Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Problems with racism in literature
Papers on racism in literature
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The ignorance of Captain Delano in Benito Cereno can be accredited to his racist convictions that guide his perception of the ship’s perilous situation. However, is Delano at fault for his racism? When rethinking the racism in Benito Cereno under the context of Althusser’s theories on ideology, racism is an ideology implemented on the subject through the social institution of slavery. Delano’s actions and thoughts throughout Benito Cereno prove that his racism is a result of a socially imposed ideology. His actions and thoughts also challenge the modern ideals of racism that place the blame for racist attitudes entirely on the racist subject. Delano is the subject of a racist ideology and has been forced into that ideology through the social …show more content…
apparatus of slavery. A fundamental aspect of ideology is that “an ideology always exists in an apparatus, and its practices, or practice. The existence is material” (Althusser 695). In Benito Cereno, the ideology of racism uses the institution of slavery as an apparatus for implementing racism. Slavery was a socially imposed practice that trained those who were enslaving others to accept the reality and need for this institution. This ideology forced people into perceiving Africans as wild people who lacked civility, education, and intelligence as a whole. However, as is the function of ideology, the individual being influenced lacks the control to escape from the cyclical nature of the idea being enforced. This system and its power left Delano with a limited capability of questioning the ideology about race imposed by this system of slavery. Along with having a material existence, ideology enacts its power on people that exist as subjects. Athusser states the importance of the subject in ideology when he says, “there is no ideology except by the subject and for the subject” (Althusser 697). While ideology holds immense power over those it influences, it can only exist by the complicit actions of the subject as well. Melville presents Delano as a subject who embraces the ideology of racism around instead of rejecting it. This characteristic of ideology shows that ideology is not self-sustaining since it requires the existence of a subject to act upon for it to fully exist and grow. Althusser believes that “man is an ideological animal by nature,” and is, therefore, ideology is best and most easily implemented on man (698). In the case of Benito Cereno, Captain Delano is the ideal subject for enabling ideology because he does not fight back against the fallacies of racism but ignores the problems and embraces the ideology as a whole until that ideology becomes engrained in his character. Melville implements this racist ideology in Delano through the means of slavery.
Delano’s actions are representative of the ideology, but Delano’s actions also convey his own personal convictions. Upon first boarding the ship, Delano perceives the men’s action of polishing hatchets as a “peculiar love in negroes of uniting industry with pastime” (Melville 40). It is a fallacy in reasoning to assume that forced manual labor would be something to love or consider a pastime just because a person is a certain race. Delano acknowledges how it is a peculiar idea to consider those ideas to be truth, but he ignores that fleeting moment of clarity and returns to the ideology he knows as truth. When facing the faults of his ideology, Delano turns away and acts as if he has no idea that there is anything wrong. By choosing to not reject racism, Delano embraces it by choice. Ideology does hold immense power over him, but he chooses to bend his will to coincide with that power rather to reject it and stand for something that would right or different. Even considering that his ideology might have flaws is too much for Delano to bear. The ideology of racism takes away the humanity of the slaves and the accountability of those enslaving them by attributing this idea of loving forced labor to the slaves. Beyond his immediate observation of their work, he considers the group he encounters to have “the raw aspect of unsophisticated Africans” (Melville 40). By using the word “raw”, Delano is …show more content…
creating a connection that the “raw” or natural nature of Africans is to be unsophisticated and that that is a common quality they would possess since it is a part of their natural state (Melville 40). Melville ingrains these ideas into Delano’s psyche to show the effect that this racist ideology has on his perception of the world. Delano’s actions are shaped by racism to the point where racism has taken over his thoughts and actions completely. These moments of racism are a part of the racist ideology and culture that has consumed Delano in Benito Cereno. Delano is, in some, ways a prisoner of the ideology of racism, but the reality is that, unlike the slaves who have no choice in their enslavement, Delano had the opportunity to fight back and chose to remain silent.
