 BP, but remains for the Kennewick man and Prince of Wales man was found to be using the same routes in 10,000 BP. Proof from Chilean archaeologists shows that people had arrived there at Monte Verde by 14,500 BP (Hall R et al., 2004). What was the first thought to be a series of artifacts, could not be verified by archeologists because of the removal of artifacts by the initial researchers (Gugliotta, 2013). Reevaluation of this claim showed that people had in fact arrived in chile by 12,500 BP (Gibbons, 1997), which satisfies the chronology. This also shows the descent of people from North America into South America. In just over 2000 years, it was possible for people to have reached Chile from Alaska. Conclusion All in all, the Beringia hypothesis is the most plausible hypotheses of all of the other hypotheses discussed.
It took 12,000 years for people to cross the Bering Strait, an 85 km long area from Serbia to Alaska (Hall D, 1997). The reason it took people 12,000 years to cross the Bering strait was mostly weather conditioned. The cold and unsurvivable conditions made it impossible for people to attempt crossing into Alaska. After crossing into Alaska though, it only took people 2000 years to travel down the west coast from Alaska to Chile. Other hypotheses may suggest that people came to North America to South America, however there is no particularly useful proof for this. An already discussed proof shows that people may have come across the Atlantic Ocean to the east coast and even if this did happen, there is no proof of survival there. The proof of migration from the Bering strait lies in the Haplogroups, skeletal proof, tools and disturbances in the environment of North America pre-native people. The Arlington Man, Prince of Wales Island Man and Kennewick Man are all examples of people who have been found while migrating across America. These examples, however are not the only examples of people who have been found during excavations. There have also been situations where human remains have not been found but instead, remains of animals and tampering with the natural balance of the environment are visible. An example of this would be the Cross Creek, which shows the use of marine life for survival, something that is also backed up by many other findings across the
coast.
The Neanderthals took advantage of a warm period 125,000 years ago while migrating. They ended up getting as far as Siberia. During that warm period 125,000 years ago the Caspian Sea was reduced in size dramatically (Than, 1). The remains of cave drawings of Neolithic peoples and human-shaped figures have been discovered that date back to around 41,000 years ago (Hammer, 66). Chinese and Malaysian Homo Sapiens have very close features to the Neanderthal.
Alan Taylor is trying to prove that the story of America does not begin with the American Revolution. When, humans first encountered America between 12, 000- 15,000 years is where the story of American first starts. Alan Taylor's thesis is true because, prior to the American Revolution the Siberians arrived in America and settled from the tip of South America to as high as Alaska. Later European empires invaded and conquered several regions of America. Alan Taylor proves that the settlement of America does not begin in the 1492 but rather about 12,000 to 15,000 years earlier. The early Americans migrated from North Eastern Asia and entered in small boats along the coast. Some other hypothesis is that the earliest humans walked along a land
-New Evidence Puts Man in North America 50,000 Years Ago. Sciencedaily. 2004. Retrieved from http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2004/11/041118104010.htm
The Kennewick man was a monumental find to further our understanding of the history of the migration patterns of the people that culture sees today. The Kennewick man being a 9200 to 9600 year old skeleton made him one of the oldest nearly whole skeletons found in North or South America. The Kennewick man was found on July 28th 1996 by two college students whose names were Will Thomas and Dave Deacy while they were walking along the Columbia River near Kennewick Washington trying to get a better view into the local hydroplane races (Chatters, 23). These college students stumbled upon something that has caused a series of serious debates that have lasted for over ten years. After the students fell upon “the rock with teeth” (Powell 2005:6) they took it to the local police forces that were in the area.
The time of westward expansion was filled of hardships and challenges for the citizens of America. They left their homes at their own will to help make life better for themselves, and would letter recognize how they helped our country expand. The people of the Oregon trail risked their lives to help better their lives and expand and improve the country of America. However, no reward comes without work, and the emigrants of the Oregon Trail definitely had it cut out for them. They faced challenges tougher than anyone elses during the time of westward expansion.The Emigrants of the Oregon trail had the the most difficult time surviving and thriving in the west because of environmental difficulties, illness abundance, and accident occurrence.
The first Indians to set foot in the western hemisphere were the Paleo-Indians. The Paleo-Indians crossed the land bridge called the Beringia (Roark 6). They are estimated to have arrived at least by 14,000 BP (Roark 6). Research shows that the Paleo-Indians
Before Columbus and the Europeans, there was a time where there were many struggles and many ideas not even thought yet. All of this changed when the ancient civilizations started to live in the Americas. This was a time when ancient civilizations expanded brought the Americas and had a unique way of living. The ancient civilizations in the Americans and in Europe were different from cultures, adaptations, and foods.
