Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Factors influencing choice of benefit program
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Factors influencing choice of benefit program
For many of us, trying to decide between company benefits and an increase in salary can be very difficult to do. For many, the best part of a benefits package centers around health insurance. A good benefits package is very important to an employee. To me, a good benefits package can be worth more than an increase in salary. According to a survey conducted by Paychex.com, participants were asked to rank the benefits by value and importance when considering a prospective job. The results showed a good health care plan was number one with 32%, vacation time was 25%, pay raise was 15%, employee benefit was 10%, performance bonus was 9% and retirement plans were 8%.
Choose Your Job by Its Benefits Program
When potential employees are job searching, their main focus tends to center around which job has the highest salary. However, unless the salary is significant, the highest salary might not mean that will be the best job offer. When deciding on whether a job offer is good or not, it is crucial to take into consideration the full package as opposed to just the salary offer. Some of the benefits that should be taken into consideration include vacation time, retirement plans, health insurance plans, life insurance and salary.
The Cafeteria Program
…show more content…
This plan is a reimbursement plan that is regulated by the IRS. A Cafeteria Plan can also be used as a reimbursement plan that will allow an employee to contribute a portion of their salary into an account on a pre-tax basis that can then be used to cover medical expenses or child care that was not covered with insurance. There are several aspects of the cafeteria plan to take into consideration such
Commonly associated with pay for employees, benefits is the second biggest obstacle for management. Like Volkswagen starts employees off at the basic pay the unions would achieve, a similar benefits program should be implemented (Greenhouse, 2014). The passing of the Affordable Health Care Act has made it possible for many citizens to receive coverage but it is basic at best. GMFC should create a plan based off of the Health Care Act and unionized plans and allow for extras to be added on. This allows for employees to pick the benefits package that works best for them.
In preparing of the negotiation, the job offer was dissected and each element was assigned a level of importance. The issues which were critical in importance were not relocating to Silicon Valley but remaining in Nashville and the annual salary. To a lesser degree of importance was the signing bonus and stock options. In addition, of least importance was the relocation bonus. With the issues prioritized, I was confident I would not lose perspective during negotiations and agree to less than an ideal contract.
Many employees when looking for a job or deciding whether to stay with their current employment often considers the employee benefits the company offers.
Compensation is made of a base salary (paid by the hour, work or the year; excluding overtime or bonuses), variable pay (bonuses, profit sharing/stock options which work hand and hand with the performance of the company), and benefits (to include health insurance/savings plans – 401(k), or tuition reimbursement). The traditional way of determining base pay for jobs was to compare jobs in the same industry. Now industry and market, no long work by themselves, the current thinking is more person-based that considers knowledge, skills, and competencies of the work. This, however, is best suited for high-performing environments that remain flexible in their deployment of human capital.
Verizon Wireless may be losing at least one competitive advantage as a result of lack of knowledge about how employee benefits packages in the wireless industry compare. Studies have shown that valuable employees and top talent candidates are highly influenced by employee benefits packages considered to be good (Paterson, 2013). The leadership team’s determination and call for organizational growth, translates to both retaining current employees and enticing new candidates to join, an area in which a top employee benefits package is a major contributor. With this consideration, and factoring in the problem of a lack of updated information, it was determined that there was a critical need for a current benefits package comparison. The investigative steps necessary for this analysis for this Capstone Project were found in Section III, and this subsequent chapter, Section IV, submits those findings.
The Short Bus: A Journey Beyond Normal, written by Jonathan Mooney, has provided me with a unique insight into the various thoughts of people who society has deemed as “not normal.” The people that Mooney has included in his book do not really understand why they have been placed under this category. However, they are doing all that they can to not be belittled and to come out on top.
In April 2010, KK BB, the CEO of Marshall & Gordon, a leading public relations firm met with the firm’s leadership committee off-site in Miami. This off-site brought together Marshall & Gordon’s executive committee, practice and regional heads, and senior HR officers to discuss on redesigning the firm’s compensation system. A global advisory taskforce, under the direction of an external consulting firm, had spent three months collecting and analyzing data. Marshall & Gordon hired external specialists to design the new performance management program. The specialists proposed that the senior managers and human resource form a global advisory unit together with Marshall & Gordon partner to represent the firm’s five regions of the firm and lead the design process. The advisory unit surveyed all consultants in February in order to understand their way of thinking about the fairness, worth, and effect of the current performance management system. Majority of the interviewees responded to the corporate surveys implying that the subject was topic was especially exciting to them. Interviews gave insights on present and prospective business plans and direction. The survey also showed that specific focus across certain employee populations should be given. Six current hires from key competitors were also interviewed to comprehend competitor pay practices and compensation program structures. Further focus groups discussions and key information interviews enabled the taskforce’s to understand the needs of certain groups within Marshall & Gordon’s worker population. The survey culminated with the taskforce conducting interviews of 20 partners and principals togeth...