The power enacted on him under Althusser’s ideology is escapable through understanding the condition and situation that the ideology has placed him in. However, Delano does not take the chance for to change or consider change. After Don Benito and Delano escape, Delano asked Benito “‘you are save; what has cast such a shadow upon you?” To this, Don Benito replies saying “‘The negro’” (Melville 107). At the moment, Delano is forced to consider the implications of what Don Benito says, but instead, “there was silence, while the moody man sat, slowly and unconsciously gathering his mantle about him, as if it were a pall. There was no more conversation that day” (Melville 107). Delano refuses his opportunity to accept blame and fault in his racisit ideology and falls prey to the racism that surrounds him. The power of ideology is overwhelming to those who are weak in character and integrity, like Delano. A fundamental aspect of Althusser’s ideology is that “what is represented in ideology is therefore not the system of the real relations which govern the existence of individuals, but the imaginary relation of those individuals to the real relations in which they live” (695). This is significant because it rethinks the idea of ideological power being based just in
the physical world and, instead, presents ideological power as being within one’s mind. With this idea, any social structure can then use power of ideology to its fullest extent. Delano’s mind is an example of this ideological system that conditions him to embrace racism. In the beginning of Benito Cereno, Melville describes Delano as “a person of singularity undistrustful good nature, not liable, except on extraordinary and repeated incentives and hardly then, to indulge in personal alarms, any way involving the imputation of malign evil in man” (Melville 36). Melville describes Delano as being unconcerned with or being oblivious to the ill intentions that any person might harbor. His naïvity stops him from seeing not only the true inequality at hand but also the fault in his racist ideology as a whole. While Delano is not at fault for being the subject of a racist ideology, Melville uses his role in the novella to make a commentary on ideology. In Carol Colatrella’s discourse on the importance of race in both La Cousine Bette and Benito Cereno, Colatrella believes that Melville is “dismantle[ing] the validity of Delano's interpretation and, therefore, the accuracy of his racial stereotypes that slaves are benign when well-managed even if their masters are potentially evil” (Colatrella). Colatrella looks at Delano and his racism as the source of Melville’s primary focus in the novella. The reality of Benito Cereno is that Melville uses Delano as an image for the ideology of racism not just a racist. The scope of Melville’s criticism on racism is not limited just to Delano but expands to the entire ideology of racism and the apparatus of slavery that ideology is implemented through.
In 1805, seal hunter Amasa Delano came across a ship call the Tryal that he mistook for a slave ship. Unknown to Delano, The slaves aboard the ship had already risen up and taken over the ship, killing the captain and most of the crew, and simply feigned slavery so as not to get caught. In author and historian Greg Grandin’s The Empire of Necessity, the slaves aboard the Tryal took part in a new era where for the first time, the tables turned, and the oppressed became the oppressors. Throughout his novel, Grandin argues that among men, there will always exist oppressors and oppressed. According to the author, every human has potential to become a slave in some way, as slavery is a necessary evil of mankind.
Equiano argues and presses the reader and his audience to recognize that the African slave and the white slave owner are not as different as his audience may believe. In order to proclaim and showcase this idea of the value and worth of African slaves, Equiano uses the Christian religion to develop and sustain his argument. In many cases during Equiano’s time period, and for a while afterwards, Christianity and the Bible were used in defense of slavery, and this fact makes Equiano’s claim more powerful and groundbreaking. One of the key attributes of the novel is Equiano’s spiritual conversion and religious revelations. I believe that Equiano’s Christianity serves to connect him with his audience, increases his credibility as an author, and ultimately proclaims the disparity between the views of the slaves’ worth as merely economical, and the assumed Christian morality of the slave traders and his audience....
The fight for racial equality is one of the most prominent issues Americans have faced throughout history and even today; as the idea that enslaving individuals is unethical emerged, many great and innovative authors began writing about the issues that enslaved people had to face. Olaudah Equiano was no exception. In his work The Interesting Narrative of the Life of Olaudah Equiano, he attempts to persuade his readers that the American way of slavery is brutal, inhumane, and unscrupulous. Equiano manages to do this by minimizing the apparent differences between himself and his primarily white audience, mentioning the cruelties that he and many other slaves had to face, and the advantages of treating your slaves correctly.
In Equiano 's personal slave narrative, The Life of Olaudah Equiano, or Gustavus Vassa, the African, Equiano uses distinguishing first person pronouns, thought provoking rhetorical questions, and eye-opening, harsh diction to flip the idea that the African people act backwards and barbaric. Equiano does so by demonstrating his personal exceptionalism through his literacy to show that truly the white people remain backwards and barbaric because of their hypocrisy. The contradiction of the perceptions of white and African people that Equiano demonstrates in his slave narrative shows that the savagery of African people is a misconception. The misconception of the perceptions of the African people makes the reader fully grasp the need to abolish
For example, when Equiano asserts “As if it were no crime in the whites to rob an innocent African girl of her virtue; but most heinous in a black man only to gratify a passion of nature, where the temptation was offered by one of a different color, though the most abandoned woman of her species (754),” he wishes to show the hypocrisy in the treatment of black men in comparison to white men. Invoking an emotional connection is an important element in literature, but especially during the Enlightenment. Illustrating that both blacks and whites share the common bond of humanity, helps makes Equiano’s narrative easier to digest. While some may criticize Equiano’s narrative for its accessibility, it fits with the theme of the
Shelby suggests that Jorge Garcia presents an inadequate conception of racism, hence a new, more nuanced concept of racism is necessitated. Garcia contends that “racism is always wrong” and that it is an “individual moral vice” (479). Garcia’s “infection model” explains that an “act is racist insofar as a racist heart infects the conduct of the racist; and an institution is racist insofar as it is rooted in the racist attitudes and the resulting racist-infected actions of its founds and/or current functions” (479). Shelby’s response to this is that an action can be racist even if it is separate from racist intentions. Shelby perceives that Garcia holds the idea that “racist beliefs are a secondary and an inessential feature of racism” since “race-based non-cognitive attitudes are the key ingredient, an...