In April of 1846, lived eight families from Springfield, Illinois simply looking to find a new place to live that is set well beyond the Rocky Mountains. Totaling approximately forty-seven participants that extended in age from newborns to the elderly, the excursion set their wagons west on an expedition that would write them into the history books (Goldman).
In early America, socio-economic class, agriculture, religion and gender played four very important roles in regional distinctions of this newly developing country. Even though agriculture, religion, and gender were extremely important, the biggest factor was socio-economic life. A person’s socio economic class was what determined their life style from a wealth, treatment, and dress style and home, which are major aspects of human life. In Everyday Life in Early America, David Freeman Hawke explains how each of these four factors determined the life style of each early resident of America as well as the overall development of the country in its beginning years to emerge into a growing and improving nation (continue)
For the purposes of this discussion we will focus on the lives of the Inuit. The Inuit are a group of people often mischaracterized as Eskimos. They lived in the area of central and northeastern Canada and Greenland. There has been much discussion of the orignination of this group of people but the most recognized theory is that they crossed from northern Asia across thin bridge of land over the Bering Strait sometime around 6000-2000 BC. Many people mistakenly think that the Inuit and Native Americans are one in the same. It seems that the Inuit most likely came from Asia more likely than the Native Americans. Although both probably came to the Americas through the Bering Strait. Biological, cultural and dialect differences show the different origin. Much of this theory is supported due to the close resemblance of the Inuit to the Mongoloid races of Eastern Asia. Because of the harsh land and climate of the Arctic, this area was probably one of the last regions to be inhabited making the Inuit on of the earth’s younger cultures.
The lands and human societies that European explorers called a New World were in fact very old. During the Ice Ages much of the world’s water was bound up in glaciers. Sea level dropped by hundreds of feet, creating a land bridge between Alaska and Siberia. Asians walked across to become the first human inhabitants of the Americas.
The United States is a country known for its variation of nationalities and ethnic races. After extensive research, and questioning I discovered that my ancestors originated from Norway and Switzerland. My family migrated to the United States in the late 1800’s from Norway due to social, economic, and religion reforms as well as, a surplus in the population. Learning of my ancestor’s migration to America has very much influenced my views on the existing immigration problems that the U.S. currently faces.
My life in early 19th century was very dreadful and scary. I was from a poor family where father goes to work in factories for 12-18 hours a day. I was from Germany. Jews was the most segregated religion in Germany. We did not have full right to do a certain things such as go to certain college to get education, shoe our religion freely to other and enjoy our festival. My father used to get a low wages in work and we have to live with the things we have we have no right to argue back for wages or anything. At that time pneumonia,tuberculosis and influenza were very common dieses. If anybody get sick in family we did not have much money to cure or buy medicine. There was a struggle going on with farmer because industrialist have started making the crops and grains in cheap mony and sell which make the life of farmer hard to live. We also have a little land where we use to farm and live since there is not profit in selling grains than my father start working in factories. My mother used to stay home and prepare food for us. Christian people were persecuting many of my relative and jews...
The going theory of the First Americans is the ever-popular land bridge hypothesis, which connected Siberia and Alaska. This is believed to have happened at least twice during the ice ages between 32,000 and 36,000 years ago and, again between 13,000 and 28,000 years ago. This repeated connection took place where the eastern and western hemispheres come the closest to one another. The best illustration that I found explaining the land bridge was the analogy made to a seesaw. On one side being the glaciers and on the other side is sea level. When the glaciers get bigger or "go up" the sea level withdraws or "goes down". Basically when all the earth's water is in the form of snow or ice sea level is lowered. At least 180 feet lower to form that Siberian land connection. Direct proof of this...
It has been noted that utilizing data and models derived from living populations may not be suitable for identifying movements of past populations. Conditions today are vastly different from earlier times. Many of the migrations studied that are undertaken on todays populations are among populations who are technically advanced compared to very early prehistoric populations. The fear is that because of the technologically advanced nature of these populations that migration patterns differ from those of prehistoric populations. Tendencies and preferences may not be the same as they once were. It may never be identified if modern migrations are similar or vastly different from prehistoric ones, but for the time being it is one of the only tools we can utilize to try and get a glimpse of what life was like in the past.