Offering employee benefits is one way a company must competes in today’s marketplace to retain old employees and attracts new ones. These benefit packages may range from offering basic health insurance to additional discretionary and perk benefits such as vacation and retirement packages. Benefit packages are often a large portion of employee costs and Federal mandates require an employer to carry and offer certain benefits even if they offer nothing else. Federally required employee benefits make up approximately a quarter of the costs associated with employer offered benefit packages. Some of these mandated benefits include Social Security, Worker’s Compensation Insurance, and the Family Medical Leave Act.
Starbucks total pay package, called ‘Your Special Blend’, which we will compare against the benefits of Tim Horton’s benefits program is called ‘Team Tim Hortons’. “Tim Horton’s employees require six months of continued employment to be eligible to be on Team Tim Horton’s and receive benefits, which is also contingent on hours worked (Tim Horton’s, 2015) Tim Hortons considers employee’s benefits a voluntary contribution by the company to its employees and it is subject and conditional to ongoing profitability. The program will be reviewed and evaluated every year and the company reserves the right to change or terminate indirect benefits depending the company’s fiscal results for the year. To be eligible for benefits at Starbuck’s partners receive benefits after 90 days of service as long as they maintain 20 or more hours a week. Starbucks also offers their employees more stability with their
The succeeding paragraphs will explain how innovations in employee benefits can improve the overall competitive compensation strategy of the organization. In order to maintain their competitive edge, companies need to fully understand that as the needs of their employee’s change, so does their benefit plans. Companies need to find innovative ways of engaging employees that encourage and support their commitment and improve their performance.
Employee benefits coordinator play a significant role in Human Resource Management. Employee Benefits coordinators are responsible for assisting with employee benefits, maintaining employee data base, managing all insurance billings and maintain employee files, sick pay, vacation and retirement. This study explores the importance of employee benefits to corporations, government agencies and non profit organizations. This paper also researches the effects on the management team and on individual employees’.
The cafeteria is not merely a place for small children; now that I am in college, I spend more time in the cafeteria than ever. Living in the dorms, I have no kitchen or any other place to cook. Instead, I have a meal plan that offers me fourteen meals each week at the Stanford/Hecht cafeteria. I eat lunch and dinner there as my two meals on most days. But, I do not and cannot go to the cafeteria and just get food. I get much more.
The organization is able to manage a high coverage of risks at relative low costs owing to the availability of highly skilled personnel in the company’s team of employees. This benefit also brings about another advantage of easing the financial burden of the organization (Johnson, 2016). Besides, effective employee benefit system offered by the organization could improve the general productivity. This benefit is attributed to the fact that employees tent to be more effective when they are given assurance of job security. In addition, workers become more productive when they and their families are given the desired security by the employer. The other benefit to the organization if it employs an effective compensation and benefits system entail benefits from premiums (Wayne, Shore, M., Bommer, & Tetrick, 2002). These premiums are typically tax deductibles as corporate expense. As such, a company that has an effective compensation and benefits system is likely save extra money for other
The foundation for effective job performance and compensation system can be traced to effective job analysis process. Fundamentally, a job analysis should consist of a thorough examination of the job 's duties and knowledge, skills, abilities, and qualities that are required in order to be successful in a specific position, upon which appropriate rewards or compensation can be determined. For many perspectives, jobs are usually made up of requirements and rewards, where rewards may be regarded as a major recruitment strategy for motivating potential employees in order to influence them to stay the organization for a longer period as well as enhance their performance. The most common or basic form of rewards which attracts employees is extrinsic
A compensation package includes salary but also includes other non-salary benefits such as: health-care benefits, 401(k) plans, PTO (paid time off) and other perks. Businesses often utilize experienced Human Resources professionals to review, update and create salary scales and compensation packages for new hires. The total compensation package is often used as means of attracting employees who will complement the organization and should be consistently reviewed, acting as an incentive for retaining qualified staff. “Organizations that are not able to develop competitive pay scales along with strong compensation packages, face the risk of a competitor offering a more attractive package, which can result in employee turnover” (Dias, 2011, pg.