“Such a tendency has the slave trade to debauch men’s minds, and harden them to every feeling of humanity” (Equiano 1013). The fact that Equiano could separate the institution of slavery from the white slave owners and focus on the main problem shows that he is a rational intelligent writer. Equiano became a strong supporter of the abolitionist movement which led to the writing of this work. He truly believed that no man should have authority over another man and once he bought his own freedom he continued to pursue this for others as
There are other contrasting aspects of the stories that call for attention. Most significantly Benito Cereno – ultimately – portrays slaves as evil and Babo as the mind behind the cunning plan that deceives Captain Delano. The reason for this one-sided representation is naturally the fact that we experience the story from Delano’s point of view. In the beginning, we perceive Babo as the typical docile, helpful, and faithful servant so often portrayed in other slave characters such as Stowe’s Uncle Tom and Jim in Twain’s Huckleberry Finn. Babo is more than just a slave; he is a “faithful fellow”, “a friend that cannot be called slave” . And despite all the underlying hints of a slave insurrection, Delano does not grasp their meaning. Examples are the slaves’ treatment of the Spanish sailors and the hatchet polishers , but in Delano’s narrow-minded world, only the white man is capable of conceiving plans of ‘evil’. And when he – and the reader too – finally sees “the mask torn away, flourishing hatchets and knives, in ferocious piratical revolt”, he is embarrassed and “with infinite pity he [withdraws] his hold from Don Benito” . From this moment on, Babo is a malign devil and Melville removes speech from Babo’s mouth. This strengthen our opinion of Babo as ‘evil’ even more, for how can we sympathise with him without hearing his version of the story? Apparently, Melville proposes no other alternative for the reader than to sympathise with the white slave owner Don Benito, whom Babo so ingeniously deceives.
...ns it held. Melville creates a character who never sees the reality on board the ship in his many speculations, particularly because Delano sees the slaves as too ignorant as to be able to devise such a thing, when the grand irony is the he is too blind to see it. Melville reverses the master and slave roles and brings them before a very slavery-conscious audience to whom he leaves the interpretation open, but laden with subtle messages about the horrible institution of slavery.
In comparison to other slaves that are discussed over time, Olaudah Equiano truly does lead an ‘interesting’ life. While his time as a slave was very poor, there are certainly other slaves that he mentions that received far more damaging treatment than he did. In turn, this inspires him to fight for the abolishment of slavery. By pointing out both negative and positive events that occurred, the treatment he received from all of his masters, the impact that religion had on his life and how abolishing slavery could benefit the future of everyone as a whole, Equiano develops a compelling argument that does help aid the battle against slavery. For Olaudah Equiano’s life journey, he expressed an array of cruelties that came with living the life of an African slave; which demonstrates all of the suffering that he endured, then proving how much it can change one’s point of view in life.
Francisco Franco was the dictator of Spain from 1939 to 1975, including the time of WW2. Perhaps he was better known as “El Caudillo,” translated into English as The Leader. He was born and raised in Spain. He was a very brilliant military general who led Nationalist rebels in defeating the Spanish government during the Spanish Civil War. Although he was viewed as a Fascist Dictator, he strongly opposed communism. He was an extremely important figure in the course of world history.
Frederick Douglass’ landmark narrative describes the dehumanization of African-American slaves, while simultaneously humanizing them through his moving prose. Douglass shows the dehumanization of slaves through depictions of violence, deindividuation, and the broken justice system. However, Douglass’ pursuit of an education, moving rhetoric, and critique of his own masters demonstrates to the reader that African-Americans are just as intelligent as white people, thus proving their humanity.
Benito Mussolini was born on July 29, 1883 outside the village of Dovia di Predappio in the Northeastern Italian province of Forli. He had one sister and one brother. They always fought and argued over little petty things with each other. His sister name was Edvige and his brother’s name was Armaldo. His mother Rosa Malteni was a well respect and appreciated schoolteacher. His father Allesandro Mussolini was both a blacksmith and a committee socialist. He received his name "Benito" from the Mexican Revolutionary Juarez. Benito grew up as a delinquent, disobedient, and did not have any manners. He was a bully to the other children around him. He would get into numerous of fights with other children.
"The Life of Olaudah Equiano” is a captivating story in which Equiano, the author, reflects on his life from becoming a slave to a freeman during the 19th century. Through his experiences and writing, Equiano paints a vivid picture of the atrocities and cruelties of European slavery. Ultimately through his narrative, Equiano intends to persuade his audience, the British government, to abolish the Atlantic slave trade as well as alert them of the harsh treatment of slaves. He successfully accomplishes his goal by subtly making arguments through the use of character, action, and setting.
Human history is littered with racism and prejudice. Vincent N. Parillo tries to explain the origins of racism and prejudice in his essay “Causes of Prejudice”. In the first part of his essay, Parillo explains the psychological approach to racism. In the second half, he speaks about the sociological aspects of racism. His well thought out and organized arguments are extremely insightful in regards to human prejudices. Studs Terkel’s essay "C.P. Ellis" helps define American prejudice from an inside perspective. His story of ex-Klansman C.P. Ellis helps us understand the origins of racism and how it can be passed down from previous generations or is a result of geographical location. Parillo and Terkel both provide insightful information on the